sr-users August 2012

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

77 participants
126 discussions

weird dp_translate result
by Juha Heinanen 01 Sep '12

01 Sep '12

i have this piece of config code: modparam("dialplan", "attrs_pvar", "$var(plan)") ... xlog("L_INFO", "Translating <$var(calling_number)> based on dpid 4\n"); if (dp_translate("4", "$var(calling_number)")) { xlog("L_INFO", "Found attrs <$var(plan)>\n"); ... dpid 4 has three entries: 109 4 10 1 ^\+1 0 na 107 4 10 1 ^\+358 0 fi 108 4 10 1 ^\+46 0 se thus in each entry attrs field has some two letter value. when the above piece of code is executed, i get to syslog Aug 31 19:06:51 wheezy2 /usr/sbin/sip-proxy[7162]: INFO: Translating <+35892345670> based on dpid 4 Aug 31 19:06:51 wheezy2 /usr/sbin/sip-proxy[7162]: INFO: Found attrs <0> if i restart the proxy, attrs value may change to some other bogus value. any ideas? -- juha

2 10

Kamailio - Nonce validity between Register and Invite
by patrice.bodeven＠orange.com 31 Aug '12

31 Aug '12

Hello, I am working on Kamailio 3.2.2. There is no traffic, only functional test done. Based on the SIP Client used until now (Xlite), the INVITE is systematically authenticated by 407 as there is no Proxy-Authorization in the initial INVITE. Expected/normal behavior. But when using an internal SIP client, the initial INVITE is generated with a Proxy-Authorization containing the nonce value used by the successful registration. In Authorization of Register (the answer is 200OK) Digest username="+33296488922(a)ims.v0.pftest.net", realm="sip:ims.v0.pftest.net", nonce="UDP43lAzpH7SjicT6+9/KDDloW4OTfTXoGWlZurBVut0JV604jox/QY+tVeA", uri="sip:ims.v0.pftest.net", response="4ed51b8e62cf769b19f8c4771e068ad3", cnonce="06440000000529330fe1", qop=auth, nc=00000011 In Proxy-Authorization of Invite Digest username="+33296488922(a)ims.v0.pftest.net", realm="sip:ims.v0.pftest.net", nonce="UDP43lAzpH7SjicT6+9/KDDloW4OTfTXoGWlZurBVut0JV604jox/QY+tVeA", uri="sip:0157361149@ims.v0.pftest.net", response="b247052d6d5b37e0b6677c816390cb77", cnonce="06440000000529330fe1", qop=auth, nc=00000012 As the nonce expire is high (see nonce_expire), I don't understand why Kamailio requests the Authentication of the INVITE by 407. 407 with Proxy-Authenticate: Digest realm="ims.v0.pftest.net", nonce="UDP6pVAzpkWDF+jSlP3zzVYcuNPhY8NQBj62WIA=", qop="auth", stale=true Does it mean that the REGISTER and INVITE are using different Nonce value ? ==> Information on my configuration file. modparam("auth_db", "db_url", DBURLAUTH) modparam("auth", "auth_checks_register", 6) # callid and From TAG modparam("auth", "qop", "auth") # enable qop=auth modparam("auth", "nonce_count", 1) # enable nonce_count support modparam("auth", "nonce_expire", 21600) # Set nonce_expire to 6 hours For register, I do if (!www_authorize("$ru", "subscriber")) { if($? == -2 || $? == -3) { sl_send_reply("403","Forbidden auth ID"); exit; } else { www_challenge("$ru", "17"); exit; } } For invite, I do if (!proxy_authorize("$fd", "subscriber")) { if($? == -2 || $? == -3) { sl_send_reply("403","Forbidden auth ID"); exit; } else { proxy_challenge("$fd", "17"); xlog("L_INFO","INVITE challenged by 407 to :$di:$dp \n"); exit; } } Followed by consume_credentials(); Thanks in advance for your support. Patrice B _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, France Telecom - Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, France Telecom - Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you.

3 9

invite/ack avps/transactions
by Juha Heinanen 31 Aug '12

31 Aug '12

i tried to access an avp that was set during invite processing while processing ack to 200 ok, but i guess the avp is already gone by that time, because positive ack is its own transaction? what i tried to do is to save somewhere invite's $du and then t_relay ack to the same place without calling loose_route. should i go for htable as storage or is there a better choice? -- juha

2 1

LCR (next_gw) question
by Nord7 31 Aug '12

31 Aug '12

Hello everyone. Configures the module LCR. I can't get him to take the next on the list of priorities gateway if the first does not work. Function "next_gw" capable of doing that? Did anyone realties that? If possible show example. Kamailio 3.3 Regards, Kirill

2 1

spam messages breaking through filters
by Daniel-Constantin Mierla 31 Aug '12

31 Aug '12

Hello, there were some spam messages going through our mailing list filters. I was updating the filters on mailman, but there are new and new ideas coming from this guys. Sorry for the pollution and I wanted to say that these messages are marked as spam by spamassasin, you can filter them locally as well looking for the header X-Spam-Level: *** You can adjust the number of '*'. Some email services do that automatically, like gmail.com for example. Of course, if anyone has better ideas of protection, please write here. Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio Advanced Training, Berlin, Nov 5-8, 2012 - http://asipto.com/u/kat

1 1

db_cluster together with the registrar module = signal 11
by Øyvind Kolbu 30 Aug '12

30 Aug '12

Hi, I upgraded our system to Kamailio 3.3 to take advantage of the new db_cluster module. Currently we have two registration/location servers each with their own sql-server. Authenticated REGISTER messages are forwarded to the other server, which uses the 0x02 flag to save() in order to store it without generating an extra reply. This works fine. My goal was to use db_cluster to update both databases at once with save() and use the failover mode when reading with lookup(). Have anyone tested a similar setup? Anyhow, here is how I tried to do it: modparam("db_cluster","connection","voip1_data2=>postgres://user:pass@hostname1/voipt1_data2") modparam("db_cluster","connection","voip2_data2=>postgres://user:pass@hostname2/voipt2_data2") modparam("db_cluster", "cluster", "data2=>voip1_data2=8s7p;voip2_data2=9s7p") modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 2) modparam("usrloc", "db_url", "cluster://data2") But I get: : : <core> [pass_fd.c:293]: ERROR: receive_fd: EOF on 33 : ALERT: <core> [main.c:785]: child process 28275 exited by a signal 11 : ALERT: <core> [main.c:788]: core was generated : INFO: <core> [main.c:800]: INFO: terminating due to SIGCHLD Same with db_mode = 1 or 3, and either modparam("db_cluster", "cluster", "data2=>voip1_data2=8s9p") or modparam("db_cluster", "cluster", "data2=>voip2_data2=8s9p"). No difference between newly booted phones or phones reregistering. Backtrace from gdb: (gdb) bt #0 0x002fd7da in db_cluster_insert (_h=0xb7d2dc88, _k=0xbf9ac954, _v=0xbf9ac7ec, _n=18) at dbcl_api.c:334 #1 0x00fbb1cc in db_insert_ucontact (_c=0xb5d828d8) at ucontact.c:565 #2 0x00fcfc5d in insert_ucontact (_r=0xfd3a00, _contact=0xb7d3ce90, _ci=0xc5cc80, _c=0xbf9acb84) at urecord.c:478 #3 0x00c55bb0 in add_contacts (_m=0xb7d05e40, _d=0xb5d63060, _cflags=0, _uri=0x0) at save.c:493 #4 save (_m=0xb7d05e40, _d=0xb5d63060, _cflags=0, _uri=0x0) at save.c:864 #5 0x00c4dd43 in w_save2 (_m=0xb7d05e40, _d=0xb5d63060 "00ֵ", _cflags=0x0) at reg_mod.c:407 #6 0x080586ad in do_action (h=0xbf9acf48, a=0xb7c405c0, msg=0xb7d05e40) at action.c:1157 #7 0x0805fe5c in run_actions (h=0xbf9acf48, a=0xb7c405c0, msg=0xb7d05e40) at action.c:1644 #8 0x080604e1 in run_actions_safe (h=0xbf9adcb8, a=0xb7c405c0, msg=0xb7d05e40) at action.c:1708 #9 0x080f96b7 in rval_get_int (h=0xbf9adcb8, msg=0xbf9ac954, i=0xbf9ad268, rv=0xb7c406cc, cache=0x0) at rvalue.c:920 #10 0x080fcf38 in rval_expr_eval_int (h=0xbf9adcb8, msg=0xb7d05e40, res=0xbf9ad268, rve=0xb7c406c8) at rvalue.c:1914 #11 0x080fd009 in rval_expr_eval_int (h=0xbf9adcb8, msg=0xb7d05e40, res=0xbf9ad544, rve=0xb7c40a70) at rvalue.c:1922 #12 0x080585fe in do_action (h=0xbf9adcb8, a=0xb7c41550, msg=0xb7d05e40) at action.c:1121 #13 0x0805fe5c in run_actions (h=0xbf9adcb8, a=0xb7c41550, msg=0xb7d05e40) at action.c:1644 #14 0x08058657 in do_action (h=0xbf9adcb8, a=0xb7c41650, msg=0xb7d05e40) at action.c:1136 #15 0x0805fe5c in run_actions (h=0xbf9adcb8, a=0xb7c41650, msg=0xb7d05e40) at action.c:1644 #16 0x0805853d in do_action (h=0xbf9adcb8, a=0xb7bd64d8, msg=0xb7d05e40) at action.c:761 #17 0x0805fe5c in run_actions (h=0xbf9adcb8, a=0xb7bc7128, msg=0xb7d05e40) at action.c:1644 #18 0x08060464 in run_top_route (a=0xb7bc7128, msg=0xb7d05e40, c=0x0) at action.c:1729 #19 0x080e11e4 in receive_msg (buf=0x82c4f20 "REGISTER sip:hometest.voip.uio.no SIP/2.0\r\nVia: SIP/2.0/UDP 193.157.149.56;branch=z9hG4bKb8e88f2eE34DCDDD\r\nFrom: \"kolbutest\" <sip:2549619@hometest.voip.uio.no>;tag=34CE9BA6-70FCC135\r\nTo: <sip:2549619@"..., len=809, rcv_info=0xbf9ade98) at receive.c:209 #20 0x08177f7b in udp_rcv_loop () at udp_server.c:544 #21 0x080b0426 in main_loop () at main.c:1633 #22 0x080b3d02 in main (argc=17, argv=0xbf9ae174) at main.c:2546 Core dumps and debug logs (debug=3) are available. -- Øyvind Kolbu University of Oslo

3 21

Job ad - see details! Sent through Search engine
by serusers＠iptel.org 30 Aug '12

30 Aug '12

Spam detection software, running on the system "mail.iptel.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: I would like to take this time to welcome you to our hiring process and give you a brief synopsis of the position's benefits and requirements. If you are taking a career break, are on a maternity leave, recently retired or simply looking for some part-time job, this position is for you. [...] Content analysis details: (6.7 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 1.4 RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT RBL: RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT [189.4.159.143 listed in bb.barracudacentral.org] 0.4 RCVD_IN_XBL RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus XBL [189.4.159.143 listed in zen.spamhaus.org] 3.3 RCVD_IN_PBL RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus PBL 1.3 RCVD_IN_RP_RNBL RBL: Relay in RNBL, https://senderscore.org/blacklistlookup/ [189.4.159.143 listed in bl.score.senderscore.com] 1.3 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET RBL: Received via a relay in bl.spamcop.net [Blocked - see <http://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?189.4.159.143>] -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] 0.8 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS

1 0

Kamailio Crash using Cassandra 1.1.2 during SIP unregister
by Boudewyn Ligthart 29 Aug '12

29 Aug '12

Hi, Kamailio crash using Cassandra 1.1.2 during SIP unregister (registering works fine) The version of Kamailio is the latest GIT version: version: kamailio 3.4.0-dev3 (x86_64/linux) 10327c flags: STATS: Off, USE_IPV6, USE_TCP, USE_TLS, TLS_HOOKS, USE_RAW_SOCKS, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MEM, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE, USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLACKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_LISTEN 16, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, DEFAULT PKG_SIZE 4MB poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select. id: 10327c compiled on 14:53:11 Aug 22 2012 with gcc 4.6.3 BT of Core : Using host libthread_db library "/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libthread_db.so.1". Core was generated by `kamailio -ddddd'. Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault. #0 fm_free (qm=0x7fa55daf7010, p=0xd22317971716b6a) at mem/f_malloc.c:527 527 if(unlikely(f->u.nxt_free!=NULL)) { (gdb) bt #0 fm_free (qm=0x7fa55daf7010, p=0xd22317971716b6a) at mem/f_malloc.c:527 #1 0x00007fa55d35ac53 in db_free_columns (_r=0x7fa55db38c30) at db_res.c:86 #2 0x00007fa55d83f87d in db_cassa_query (_h=<optimized out>, _k=0x7fa55adc6aac, _op=<optimized out>, _v=<optimized out>, _c=0x7fff72ef0e30, _n=<optimized out>, _nc=16, _o=0x7fa55afca990, _r=0x7fff72ef0f10) at dbcassa_base.cpp:659 #3 0x00007fa55adb58eb in db_load_urecord (_c=0x7fa55db218d0, _d=0x7fa5576eee38, _aor=0x7fff72ef11b0) at udomain.c:592 #4 0x00007fa55adb93cd in get_urecord (_d=<optimized out>, _aor=0x7fff72ef11b0, _r=0x7fff72ef1200) at udomain.c:1017 #5 0x00007fa55ab91698 in lookup (_m=0x7fa55db40c48, _d=0x7fa5576eee38, _uri=<optimized out>) at lookup.c:156 #6 0x00007fa55ab957f2 in w_lookup (_m=0x7fa55db40c48, _d=0x7fa5576eee38 "\350\355nW\245\177", _uri=<optimized out>) at reg_mod.c:437 #7 0x000000000041c624 in do_action (h=0x7fff72ef17f0, a=0x7fa55db23098, msg=0x7fa55db40c48) at action.c:1153 #8 0x000000000041b493 in run_actions (h=0x7fff72ef17f0, a=0x7fa55db23098, msg=0x7fa55db40c48) at action.c:1646 #9 0x0000000000423a24 in run_actions_safe (h=<optimized out>, a=<optimized out>, msg=<optimized out>) at action.c:1710 #10 0x00000000004d79a0 in rval_get_int (h=0x7fff72ef2790, msg=<optimized out>, i=0x7fff72ef1c30, rv=<optimized out>, cache=<optimized out>) at rvalue.c:920 #11 0x00000000004dc82c in rval_expr_eval_int (h=0x7fff72ef2790, msg=0x7fa55db40c48, res=0x7fff72ef1c30, rve=0x7fa55db23218) at rvalue.c:1914 #12 0x00000000004dc8f9 in rval_expr_eval_int (h=0x7fff72ef2790, msg=0x7fa55db40c48, res=0x7fff72ef20d0, rve=0x7fa55db238e8) at rvalue.c:1922 #13 0x000000000041cb66 in do_action (h=0x7fff72ef2790, a=0x7fa55db26d38, msg=0x7fa55db40c48) at action.c:1123 #14 0x000000000041b493 in run_actions (h=0x7fff72ef2790, a=0x7fa55db26d38, msg=0x7fa55db40c48) at action.c:1646 #15 0x000000000041c7e1 in do_action (h=0x7fff72ef2790, a=0x7fa55db15b38, msg=0x7fa55db40c48) at action.c:763 #16 0x000000000041b493 in run_actions (h=0x7fff72ef2790, a=0x7fa55db118c8, msg=0x7fa55db40c48) at action.c:1646 #17 0x0000000000423ab0 in run_top_route (a=0x7fa55db118c8, msg=0x7fa55db40c48, c=<optimized out>) at action.c:1731 #18 0x00000000004b39ee in receive_msg (buf=<optimized out>, len=<optimized out>, rcv_info=<optimized out>) at receive.c:209 #19 0x000000000054de1a in udp_rcv_loop () at udp_server.c:544 #20 0x0000000000478879 in main_loop () at main.c:1635 #21 0x000000000041b002 in main (argc=<optimized out>, argv=<optimized out>) at main.c:2548 Thanks, Bou

2 2

[OT] sip:provider CE v2.6 is out!
by Andreas Granig 29 Aug '12

29 Aug '12

Hi all, I'm excited to announce the release of the Sipwise sip:provider Community Edition v2.6, a free and open source turn-key platform, which uses Kamailio, Sems and Asterisk in its core to provide a full-blown and feature-rich VoIP soft-switch. http://www.sipwise.com/news/announcements/spce-v2_6-release/ New core features are *full presence/xcap/im support* together with the awesome Jitsi client, allowing you to deploy your own Skype-like service for encryted voice/video communication, buddy lists, instant messaging, screen sharing and remote desktop control. We also support *media features for error announcements*, like busy, blocked, unknown number etc. Check our VM images to get started within a couple of minutes and learn what can be built with the power of Kamailio as a stateless load-balancer and a stateful proxy/registrar, and Sems as an SBC and application server. http://www.sipwise.com/products/spce/quickinstall/ Thanks a lot to all developers, contributors and members of this mailing list to make this possible and for helping us out! Andreas

1 0

Work offer inside
by serusers＠iptel.org 29 Aug '12

29 Aug '12

Spam detection software, running on the system "mail.iptel.org", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: I would like to take this time to welcome you to our hiring process and give you a brief synopsis of the position's benefits and requirements. If you are taking a career break, are on a maternity leave, recently retired or simply looking for some part-time job, this position is for you. [...] Content analysis details: (7.4 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.7 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.4587] 1.4 RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT RBL: RCVD_IN_BRBL_LASTEXT [186.32.220.19 listed in bb.barracudacentral.org] 3.3 RCVD_IN_PBL RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus PBL [186.32.220.19 listed in zen.spamhaus.org] 0.4 RCVD_IN_XBL RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus XBL 0.8 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS

1 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users August 2012