sr-users September 2012

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

78 participants
139 discussions

Siremis v3.3.0 Released
by Elena-Ramona Modroiu 06 Sep '12

06 Sep '12

Hi, Siremis v3.3.0 was released - the web management interface compatible with Kamailio v3.3.x. This version is an update of v3.2.1 to be able to work with the database schema of Kamailio v3.3.x. The news of the release, including links to installation and screenshots, is available at: - http://siremis.asipto.com/2012/09/06/siremis-v3-3-0-released/ Regards, Ramona

1 0

Meeting in London
by Carsten Bock 06 Sep '12

06 Sep '12

Hi, anyone from the Kamailio-Community in for a beer tomorrow evening in London? I have several meetings during the day (last one at 5PM) and i'll be travelling back to Germany on Saturday, so i'm free for some chat about Kamailio, SIP, IMS or IPv6 during the evening... :-) If yes, just drop me a mail... Carsten -- Carsten Bock CEO (Geschäftsführer) ng-voice GmbH Schomburgstr. 80 D-22767 Hamburg / Germany http://www.ng-voice.com mailto:carsten@ng-voice.com Office +49 40 34927219 Fax +49 40 34927220 Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg Registergericht: Amtsgericht Hamburg, HRB 120189 Geschäftsführer: Carsten Bock Ust-ID: DE279344284 Hier finden Sie unsere handelsrechtlichen Pflichtangaben: http://www.ng-voice.com/imprint/

1 0

Информация для бухгалтера
by jan＠iptel.org 06 Sep '12

06 Sep '12

Spam detection software, running on the system "mail.iptel.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: òÁÂÏÔÁÅÔÅ ÂÕÈÇÁÌÔÅÒÏÍ? ðÏÍÎÉÔÅ, ËÁË ÓÌÏÖÎÏ ×ÁÍ ÒÁÎØÛÅ ÂÙÌÏ ÎÁÊÔÉ ÏÂÕÞÅÎÉÅ ÐÏ ÎÕÖÎÏÊ ÔÅÍÅ ôÅÐÅÒØ, ÎÁ ÓÁÊÔÅ ÎÁÛÅÇÏ ÕÞÅÂÎÏÇÏ ÃÅÎÔÒÁ ÎÁ ÜÔÏ ÕÊÄÅÔ ×ÓÅÇÏ ÎÅÓËÏÌØËÏ ÍÉÎÕÔ! é ÎÅ ×ÁÖÎÏ, × ÞÅÍ ×ÁÍ ÎÕÖÎÏ ÒÁÚÏÂÒÁÔØÓÑ - × îäó, ÒÁÓÞÅÔÅ ÏÔÐÕÓËÏ×, ÏÐÌÁÔÅ ÔÒÕÄÁ, ÎÁÌÏÇÏÏÂÌÏÖÅÎÉÉ, ÓÔÒÁÈÏ×ÙÈ ×ÚÎÏÓÁÈ, ÐÏÄÇÏÔÏ×ÉÔØÓÑ Ë ×ÏÚÍÏÖÎÙÍ ÐÒÏ×ÅÒËÁÍ ÉÌÉ ÒÁÚÏÂÒÁÔØÓÑ Ó ÄÏËÕÍÅÎÔÏÏÂÏÒÏÔÏÍ. úÁÈÏÄÉÔÅ ÎÁ ÎÁÛ ÓÁÊÔ - ÕÞÉÔØÓÑ ÓÔÁÌÏ ÇÏÒÁÚÄÏ ÐÒÏÝÅ. é ÍÙ ×ÓÅÇÄÁ ÐÏÍÏÖÅÍ, ÒÁÓÓËÁÖÅÍ, ÏÂßÑÓÎÉÍ É ÐÏÄÂÅÒ£Í ÔÏ, ÞÔÏ ×ÁÍ ÐÏÄÏÊÄ£Ô! [...] Content analysis details: (9.5 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 3.5 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 99 to 100% [score: 0.9981] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.4 RCVD_IN_XBL RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus XBL [2.146.222.10 listed in zen.spamhaus.org] 3.3 RCVD_IN_PBL RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus PBL 1.4 RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT RBL: RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT [2.146.222.10 listed in bb.barracudacentral.org] 0.8 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS 0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY Informational: message has unparseable relay lines

1 0

Problem with dumping offline messages
by Stoyan Mihaylov 06 Sep '12

06 Sep '12

Following examples, I tried to add processing of offline messages. Structure of my system is: SIP client <->Kamailio<->Asterisk<->Kamailio<->SIP client Where Kamailio in above is same server, but SIP clients are different. Now I have no problems with audio, video calls and messages, if both clients are online. All messages received from client are sent to Asterisk, where I can or not process them and then I forward back to Kamailio. When messages came from Asterisk server, then they are sent directly to end user. Sending messages to end user - I call this function, only if message come from allow_source_address(): route[MSILO_MESSAGE]{ if (lookup("location")){ xlog(" Relying"); t_relay(); }else{ xlog("Storing MSILO_MESSAGE $ru-$tu-$ou"); m_store("$ru"); t_relay(); t_reply("202", "Accepted"); }; exit(); } When client register: route[REGISTRAR] { if (is_method("REGISTER")) { if(isflagset(FLT_NATS)) { setbflag(FLB_NATB); # uncomment next line to do SIP NAT pinging ## setbflag(FLB_NATSIPPING); } if (!save("location",0x04)) sl_reply_error(); # MSILO - dumping user's offline messages if (m_dump("$fu")){ xlog("MSILO: offline messages for $fu dumped - if they were \n"); }else{ xlog("MSILO: no offline messages dumped\n"); }; exit; } } I am sending message to offline contact, and I see record in silo table. Record looks perfect. Then offline contact become online, I see in debug MSILO: offline messages for {offlined contact} dumped - if they were But client do not receive nothing. In case all contacts are online, then message go to contact, and is not stored in silo. Setup of msilio is: loadmodule "msilo.so" modparam("msilo","db_url",DBURL) modparam("msilo","from_address","sip:registrar@MY DOMAIN") modparam("msilo","contact_hdr","Contact: registrar@MYDOMAIN:5060;msilo=yes\r\n") modparam("msilo","content_type_hdr","Content-Type: text/plain\r\n") modparam("msilo","offline_message","***$rU***$rb***") By the way - I receive in Asterisk offline message. Obviously, I am doing something wrong, but I cant understand what. Any help is welcome. Version of Kamailio is: #~> kamailio -V version: kamailio 3.2.3 (x86_64/linux) 59f87e flags: STATS: Off, USE_IPV6, USE_TCP, USE_TLS, TLS_HOOKS, USE_RAW_SOCKS, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MEM, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, DBG_QM_MALLOC, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE, USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLACKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_LISTEN 16, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 4MB poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select. id: 59f87e compiled on 14:43:47 Jul 19 2012 with gcc 4.5.2

2 1

frequency of dispatcher probing
by Juha Heinanen 05 Sep '12

05 Sep '12

i have defined: modparam("dispatcher", "flags", 2) modparam("dispatcher", "ds_ping_interval", 10) modparam("dispatcher", "ds_probing_threshhold", 3) modparam("dispatcher", "ds_probing_mode", 2) and still i see that dispatcher is pinging inactive node at least once per second: U 2012/09/05 13:47:04.143977 192.98.103.10:5060 -> 192.98.103.3:5070 OPTIONS sip:192.98.103.3:5070 SIP/2.0. ... U 2012/09/05 13:47:04.644185 192.98.103.10:5060 -> 192.98.103.3:5070 OPTIONS sip:192.98.103.3:5070 SIP/2.0. ... U 2012/09/05 13:47:05.143991 192.98.103.10:5060 -> 192.98.103.3:5070 OPTIONS sip:192.98.103.3:5070 SIP/2.0. ... U 2012/09/05 13:47:06.143975 192.98.103.10:5060 -> 192.98.103.3:5070 OPTIONS sip:192.98.103.3:5070 SIP/2.0. ... U 2012/09/05 13:47:06.144056 192.98.103.10:5060 -> 192.98.103.3:5070 OPTIONS sip:192.98.103.3:5070 SIP/2.0. ... what is that i'm missing in order to make ping interval 10 seconds? -- juha

2 2

Re: [SR-Users] memory usage
by Uri Shacked 05 Sep '12

05 Sep '12

> The 20% initialy loaded is because I load many data with MTREE, > HTABLE,DIALPLAN etc....(5 million rows with MTREE..) > Regarding the PKG, how do i set it? I read a few months ago that the > shared and private memory on version 3.2.2 are the same. > Thanks for the help :-) > > On 09/05/2012 11:44 AM, Uri Shacked wrote: > >* Hi, *>* Thanks, *>* How do i find memory leaks? *>* when my > application starts the it shows the following values: *>* shmem:fragments > = 143898 *>* shmem:freesize = 3446570952 *>* shmem:max_used_size = > 861854768 *>* shmem:real_used_size = 848396344 *>* shmem:total_size = > 4294967296 *>* shmem:used_size = 319676976 *>* I divided the > "real_used_size" with the "total_size" and notice that *>* it is 20%. So, > this is my initial value of the application. *>* After 2 months with > 40,000 calls per day, the relations between these *>* values is 39%. > (doing a reload of the data that occupies 20% failed *>* due to "no > memory") *>* So, 19% occupation of memory is normal for this amount of > calls? or is *>* it a memory leak? if it is a memeory leak, how do i see > where? *Hello, > > Too little information to go on here. A reload might fail mostly because > data from the DB (e.g. with carrierroute case) is first loaded into > private memory (the sql result). Depending of the module there are other > tricks you could do (decrease the number of fetch rows the query returns > etc.). The out of memory condition affects shared or private mem. Try to > use at least 15 MB for PKG mem. > > If the 39% is with traffic, then it's normal, if you don't have any > traffic I still would not worry. The thing that worries me a little is > the value, you are using from the start around 0.8 GB of used shared > memory... this is a lot. From the percentages you provided it looks ok.... > > Marius > >* Uri *>* On 09/05/2012 10:19 AM, Uri Shacked wrote: *>* >/Hi, />/When I > start kamailio it loads some data into memory. />/Now *>* calls are > starting to gather up. How can I check how mach memory *>* />/does my > avp's take? />/BR, />/Uri /Hello Uri, *>* *>* avp's are associated with > the transactions, so they free'd when the *>* transaction stops(and calls > are composed of transactions). This is true *>* for dialog information as > well (dlg_var's etc.). Continuous growth in *>* memory at a constant call > rate (incoming sip requests) might mean a *>* leak. If you need > statistics about the total memory usage you can use *>* `kamctl fifo > get_statistics all` and check for the shmem real_used_size *>* and > max_used_size fields. *>* *>* Cheers, *>* Marius *>* *>* -- *>* Zbihlei > Marius *>* *>* Head of *>* Linux Development Services Romania *>* * > > -- > Zbihlei Marius > > Head of > Linux Development Services Romania > > 1&1 Internet Development srl Tel KA: 754-9152 > Str Mircea Eliade 18 Tel RO: +40-31-223-9152 > Sect 1, Bucuresti mailto: marius.zbihlei at 1and1.ro<http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users> > 71295, Romania > >

1 0

memory usage
by Uri Shacked 05 Sep '12

05 Sep '12

Hi, Thanks, How do i find memory leaks? when my application starts the it shows the following values: shmem:fragments = 143898 shmem:freesize = 3446570952 shmem:max_used_size = 861854768 shmem:real_used_size = 848396344 shmem:total_size = 4294967296 shmem:used_size = 319676976 I divided the "real_used_size" with the "total_size" and notice that it is 20%. So, this is my initial value of the application. After 2 months with 40,000 calls per day, the relations between these values is 39%. (doing a reload of the data that occupies 20% failed due to "no memory") So, 19% occupation of memory is normal for this amount of calls? or is it a memory leak? if it is a memeory leak, how do i see where? Uri On 09/05/2012 10:19 AM, Uri Shacked wrote: >* Hi, *>* When I start kamailio it loads some data into memory. *>* Now calls are starting to gather up. How can I check how mach memory *>* does my avp's take? *>* BR, *>* Uri *Hello Uri, avp's are associated with the transactions, so they free'd when the transaction stops(and calls are composed of transactions). This is true for dialog information as well (dlg_var's etc.). Continuous growth in memory at a constant call rate (incoming sip requests) might mean a leak. If you need statistics about the total memory usage you can use `kamctl fifo get_statistics all` and check for the shmem real_used_size and max_used_size fields. Cheers, Marius -- Zbihlei Marius Head of Linux Development Services Romania

2 1

memory usage
by Uri Shacked 05 Sep '12

05 Sep '12

Hi, When I start kamailio it loads some data into memory. Now calls are starting to gather up. How can I check how mach memory does my avp's take? BR, Uri

2 1

event_route[dialog:failure]
by Uri Shacked 05 Sep '12

05 Sep '12

Hi, i seems to me that the "event_route[dialog:failure]" does not recognize dialog failures. i use dlg_manage when i recieve the INVITE. i get 301, 302, 402 or send_reply with some +300 responses. on the manage_failure i print the responses, on the event_route[dialog:start] and [dialog:end] i get good results as well. but, the dialog:failure] does not rise.... any ideas? BR, Uri

2 2

LUA Authentication.
by David | StyleFlare 05 Sep '12

05 Sep '12

I think I saw once an example from miconda using LUA for Auth? Does anyone else remember seeing that? I wanted to do a custom Auth using LUA. Thanks in advance for any pointers. David.

4 3

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users September 2012