Hi,
I have a question concerning registration.
If my UA performs a successful registration and during contact update it
sends
first REGISTER request with the Authorization header already present with
new nonce and response params,
will ser respond with 401 or OK. Will functions such us
radius_www_authenticate("$fd.digest_realm"); and
www_authenticate("$td.digest_realm", "credentials");
return success??
BTW how is the avp fd.digest_realm set?
Now when we try to do this ser responds with 401.
Is this correct?
Kind regards
Tomasz
Hello all,
I've a single question :
Does anyone made a SER v2.0 with a working Radius authentication and
accounting ?
I actually am interest to get some tips, I've many problems about AVPs, DB
relations, proxy authentication, ... and i don't really find any full
updated docs.
The config : SER 2.0, mySQL, Radiator.
Many thanks in advance !
Samuel MULLER
Dear all,
few days ago I found in a script posted in this mail-list a function
that allow to forward a sip message to another host in this way
function_name("ip.host.target.message","port");
Is there anyone that know the name of this function ?
Thank a lot,
Flt
Hi,
We have a requirement to build a prepaid system using OpenSER. I took a look at CDRTool which looks quite promising. But I am not sure how to build the Call control module and provide IVR type information to the end users.
If any one has done similar type of job, please respond.
thanks,
Rana
_________________________________________________________________
Keep your kids safer online with Windows Live Family Safety.
http://www.windowslive.com/family_safety/overview.html?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_fa…
Hello to all the members.
As user of the project and responsible of an implementation of it in a
production large scale environment. it is a little bit worrying reade terms
as "conflicting interests" related to project in the news published today.
According to this new change within the project, which I feel go further
than renaming it, what could the board members to comment about the RoadMap,
philosophy and near future of Kamailio (Formerly known as OpenSER)?
One of the biggest warranties that users have felt ourselves is exactly the
support and knowledge from the founders and leaders, and it would be very
worrying not been able to count with it anymore.
Thanks in advance for your attention, and I apologize in advance if this
question is out off topic.
Best regards.
Sergio Gutiérrez.
The readme file that comes with the software explains this.
Adrian
I've been looking at the mediaproxy (v1) code, and am a little confused
why it has the concept of "local" and "remote" domains and why it treats
them differently.
Can anyone shed light on this?
Max.
Hi Iñaki,
As far as we are concerned we do not maintain MediaProxy 1.x anymore.
So is likely this will not get fixed. All new developments and bug
fixing are done against 2.0
Adrian
>>>>>>>
Hi, I use MediaProxy 1.9.1 with OpenSer.
idleTimeout=50 seconds
I've received an INVITE and a 183 with early media during 52 seconds
and after
that the 200 was received. But the RTP session in MediaProxy was
terminated
after 50 seconds (idleTimeout). Why?
Is a still no answered call considered "idle"?
This is the syslog:
On Thursday 24 July 2008, CSB wrote:
> I have an error which is driving me crazy:
>
> Jul 24 16:58:34 beta /sbin/openser[5446]: ERROR:core:udp_send:
> sendto(sock,0x81aaed8,825,0,0xb61216f0,16): Operation not permitted(1)
>
> If I turn the firewall off, start a call and then turn the firewall on the
> call continues successfully. However the next call is not successful. We
> use Mediaproxy and I suspect that is trying to do some communication that
> is being blocked by the firewall but that is only a suspicion. The dialogue
> for this call is shown at the bottom.
Hi CSB,
how about debugging your firewall rules step by step and test each rule? This
way you should be able to isolate the problematic one.
Cheers,
Henning