sr-users June 2013

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

94 participants
170 discussions

by Juha Heinanen

would it be possible to enhance avpops module to print config file line number when error occurs? now i just get: Jun 24 14:13:43 host /usr/sbin/sip-proxy[29890]: ERROR: avpops [avpops_impl.c:1170]: ops_check_avp(): value types don't match -- juha

10 years, 10 months

Asterisk Gateway OPTIONS relay

by Ian French

Hey list, I've been trying the relay OPTIONS messages from an asterisk server through kamailio to clients so to preserve the qualify feature in asterisk. So ASTERISK -----OPTIONS----> KAMAILIO ------------> UA UA ----OK-----> KAMAILIO ---OK-----> ASTERISK But I'm seeing floods of OPTIONS messages between asterisk and kamailio now. So much so that kamailio seems to deadlock introducing 10 -20 second delays in processing messages firstly I've enabled the options.so but this is just enable remote monitoring of the application and in my FROMASTERISK route #!ifdef WITH_ASTERISK # Test if coming from Asterisk route[FROMASTERISK] { # if($si==$sel(cfg_get.asterisk.bindip) # && $sp==$sel(cfg_get.asterisk.bindport)) if ((method==OPTIONS) && (uri=~"sip:.*[@]+.*")) { xlog("L_INFO","Options Reply from $ru to $fu\r\n"); return 1; } if(ds_is_from_list("2")){ $sht(forw=>$ft)=$si; xlog("L_INFO","INVITE: INVITE Passed From [$fu] Asterisk Cluster To [$rm:$au].\n"); return 1; } return -1; } I've included a debug below, stating *RFC3261 transaction matching failed. *Can anyone help or advise on how I should solve this Thanks in advance Ian KamP /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[19288]: DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:630]: SIP Request: KamP /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[19288]: DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:632]: method: <OPTIONS> KamP /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[19288]: DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:634]: uri: <sip:XXXXXXXX@P.P.P.P:5060> KamP /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[19288]: DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:636]: version: <SIP/2.0> KamP /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[19288]: DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_via.c:1287]: Found param type 232, <branch> = <z9hG4bK50c02ae3>; state=6 KamP /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[19288]: DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_via.c:1287]: Found param type 235, <rport> = <n/a>; state=17 KamP /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[19288]: DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_via.c:2300]: end of header reached, state=5 KamP /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[19288]: DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:515]: parse_headers: Via found, flags=2 KamP /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[19288]: DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:517]: parse_headers: this is the first via KamP /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[19288]: DEBUG: <core> [receive.c:145]: After parse_msg... KamP /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[19288]: DEBUG: <core> [receive.c:186]: preparing to run routing scripts... KamP /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[19288]: DEBUG: <core> [socket_info.c:501]: grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 10==10 && [P.P.P.P] == [P.P.P.P] KamP /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[19288]: DEBUG: <core> [socket_info.c:504]: grep_sock_info - checking if port 5060 matches port 5060 KamP /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[19288]: DEBUG: <core> [socket_info.c:501]: grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 10==10 && [A.A.A.A] == [P.P.P.P] KamP /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[19288]: DEBUG: <core> [forward.c:446]: check_self: host != me KamP /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[19288]: DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_to.c:174]: DEBUG: add_param: tag=as2c63e7cc KamP /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[19288]: DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_to.c:803]: end of header reached, state=29 KamP /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[19288]: DEBUG: <core> [parser/parse_to.c:803]: end of header reached, state=10 KamP /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[19288]: DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:187]: DEBUG: get_hdr_field: <To> [32]; uri=[sip:XXXXXXXX@P.P.P.P:5060] KamP /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[19288]: DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:167]: get_hdr_field: cseq <CSeq>: <102> <OPTIONS> KamP /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[19288]: DEBUG: maxfwd [mf_funcs.c:85]: value = 70 KamP /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[19288]: DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:201]: DEBUG: get_hdr_body : content_length=0 KamP /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[19288]: DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:103]: found end of header KamP /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[19288]: DEBUG: geoip [geoip_pv.c:395]: attempt to match: A.A.A.A KamP /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[19288]: DEBUG: geoip [geoip_pv.c:401]: geoip PV updated for: A.A.A.A KamP /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[19288]: INFO: <script>: SIP message from unprohibited source IE (ip: A.A.A.A) - Packet accepted KamP /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[19288]: DEBUG: <core> [msg_translator.c:204]: check_via_address(A.A.A.A, A.A.A.A, 0) KamP /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[19288]: DEBUG: siputils [checks.c:73]: no totag KamP /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[19288]: DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:1081]: DEBUG: t_check_msg: msg id=294 global id=293 T start=0xffffffffffffffff *KamP /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[19288]: DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:528]: t_lookup_request: start searching: hash=44040, isACK=0* *RFC3261 transaction matching failedKamP /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[19288]: DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:485]: DEBUG: RFC3261 transaction matching failed KamP /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[19288]: DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:711]: DEBUG: t_lookup_request: no transaction found* KamP /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[19288]: DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:1150]: DEBUG: t_check_msg: msg id=294 global id=294 T end=(nil) KamP /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[19288]: INFO: <script>: SIP Dialog From Asterisk Gatways A.A.A.A- No Authentication KamP /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[19288]: DEBUG: <core> [socket_info.c:501]: grep_sock_info - checking if host==us: 10==10 && [P.P.P.P] == [P.P.P.P] KamP /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[19288]: DEBUG: <core> [socket_info.c:504]: grep_sock_info - checking if port 5060 matches port 5060 KamP /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[19288]: DEBUG: siputils [checks.c:73]: no totag KamP /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[19288]: DEBUG: rr [record.c:519]: rr_param_buf=<;nat=yes> KamP /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[19288]: DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:1379]: DEBUG: t_newtran: msg id=294 , global msg id=294 , T on entrance=(nil) KamP /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[19288]: DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:528]: t_lookup_request: start searching: hash=44040, isACK=0 KamP /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[19288]: DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:485]: DEBUG: RFC3261 transaction matching failed KamP /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[19288]: DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:711]: DEBUG: t_lookup_request: no transaction found KamP /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[19288]: DEBUG: tm [t_hooks.c:374]: DBG: trans=0x2b8a8f4f0ed8, callback type 1, id 0 entered KamP /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[19288]: DEBUG: <core> [msg_translator.c:204]: check_via_address(A.A.A.A, A.A.A.A, 0) KamP /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[19288]: DEBUG: tm [t_funcs.c:388]: SER: new transaction fwd'ed KamP /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[19288]: DEBUG: <core> [usr_avp.c:646]: DEBUG:destroy_avp_list: destroying list (nil) KamP last message repeated 5 times

10 years, 10 months

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio loadbalancer with TLS problem forwarding INVITE back to UA

by Klaus Darilion

Hi Allen! Again on-list, please do not use private emails unless you have to provide sensitive data. On 28.06.2013 01:17, Allen Zhang wrote: > Hi Klaus, > > I dived into it and found the problem: > > When UA2 send a REGISTER to the load balancer, fix_nated_register() is called and source ip of the UA is stored in the connection hash by tcpconn_new(), instead of the port from the contact header field. > But when proxy tries to send the INVITE to UA2 via the load balancer, the load balancer calls tcpconn_find() with the port from the contact header field. > Hence can't match the connection stored in hash. I do not understand that. fix_nated_register stores both info: the original contact + src-ip:port:transport. After lookup(), the Request-URI is filled with the original contact, but $du (destination URI, internally used by Kamailio for routing) is populated with src-ip:port:transport. Thus, Kamailio should use the $du to find the TCP connection. Anyway, TLS debugging is always difficult. I suggest to try to make it running with TCP. If TCP works, TLS will work too. regards Klaus > > I need to use fix_nated_register() because the UA will be behind NAT in the future. How do I let the LB use aliased port instead of the port from the contact header field? > > Regards, > > Allen > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Klaus Darilion [mailto:klaus.mailinglists@pernau.at] > Sent: Thursday, 27 June 2013 10:54 p.m. > To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List > Cc: Allen Zhang; Shane Harrison > Subject: Re: [SR-Users] kamailio loadbalancer with TLS problem forwarding INVITE back to UA > > make sure to also use handle_ruri_alias() > http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/4.0.x/modules/nathelper.html#idp16851488 > for requests from the proxy->lb->client > > see the default kamailio config for proper usage of handle_ruri_alias() and add_contact_alias() > > regards > klaus > > > On 27.06.2013 02:34, Allen Zhang wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Our set up: >> >> UA1 ----- >> >> ------ Proxy1 >> >> >> \ >> / >> >> Loadbalancer (dispatcher module) >> >> / \ >> >> UA2----- >> >> ------ Proxy2 >> >> Both proxies have registrar module loaded and share the same database. >> >> REGISTERs work fine. >> >> The problem is this: >> >> TLS TCP >> >> UA1 ----------------------> LB --------------------> Proxy >> >> INVITE(to UA2) INVITE(to UA2) >> >> TLS TCP >> >> UA1 <------------- LB <------------- Proxy >> >> 100 Trying >> >> TLS TCP >> >> UA1 <------------- LB <----------------------- Proxy >> >> INVITE(to UA2) >> >> TLS >> TCP >> >> UA1 <----------------------- LB <----------------------- Proxy >> >> 100 Trying >> >> All above worked fine. Below is what's expected but never happened: >> >> TLS >> TCP >> >> UA2 <----------------------- LB <----------------------- Proxy >> >> INVITE(to UA2) >> >> We'd like the LB to reuse the TLS connection initiated by UA2. But LB >> can't find an open connection and tries to start a new TLS connection. >> The new connection fails. >> >> UAs are not behind NAT at the moment but will be in the future. >> >> Tried this approaches on LB: >> >> route(ADD_CONTACT_ALIAS); >> >> If (not from proxy) >> >> t_relay(); >> >> else >> >> do load balancing >> >> No luck. >> >> Any help is appreciated. >> >> Regards, >> >> Allen >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing >> list sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org >> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users >> >

10 years, 10 months

Wrong src-adress in packets sent from Kamailio when using listen=

by Johan Wilfer

Hi! I've the following setup: Teleco <-> Kamailio <-> Asterisk(s) The proxy has one public IP (say 1.2.3.4) and one private (10.0.0.1). The asterisk-pbx:es has private adresses (10.0.0.2 in this example) I noticed that if I bind like this in kamilio.cfg listen=tcp:1.2.3.4:5060 listen=udp:1.2.3.4:5060 listen=tcp:10.0.0.1:5060 listen=udp:10.0.0.1:5060 Then if a call comes in from the Telco to Kamailio (1.2.3.4), kamailio should forward the SIP-packet from it's private address (10.0.0.1) to asterisk (10.0.0.2) However, the source address of the packets sent from Kamilio to Asterisk is wrong - it uses the public ip. Like this (tcpdump output): 15:02:08.999642 IP 1.2.3.4.sip > 10.0.0.1.5060: SIP, length: 1346 15:02:09.474525 IP 1.2.3.4.sip > 10.0.0.1.5060: SIP, length: 1346 15:02:10.474524 IP 1.2.3.4.sip > 10.0.0.1.5060: SIP, length: 1346 15:02:12.474525 IP 1.2.3.4.sip > 10.0.0.1.5060: SIP, length: 1346 Obviously kamailio doesn't get any answers here. The packet goes out of the right interface, but with the wrong src-address. However, if I remove the lines with "listen=" in kamailio.cfg to allow kamilio to bind to all interfaces the src-address is correct and everything works! (I've also done some tests with icmp and telnet and the src-addr seems right in all these cases.) Is this a bug or am I missing something here? -- Johan Wilfer

10 years, 10 months

Xhttp_pi DB Query Clause Operators

by Simpson Chua

Hi, I'm using the xhttp_pi module to query the kamailio user registration table "location". Per the defined clause_cols operators in the module, it doesn't seem possible to achieve a query equivalent to a SQL "contains" or "like". An exact match is required to query the record; e.g., http://xxxxxxx/location/QueryContacts?cmd=on&0=sip:8675309@a.b.c.d:5060;tra…. Is my understanding correct that there is no way to match on an regular expression? My end goal is to be able to query for a user's AOR and expiration status based on a search string (e.g. 8675309) via a webservice. Can anyone share a better method to do this? Perhaps asynchronously? All feedback is appreciated. Sample contact field: sip:8675309@a.b.c.d:5060;transport=udp Sample Framework: <cmd><cmd_name>QueryContacts</cmd_name> <db_table_id>location</db_table_id> <cmd_type>DB1_QUERY</cmd_type> <clause_cols> <col><field>contact</field><operator>=</operator></col> </clause_cols> <query_cols> <col><field>username</field></col> <col><field>contact</field></col> <col><field>expires</field></col> </query_cols> </cmd> Thanks, Simpson ________________________________ From: "sr-users-request(a)lists.sip-router.org" <sr-users-request(a)lists.sip-router.org> To: sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2013 5:00 AM Subject: sr-users Digest, Vol 97, Issue 104 Send sr-users mailing list submissions to sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to sr-users-request(a)lists.sip-router.org You can reach the person managing the list at sr-users-owner(a)lists.sip-router.org When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of sr-users digest..." Today's Topics: 1. kamailio loadbalancer with TLS problem forwarding INVITE back to UA (Allen Zhang) 2. Re: dialplan not working (Victor V. Kustov) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 00:34:00 +0000 From: Allen Zhang <Allen.Zhang(a)imgtec.com> To: "sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> Cc: Shane Harrison <Shane.Harrison(a)imgtec.com> Subject: [SR-Users] kamailio loadbalancer with TLS problem forwarding INVITE back to UA Message-ID: <04588C075527D74CABD19E7C320BCB1C013BE6F6(a)WEMAIL01.we.imgtec.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Hi, Our set up: UA1 ----- ------ Proxy1 \ / Loadbalancer (dispatcher module) / \ UA2----- ------ Proxy2 Both proxies have registrar module loaded and share the same database. REGISTERs work fine. The problem is this: TLS TCP UA1 ----------------------> LB --------------------> Proxy INVITE(to UA2) INVITE(to UA2) TLS TCP UA1 <------------- LB <------------- Proxy 100 Trying TLS TCP UA1 <------------- LB <----------------------- Proxy INVITE(to UA2) TLS TCP UA1 <----------------------- LB <----------------------- Proxy 100 Trying All above worked fine. Below is what's expected but never happened: TLS TCP UA2 <----------------------- LB <----------------------- Proxy INVITE(to UA2) We'd like the LB to reuse the TLS connection initiated by UA2. But LB can't find an open connection and tries to start a new TLS connection. The new connection fails. UAs are not behind NAT at the moment but will be in the future. Tried this approaches on LB: route(ADD_CONTACT_ALIAS); If (not from proxy) t_relay(); else do load balancing No luck. Any help is appreciated. Regards, Allen

10 years, 10 months

kamailio loadbalancer with TLS problem forwarding INVITE back to UA

by Allen Zhang

Hi, Our set up: UA1 ----- ------ Proxy1 \ / Loadbalancer (dispatcher module) / \ UA2----- ------ Proxy2 Both proxies have registrar module loaded and share the same database. REGISTERs work fine. The problem is this: TLS TCP UA1 ----------------------> LB --------------------> Proxy INVITE(to UA2) INVITE(to UA2) TLS TCP UA1 <------------- LB <------------- Proxy 100 Trying TLS TCP UA1 <------------- LB <----------------------- Proxy INVITE(to UA2) TLS TCP UA1 <----------------------- LB <----------------------- Proxy 100 Trying All above worked fine. Below is what's expected but never happened: TLS TCP UA2 <----------------------- LB <----------------------- Proxy INVITE(to UA2) We'd like the LB to reuse the TLS connection initiated by UA2. But LB can't find an open connection and tries to start a new TLS connection. The new connection fails. UAs are not behind NAT at the moment but will be in the future. Tried this approaches on LB: route(ADD_CONTACT_ALIAS); If (not from proxy) t_relay(); else do load balancing No luck. Any help is appreciated. Regards, Allen

10 years, 10 months

dialplan not working

by Victor V. Kustov

Hi all! i've got dialplan rule 3:1:1:1:^[3-9]([0-9]{9})$:10:^([0-9]{10})$:8\\1:"" kamcmd> mi dp_translate 1 9999999999 error: 404 - No translation why? -- WBR, Victor JID: coyote(a)bks.tv JID: coyote(a)bryansktel.ru I use FREE operation system: 3.9.6-calculate GNU/Linux

10 years, 10 months

After increasing to pkg memory to 64 mb it ran for a little while and crashed again in parsing via

by Krishna Kurapati

Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault. #0 qm_detach_free (qm=0x2acc4a44b010, size=64) at mem/q_malloc.c:269 269 FRAG_END(next)->prev_free=prev; Missing separate debuginfos, use: debuginfo-install glibc-2.12-1.80.el6_3.4.x86_64 keyutils-libs-1.4-4.el6.x86_64 krb5-libs-1.9-33.el6_3.2.x86_64 libcom_err-1.41.12-12.el6.x86_64 libselinux-2.0.94-5.3.el6.x86_64 lua-5.1.4-4.1.el6.x86_64 mysql-libs-5.1.61-4.el6.x86_64 nss-softokn-freebl-3.12.9-11.el6.x86_64 openssl-1.0.0-25.el6_3.1.x86_64 zlib-1.2.3-29.el6.x86_64 (gdb) backtrace #0 qm_detach_free (qm=0x2acc4a44b010, size=64) at mem/q_malloc.c:269 #1 qm_malloc (qm=0x2acc4a44b010, size=64) at mem/q_malloc.c:386 #2 0x0000000000560fa1 in parse_via ( buffer=0x8c6a3b "SIP/2.0/UDP 50.62.72.174;branch=z9hG4bK0719.d5bdc555.0;i=5\r\nVia: SIP/2.0/TCP 75.43.10.221:60779;rport=60779;branch=z9hG4bKPj9c54a027dea04c58a1cb56b938face6b\r\nMax-Forwards: 16\r\nFrom: <sip:578626051@50."..., end=0x8c7289 "", vbody=0x2acc4a492390) at parser/parse_via.c:2540 #3 0x0000000000538e68 in get_hdr_field (buf=<value optimized out>, end=0x8c7289 "", hdr=0x2acc4a49c930) at parser/msg_parser.c:140 #4 0x0000000000539ac9 in parse_headers (msg=0x2acc4a48d100, flags=2, next=<value optimized out>) at parser/msg_parser.c:351 #5 0x000000000053af8d in parse_msg (buf=<value optimized out>, len=<value optimized out>, msg=0x2acc4a48d100) at parser/msg_parser.c:650 #6 0x000000000049a2ef in receive_msg ( buf=0x8c6a00 "MESSAGE sip:50.62.72.174:15060;transport=udp SIP/2.0\r\nVia: SIP/2.0/UDP 50.62.72.174;branch=z9hG4bK0719.d5bdc555.0;i=5\r\nVia: SIP/2.0/TCP 75.43.10.221:60779;rport=60779;branch=z9hG4bKPj9c54a027dea04c58a"..., len=2185, rcv_info=0x7fff5632c830) at receive.c:144 #7 0x0000000000528666 in udp_rcv_loop () at udp_server.c:557 #8 0x0000000000464daa in main_loop () at main.c:1638 #9 0x0000000000467adc in main (argc=<value optimized out>, argv=<value optimized out>) at main.c:2566

10 years, 10 months

Kamailio is crashing while parsing Via header

by Krishna Kurapati

Once I increased package memory the crash went away. 4(21729) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:623]: SIP Request: 4(21729) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:625]: method: <MESSAGE> 4(21729) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:627]: uri: <sip:50.62.72.174:15060;transport=udp> 4(21729) DEBUG: <core> [parser/msg_parser.c:629]: version: <SIP/2.0> 0(21722) ALERT: <core> [main.c:788]: child process 21729 exited by a signal 11 0(21722) ALERT: <core> [main.c:791]: core was generated 0(21722) INFO: <core> [main.c:803]: INFO: terminating due to SIGCHLD (gdb) backtrace #0 qm_detach_free (qm=0x2b7b70759010, size=64) at mem/q_malloc.c:269 #1 qm_malloc (qm=0x2b7b70759010, size=64) at mem/q_malloc.c:386 #2 0x0000000000560fa1 in parse_via ( buffer=0x8c6a3b "SIP/2.0/UDP 50.62.72.174;branch=z9hG4bK3f84.7fd8a5e.0;i=3\r\nVia: SIP/2.0/TCP 75.43.10.221:60659;rport=60660;branch=z9hG4bKPjc9713006b62149648240ed4ea4686b85\r\nMax-Forwards: 16\r\nFrom: <sip:578626051@50.6"..., end=0x8c6e7d "", vbody=0x2b7b7077ae90) at parser/parse_via.c:2540 #3 0x0000000000538e68 in get_hdr_field ( buf=<value optimized out>, end=0x8c6e7d "", hdr=0x2b7b707aa9c0) at parser/msg_parser.c:140 #4 0x0000000000539ac9 in parse_headers (msg=0x2b7b7079b100, flags=2, next=<value optimized out>) at parser/msg_parser.c:351 #5 0x000000000053af8d in parse_msg ( buf=<value optimized out>, len=<value optimized out>, msg=0x2b7b7079b100) at parser/msg_parser.c:650 #6 0x000000000049a2ef in receive_msg ( buf=0x8c6a00 "MESSAGE sip:50.62.72.174:15060;transport=udp SIP/2.0\r\nVia: SIP/2.0/UDP 50.62.72.174;branch=z9hG4bK3f84.7fd8a5e.0;i=3\r\nVia: SIP/2.0/TCP 75.43.10.221:60659;rport=60660;branch=z9hG4bKPjc9713006b621496482"..., len=1149, rcv_info=0x7fff932d32e0) at receive.c:144 #7 0x0000000000528666 in udp_rcv_loop () at udp_server.c:557 #8 0x0000000000464daa in main_loop () at main.c:1638 #9 0x0000000000467adc in main (argc=<value optimized out>, argv=<value optimized out>) at main.c:2566

10 years, 10 months

Installing Kamailio on EC2

by Sunil Chandrasekharan

Hi All, I have just started and installed Kamailio on EC2 Ubuntu instance. I am going on with the steps provided in this link http://www.kamailio.org/wiki/install/4.0.x/git i have gone ahead and installed Kamailiio. I have just reached to Section no. 8 on the link. But i am not sure if there is anything extra i need to take care. Kindly let me know if any extra parameters / details need to be checked for Kamailio on EC2. On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 6:00 PM, aft <aftnix(a)gmail.com> wrote: > What have you tried? > > On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 2:55 PM, Sunil Chandrasekharan > <sunil.kainat(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > I am trying to install Kamailio on Amazon EC2. I read out in web about > some > > people already achieved configuring Kamailio on EC2. > > > > Kindly support on the pre-requisties to be installed before i go with > > Kamailio installation.. > > > > My requirements ; > > > > Kamailio to be installed with Presence module. > > > > In the config file , i see that we have to use define with NAT and > install > > RTP proxy. Is it required? > > Is there any module to be added to get MSRP working, so that i can share > a > > file. > > > > Kindly support to get Kamailio running with register,presence,IM and > MSRP on > > Amazon EC > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list > > sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org > > http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users > > > > > > -- > -Cheers > -Arif > > _______________________________________________ > SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list > sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org > http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users >

10 years, 10 months

← Newer
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
...
17
Older →

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users June 2013