sr-users May 2011

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

78 participants
129 discussions

by Asun

Hello I've installed kamailio 3.1 but It's doesn't Work with radius authentication. I've followed this manual <http://www.kamailio.org/docs/openser-radius-1.0.x.html> http://www.kamailio.org/docs/openser-radius-1.0.x.html but it does'nt work, because is for openser not kamailio. Is there another manual to do this? Anyone have radius authentication with kamailio? Can anyone help me? Thank you Asun

13 years, 1 month

Presence changes not seen for first time login

by Swetha Raj

Hi All, I have Kamailio3.1 set up by following the steps mentioned here - http://kb.asipto.com/kamailio:presence:k31-made-simple. When i login two users via Jitsi and add each other,one user is not able to see the other user's presence changes.Below are the steps to reproduce - 1.Login user1@sipdomain via jitsi 2.Login user2@sipdomain vis jitsi 3.user1 adds user2,user2 receives the request and accepts it. 4.user2 adds user1. 5.Now any presence changes from user1 is visible to user2 But any changes from user2 is not visible to user1. This issue is resolved if the users re-login.Any ideas what could be the issue ? Also how do i see the complete SIP headers in kamailio log,is their a way to enable it ? Thanks, Swetha

13 years, 1 month

Invitation to connect on LinkedIn

by Anand Kumar via LinkedIn

LinkedIn ------------ Anand Kumar requested to add you as a connection on LinkedIn: ------------------------------------------ Luis, I'd like to add you to my professional network on LinkedIn. - Anand Accept invitation from Anand Kumar http://www.linkedin.com/e/-y8k3ym-go88enz1-1n/XkppUi8mK5TI9VJsZIpnfBovln4Su… View invitation from Anand Kumar http://www.linkedin.com/e/-y8k3ym-go88enz1-1n/XkppUi8mK5TI9VJsZIpnfBovln4Su… ------------------------------------------ DID YOU KNOW you can conduct a more credible and powerful reference check using LinkedIn? Enter the company name and years of employment or the prospective employee to find their colleagues that are also in your network. This provides you with a more balanced set of feedback to evaluate that new hire. http://www.linkedin.com/e/-y8k3ym-go88enz1-1n/rsr/inv-27/ -- (c) 2011, LinkedIn Corporation

13 years, 1 month

core kamailio 3.1.2

by Bruno Bresciani

Hi ALL Why kamailio 3.1.2 generate core when function recvmsg return 0? Below is the trace of the core kamailio: May 27 10:29:14 sswpst00 /home2/local/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[31288]: INFO: <script>: CFG: Cseq INVITE ... May 27 10:29:14 sswpst00 /home2/local/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[31288]: DEBUG: tm [t_reply.c:1129]: ->>>>>>>>> T_code=100, new_code=488 May 27 10:29:14 sswpst00 /home2/local/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[31288]: DEBUG: tm [t_hooks.c:288]: DBG: trans=0xb61304a0, callback type 64, id 0 entered *May 27 10:29:15 sswpst00 /home2/local/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[31308]: : <core> [pass_fd.c:293]: ERROR: receive_fd: EOF on 11* May 27 10:29:15 sswpst00 /home2/local/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[31308]: DEBUG: <core> [tcp_main.c:3551]: DBG: handle_ser_child: dead child 1, pid 31288 (shutting down?) May 27 10:29:15 sswpst00 /home2/local/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[31308]: DEBUG: <core> [io_wait.h:617]: DBG: io_watch_del (0x82561e0, 11, -1, 0x0) fd_no=18 called *May 27 10:29:15 sswpst00 /home2/local/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[31285]: ALERT: <core> [main.c:741]: child process 31288 exited by a signal 11* May 27 10:29:15 sswpst00 /home2/local/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[31285]: ALERT: <core> [main.c:744]: core was generated May 27 10:29:15 sswpst00 /home2/local/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[31285]: INFO: <core> [main.c:756]: INFO: terminating due to SIGCHLD *May 27 10:29:15 sswpst00 /home2/local/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[31308]: INFO: <core> [main.c:807]: INFO: signal 15 received* May 27 10:29:15 sswpst00 /home2/local/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[31308]: DEBUG: <core> [main.c:818]: Memory status (pkg): Regards,

13 years, 2 months

ser_ctl / serweb

by Claudio Furrer

Hi all, Just want to ask if ser_ctl application will be merged into sr3.1 or future releases. By the moment I've found it here [1], [2] or [3]. Is it full compatible with sip-router v3.x? I know kamctl and kamdbctl would be suggested but these are for kamailio flavour. I don't find too much work based on SER flavour regarding to database/users administration and web provisioning. BTW, siremis only works with kamailio db structures, but for sip-router v3 ser-flavoured only found serweb 2.x here [4] and [5] which I don't know if is it working well with the current new releases of the project. I would appreciate if someone can advice me if kamailio is the way to go, because have find that sip-router or ser flavours miss some docs and apps that kamailio already have. I'm asking from a a SER-user point of view, who want to migrate to SR-3 :( [1] http://ftp.iptel.org/pub/serctl/daily-snapshots/ [2] http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=ser;a=tree;f=ser_ctl;h=7db4a… [3] http://cvs.berlios.de/viewvc/ser/serctl/ [4] http://ftp.iptel.org/pub/serweb/daily-snapshots/ [5] http://developer.berlios.de/projects/serweb/ Thank you, Claudio

13 years, 2 months

Howto restore a FIFO file?

by Spinov Evgeniy

Hello, everyone. I've accidentally started 2nd copy of Kamailio and killed it at once. However, fifo file was deleted by killed Kamailio, while the first one copy is running fine. Is there any way to restore the fifo file to the first kamailio, unless restarting it? Thank you.

13 years, 2 months

[OT] IETF SIMPLE WG will destroy MSRP with the new draft-ietf-simple-msrp-sessmatch-11

by Iñaki Baz Castillo

Hi, for those interested in MSRP protocol (instant message sessions and file transfer for SIP) there are bad news: Even if there are already clients and servers (MSRP relays o IM conference servers) implementing the MSRP protocol (RFC 4975 and 4976) the SIMPLE WG will publish a new draft [*] that breaks these RFC's just to satisfy big vendors interested in deploying MSRP capable SBC/ALG boxes (so instead of solving NAT issues with MSRP relays as RFC 4976 states, they want it to be fixed in the router by doing ugly ALG, or in a SBC). This is terrible because all the MSRP devices should implement this new draft in order to interoperate (no backward compatibility at all). The draft also breaks the security defined in RFC 4975 (for example, TLS name based authentication cannot work anymore). For further information I recommend reading these two posts: http://blog.tekelec.com/blog/bid/29816/More-on-MSRP-Session-Match-Extension http://blog.tekelec.com/blog/bid/33138/MSRP-Session-Match-Backwards-Compati… and also these very *hot* mail threads in the SIMPLE maillist: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/simple/current/msg09227.html http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/simple/current/msg09229.html [*] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-simple-msrp-sessmatch-11 -- Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc(a)aliax.net>

13 years, 2 months

Re: [SR-Users] sr-users Digest, Vol 72, Issue 67

by Boris

sr-users-request(a)lists.sip-router.org wrote: >Send sr-users mailing list submissions to > sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org > >To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users >or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > sr-users-request(a)lists.sip-router.org > >You can reach the person managing the list at > sr-users-owner(a)lists.sip-router.org > >When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific >than "Re: Contents of sr-users digest..." > > >Today's Topics: > > 1. Aliases Using the Default Script; (David J.) > 2. Re: Green VoIP - energy efficiency and performances of v3.0 > (Jan Janak) > 3. Kamailio v3.1.4 Released (Daniel-Constantin Mierla) > 4. Re: ser_ctl / serweb (caio) > 5. Re: [OT] IETF SIMPLE WG will destroy MSRP with the new > draft-ietf-simple-msrp-sessmatch-11 (I?aki Baz Castillo) > 6. Re: [OT] IETF SIMPLE WG will destroy MSRP with the new > draft-ietf-simple-msrp-sessmatch-11 (Daniel-Constantin Mierla) > > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >Message: 1 >Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 14:27:55 -0400 >From: "David J." <david(a)styleflare.com> >Subject: [SR-Users] Aliases Using the Default Script; >To: "SIP Router - Kamailio (OpenSER) and SIP Express Router (SER) - > Users Mailing List" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> >Message-ID: <4DDE9BAB.4060401(a)styleflare.com> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > >I am using the kamailio default script on 3.1.3. > >I was wondering what happens when I added an Alias in dbaliases? > >For example if I add 18005551212(a)mydomain.com alias to 1001(a)mydomain.com > >when an invite comes in; it works perfect I got a 200 back. (1001 Device >rings.) > >If I add another alias to a remote server; ie. > >18005551213(a)mydomain.com alias to 1800555124(a)someotherdomain.com > >I get a 404 back. > >I wonder what happens internally? > >What should I modify to enable this case; > >Thanks. > > > >------------------------------ > >Message: 2 >Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 20:49:39 +0200 >From: Jan Janak <jan(a)ryngle.com> >Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Green VoIP - energy efficiency and > performances of v3.0 >To: miconda(a)gmail.com >Cc: "SIP Router - Kamailio \(OpenSER\) and SIP Express Router \(SER\) > - Users Mailing List" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org>, sr-dev > <sr-dev(a)lists.sip-router.org> >Message-ID: <BANLkTikUb_iwBDEuqk977-ECmmHo4dEXvQ(a)mail.gmail.com> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > >No, I turned it off. > >-Jan > >On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 11:50, Daniel-Constantin Mierla ><miconda(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> Hello, >> >> out of curiosity, since you used the sources from GIT - was memory debugging >> on? It is usually enabled in master branch and that could have some impact >> in memory usage and performances... >> >> Thanks, >> Daniel >> >> On 5/25/11 3:00 PM, Jan Janak wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 06:54, Jeremya<jeremy(a)electrosilk.net> ?wrote: >>>> >>>> These figures pale into insignificance compared to the power required >>>> for standard SIP devices - typically 5-8 watts per device multiplied by >>>> the number of devices. >>>> >>>> When you factor in Gigabit Ethernet the power ups significantly. >>>> >>>> Optimisation at the server level is not significant on any scale. >>>> Optimisation on communications power: i.e. end-devices, DSL& ?switches >>>> is where the power savings are important. >>> >>> Sure, the total power consumption of the whole system is dominated by >>> the power consumption of end-point devices, there's no doubt about >>> that and the paper says that. >>> >>> Nevertheless, as an ITSP you are typically paying for the energy >>> consumed by your servers and in that case knowing what you can expect >>> and how many servers you need is useful. Modern data-center servers >>> have significant base-line power consumption and a portion of that >>> needs to be attributed to the SIP service running on those servers. >>> >>> -Jan >>> >>>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hello, >>>>> >>>>> Jan Janak conducted a very interesting research project regarding >>>>> energy efficiency of VoIP systems during 2010, a collaboration between >>>>> iptel.org and Columbia University. >>>>> >>>>> The team used the source code from sip-router.org GIT repository from >>>>> January 2010, which corresponds to Kamailio (former OpenSER) and SER >>>>> v3.0. The latest stable series v3.1 shares the same internal >>>>> architecture with v3.0. >>>>> >>>>> As part of the research work, Jan could also gather some figures about >>>>> capacity and performances of v3.0 with a quite complex configuration >>>>> file: etc/sip-router-oob.cfg (involving authentication and NAT >>>>> traversal as well). >>>>> >>>>> You can read the paper about energy efficiency at: >>>>> >>>>> - Green VoIP Article: http://asipto.com/u/2j >>>>> >>>>> The draft notes about capacity and performances of v3.0 are available >>>>> at: >>>>> >>>>> - Performances and Capacity for v3.0 Wiki page: http://asipto.com/u/2k >>>>> >>>>> Some interesting results: >>>>> >>>>> - one instance of SIP server with 500 000 online users (mixed users ? >>>>> behind and not NAT routers) ? consumed energy 210W >>>>> - one instance of SIP server with 1 000 000 online users (no NAT >>>>> involved) ? consumed energy 190W >>>>> - on a 32-bit machine with 4GB of memory and with 2.5GB reserved for >>>>> SIP server, the server could support 43 000 simultaneous TLS >>>>> connections ? consumed energy 203W >>>>> - one SIP server instance with 80 000 permanent TCP connections, the >>>>> SIP server could still handle at least 1000 requests per second and a >>>>> connection arrival rate of 1000 new connections per second, done for >>>>> 20 000 new connections. CPU load generated by the SIP server was from >>>>> 6% to 8%. >>>>> >>>>> I added a new section to the draft notes to list the enhancements done >>>>> for the latest stable release (v3.1.x) that contribute to performance >>>>> improvements, like asynchronous TLS, fine tuning of memory for TLS >>>>> connections and raw UDP sockets. >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> Daniel >>>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list >>>> sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org >>>> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list >>> sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org >>> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users >> >> -- >> Daniel-Constantin Mierla >> http://www.asipto.com >> >> > > > >------------------------------ > >Message: 3 >Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 21:00:42 +0200 >From: Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com> >Subject: [SR-Users] Kamailio v3.1.4 Released >To: kamailio <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org>, sr-dev > <sr-dev(a)lists.sip-router.org>, business(a)lists.kamailio.org >Message-ID: <4DDEA35A.7070606(a)gmail.com> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > >Hello, > >Kamailio SIP Server v3.1.4 stable release is out. > >This is a maintenance release of latest stable branch, 3.1, that >includes fixes since release of v3.1.3. There is no change to database >schema or configuration language structure. Deployments running previous >v3.1.x versions are strongly recommended to be upgraded to v3.1.4. > >For more details about version 3.1.4, visit: > >http://www.kamailio.org/w/2011/05/kamailio-v3-1-4-released/ > >Cheers, >Daniel > >-- >Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- http://www.asipto.com >http://linkedin.com/in/miconda -- http://twitter.com/miconda > > > > >------------------------------ > >Message: 4 >Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 17:59:42 -0300 >From: caio <elcaio(a)gmail.com> >Subject: Re: [SR-Users] ser_ctl / serweb >To: "SIP Router - Kamailio (OpenSER) and SIP Express Router (SER) - > Users Mailing List" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org> >Message-ID: <BANLkTik+dnTp-egK2xy1ua=tPnCcaDuuOA(a)mail.gmail.com> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > >Hello, > >Anyone know if ser_ctl (python utility) will be merged into master? Or is >going to be deprecated? >If it still alive, are there any examples/docs of the usage for DB users >provisoining? >kamctl and kamdbctl are recomended for its substitution? > >Which utility will be official for sip-router? >Sorry if it already were discussed, but I didn't find comments about it >since 2010. > >Thank you >Claudio > >On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Claudio Furrer <elcaio(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> Just want to ask if ser_ctl application will be merged into sr3.1 or future >> releases. >> By the moment I've found it here [1], [2] or [3]. >> >> Is it full compatible with sip-router v3.x? >> >> I know kamctl and kamdbctl would be suggested but these are for kamailio >> flavour. I don't find too much work based on SER flavour regarding to >> database/users administration and web provisioning. >> BTW, siremis only works with kamailio db structures, but for sip-router v3 >> ser-flavoured only found serweb 2.x here [4] and [5] which I don't know if >> is >> it working well with the current new releases of the project. >> >> I would appreciate if someone can advice me if kamailio is the way to go, >> because have find that sip-router or ser flavours miss some docs and apps >> that >> kamailio already have. >> >> I'm asking from a a SER-user point of view, who want to migrate to SR-3 :( >> >> [1] http://ftp.iptel.org/pub/serctl/daily-snapshots/ >> [2] >> >> http://git.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=ser;a=tree;f=ser_ctl;h=7db4a… >> [3] http://cvs.berlios.de/viewvc/ser/serctl/ >> >> [4] http://ftp.iptel.org/pub/serweb/daily-snapshots/ >> [5] http://developer.berlios.de/projects/serweb/ >> >> Thank you, >> Claudio >> >

13 years, 2 months

Re: [SR-Users] sr-users Digest, Vol 72, Issue 67

by Boris

13 years, 2 months

Re: [SR-Users] sr-users Digest, Vol 72, Issue 67

by Boris

13 years, 2 months

← Newer
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
...
13
Older →

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users May 2011