sr-users November 2009

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

80 participants
108 discussions

[Kamailio-Users] Compiling nonce.o (Auth Module) with TLS=1 fails

by Martin Koenig

Hello all, I am trying to compile kamailio 1.5.3 with TLS=1. The whole kamailio package compiles just fine, with the exception of nonce.o: gcc -fPIC -DPIC -g -O9 -funroll-loops -Wcast-align -Wall -minline-all-stringops -falign-loops -ftree-vectorize -mtune=prescott -Wold-style-definition -Wmissing-field-initializers -Wredundant-decls -DMOD_NAME='"auth"' -DNAME='"kamailio"' -DVERSION='"1.5.3-tls"' -DARCH='"i386"' -DOS='"linux"' -DCOMPILER='"gcc 4.0.2"' -D__CPU_i386 -D__OS_linux -D__SMP_yes -DCFG_DIR='"/usr/local/etc/kamailio/"' -DPKG_MALLOC -DSHM_MMAP -DUSE_IPV6 -DUSE_MCAST -DUSE_TCP -DDISABLE_NAGLE -DHAVE_RESOLV_RES -DSTATISTICS -DCHANGEABLE_DEBUG_LEVEL -DUSE_LOCAL_ROUTE -DF_MALLOC -DUSE_TLS -DFAST_LOCK -DADAPTIVE_WAIT -DADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024 -DHAVE_GETHOSTBYNAME2 -DHAVE_UNION_SEMUN -DHAVE_SCHED_YIELD -DHAVE_MSG_NOSIGNAL -DHAVE_MSGHDR_MSG_CONTROL -DHAVE_ALLOCA_H -DHAVE_TIMEGM -DHAVE_EPOLL -DHAVE_SIGIO_RT -DHAVE_SELECT -I/usr/local/ssl/include -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/include/openssl -c nonce.c -o nonce.o In file included from /usr/include/openssl/evp.h:84, from /usr/include/openssl/x509.h:67, from /usr/include/openssl/ssl.h:177, from ../sl/../../tls/tls_config.h:34, from ../sl/../../version.h:29, from ../sl/../../sr_module.h:54, from ../sl/sl_api.h:33, from auth_mod.h:39, from nonce.c:40: /usr/include/openssl/md5.h:105: error: conflicting types for âMD5_CTXâ ../../md5.h:42: error: previous declaration of âMD5_CTXâ was here nonce.c: In function âcalc_nonceâ: nonce.c:116: warning: passing argument 1 of âMD5Initâ from incompatible pointer type nonce.c:126: warning: passing argument 1 of âMD5Updateâ from incompatible pointer type nonce.c:128: warning: passing argument 1 of âMD5Updateâ from incompatible pointer type nonce.c:129: warning: passing argument 2 of âU_MD5Finalâ from incompatible pointer type make: *** [nonce.o] Error 1 Do you guys have any hints on what is going wrong? Best regards, Martin Koenig

14 years, 4 months

[Kamailio-Users] Can kamailio bypass rtp media to backend sip server?

by Lei Tang

Hi everyone, I'm new to kamailio. I plan to setup a sip server cluster, Does someone can give me some suggestions if I can use kamailio as front server, which handle sip message and bypass rtp media message to backendserver, this mean the kamailio handle only sip message, the rtp packets are sent directed to backend server. The sip sequences is 1.softswitch send invite to kamailio 2.kamailio send invite to backend server. 3.backend server return 200 ok to kamailio 4.kamailio return 200 ok to softswitch, the ip and port in sip is from the backend server's msg, this make the softswitch send rtp direct to backend server. 5.rtp packets are transfered between softswitch and backend server. .... 6.backend server send bye to kamailio 7.kamailio send bye to softswitch. -- Lei.Tang lei.tlfly(a)gmail.com

14 years, 4 months

[Kamailio-Users] Adding Columns to Database

by JR Richardson

Hi All, Using openser 1.1.0-notls (i386/linux) from debian etch package. Working with mysql database integration, working fine, using permissions module with 'trusted' table and alias_db module with the 'dbalias' table. I created the database and tables with openser_mysql cmd and things seemed to work out of the box. I ran into trouble when I dropped the database and manually created just the 'trusted' and 'dbalias' tables and added a few more columns in the tables [accountcode,notes,id(auto increment)]. When I restarted openser, no go, was getting table version and structure errors. So my question: is the table structure strict as per the openser_mysql script and are all 19 tables required for a properly running instance? I have not tried yet, but would it break if I added the new columns to the openser_mysql script created tables? Thanks. JR -- JR Richardson Engineering for the Masses

14 years, 4 months

[Kamailio-Users] compile error for perl module on Fedora 11

by Zen Kato

I have installed the following packages on Fedora 11: perl-5.10.0-82.fc11.i586 perl-devel-5.10.0-82.fc11.i586 perl-libs-5.10.0-82.fc11.i586 perl-LDAP-0.34-5.fc11.noarch perl-IPC-Shareable-0.60-9.fc11.noarch But, when I compile perl modules: # make include_modules="jabber db_mysql perl perlvdb" all ....(snip)....... openserxs.c:1968: error: ‘PL_scopestack_ix’ undeclared (first use in this function) openserxs.c:1969: error: ‘XSRETURN_YES’ undeclared (first use in this function) make[1]: ディレクトリ `/usr/local/src/kamailio/1.5.3/kamailio-1.5.3-notls/modules/perl' から出ます make: *** [modules] エラー 2 What modules should I install on Fedora 11? Regards, Zen

14 years, 4 months

Problems with PRESENCE/DIALOG functionality in sip-router

by klaus.feichtinger＠gmx.net

Hi all, I've tested the current release candidate for Kamailio these days and found that the presence/dialog state functionality is not given in the current version. The first (and worst) difference to the latest stable release is that the handling of "setflag(X)" for tracing the dialogs resulted in a crash of kamailio with following error message: ********************** EXCERPT ****************** Nov 24 13:35:47 lennysrv /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[13814]: : tm [t_hooks.c:190]: BUG:tm:register_tmcb: callback type TMCB_REQUEST_IN can't be register along with types Nov 24 13:35:47 lennysrv /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[13814]: ERROR: dialog [dlg_handlers.c:615]: failed cache in T the shortcut to dlg Nov 24 13:35:53 lennysrv /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[13815]: NOTICE: acc [acc.c:275]: ACC: call missed: timestamp=1259134133;method=INVITE;from_tag=4051501197-3958320-1259134127622;to_tag=3762694574-3958280-1259134127622;call_id=140363298-3958320-1259134127622(a)10.16.48.60;code=603;reason=Decline;src_user=5003;src_domain=10.16.48.205;dst_ouser=5002;dst_user=5002;dst_domain=10.16.48.60 Nov 24 13:35:56 lennysrv /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[13815]: INFO: pua_usrloc [ul_publish.c:203]: should not send ul publish Nov 24 13:35:56 lennysrv /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[13815]: INFO: <script>: --- pua-set-publish() was executed --- Nov 24 13:35:58 lennysrv kernel: [176699.348059] kamailio[13821]: segfault at c0c0c0c0 ip b7de43b3 sp bfb03eb8 error 5 in libc-2.7.so[b7d6e000+155000] Nov 24 13:35:58 lennysrv /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[13837]: : <core> [pass_fd.c:283]: ERROR: receive_fd: EOF on 12 Nov 24 13:35:58 lennysrv /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[13812]: ALERT: <core> [main.c:721]: child process 13821 exited by a signal 11 Nov 24 13:35:58 lennysrv /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[13812]: ALERT: <core> [main.c:724]: core was generated Nov 24 13:35:58 lennysrv /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[13812]: INFO: <core> [main.c:736]: INFO: terminating due to SIGCHLD Nov 24 13:35:58 lennysrv /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[13814]: INFO: <core> [main.c:787]: INFO: signal 15 received *************************************************** However, the module documentation of the source code (READMEs) does not include major news. The configuration is "the same" (regarding handle_publish, handle_subscribe, pua_set_publish) as I've used in the kamailio-1.5.3 version. But - no NOTIFY messages with XML bodies are sent to the subscribers / watchers. Instead of using the setflag(X) method I´ve tried using the method "dlg_setflag(X)" for prohibiting crashes - that was accepted by kamailio. Were these modules tested (in combination with the dialog module) in the new version 3.0 RC1? - presence - presence_xml - presence_dialoginfo - pua - pua_dialoginfo - pua_usrloc It does not work in the SER variant of sip-router, too. Yesterday I've downloaded the current version with GIT, compiled the code, adapted the configuration. But the result is the same as with kamailio-3 RC1 (crash and no XML). For being sure that I have not made any mistake in the configuration, I've tested the functionality in the version 1.5.3 of Kamailio today. It works fine - the subscribers receive NOTIFY messages with XML body after every PRESENCE and DIALOG state change. Can anybody give me a hint? Thanks in advance! regards, Klaus P.S. the tested versions: PROBLEMS: ======== version: kamailio 3.0.0-rc1 (i386/linux) 78f069 flags: STATS: Off, USE_IPV6, USE_TCP, USE_TLS, TLS_HOOKS, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MEM, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, DBG_QM_MALLOC, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE, USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLACKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_LISTEN 16, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535 poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select. @(#) $Id$ main.c compiled on 13:34:37 Nov 20 2009 with gcc 4.3.2 version: ser 2.99.99-pre3 (i386/linux) flags: STATS: Off, USE_IPV6, USE_TCP, USE_TLS, TLS_HOOKS, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MEM, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, DBG_QM_MALLOC, USE_FUTEX, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT, USE_DNS_CACHE, USE_DNS_FAILOVER, USE_NAPTR, USE_DST_BLACKLIST, HAVE_RESOLV_RES ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_LISTEN 16, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535 poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select. @(#) $Id$ main.c compiled on 11:12:49 Nov 23 2009 with gcc 4.3.2 SUCCESS: ======= version: kamailio 1.5.3-notls (i386/linux) flags: STATISTICS, USE_IPV6, USE_TCP, DISABLE_NAGLE, USE_MCAST, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC, F_MALLOC, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144, MAX_LISTEN 16, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535, PKG_SIZE 4194304 poll method support: poll, epoll_lt, epoll_et, sigio_rt, select. svnrevision: unknown @(#) $Id: main.c 5608 2009-02-13 16:48:17Z henningw $ main.c compiled on 13:31:21 Nov 24 2009 with gcc 4.3.2 -- Jetzt kostenlos herunterladen: Internet Explorer 8 und Mozilla Firefox 3.5 - sicherer, schneller und einfacher! http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/chbrowser

14 years, 4 months

Looking for documentation with SER 2.0

by inge

Hello here, I'm testing SER 2.0 on a dev plateform. I see that there's a lot of modifications beside SER 0.9.9. But I have a lot of pain to find documentation like SER Getting Started for 0.9.x to be able to understand the new routing method (ie. ser.cfg) and the databases scheme and all other parameters at the top of the config file. I install SERWeb too, the version 2.1, and it looks like very different too (don't know how to create an admin user, separate greeting/sip password, etc.). What's your recommandation about SERWeb version with SER2.0 ? Regards, Adrien .L

14 years, 4 months

[Kamailio-Users] Inbound NAT detection and fix_nated_register() very poorly documented

by Alex Balashov

Greetings, I was faced with the following problem in Kamailio 1.5.2: I was using nathelper + rtpproxy + registrar and needed to relay media for calls going inbound to a NAT'd registrant through rtpproxy - only if the registrant is NAT'd. Here is the scenario: Media gateway Kamailio (on public IP) ----> registrar -----> NAT'd registrant (w/nathelper) I was handling registrations from NAT'd endpoints like this: if(nat_uac_test("1")) { force_rport(); fix_nated_contact(); } I was aware of fix_nated_register() but was not clear on its relationship to the 'received_param' parameter stored in 'location' and set as a modparam to both the 'registrar' and 'nathelper' modules, so I was not using it. Very quickly I ran into an obvious problem: if the contact stored in the 'contact' column in 'location' is already fixed up with the received IP:port, there is no way to know that the endpoint to which the call is going is behind NAT -- when lookup() is called, the RURI is set to the public IP:port. There are no flags of any kind that one can set during save() that persist while the contact binding is present for that AOR and can be resurrected on lookup(). Anyway, I eventually figured out how to fix this problem by empirical means, with no clear help from the nathelper documentation. It turns out that if I set the 'received_param' as a modparam to 'nathelper' and 'registrar' and handle registrations from NAT'd endpoints with fix_nated_register() instead, it will magically work. I made the following discoveries to arrive at this conclusion, both of which are not documented. This is why it will work: 1) When the original (RFC1918) 'contact' is stored in the 'location' table (if using DB, which I am), the 'received' parameter is stored alongside it and contains the public IP:port. When lookup() is called, the RURI domain is set to private address, e.g. if(!lookup("location")) { # Error handling here exit; } xlog("L_INFO", "[R-2:$ci] -> Registration resolved to RURI: $ru\n"): $ru here will contain something like this: sip:s@10.1.0.2:5060, the original and unmodified contact supplied by the UAC. But somehow, magically, when t_relay() is called the request will be relayed to a different RURI - one with the 'received' IP:port substituted in the domain portion. So, the request goes end up going to the correct place. This is, of course, because of the way the 'received' parameter is supposed to work when appended to a Contact URI. But the point is that it is not documented; nowhere in the documentation for lookup() or t_relay() does it say that this will transpire, and I have no way of knowing it except by observation. 2) For some reason, nat_uac_test("1") returns a positive result after the lookup() and confirms that the destination is NAT'd. This allows me to set a flag and then mangle the SDP in the reply to use rtpproxy for NAT traversal of media as well, e.g. route[2] { ... if(!lookup("location")) { # Error handling here exit; } if(nat_uac_test("1")) setflag(9); ... t_on_reply("1"); if(!t_relay()) sl_reply_error(); ... } ... onreply_route[1] { if(t_check_status("(180|183|200)")) { if(nat_uac_test("5")) fix_nated_contact(); if(search("Content-Type: application/sdp")) { if(isflagset(9)) { set_rtp_proxy_set("1"); force_rtp_proxy(); } } } } But if you examine carefully the documentation for nat_uac_test(), it says the following for bit flag 1: * 1- Contact header field is searched for occurrence of RFC1918 addresses. To me this means that nat_uac_test() should not work after the lookup() above. The only Contact header value that is present in the inbound INVITE handler is the Contact URI of the media gateway, which is a public IP address! Yet for some reason it works, as if by magic; apparently it is somehow implicit that a hidden "received" attribute of the RURI is also part of this check. This is also not documented, and is completely counterintuitive. Is there any possibility of clearing up documentation as to this point? Perhaps I have done something wrong here unknowingly; I have no idea. I know that my solution works but I cannot justify why in terms of the documentation. Is it very much to ask that the documentation be explicit about hidden but critically important mysteries like this? Thanks! -- Alex -- Alex Balashov - Principal Evariste Systems Web : http://www.evaristesys.com/ Tel : (+1) (678) 954-0670 Direct : (+1) (678) 954-0671

14 years, 4 months

[Kamailio-Users] tmx.so: undefined symbol: _tm_table

by Andrey Utkin

Hello all. I try to use config from http://sip-router.org/wiki/migration/kamailio-3.0-config I use a kamailio compiled from git://git.sip-router.org/sip-router, branch kamailio_3.0, commit 9b482424cb8aff4050426033908e7e243f03ae83 Kamailio fails to launch with such error: root@oba:~# kamailio 0(24231) DEBUG: <core> [cfg.y:1551]: loading modules under /usr/lib/kamailio loading modules under /usr/lib/kamailio 0(24231) DEBUG: <core> [cfg.y:1544]: loading module modules/db_mysql.so 0(24231) DEBUG: <core> [sr_module.c:349]: load_module: module file not found <modules/db_mysql.so> 0(24231) DEBUG: <core> [sr_module.c:382]: load_module: trying to load </usr/lib/kamailio/modules/db_mysql.so> 0(24231) DEBUG: <core> [cfg.y:1544]: loading module modules_k/mi_fifo.so 0(24231) DEBUG: <core> [sr_module.c:349]: load_module: module file not found <modules_k/mi_fifo.so> 0(24231) DEBUG: <core> [sr_module.c:382]: load_module: trying to load </usr/lib/kamailio/modules_k/mi_fifo.so> 0(24231) DEBUG: <core> [cfg.y:1544]: loading module modules_k/kex.so 0(24231) DEBUG: <core> [sr_module.c:349]: load_module: module file not found <modules_k/kex.so> 0(24231) DEBUG: <core> [sr_module.c:382]: load_module: trying to load </usr/lib/kamailio/modules_k/kex.so> 0(24231) DEBUG: <core> [cfg.y:1544]: loading module modules_k/sl.so 0(24231) DEBUG: <core> [sr_module.c:349]: load_module: module file not found <modules_k/sl.so> 0(24231) DEBUG: <core> [sr_module.c:382]: load_module: trying to load </usr/lib/kamailio/modules_k/sl.so> 0(24231) DEBUG: <core> [cfg.y:1544]: loading module modules/tm.so 0(24231) DEBUG: <core> [sr_module.c:349]: load_module: module file not found <modules/tm.so> 0(24231) DEBUG: <core> [sr_module.c:382]: load_module: trying to load </usr/lib/kamailio/modules/tm.so> 0(24231) DEBUG: <core> [cfg.y:1544]: loading module modules_k/tmx.so 0(24231) DEBUG: <core> [sr_module.c:349]: load_module: module file not found <modules_k/tmx.so> 0(24231) DEBUG: <core> [sr_module.c:382]: load_module: trying to load </usr/lib/kamailio/modules_k/tmx.so> 0(24231) ERROR: <core> [sr_module.c:390]: ERROR: load_module: could not open module </usr/lib/kamailio/modules_k/tmx.so>: /usr/lib/kamailio/modules_k/tmx.so: undefined symbol: _tm_table 0(24231) : <core> [cfg.y:3210]: parse error in config file //etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg, line 117, column 12-29: failed to load module .... Has anybody succeed to load this module from last git sources?

14 years, 4 months

[Kamailio-Users] Presence

by Andrey Utkin

Hello, all. My objective is to make a kamailio installation where phones call to each other by number and are able to monitor others using SUBSCRIBE. I use Kamailio 3.0.0 rc1 pulled from git. My config file is http://pastebin.ca/1675069 I had bad results with establishing calls, possibly because i frequently restarted kamailio, only once i had INVITE passing from one phone to other. RTPProxy mustn't work on a box with grey IP, i know. But my greatest convern now is notifications. I just want to say that i never got NOTIFYs with xml containing bodies, what was usual in Asterisk. First of all NOTIFYs that go immediately after SUBSCRIBEs also have no xml body. Please direct me what is wrong in my configuration regarding presence setup. Tell me what system info to provide.

14 years, 4 months

[Kamailio-Users] we don't follow the RFCs!

by BERGANZ François

Hello all, As I could see in the source, we dont follow the RFCs. If I send an INVITE, kamailio response a Giving a try It isnt in the RFCs! It is normaly Trying. I could change it in -src/modules/tm/t_funcs.c -line: static str relay_reason_100 = str_init("Giving a try"); I hope you understand what I mean François BERGANZ Ingénieur R&D VoIP Acropolis Telecom P Pensez à l'Environnement, n'imprimez ce mail que si nécessaire.

14 years, 4 months

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users November 2009