On Tuesday 27 March 2007 17:41, you wrote:
> Hi Henning.
>
> I tested the compilation and it does not detect the architecture.
>
> I think that maybe is because of uname -p outputs sparc, and uname -m
> outputs sun4v.
> [..]
Hi Sergio,
thank you for the testing. I add another check to the patch according your
suggestions, could please try it another time?
Cheers,
Henning
On 12/20/06, Klaus Darilion <klaus.mailinglists(a)pernau.at > wrote:
>
> Hi Mark!
>
> Postgres should work well - I use it since ser 0.8. Just make sure that
> the hard disk does not get full, because this breaks the index inside
> postgres and postgres is getting real slow (re-create the index if it
> happens).
>
> Last time I tested openser_postgres.sh it worked fine. If you find a bug
> please let us know.
>
> Please check to use the latest versions from CVS (for 1.1 use CVS
> rel_1_1_0)
The latest version from cvs doesn't work out of the box with openser build
from the release tarball, because the release tarball doesn't included
/usr/sbin/openser_gen_ha1 (although I could get past this by replacing it
with the md5sum equivelant).
However, the release tarball doesn't work because of this bug:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=743020&aid=1518732&group_…
So, 1. is the cvs version of rel_1_1_0 considered safe for production use?
2. if so and there are important fixes such as this in CVS, would
openser.org consider
releasing a point release containing such changes?
Thanks,
Mark Price
Hi Bogdan,
I increased PKG_MEM_POOL_SIZE to 2MB and of course it took much longer
to run out of memory. Usually it happens once every day, this time it
ran for 3 days before running out of memory. If you don't mind, I will
send the memory dump by personal email since I don't have easy access to
an ftp server.
Can you explain what you mean by 1.1.x? The version I am using is
openser-1.1.1-notls_src.tar.gz, downloaded from your site under 1.1.1/.
I am guessing that to get the fix I should use whatever is under
latest-1.1.x/ Is this right?
thank you
George
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu [mailto:bogdan@voice-system.ro]
> Sent: Friday, March 30, 2007 3:33 PM
> To: Papadopoulos Georgios
> Cc: users(a)openser.org
> Subject: Re: [Users] out of memory
>
> Papadopoulos Georgios wrote:
> >
> > Hi Bogdan,
> >
> > I found the following thread in the list
> > http://www.openser.org/pipermail/users/2006-June/005339.html
> > I suspect that I have the same issue. If I assume that our DNS is
> > strange, then my 1.1.1-notls version will be affected,
> right? Is there
> > a patch to fix this? Eventually I want to go to 1.2 but I
> have to do a
> > lot of testing before I can put it in production. So for
> the moment I
> > need a fix for 1.1.1.
> >
> that fix is present in 1.1.x also.
> > Also back in December I sent this to the list
> > http://www.openser.org/pipermail/users/2006-December/008205.html
> > >From the start, we had the issue of openser stopping to process any
> > incoming requests. On December I thought it was DNS related. I am
> > still in the dark about this. Lately I added logging and I
> discovered
> > the "out of memory" error. I am guessing that the error was
> there from
> > the start, I just did not know about it. Do all of these make any
> > sense to you? And is there a way to test our DNS to
> determine whether it is buggy?
> >
> I;m afraid not :)
> > In the meantime I will follow the instructions on the wiki
> to get the
> > memory dump.
> >
> yes - that will be the most relevant info.
>
> regards,
> bogdan
> > thank you
> >
> > George
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu [mailto:bogdan@voice-system.ro]
> >> Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 11:54 AM
> >> To: Papadopoulos Georgios
> >> Cc: users(a)openser.org
> >> Subject: Re: [Users] out of memory
> >>
> >> Hi Papadopoulos,
> >>
> >> the error you get complains about the lack of private memory (per
> >> process) - the statistics show info about the shared memory. See:
> >> http://www.openser.org/dokuwiki/doku.php/troubleshooting:memory
> >>
> >> but look for pkg instead of shm.....
> >>
> >> regards,
> >> bogdan
> >>
> >> Papadopoulos Georgios wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hello,
> >>>
> >>> Lately our OpenSER 1.1.1 is running out of memory and I get the
> >>> following message
> >>> 4(25190) get_hdr_field: out of memory The result is that
> it stops
> >>> processing any incoming request. This is a production
> system and of
> >>> course it causes a great deal of frustration.
> >>>
> >>> The last time this happened I got the following statistics before
> >>> restarting
> >>>
> >>>> ./openserctl fifo get_statistics
> >>>>
> >>> Total statistics = 37
> >>> Total modules = 5
> >>> Module name = core; statistics=8
> >>> core:rcv_requests = 3259334
> >>> core:rcv_replies = 8816
> >>> core:fwd_requests = 736
> >>> core:fwd_replies = 137
> >>> core:drop_requests = 743
> >>> core:drop_replies = 0
> >>> core:err_requests = 0
> >>> core:err_replies = 43
> >>> Module name = shmem; statistics=6
> >>> shmem:total_size = 268435456
> >>> shmem:used_size = 1675864
> >>> shmem:real_used_size = 1835104
> >>> shmem:max_used_size = 4399048
> >>> shmem:free_size = 266600352
> >>> shmem:fragments = 17710
> >>> Module name = sl; statistics=9
> >>> sl:1xx_replies = 0
> >>> sl:2xx_replies = 1690410
> >>> sl:3xx_replies = 43
> >>> sl:4xx_replies = 334827
> >>> sl:5xx_replies = 1185629
> >>> sl:6xx_replies = 0
> >>> sl:sent_replies = 3210909
> >>> sl:sent_err_replies = 0
> >>> sl:received_ACKs = 743
> >>> Module name = tm; statistics=11
> >>> tm:received_replies = 8636
> >>> tm:relayed_replies = 7096
> >>> tm:local_replies = 1718
> >>> tm:UAS_transactions = 7003
> >>> tm:UAC_transactions = 94
> >>> tm:2xx_transactions = 1528
> >>> tm:3xx_transactions = 3
> >>> tm:4xx_transactions = 5129
> >>> tm:5xx_transactions = 468
> >>> tm:6xx_transactions = 0
> >>> tm:inuse_transactions = 0
> >>> Module name = usrloc; statistics=3
> >>> usrloc:location-users = 0
> >>> usrloc:location-contacts = 0
> >>> usrloc:location-expires = 7282
> >>>
> >>> I am not sure how to read these numbers but I see a big
> "free_size"
> >>> and still OpenSER is out of memory. Any suggestions?
> >>>
> >>> thank you
> >>>
> >>> George
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Disclaimer
> >>>
> >>> The information in this e-mail and any attachments is
> >>>
> >> confidential. It
> >>
> >>> is intended solely for the attention and use of the named
> >>> addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, or person
> >>> responsible for delivering this information to the intended
> >>>
> >> recipient,
> >>
> >>> please notify the sender immediately. Unless you are the intended
> >>> recipient or his/her representative you are not
> authorized to, and
> >>> must not, read, copy, distribute, use or retain this
> message or any
> >>> part of it. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be
> >>>
> >> secure or
> >>
> >>> error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost,
> >>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> -
> >>
> >>> --
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Users mailing list
> >>> Users(a)openser.org
> >>> http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
Hi,
@msg.event or @msg.supported, or even @msg.["header-name"] is not
implemented yet? im using latest ser from CVS..
btw, is it ok to use latest SER 2.0 for presence instead of the
suggested snapshot v.4? I've noticed xcap-root and auth_xcap_root
params were removed from rls and pa modules, so i've set xcap_root
param in xcap module instead.
Hi,
I'm just wondering if it's possible to turn off logging of some presence
status messages?
I have debug=0
But still I see a lot of:
pr 2 08:06:11 proxy-02 /usr/sbin/openser[28662]: PRESENCE:
generate_ETag: etag= a.1175493921.28662.1 / 20
Apr 2 08:06:11 proxy-02 /usr/sbin/openser[28662]: PRESENCE:
get_subs_dialog:The query for subscribtion for [user]= xxx,[domain]= yyy
for [event]= presence returned no result
Apr 2 08:06:11 proxy-02 /usr/sbin/openser[28662]:
PRESENCE:query_db_notify: Could not get subs_dialog from database
/32] 08:06:11 proxy-02 /usr/sbin/openser[28662]: PRESENCE:
handle_publish: sip-etag: [SIP-ETag: a.1175493921.28662.1
Is the only way do only have L_ERR filtered in syslog daemon?
br hw
Hi all,
I am trying to use avp_db_store() stores my table "contact" with caller uri
ex:
table name: contact
-----------------------------
| username | domain |
-----------------------------
| | |
-----------------------------
| | |
-----------------------------
If (method=="INVITE"){
avp_write("$ruri/username", "s:name");
avp_db_store("$ruri", "s:name/contact");
};
if the incoming call then save username and domain of caller in contact
caller: bob(a)iptel.org
=>
-----------------------------
| username | domain |
-----------------------------
| bob | iptel.org |
-----------------------------
| | |
-----------------------------
but not success, system reply
ERROR:avpops:db_store: insert faild
Please help me in the problem
Thanks a lot in advance
chungyu
Hello!
I'm using SER + rtpproxy, but altough the NAT problem seems to be solved, I
get no audio ... analysing the traffic with ethereal, I realized that the
traffic going from the proxy to the UAs never arrives (ICMP unreacheable
destination)... I assume it is because the users have their ports blocked,
is that correct? I changed the rtpproxy port range (PORT_MIN and PORT_MAX )
to lower ports, but still I got the same messages...
Does anybody knows anything that can be done by me in terms of
configurations of the rtpproxy or ser.cfg or whatever, given the fact that I
don't have power to open the ports??.....
Thanks,
Amanda
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Amanda Remes Mattiuz
amattiuz(a)gmail.com