sr-users May 2009

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

59 participants
114 discussions

by Kareem Hamdy

Is there an easier way to search through the mailing list other than going to http://lists.kamailio.org/pipermail/users/, and searching in my Firefox based on the subject name? Thanks

14 years, 11 months

[Kamailio-Users] RLS - is rls-services supported ?

by Pascal Maugeri

Hi I'm doing an integration of the RLS module for Kamailio 1.5 and a third-party XCAP server. I see that when my client sends a SIP SUBSCRIBE to a list that is defined into the document rls-services, I only see the traffic from Kamailio/RLS to the XCAP server to retrieve a resource-lists document, nothing about the rls-services document ?! Does RLS support rls-services ? If not what lists should contain the resource-lists document ? Cheers Pascal

14 years, 11 months

Re: [Kamailio-Users] XCAP_CLIENT failing to fetch/parse resource-lists document

by Daniel-Constantin Mierla

On 05/20/2009 01:04 PM, Pascal Maugeri wrote: > > that is caused by CURLE_WRITE_ERROR. > > Do you get a pkg memory or so error before those pasted above? > > > Well I only get the following line before: > > May 20 13:59:52 sandbox /usr/sbin/kamailio[11424]: > WARNING:core:fm_free: free(0) called > > [...] > > Any idea of what could go wrong ? Do you get the error for all xcap queries? Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://www.asipto.com/

14 years, 11 months

[Serusers] SER fail authentication using RADIUS

by Leon Li

Hi, I got the following error when using FreeRADIUS to authenticate SER registration. May 21 04:46:57 ser[3352]: REGISTER May 21 04:46:57 ser[3352]: REGISTER: challenging user May 21 04:46:57 ser[3354]: REGISTER May 21 04:46:57 ser[3354]: pre_auth(): Credentials received are not filled properly What does this mean? Also, I don't see any RADIUS traffic generated by SER. Please assist. Thanks Leon

14 years, 11 months

[Kamailio-Users] DTMF and Kamailio

by Simon Muyal

Hello, I have the following topology: IPphones <-> IPBX-1 <-> <-> IPBX-A <-> IPphones IPphones <-> IPBX-2 <-> KAMAILIO <-> IPBX-B <-> IPphones ... IPphones <-> IPBX-N <-> IPBX-X <-> IPphones version: kamailio 1.4.1-notls (i386/linux) I experienced problems regarding DTMF digits transport. DTMF is transported through RTP data and it is not recognized at the end. Does anyone could recommend me how to force the negotiation between Kamailio and IPBXs to be sure that IPphones and IPBXs will use another method to transport DTMF (like OOB SIP INFO or RFC2833) Many thanks, Simon -- -------------------------------------------------------------- Simon Muyal Suivi des Services aux Usagers (SSU) Services operations & support Réseau National de Télécommunications pour la Technologie, l'Enseignement et la Recherche Tel: +33 (0) 1 53 94 20 40 | GIP RENATER Fax: +33 (0) 1 53 94 20 41 | c/o ENSAM E-mail: muyal(a)renater.fr | 151 Boulevard de l'Hôpital http://www.renater.fr | 75013 PARIS --------------------------------------------------------------

14 years, 11 months

[Kamailio-Users] Load Based Load Balancing

by Kareem Hamdy

Hello: I've been going through your lists and your documentation, and I'm unable to find how you set up load based load balancing. To further illustrate: For example, let's say we have the following live calls:1,2,3,4,5,6,7 Round Robin Works Well ---------------------- +-----+ | SER | +-----+ | | +--------------+ |-------| FreeSWITCH 1 | [Calls 1,3,5,7] | +--------------+ | | +--------------+ |-------| FreeSWITCH 2 | [Calls 2,4,6] +--------------+ But let's say some of the calls end significantly quicker than the others, how can I send calls by their load (current calls, cpu, etc) For example, let's say we have the following live calls:1,2,3,4,5,6,7 - Let's say calls 4 and 5 lasted about 30 seconds, while the others lasted about 5 minutes. How would I be able to route calls to the box that's least used - in this example, "FreeSWITCH 2" at any given time had the least number of calls, so calls 4,5, and 6 were dispatched to it. Load Based Load Balancing ------------------------- +-----+ | SER | +-----+ | | +--------------+ |-------| FreeSWITCH 1 | [Calls 1,3,7] | +--------------+ | | +--------------+ |-------| FreeSWITCH 2 | [Calls 2,6] +--------------+ Thanks, Kareem

14 years, 11 months

[Kamailio-Users] Fwd: Debian distributions

by David

To: users(a)listskamailio.org Debian used to pack with OpenSER, does Kamailio ?

14 years, 11 months

Re: [Kamailio-Users] [Kamailio-Devel] Bugs on "kamctl" related to CR??? - Moving from Devel to User List

by Edson - Lists

Hi, Ovidiu I'm replicating this trade on User list, as You suggested, but take look on what I had done: Kamailio-151:/etc/kamailio # kamdbctl reinit kamailio MySQL password for root: INFO: Database kamailio deleted INFO: test server charset INFO: creating database kamailio ... INFO: Core Kamailio tables succesfully created. Install presence related tables? (y/n): y INFO: creating presence tables into kamailio ... INFO: Presence tables succesfully created. Install tables for imc cpl siptrace domainpolicy carrierroute userblacklist htable purple? (y/n): y INFO: creating extra tables into kamailio ... INFO: Extra tables succesfully created. Kamailio-151:/etc/kamailio # kamctl cr addrt 0 'XXXX' ERROR 1146 (42S02) at line 1: Table 'kamailio.route_tree' doesn't exist ERROR: cr - SQL Error Kamailio-151:/etc/kamailio # and the error/bug persist. Even with a clean DB definition... Where could the problem be? I understand that it's on the "kamctl" script, but I can be wrong... Edson. Ovidiu Sas escreveu: > This is a question for users, not for devel. > Please install the extra tables via kamdbctl. > Take a look also at /etc/kamailio/kamctlrc where the extra tables are defined. > > > Regards, > Ovidiu Sas > > On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 4:25 PM, Edson - Lists <4lists(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi, Guys... >> >> After some tests, I realize that CarrierRoute will feet better on we >> want to do, but when trying to include a carrier, I got: >> >> # kamctl cr addrt 1 XXXX >> ERROR 1146 (42S02) at line 1: Table 'kamailio.route_tree' doesn't exist >> ERROR: cr - SQL Error >> >> Then I try to include a route by hand with the commands: >> >> INSERT INTO carrier_name (carrier) VALUES ("default"); >> INSERT INTO domain_name (domain) VALUES ("default"); >> INSERT INTO carrierroute (carrier,domain,scan_prefix,flags,mask,prob,strip,rewrite_host,rewrite_prefix,rewrite_suffix,description) >> VALUES("1","1","1000","0","0","1","0","PEER-01","","","FRANCE"); >> >> And try to see the results, but I got: >> >> # kamctl cr show >> cr routing tree >> ERROR 1146 (42S02) at line 1: Table 'kamailio.route_tree' doesn't exist >> cr routes >> >> Now is this resulting from bug(s) in the "kamctl" script or from wrong >> definitions on the "kamctlrc" file? >> >> Edson. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Kamailio (OpenSER) - Devel mailing list >> Devel(a)lists.kamailio.org >> http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel >> http://lists.openser-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel >> >

14 years, 11 months

[Kamailio-Users] rtpproxy error

by Chandrakant Solanki

Hi I have found following errors... Anybody how it occurs... Is there any special way to install rtpproxy..?? May 20 05:01:33 asterisk4 /sbin/kamailio[24792]: ERROR:nathelper:send_rtpp_command: can't connect to RTP proxy May 20 05:01:33 asterisk4 /sbin/kamailio[24792]: ERROR:nathelper:send_rtpp_command: proxy <unix:/var/run/rtpproxy.sock> does not respond, disable it May 20 04:11:40 asterisk4 /sbin/kamailio[24525]: WARNING:nathelper:rtpp_test: can't get version of the RTP proxy May 20 04:11:40 asterisk4 /sbin/kamailio[24525]: WARNING:nathelper:rtpp_test: support for RTP proxy <unix:/var/run/rtpproxy.sock> has been disabled temporarily -- Regards, Chandrakant Solanki

14 years, 11 months

[Kamailio-Users] new feature: event_route

by Daniel-Constantin Mierla

Hello, I just introduced support for a new type of route in configuration file - event_route. The prototype for it is: event_route[groupid:eventid] { [actions] } The main purpose for it is to allow modules (and core) to be able to execute code written in configuration file when a specific event happens, without altering the config grammar. Also, in short term, the modules that fire events should be able to impose what type of actions can be used in the respective event_route - now functions allowed in request route can be used. First module that uses this feature is htable, executing an event route only once, when all modules were initialized. A typical use case is to initialize some items in a hash table. Example: modparam("htable", "htable", "a=>size=4;") event_route[htable:mod-init] { $sht(a=>calls-to::10.10.10.10) = 0; $sht(a=>max-calls-to::10.10.10.10) = 100; } route { if(is_method("INVITE") && !has_totag()) { switch($rd) { case "10.10.10.10": lock("calls-to::10.10.10.10"); $sht(a=>calls-to::10.10.10.10) = $sht(a=>calls-to::10.10.10.10) + 1; unlock("calls-to::10.10.10.10"); if($sht(a=>calls-to::10.10.10.10)>$sht(a=>max-calls-to::10.10.10.10)) { sl_send_reply("500", "To many calls to .10"); exit; } break; ... } } } This system will be used to get kamailio's error_route and local_route functionalities. Other cases I have in mind now are: - auto-expired dialog route introduced in kamailio 1.5.0 to become event_route[dialog:auto-expired] - call event route when a location record has expired on timer: event_route[usrloc:auto-expired] making available via PV details of expired contact - rtimer module routes to become event routes Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://www.asipto.com/

14 years, 11 months

← Newer
1
...
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Older →

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users May 2009