sr-users July 2007

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

163 participants
262 discussions

Re: [Serusers] loose_route behaviour, detecting single Route with myself
by Jiri Kuthan 17 Jul '07

17 Jul '07

Not sure it is worth patching the code which is IMO working. If I understand it right, you are having tel URI in Route? However this might have happened, that seems little sensible to me. The point is that tel URI is used to decouple a PSTN destination from a possible path via IP netowrk, whereas Route is intended to lay down such a path. Putting these two things together appears of limited use value to me. Anyhow, would you mind sending a dump of the SIP request in question -- I'm a bit confused what situation we are actually solving. -jiri At 19:46 10/07/2007, JF wrote: >no comments? > >On 6/28/07, JF <jfkavaka(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> I would propose to simply apply this patch to modules/rr/loose.c: >> >> @@ -1069,8 +1069,8 @@ >> return -1; >> } >> >> - if (is_myself(&_m->parsed_uri.host, _m->parsed_uri.port_no) >> - || _m->parsed_uri.type==TEL_URI_T || >> _m->parsed_uri.type==TELS_URI_T) { >> + if (_m->parsed_uri.type==TEL_URI_T || _m->parsed_uri.type==TELS_URI_T || >> + is_myself(&_m->parsed_uri.host, >> _m->parsed_uri.port_no)) { >> DBG("loose_route: RURI is myself (or tel URI)\n"); >> if ((ret = is_myself(&puri.host, puri.port_no)) == 1 && >> !(enable_double_rr && is_2rr(&puri.params))) { >> >> >> JF >> >> On 6/22/07, Greger Viken Teigre <greger(a)teigre.com> wrote: >> > This seems like a corner case where the tel uri with no domain results in maybe a bit unfortunate return code from loose_route. >> > Comments anyone? >> > g-) >> > >> > >> > ------- Original message ------- >> > From: JF <jfkavaka(a)gmail.com> >> > Cc: serusers(a)iptel.org, openimscore-cscf(a)lists.berlios.de >> > Sent: 22.6.'07, 11:11 >> > >> > > Thanks Greger, >> > > >> > > The problem is related to the fact that the Req-URI is a tel-URI. >> > > I had to work around it in the script by not letting loose_route get >> > > called when the URI is a tel URI. >> > > >> > > In loose.c, loose_route() says (by looking at the log): >> > > DBG("loose_route: RURI is NOT myself\n"); >> > > because Req-URI doesn't have a host part. >> > > >> > > Then after_loose(_m, &puri, 1, 0) is called because the single >> > > existing Route header has our SIP URI. >> > > And then: >> > > DBG("after_loose: Topmost route URI: '%.*s' is me\n", uri->len, ZSW(uri->s)); >> > > and >> > > DBG("after_loose: No next URI found\n"); >> > > An since _ruri_myself == 0, return RR_DRIVEN; >> > > >> > > IMO the fact that the Req-URI is a tel URI shouldn't make loose_route >> > > return true in this case... >> > > >> > > JF >> > > >> > > >> > > On 6/21/07, Greger V. Teigre <greger(a)teigre.com> wrote: >> > > > If there's a single Route header pointing to itself, then this is a good >> > > > indication that a UA added a Route to your proxy as an outbound proxy. >> > > > If SER correctly identities the uri as itself, it should AFAIK return false. >> > > > Could you please turn on debugging and then look for loose_route and >> > > > after_loose debug messages in the logs and post them? >> > > > g-) >> > > > >> > > > JF wrote: >> > > > > Hi all, >> > > > > >> > > > > When SER receives an INVITE with a single Route header pointing to >> > > > > itself, it's supposed to delete it and process the message as if no >> > > > > Route header was there in the first place. This is what RFC3261 >> > > > > mandates, right? >> > > > > >> > > > > But currently the loose_route function returns true to the script in >> > > > > this case, just like when more Route headers are present. >> > > > > >> > > > > So I have some routing logic for when no Route headers are present, >> > > > > and if I want to apply the same routing logic to the case when there >> > > > > is a single Route header pointing to myself (naturally, as it's the >> > > > > same as if no Route header was present), I currently have to replicate >> > > > > the same routing logic inside the if (loose_route())... >> > > > > >> > > > > Or is there an other way? Do I have to develop my own module function >> > > > > or use some regexp search from the script to detect if there are more >> > > > > Routes besides myself before I call loose_route? >> > > > > >> > > > > The best would be to change loose_route to return false and just >> > > > > remove the Route header pointing to myself when there are no more >> > > > > Route headers in the message... what do you think? >> > > > > >> > > > > JF >> > > > > _______________________________________________ >> > > > > Serusers mailing list >> > > > > Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org >> > > > > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > _______________________________________________ >> > > Serusers mailing list >> > > Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org >> > > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers >> > >> > >> >_______________________________________________ >Serusers mailing list >Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org >http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers -- Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/

2 1

[OpenSER-Users] short remainder: IRC OpenSER meeting today 13:00 GMT
by Henning Westerholt 17 Jul '07

17 Jul '07

Hello all, just a short remainder about the IRC OpenSER development meeting today at 13:00 GMT in the #openser channel on freenode.net. Information about this meeting: http://openser.org/dokuwiki/doku.php/development:irc-meeting-agenda-17-07-2… Please join us! -- Henning Westerholt - Unix system development 1&1 Internet AG, Brauerstraße 48, 76135 Karlsruhe, Germany

1 0

[OpenSER-Users] Request for comment : logging in OpenSER
by Bogdan-Andrei Iancu 17 Jul '07

17 Jul '07

Hi everybody, There is some undergoing work on the logging system in OpenSER and I feel that some issues should be publicly addressed before moving forward. What we have now in openser: 1) two logging systems - syslog and standard error 2) message format - totally chaos. What we want to fix: 1) a better way to make easy distinction between the logs from different levels (ERR, WARN, DBG, etc) 2) a standard message format that, independend of the logging support (syslog, stderr), will provide all the needed information (level and date at least). Here is my suggestion: 1) logging and message format: There will be different macros for each log level and the message should include the module_name and function for a better tracking of the messages: LOG_NOTICE("module_name:function: message") LOG_DBG("module_name:function: message") LOG_ERR("module_name:function: message") ...... 2) logging backends: a) syslog syslog automatically logs the date, process and from syslog.conf, you can redirect the log in different files based on the log level, so here there is nothing to be changed. b) stderr we need to extend dprint() (logger function for stderr) to prefix to the log message the date and log level (as text). This will provide similar possibilities as for syslog. (a patch is already available for this on the tracker) If there are some comments on the proposed solution or there is a better approach, please let me know as I want to move on with this topic. Regards, Bogdan

5 6

[Serusers] need help!
by Mukesh Prajapati 17 Jul '07

17 Jul '07

Hi I read the Ser Getting started pdf. can anybody tell me what would be the structure of My Sql database used in "Hello world scenario with my sql authentication" thnks mukesh --------------------------------- Boardwalk for $500? In 2007? Ha! Play Monopoly Here and Now (it's updated for today's economy) at Yahoo! Games.

2 1

[OpenSER-Users] OpenSER + FreeRadius issue
by openser＠zap2link.com 16 Jul '07

16 Jul '07

Hi All, Well, after a bit of a struggle with the example document on the website, which is highly outdated, I've managed to have OpenSER send Radius requests to my FreeRadius Server. Now, I'm getting rejected by the radius server, with the following error messages: Sun Jul 15 05:02:02 2007 : Auth: rlm_digest: Configuration item "User-Password" or Digest-HA1 is required for authentication. Sun Jul 15 05:02:02 2007 : Auth: Login incorrect: [101(a)192.168.2.80/<no User-Password attribute>] (from client openser port 5060) Sun Jul 15 05:02:12 2007 : Auth: Login incorrect: [101(a)192.168.2.80/<no User-Password attribute>] (from client openser port 0) Sun Jul 15 05:02:22 2007 : Auth: rlm_digest: Configuration item "User-Password" or Digest-HA1 is required for authentication. Sun Jul 15 05:02:22 2007 : Auth: Login incorrect: [101(a)192.168.2.80/<no User-Password attribute>] (from client openser port 5060) Sun Jul 15 05:02:31 2007 : Auth: Login incorrect: [103(a)192.168.2.80/<no User-Password attribute>] (from client openser port 0) Assistance would be appreciated. Following below is my OpenSER and FreeRadius configurations: http://pastebin.com/f41e8204a Regards, openser(a)zap2link.com

1 0

[Serusers] [serusers] sip trunk between a cisco callmanager
by julia heller 16 Jul '07

16 Jul '07

Hi, does anybody know, how i can make a sip trunk between a cisco callmanager 5.0 and a sip express router (0.9.6)? kind regards julia -- Der GMX SmartSurfer hilft bis zu 70% Ihrer Onlinekosten zu sparen! Ideal für Modem und ISDN: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/smartsurfer

2 2

[OpenSER-Users] OpenSER + OPTIONS module
by Marc LEURENT 16 Jul '07

16 Jul '07

Hello Does anyone succeed in having openwengo SIP pings working with openser I've added the options module and the fonction below but openser isn't answering. loadmodule "options.so" ...... if (uri==myself) { if ((method==OPTIONS) || ( uri=~"sip:ping[@]+.*")) { options_reply(); }; }; Thanks Marc Session Initiation Protocol Status-Line: SIP/2.0 404 Not Found Status-Code: 404 [Resent Packet: False] Message Header Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.95.109:5060;rport=5060;branch=z9hG4bK1170921213 From: sip.wifirst.fr <sip:test@192.168.95.248>;tag=62904156 To: <sip:ping@192.168.95.248>;tag=e9b225e6b81dc6124ee6640a10a59bf1.f647 Call-ID: 668195568(a)192.168.95.109 CSeq: 20 OPTIONS Sequence Number: 20 Method: OPTIONS Server: OpenSER (1.2.1-notls (i386/linux)) Content-Length: 0

3 2

[OpenSER-Users] <db_url> not found in module <pua_usrloc>
by Iñaki Baz Castillo 16 Jul '07

16 Jul '07

Hi, I'm trying to enabe the module pua_usrloc in OpenSer 1.2.1 but I can't since I get an error: set_mod_param_regex: parameter <db_url> not found in module <pua_usrloc> Of course, I have loaded the modules: loadmodule "pua.so" loadmodule "pua_usrloc.so" I see no "db_url" parameter for pua_usrloc module in the doc: http://www.openser.org/docs/modules/1.2.x/pua_usrloc.html but I do see it in the pua module, so I set: modparam("pua", "db_url", "mysql://openser:openserrw@localhost/openser") but I get the same error: <db_url> not found in module <pua_usrloc> So I've tryed to add: modparam("pua_usrloc", "db_url", "mysql://openser:openserrw@localhost/openser") with exactly same problem. Any idea of what I'm doing wrong? anybody using pua_usrloc module succesfully? Regards. -- Iñaki Baz Castillo ibc(a)in.ilimit.es

2 2

[Serusers] How to use avps in subst
by Roger Lewau 16 Jul '07

16 Jul '07

Hello I am running version 0.9.6 and have a situation where I want to change the remote-party-id of a forwarded call so that when the call reach the destination the forwarding users number is avertised. It is necessary to change it becaus if I dont change this header the first number of the trunk is shown, which almost everytime is another customer than the forwarder. I have experimented with avpops and subst but can not get the avp part to translate into the value in the resulting string. This is the code I am using for unconditional forwarding if (avp_db_load("$ruri/username", "s:cfwd")) { setflag(22); revert_uri(); avp_write("$ruri/username","s:calledno"); subst('/^Remote-Party-ID:(.*)>(.*)$/Remote-Party-ID: "$avp(calledno)" <sip:$avp(calledno)>\2/i'); avp_delete("s:calledno"); avp_pushto("$ruri/username", "s:cfwd"); prefix("01"); #use interface 1 on Vegastream Gate route(5); route(4); break; }; The resulting header looks like this: Remote-Party-ID: "$avp(rpid)" <sip:$avp(rpid)>;party=calling;screen=no;privacy=off. Is it not possible to use avpops in subst? Any other idea on how to change the header in 0.9.6. Kind regards Roger Lewau

1 0

[Serusers] SER <> Asterisk in trunk context
by inge 16 Jul '07

16 Jul '07

Hi all, I find somes informations about using SER and Asterisk to do a SIP trunk. Indeed, the context is the follow : - One Asterisk with PABX functionnality wich provide some services - This Asterisk wants to make calls to PSTN without direct interco - Asterisk should be interconnect to a SER server In this context, what's the solutions to provide a trunk between Asterisk and SER for this context, and have accounting on SER ? Thanks for your indications and support. Sincerely, Adrien .L

1 1

← Newer
1
...
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
...
27
Older →

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users July 2007