sr-users August 2009

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

55 participants
77 discussions

by qiulei212

hello friends: I crashed when i compile the SER source and use the tls.so! I have install the openssl 0.9.8 in the default folder :/usr/local and install the ser-2.0.0-rc1 in the default too. run the command below: make group_include="standard" include_modules="tls" all make group_include="standard" include_modules="tls" installthe tls.so in the /usr/local/lib/ ser/modules folderthe I add the loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/tls.so" in the ser.cfg and start /usr/local/sbin/ serbut the ser start failed!I run the ser -c and found:ERROR: load_module: could not open module </usr/local/lib/ser/modules/tls.so>: /usr/local/lib/ser/modules/tls.so: undefined symbol: deflate I don't know Why and ask help for you ! Thanks a lot ! qiulei212 2009-08-21

14 years, 8 months

[Kamailio-Users] Choosing IP address when relaying request

by mayamatakeshi

Hello, I have 2 ip addresses being listened in my cfg file. Is it possible to set which ip address will be used when relaying a request? regards, takeshi

14 years, 8 months

[Kamailio-Users] Problem with BYE when using TCP or TLS between two Kamilio proxies

by Dubravko Caric

Hi all, I have a problem with routing BYE messages (when called UAC sends BYE) when connection between two Kamailio (1.5.1 with identical configurations) proxies is done by TLS/TCP. WORKING: UAC#1 <-- UDP/TCP/TLS --> Proxy#1 <--UDP--> Proxy#2 <-- UDP/TCP/TLS --> UAC#2 NOT WORKING: UAC#1 <-- UDP/TCP/TLS --> Proxy#1 <-- TCP or TLS --> Proxy#2 <-- UDP/TCP/TLS --> UAC#2 By looking at ngrep log I found out that when “UAC#1” sends INVITE, “Proxy#1” sends right “Contact” header (Contact:<sip:bob@IP_ADDRESS_OF_UAC#1:6126;transport=udp>) to “Proxy#2” , but “Proxy#2” sends wrong “Contact” header (Contact:<sip:bob@IP_ADDRESS_OF_PROXY#1:39879;transport=udp>) to “UAC#2”. When UAC#2 sends BYE, it is sends message with this wrong header and when it arrives on “Proxy#1” proxy doesn’t sends BYE message to UAC#1. Or when UACs with TCP, this are “Proxy#1” errors: DBG:core:tcp_send: no open tcp connection found, opening new one ERROR:core:tcp_blocking_connect: poll error: flags 18 ERROR:core:tcp_blocking_connect: failed to retrieve SO_ERROR (111) Connection refused ERROR:core:tcpconn_connect: tcp_blocking_connect failed ERROR:core:tcp_send: connect failed ERROR:tm:msg_send: tcp_send failed ERROR:tm:t_forward_nonack: sending request failed DBG:tm:t_relay_to: t_forward_nonack returned error What bothers me is that when I call the other UAC, he can hangup the call (even when he is CALLED UAC), then I restart both proxies and it is other way around. I do not know if I described problem clearly but I am lost in where to look next so any help would be appreciated. Why proxy change Contact header when I switch from UDP to TCP between proxies? I'm not rewriting Contact header and only thing that I change in configuration when switching from UDP to TCP is this: if($rd=="example.com") { t_relay("tcp: example.com:5063"); exit; } Thanks a lot /dubravko

14 years, 8 months

[Kamailio-Users] limits per subscriber and per gateway

by Dmitri G.

Hello, First I would like to say thank you for the helpful members here, I have got useful tips and suggestions here. I am trying to implement some kind of "protection" for me, let me describe what is my problem at the moment. I know I ask a bit much questions here .) I would like to limit the number of incoming calls from my customers, but on a customer basis. I have a subscriber with an Asterisk, so it will be a bad idea to set a limit to 1 concurrent call for this customer, but limit 1 will work for a customer with an IP phone (remember the 100rel thing what I posted here? that was a workaround for this subscriber... I mean to remove 100rel from the supported header). So basically I would like to limit every subscriber, on a per customer basis. The next big thing is the lcr gateways, so where I send the calls. I have 2 peers, one of then have a limit for me, it's 20 concurrent calls. They don't limit me, so I can send out 30-40-50 calls to them, but they will charge me a big amount of Lei (Romanian currency) for every calls above 20 at the same time. They have freeswitch.... doesn't matter, I'm just saying they have freeswitch :) But they have very very good price(for 20 calls what i mentioned), so I would like to fill that "20 calls" space. I have asked them to give some limits for me, so refuse calls above 20 (so this way lcr can send out to the another gateway), but they don't want to do it (well, they need money I think) I would like to store values for these limits in mysql (column "limit" in subscriber table, and column "calllimit" in gw table, or I can store it in a separate table). Right now I store these values in a mysql table called "iplimits" I am not perfectly sure about how I can select these values from the table, and how can I "play" with these values. Even don't know how to retrieve the current number of concurrent calls per gateway or per subscriber. And what to do with these selected values? Store it in an avp and then do some checks against it? I am reading the module docs, especially sqlops, but I think I can't see the wood for the trees. I hope somebody can give me suggestions (or an example) about this. Kind regards, Dmitri

14 years, 8 months

[Kamailio-Users] inbound "failover"

by Dmitri G.

Sorry, I have accidentally sent this message to opensips mailing list, I am sending it now to the right place Hello, I would like to implement some kind of failover for my Asterisk, let me describe how I would like to see it. I registered 2 sip users with my Kamailio, 1020(a)domain.com and 1030(a)domain.com. I have added aliases to 1020 (aliases from 1021@domain com to 1029(a)domain.com). Right now calls to 1020-1029 goes well to 1020, it works fine. But I would like to do the following: If 1020 isn't registered with Kamailio (let's say if registration for 1020 is down in Kamailio, so AOR not found for 1020), it is possible to route calls to 1030? So route calls to 1030 only when registration for 1020 isn't active in Kamailio. I have tried manipulating with faillure_route, but without any luck. I hope it is clear what I would like to do :) Any help would be much appreciated. Kind regards, Dmitri

14 years, 8 months

Re: [Kamailio-Users] kamailio syslog logging

by Henning Westerholt

On Mittwoch, 19. August 2009, Jason Penton wrote: > Hey Henning, > > no, none of my log messages from the cfg file come into the log file. > However I do get the following: > > Aug 19 17:35:38 ug2s02-zone2 kamailio[12273]: [ID 797031 local0.debug] > DBG:core:fm_malloc_init: F_OPTIMIZE=16384, /ROUNDTO=2048 > Aug 19 17:35:38 ug2s02-zone2 kamailio[12273]: [ID 596959 local0.debug] > DBG:core:fm_malloc_init: F_HASH_SIZE=2067, fm_block size=16560 > Aug 19 17:35:38 ug2s02-zone2 kamailio[12273]: [ID 362601 local0.debug] > DBG:core:fm_malloc_init: params (fbe00000, 33554432), start=fbe00000 > Aug 19 17:35:38 ug2s02-zone2 kamailio[12273]: [ID 551434 local0.debug] > DBG:core:shm_mem_init_mallocs: success > Aug 19 17:35:38 ug2s02-zone2 kamailio[12273]: [ID 123545 local0.info] > INFO:core:init_tcp: using /dev/poll as the TCP io watch method (auto > detected) > > weird that I get some messages but not the others. I have alot of LM_INFO > messages in my code that I dont see too????? Hi Jason, so it seems that you indeed get only DEBUG messages in the log file, so try the suggestion Alex gave to you - local0.* This should catch all. Cheers, Henning

14 years, 8 months

[Kamailio-Users] kamailio syslog logging

by Jason Penton

Hi All, I am having some problems logging Kamailio in debug mode using syslog. All is fine if I log to stderr. However, when I log to syslog I get a few dbug messages and then it stops -- I dont get any of my routing messages or anything???? i am suing solaris? Any suggestions Cheers Jason

14 years, 8 months

[Serusers] new_t: out of mem

by Roger Tan

hi. I tested my ser server which version is 0.9.7+cvs20080424 used sipps sending 1000 invite per sec. after about 10 sec, there was an out of mem error. Aug 18 09:40:12 ubuntu /sbin/ser[20805]: ERROR: new_t: out of mem: Aug 18 09:40:12 ubuntu /sbin/ser[20805]: ERROR: t_newtran: new_t failed Aug 18 09:40:12 ubuntu /sbin/ser[20805]: ERROR: sl_reply_error used: I'm terribly sorry, server error occurred (1/SL) Aug 18 09:40:12 ubuntu /sbin/ser[20805]: ERROR: sip_msg_cloner: cannot allocate memory and my memlog is: Aug 18 10:11:02 ubuntu /sbin/ser[20787]: ----------------------------- Aug 18 10:11:02 ubuntu /sbin/ser[20787]: Memory status (shm): Aug 18 10:11:02 ubuntu /sbin/ser[20787]: qm_status (0xb5acf000): Aug 18 10:11:02 ubuntu /sbin/ser[20787]: heap size= 33554432 Aug 18 10:11:02 ubuntu /sbin/ser[20787]: used= 1914592, used+overhead=2224736, free=31329696 Aug 18 10:11:02 ubuntu /sbin/ser[20787]: max used (+overhead)= 33534720 Aug 18 10:11:02 ubuntu /sbin/ser[20787]: dumping all alloc'ed. fragments: Aug 18 10:11:02 ubuntu /sbin/ser[20787]: 0. N address=0xb5ad41a8 frag=0xb5ad41a0 size=16 used=1 Aug 18 10:11:02 ubuntu /sbin/ser[20787]: 1. N address=0xb5ad41c8 frag=0xb5ad41c0 size=16 used=1 Aug 18 10:11:02 ubuntu /sbin/ser[20787]: 2. N address=0xb5ad41e8 frag=0xb5ad41e0 size=16 used=1 Aug 18 10:11:02 ubuntu /sbin/ser[20787]: 3. N address=0xb5ad4208 frag=0xb5ad4200 size=16 used=1 Aug 18 10:11:02 ubuntu /sbin/ser[20787]: 4. N address=0xb5ad4228 frag=0xb5ad4220 size=4096 used=1 Aug 18 10:11:02 ubuntu /sbin/ser[20787]: 5. N address=0xb5ad5238 frag=0xb5ad5230 size=4096 used=1 Aug 18 10:11:02 ubuntu /sbin/ser[20787]: 6. N address=0xb5ad6248 frag=0xb5ad6240 size=2800 used=1 Aug 18 10:11:02 ubuntu /sbin/ser[20787]: 7. N address=0xb5ad6d48 frag=0xb5ad6d40 size=1680 used=1 Aug 18 10:11:02 ubuntu /sbin/ser[20787]: 8. N address=0xb5ad73e8 frag=0xb5ad73e0 size=16 used=1 Aug 18 10:11:02 ubuntu /sbin/ser[20787]: 9. N address=0xb5ad7408 frag=0xb5ad7400 size=1572864 used=1 Aug 18 10:11:02 ubuntu /sbin/ser[20787]: 10. N address=0xb5c57418 frag=0xb5c57410 size=16 used=1 Aug 18 10:11:02 ubuntu /sbin/ser[20787]: 11. N address=0xb5c57438 frag=0xb5c57430 size=320 used=1 Aug 18 10:11:02 ubuntu /sbin/ser[20787]: 12. N address=0xb5c57588 frag=0xb5c57580 size=48 used=1 Aug 18 10:11:02 ubuntu /sbin/ser[20787]: 13. N address=0xb5c575c8 frag=0xb5c575c0 size=80 used=1 Aug 18 10:11:02 ubuntu /sbin/ser[20787]: 14. N address=0xb5c57628 frag=0xb5c57620 size=80 used=1 Aug 18 10:11:02 ubuntu /sbin/ser[20787]: 15. N address=0xb5c57688 frag=0xb5c57680 size=80 used=1 Aug 18 10:11:02 ubuntu /sbin/ser[20787]: 16. N address=0xb5c576e8 frag=0xb5c576e0 size=16 used=1 Aug 18 10:11:02 ubuntu /sbin/ser[20787]: 17. N address=0xb5c57708 frag=0xb5c57700 size=16 used=1 Aug 18 10:11:02 ubuntu /sbin/ser[20787]: 18. N address=0xb5c57728 frag=0xb5c57720 size=16 used=1 Aug 18 10:11:02 ubuntu /sbin/ser[20787]: 19. N address=0xb5c57748 frag=0xb5c57740 size=16 used=1 Aug 18 10:11:02 ubuntu /sbin/ser[20787]: 20. N address=0xb5c57768 frag=0xb5c57760 size=32 used=1 Aug 18 10:11:02 ubuntu /sbin/ser[20787]: 21. N address=0xb5c57798 frag=0xb5c57790 size=131072 used=1 Aug 18 10:11:02 ubuntu /sbin/ser[20787]: 22. N address=0xb5c777a8 frag=0xb5c777a0 size=16 used=1 Aug 18 10:11:02 ubuntu /sbin/ser[20787]: 23. N address=0xb5c777c8 frag=0xb5c777c0 size=16 used=1 Aug 18 10:11:02 ubuntu /sbin/ser[20787]: 24. N address=0xb5c777e8 frag=0xb5c777e0 size=32 used=1 Aug 18 10:11:02 ubuntu /sbin/ser[20787]: 25. N address=0xb5c77818 frag=0xb5c77810 size=131072 used=1 Aug 18 10:11:02 ubuntu /sbin/ser[20787]: 60. N address=0xb5ca7948 frag=0xb5ca7940 size=48 used=1 Aug 18 10:11:02 ubuntu /sbin/ser[20787]: 61. N address=0xb5ca7988 frag=0xb5ca7980 size=16 used=1 Aug 18 10:11:02 ubuntu /sbin/ser[20787]: 62. N address=0xb5ca79a8 frag=0xb5ca79a0 size=80 used=1 Aug 18 10:11:02 ubuntu /sbin/ser[20787]: 63. N address=0xb5ca7a08 frag=0xb5ca7a00 size=48 used=1 Aug 18 10:11:02 ubuntu /sbin/ser[20787]: 64. N address=0xb5ca7a48 frag=0xb5ca7a40 size=32 used=1 Aug 18 10:11:02 ubuntu /sbin/ser[20787]: 65. N address=0xb5ca7a78 frag=0xb5ca7a70 size=16 used=1 Aug 18 10:11:02 ubuntu /sbin/ser[20787]: 66. N address=0xb5ca7a98 frag=0xb5ca7a90 size=65808 used=1 Aug 18 10:11:02 ubuntu /sbin/ser[20787]: dumping free list stats : Aug 18 10:11:02 ubuntu /sbin/ser[20787]: hash= 1. fragments no.: 1232, unused: 0 ^I^I bucket size: 16 - 16 (first 16) Aug 18 10:11:02 ubuntu /sbin/ser[20787]: hash= 38. fragments no.: 54, unused: 0 ^I^I bucket size: 608 - 608 (first 608) Aug 18 10:11:02 ubuntu /sbin/ser[20787]: hash= 43. fragments no.: 54, unused: 0 ^I^I bucket size: 688 - 688 (first 688) Aug 18 10:11:02 ubuntu /sbin/ser[20787]: hash= 44. fragments no.: 3991, unused: 0 ^I^I bucket size: 704 - 704 (first 704) Aug 18 10:11:02 ubuntu /sbin/ser[20787]: hash= 57. fragments no.: 114, unused: 0 ^I^I bucket size: 912 - 912 (first 912) Aug 18 10:11:02 ubuntu /sbin/ser[20787]: hash= 58. fragments no.: 4004, unused: 0 ^I^I bucket size: 928 - 928 (first 928) Aug 18 10:11:02 ubuntu /sbin/ser[20787]: hash= 68. fragments no.: 46, unused: 0 ^I^I bucket size: 1088 - 1088 (first 1088) Aug 18 10:11:02 ubuntu /sbin/ser[20787]: hash= 82. fragments no.: 109, unused: 0 ^I^I bucket size: 1312 - 1312 (first 1312) Aug 18 10:11:02 ubuntu /sbin/ser[20787]: hash= 115. fragments no.: 34, unused: 0 ^I^I bucket size: 1840 - 1840 (first 1840) Aug 18 10:11:02 ubuntu /sbin/ser[20787]: hash= 174. fragments no.: 3795, unused: 0 ^I^I bucket size: 2784 - 2784 (first 2784) Aug 18 10:11:02 ubuntu /sbin/ser[20787]: hash= 186. fragments no.: 790, unused: 0 ^I^I bucket size: 2976 - 2976 (first 2976) Aug 18 10:11:02 ubuntu /sbin/ser[20787]: hash= 187. fragments no.: 3820, unused: 0 ^I^I bucket size: 2992 - 2992 (first 2992) Aug 18 10:11:02 ubuntu /sbin/ser[20787]: hash= 262. fragments no.: 1, unused: 0 ^I^I bucket size: 4192 - 4192 (first 4192) Aug 18 10:11:02 ubuntu /sbin/ser[20787]: hash= 318. fragments no.: 1, unused: 0 ^I^I bucket size: 5088 - 5088 (first 5088) Aug 18 10:11:02 ubuntu /sbin/ser[20787]: ----------------------------- I think it's not a memory leak but the so many small memory fragments, and those fragments were not combinated. How I solve this problem? Thanks. -- MSN: miao__tan(a)hotmail.com Email: m.roger.t(a)gmail.com

14 years, 8 months

[Kamailio-Users] SIP Project for Beginner

by Sangmane

Hi all, I am new to SIP. I've downloaded Netbeans 6.7 and installed related plugins. When I tried to create an SIP Project, I couldn't find any SIP Categories in NB 6.7. Is there any basic guidance for SIP in Netbeans ? thank you very much. Sangmane -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/SIP-Project-for-Beginner-tp25010377p25010377.html Sent from the OpenSER Users Mailing List mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

14 years, 8 months

[Kamailio-Users] remove 100rel from Supported header

by Dmitri G.

Hello, Is there a way to remove 100rel from Supported header (only this, and keep the others) by Kamailio? I am using Kamailio 1.5.1 notls. Kind regards, Dmitri

14 years, 8 months

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users August 2009