sr-users August 2007

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

169 participants
286 discussions

[Serusers] ser-0.9.6: modules/postgres bugreport & patch
by Alexandre Snarskii 13 Oct '08

13 Oct '08

Hi! I'm running ser-0.9.6, on FreeBSD 6.1-stable, database backend is postgresql version 8.1.3. Today I got errors in logfiles, saying: messages.2.bz2:May 29 14:35:03 <XXX> /usr/local/sbin/ser[51448]: ERROR:avpops:dbrow2avp: dbrow contains NULL fields The similar problem reported in: http://lists.iptel.org/pipermail/serusers/2005-May/019681.html with much more detailed description of error, database contents and config samples. Patch is trivial, and looks more like a fix to copy'n'paste error: in mysql/val.c function str2val states: if (!_s) { memset(_v, 0, sizeof(db_val_t)); VAL_TYPE(_v) = _t; VAL_NULL(_v) = 1; return 0; } VAL_NULL(_v) = 0; and the last line mentions that 'well, that's value is not NULL'. In postgresql/db_val.c, line 182, function str2valp, the same statement is the: if (!_s) { DLOG("str2valp", "got a null value"); VAL_TYPE(_v) = _t; VAL_NULL(_v) = 1; return 0; } without explicit notification that this is not-NULL value. More than, nowhere else in this function VAL_NULL(_v) not set to 0. So, if a value _v.val contained anyting but 0 at the function start, resulting value will be threated as NULL despite the fact, that _s is NOT NULL. Patch is obvious, just add VAL_NULL(_v)=0; after cited block (line 188) and everyting will be ok. At least for me it's ok for some hours :)

2 3

[Serusers] SER Nokia CANCEL Problem
by Abdul Qadir 07 May '08

07 May '08

Hi , I tried to call from one nokia sip (E61 and other models )phone to another nokia sip phone. The call works fine. The problem comes only when I call from Phone A to Phone B and then immediately cancel the call(from Phone A). The Phone A will hangup the call as it sent CANCEL but the SER will ignore this CANCEL and still send INVITE to Phone B resulting in a ghost call situation. I tried to capture a log of message and found that Phone A "CANCEL" message is received on SER even before any provisional response from Phone B. Therefor SER doesnot relay this CANCEL request to Phone B. I even checked RFC which clearly says that UAC should not send CANCEL untill it receives any provisional response. I talked to Nokia expert and they said the 100 Trying message from your server is considered as provisional response, therefor behaviour of client is absolutely correct. Is there any way I can stop 100 Trying message and still run statefull SER, so that I can verify what nokia said. Any ideas suggestions are welcome. Thanking you all in advance. Best Regards, Abdul Qadir --------------------------------- Don't be flakey. Get Yahoo! Mail for Mobile and always stay connected to friends.

10 36

[Serusers] SER 2_0_0 ERROR: slow timer too slow
by tzieleniewski 10 Jan '08

10 Jan '08

Hi, I encountered the following error: Jun 15 08:57:21 rd ser[12680]: ERROR: slow timer too slow: overflow (7997 - 6974 = 1023) Jun 15 08:57:24 rd last message repeated 46 times Could you please point me what could be the reason? Thanks in advance. Tomasz

2 1

[Users] Re: 200 ok not cought in ONREPLY
by Dan-Cristian Bogos 19 Oct '07

19 Oct '07

Guys, thanks to your support (both Bogdan and Daniel), I found out that there was nothing wrong with the server and t_onreply handling, but the INVITE was taking another routing three than the one I was checking and therefore never hit the t_on_reply section I wanted. This being said, I consider this issue resolved. Cheers, Dan

6 6

[Users] AVP management
by Ovidiu Sas 05 Oct '07

05 Oct '07

Hi all, There are modules that are using default values for AVPs. What will happen if another module is reusing the same AVP? Or if the AVP is redefined inside the script? Is this completely orthogonal? Should I worry about this while using AVPs? Regards, Ovidiu Sas

4 6

[OpenSER-Users] Pb with installation of openseradmin
by zze-WU Yin RD-MAPS-LAN 29 Sep '07

29 Sep '07

Hello every body, I tryed to install openseradmin. But I have got many problems. I knew that it must install ruby and rubygem. So I have downloaded : ruby-1.8.5-p2 and rubygem-0.9.4 no problem for their installation. But when I tried to do: gem install rails --include-dependencies, i have got a error message: ERROR: While executing gem...(Gem: RemoteFetcher::FetchError) getaddrinfo: Temporary failure in name resolution (SocketError) So anybody know what's the matter? Thanks very much!! Yin

3 2

[Serusers] Communication Problem btw SER and User Agent
by Adeyeye O. Michael 17 Sep '07

17 Sep '07

Hi, Here is an indication that my SER is running: micadeyeye@asmicom:/usr/src/Research-Progress$ ser Listening on udp: 127.0.0.1 [127.0.0.1]:5060 udp: 196.24.224.76 [196.24.224.76]:5060 tcp: 127.0.0.1 [127.0.0.1]:5060 tcp: 196.24.224.76 [196.24.224.76]:5060 Aliases: tcp: asmicom.local:5060 tcp: localhost:5060 udp: asmicom.local:5060 udp: localhost:5060 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- But each time I tried connecting to it from a USER AGENT (ZAP, UCTIMSCLIENT), it doesn't interact with the client. I checked my dump(via wireshack) but only REGISTER messages are sent with no reply from SER. Can anyone help me? I have both SER and client sitting on same PC (using same port-5060).

2 1

[Serusers] TLS problem ser 2_0_0 - ERROR: tls_init.c:366: Unable to set the memory allocation functions
by Tomasz Zieleniewski 17 Sep '07

17 Sep '07

Hi, I did everything according to the tls module description when I start SER I get the following error: What do I have to do to make things work? Thanks in advance. Tomasz Aug 24 18:42:39 sen ser[26840]: tls: _init_tls_h: compiled with openssl version "OpenSSL 0.9.8c 05 Sep 2006" (0x0090803f), kerberos support: off, compression: on Aug 24 18:42:39 sen ser[26840]: tls: init_tls_h: installed openssl library version "OpenSSL 0.9.8c 05 Sep 2006" (0x0090803f), kerberos support: off, zlib compression: on compiler: gcc -fPIC -DOPENSSL_PIC -DZLIB -DOPENSSL_THREADS -D_REENTRANT -DDSO_DLFCN -DHAVE_DLFCN_H -m64 -DL_ENDIAN -DTERMIO -O3 -Wa,--noexecstack -g -Wall -DMD32_REG_T=int -DMD5_ASM Aug 24 18:42:39 sen ser[26840]: ERROR: tls_init.c:366: Unable to set the memory allocation functions Aug 24 18:42:39 sen ser[26840]: could not initialize tls, exiting...

2 1

[OpenSER-Users] NatPing stop working
by Marcello Lupo 05 Sep '07

05 Sep '07

Hi to all, i have openser 1.2.1 active from some months.. Suddenly on yesterday the natping stop to work. I have 140 contacts in user location almost all of them natted. There is some limit to user in location table at which the ping stops or a particular server load? There is a way to have something in the logs about it?? I didn't found anything in the logs. This is my config: modparam("nathelper", "natping_interval", 30) modparam("nathelper", "ping_nated_only", 1) With a restart of openser all come back to work but i'm afraid if it will happen again? Thanks for help, Bye, Marcello

2 14

Re: [OpenSER-Users] Broken "BYE" returned from Asterisk on TLS implementation ?
by David Loh 05 Sep '07

05 Sep '07

Hi, Arrggghh .. that's one of my attempts to eliminate the broken "BYE" problem... that's ngrep was captured when I set "modparam("rr", "enable_double_rr", "0");", I've paste another ngrep to http://pastebin.ca/674450, this time the double RR header is enabled. And I've posted my .cfg to http://pastebin.ca/Nx0Ss4Fd (key to decrypt the post is "openser"). Even though double RR header is enabled, but for BYE it's still doesn't process properly :( For the .cfg file line #130 onward, I did tried t_relay, forward and force_send_socket, but none of this will do the trick (force_send_socket was complaining TLS error due to missing certificate (?) ) Would appreciate if anyone could enlighten me why is this happen ? Thanks, David Loh Klaus Darilion wrote: > But the INVITE you posted at http://pastebin.ca/673392 also has only > one Record-Route header. > > regards > klaus > > David Loh schrieb: >> Hi, >> >> Yea, OpenSER proxy was add 2 record-route header for the INVITE/ACK >> ...but when asterisk disconnected the call and send BYE back to OpenSER, >> the TLS RR header wasn't present, the only 2 RR header was >> "SIP/2.0/UDP <OpenSER_IP>" and "SIP/2.0/UDP <Client_WAN_IP>" .... >> I'm puzzled ... is there any command to 'fix' this? >> >> >> Regards, >> David Loh >> >> Klaus Darilion wrote: >>> The openser proxy should add 2 record-route header (TLS and UDP = >>> double record route). This is why it does not work. >>> >>> regards >>> klaus >>> >>> David Loh schrieb: >>>> Hi All, >>>> >>>> Greeting. >>>> >>>> I've been struggle with OpenSER TLS implementation for more than a >>>> week, since I've ported from UDP to TLS, everything work fine >>>> except the "BYE" request from Asterisk (loose route), my >>>> implementation was something like below: >>>> >>>> [Client] --> [Router] --> [Internet] --> [SIP] --> [Asterisk] >>>> >>>> My OpenSER.cfg already configured to listen on two port which is :- >>>> "tls:eth0:5061" and "udp:eth0:5060", client make p2p or PSTN (or >>>> even voicemail) having no problem, >>>> but when the callee disconnect the call, caller will never get hang >>>> up :( >>>> >>>> I've attached my ethereal trace/ngrep to pastebin, >>>> http://pastebin.ca/673392 >>>> >>>> Wondering if anyone can help me with the broken "BYE" that returned >>>> from Asterisk ? >>>> Line #131, supposedly this line should have contain 2 Via header, >>>> one was "SIP/2.0/UDP" and another "SIP/2.0/TLS", >>>> but somehow the TLS via header was gone !! (compare to previous ACK >>>> (Line #117) /INVITE (Line #51). >>>> Due to the missing TLS via header, OpenSER log file was complaining >>>> "protocol/port mis-match". >>>> >>>> The last BYE request (Line #256) is actually firing from Client, >>>> which contain the "TLS" via. >>>> >>>> >>>> I've even tried "force_send_socket" to port 5061 (instead of 5060) >>>> from loose route, but it complaining TLS certificate error, >>>> since Asterisk doesn't support TLS natively, I've no clue why is >>>> the ACK/INVITE/CANCEL work but not BYE. >>>> if (loose_route) { >>>> .... >>>> if(is_method("BYE")) { force_send_socket(IP:5061); } >>>> } >>>> >>>> >>>> Has any one gone through of this kinda OpenSER over TLS + Asterisk >>>> setup, >>>> I'm really appreciate if you can share your experience with me, or >>>> pin point what's the mistakes I made here. >>>> >>>> Thanks in advance. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> David Loh >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Users mailing list >>>> Users(a)openser.org >>>> http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users >>> >>> >> >> > >

2 5

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users August 2007