I installed SER and everything was working ok but I had to recompile
SER with RADIUS support. I installed radiusclient 0.3.2 from sources.
I editted the Makefile deleting "auth_radius", "group_radius" and
"uri_radius" from the excluded modules. I Tryed to recompile SER but
when I did "make install" appeared the following warnings:
ERROR: module modules/acc/acc.so not compiled
ERROR: module modules/auth_radius/auth_radius.so not compiled
ERROR: module modules/group_radius/group_radius.so not compiled
ERROR: module modules/uri_radius/uri_radius.so not compiled
I tryed to locate the modules but only found the acc.so in "/usr/
local/lib/ser/modules/acc.so". The others I don't have... Can anyone
help me please...
Thanks in advance and sorry about my bad English
Marco Passarinho
Hi,
Is this possible to replace CID (SER UA ID) to Alias. I have UA
5001112222(a)mydoamin.com and Alias 2123334444.
When UA call other UA2 the ID shows 5001112222, but i want to show
2123334444.
Thanks,
Ali...
Hi,
I still couldn't find a nice way of remote sip & rtp packet capturing and analyzing.
Is there any tool to do this ?
Do I need to use rcap protocol ? How can I use it on SER ?
Thanks,
ilker
________________________________
From: serusers-bounces(a)lists.iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org] On Behalf Of İlker Aktuna (Koç.net)
Sent: Friday, July 07, 2006 2:39 PM
To: serusers(a)iptel.org
Subject: [Serusers] Remote sip and rtp analyzing
Hi,
I am looking for a solution to analyze sip and rtp packets on a Ser + Mediaproxy server.
SIPAlanyzerV6 seems to receive remote capturing, but there is no information on its manuals for remote capture.
What is the best solution to analyze sip and rtp packets remotely from a SER server ?
I also would like to have some statistical output, if possible.
Thanks for your comments.
ilker
C "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
Hi,
I still couldn't find a nice way of remote sip & rtp packet capturing and analyzing.
Is there any tool to do this ?
Do I need to use rcap protocol ? How can I use it on SER ?
Thanks,
ilker
________________________________
From: serusers-bounces(a)lists.iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org] On Behalf Of İlker Aktuna (Koç.net)
Sent: Friday, July 07, 2006 2:39 PM
To: serusers(a)iptel.org
Subject: [Serusers] Remote sip and rtp analyzing
Hi,
I am looking for a solution to analyze sip and rtp packets on a Ser + Mediaproxy server.
SIPAlanyzerV6 seems to receive remote capturing, but there is no information on its manuals for remote capture.
What is the best solution to analyze sip and rtp packets remotely from a SER server ?
I also would like to have some statistical output, if possible.
Thanks for your comments.
ilker
<http://387555.sigclick.mailinfo.com/sigclick/03010505/04074D00/030C044C/031…>
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Bu e-posta mesaji kisiye ozel olup, gizli bilgiler iceriyor olabilir. Eger bu e-posta mesaji size yanlislikla ulasmissa, icerigini hic bir sekilde kullanmayiniz ve ekli dosyalari acmayiniz. Bu durumda lutfen e-posta mesajini kullaniciya hemen geri gonderiniz ve tum kopyalarini mesaj kutunuzdan siliniz. Bu e-posta mesaji, hic bir sekilde, herhangi bir amac icin cogaltilamaz, yayinlanamaz ve para karsiligi satilamaz. Bu e-posta mesaji viruslere karsi anti-virus sistemleri tarafindan taranmistir. Ancak yollayici, bu e-posta mesajinin - virus koruma sistemleri ile kontrol ediliyor olsa bile - virus icermedigini garanti etmez ve meydana gelebilecek zararlardan dogacak hicbir sorumlulugu kabul etmez.
This message is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed , and may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this message or you receive this mail in error, you should refrain from making any use of the contents and from opening any attachment. In that case, please notify the sender immediately and return the message to the sender, then, delete and destroy all copies. This e-mail message, can not be copied, published or sold for any reason. This e-mail message has been swept by anti-virus systems for the presence of computer viruses. In doing so, however, sender cannot warrant that virus or other forms of data corruption may not be present and do not take any responsibility in any occurrence.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
We are generating accounting records for INVITE, BYE and CANCEL
methods. We use flatstore and rotate the files nightly via cron.daily.
We expected the number of each type of record to "add up". That is we
expected each INVITE to have either a BYE or CANCEL based on the Call-ID
field but we are actually getting duplicates and in some cases seem to
get BYEs without a corresponding INVITE.
I think some of these BYE may be for calls initiated by the proxy to
either our Asterisk voicemail server or to another UA because of blind
transfers initiated at the phone or call forward always initiated by the
proxy.
The trouble is we have 600+ subscribers and the logs are huge. I have
used cat, grep and sort to try and identify the mismatch but this is
tedious at best. Does anyone have any insight into why the mismatch
might exist and suggestions for record matching based on the Call-ID field.
We are using ser 0.9.7-pre3, Cisco 79x0 phones running 7.3 image and
Cisco 2821 gateways running 12.3(8)T11.
Thanks,Steve
Hi,
Is there a common method for rewriting the caller id for outboud calls?
apparently rpid is insufficient..
I need something like the "set(CALLERID=904xxxxxxx)" thing in asterisk.
Thanks
Mark price
Hi,
There is no special purpose to remove Via. But, I just
tried to remove the original "Via", and observed this
problem.
Thanks,
Vivek
-------------------------
>Hello,
>
I> do not think it is needed to remove the Via header
for replication >of REGISTER. Is there a special
purpose for it?
>
>Cheers,
>Daniel
--- samuel <samu60(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 09:40:46 +0200
> From: samuel <samu60(a)gmail.com>
> To: "Ohad.Levy(a)infineon.com"
> <Ohad.Levy(a)infineon.com>
> Subject: Re: [Users] Query on Registration
> CC: vigibi(a)yahoo.com, users(a)openser.org
>
> You can also try to do it outside the config, using
> the UNIX/FIFO
> interface and the t_uac "function".
>
> just my 2 cents..
> SAmuel.
>
> 2006/7/27, Ohad.Levy(a)infineon.com
> <Ohad.Levy(a)infineon.com>:
> > What about t_replicate?
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: users-bounces(a)openser.org
> [mailto:users-bounces@openser.org] On
> > > Behalf Of Vivek Bhat
> > > Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2006 1:22 AM
> > > To: users(a)openser.org
> > > Subject: [Users] Query on Registration
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I am trying to implement Third-Party
> registration in
> > > IMS environment using OPENSER as S-CSCF. Here is
> what
> > > I want to do:
> > >
> > > UAC
> > >
> >
>
........................................................................
> > ..
> > > ...........S-CSCF
> > > (Openser)
> > >
> > > REGISTER
> > >
> > > ----------------------------------->
> > >
> > > 200 OK
> > >
> > > <--------------------------------------
> > >
> > > This part is working fine.
> > >
> > > Now, S-CSCF sends separate REGISTER to
> Application
> > > Server (AS) and needs to get the response. But,
> this
> > > response should NOT be sent to UAC.
> > >
> > > S-CSCF
> > >
> >
>
........................................................................
> > ..
> > > .
> > > AS
> > >
> > > REGISTER
> > >
> > > ------------------------------------->
> > >
> > > Response
> > > ([1-6]xx
> > >
> > > <-----------------------------------------
> > >
> > > I tried to send this REGISTER by removing old
> headers
> > > from the first REGISTER received from UAC and
> > > creating my own (using remove_hf and append_hf).
> Also,
> > > I just removed the old "via" header, and Openser
> > > automatically added new Via header with openser
> ip
> > > address.
> > >
> > > However, when AS sends the response, S-CSCF
> forwards
> > > this response to UAC even though Via header does
> NOT
> > > contain the UAC IP address. Why is that? How
> to
> > > stop relaying the any response received from
> AS to
> > > UAC? Or else, is it possible to create a new
> REGISTER
> > > request from OpenSER?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Vivek
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> __________________________________________________
> > > Do You Yahoo!?
> > > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> protection around
> > > http://mail.yahoo.com
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Users mailing list
> > > Users(a)openser.org
> > >
> http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Users mailing list
> > Users(a)openser.org
> > http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
> >
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
friends:
I looking for this error, I add in module/jabber/jabber.c file in mod_init funtion 2 trace to view where is the error.
please look in the trace, I show the error.
please help me
for(i=0; i<nrw; i++)
{
LOG(L_ERR, "XJAB trace 1 to debug error \n");
db_con[i] = jabber_dbf.init(db_url);
LOG(L_ERR, "XJAB trace 2 to debug error \n");
if (!db_con[i])
{
LOG(L_ERR, "XJAB:mod_init: Error while connecting database\n");
return -1;
}
else
{
if (jabber_dbf.use_table(db_con[i], db_table) < 0) {
LOG(L_ERR, "XJAB:mod_init: Error in use_table\n");
return -1;
}
DBG("XJAB:mod_init: Database connection opened successfully\n");
}
}
and run the program with -f ser.jabber -E -dddddddddddddd options
0(9857) read 3400580695 from /dev/urandom
0(9857) seeding PRNG with 259723670
0(9857) test random number 1984477284
0(9857) WARNING: fix_socket_list: could not rev. resolve 192.168.0.4
0(9857) WARNING: fix_socket_list: could not rev. resolve 192.168.0.4
Listening on
udp: 127.0.0.1 [127.0.0.1]:5060
udp: 192.168.0.4 [192.168.0.4]:5060
tcp: 127.0.0.1 [127.0.0.1]:5060
tcp: 192.168.0.4 [192.168.0.4]:5060
Aliases:
tcp: localhost:5060
udp: localhost:5060
*: 192.168.0.4:*
WARNING: no fork mode and more than one listen address found(will use only the the first one)
0(9857) init_tcp: using sigio_rt as the io watch method (auto detected)
0(9857) Se inicializo init_tmcb_lists
0(9857) Presence Agent - initializing
0(9857) ... common libraries
0(9857) cds_initialize(): init the content
0(9857) qsa_initialize(): init the content
print - initializing
textops - initializing
0(9857) Maxfwd module- initializing
stateless - initializing
0(9857) XJAB:mod_init: initializing ...
0(9857)XJAB trace 1 to debug error
0(9857) XJAB trace 2 to debug error
0(9857) XJAB:mod_init: Database connection opened successfully
0(9857) XJAB trace 1 to debug error
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
friends:
I looking for this error, I add in module/jabber/jabber.c file in mod_init funtion 2 trace to view where is the error.
please look in the trace, I show the error.
please help me
for(i=0; i<nrw; i++)
{
LOG(L_ERR, "XJAB trace 1 to debug error \n");
db_con[i] = jabber_dbf.init(db_url);
LOG(L_ERR, "XJAB trace 2 to debug error \n");
if (!db_con[i])
{
LOG(L_ERR, "XJAB:mod_init: Error while connecting database\n");
return -1;
}
else
{
if (jabber_dbf.use_table(db_con[i], db_table) < 0) {
LOG(L_ERR, "XJAB:mod_init: Error in use_table\n");
return -1;
}
DBG("XJAB:mod_init: Database connection opened successfully\n");
}
}
and run the program with -f ser.jabber -E -dddddddddddddd options
0(9857) read 3400580695 from /dev/urandom
0(9857) seeding PRNG with 259723670
0(9857) test random number 1984477284
0(9857) WARNING: fix_socket_list: could not rev. resolve 192.168.0.4
0(9857) WARNING: fix_socket_list: could not rev. resolve 192.168.0.4
Listening on
udp: 127.0.0.1 [127.0.0.1]:5060
udp: 192.168.0.4 [192.168.0.4]:5060
tcp: 127.0.0.1 [127.0.0.1]:5060
tcp: 192.168.0.4 [192.168.0.4]:5060
Aliases:
tcp: localhost:5060
udp: localhost:5060
*: 192.168.0.4:*
WARNING: no fork mode and more than one listen address found(will use only the the first one)
0(9857) init_tcp: using sigio_rt as the io watch method (auto detected)
0(9857) Se inicializo init_tmcb_lists
0(9857) Presence Agent - initializing
0(9857) ... common libraries
0(9857) cds_initialize(): init the content
0(9857) qsa_initialize(): init the content
print - initializing
textops - initializing
0(9857) Maxfwd module- initializing
stateless - initializing
0(9857) XJAB:mod_init: initializing ...
0(9857)XJAB trace 1 to debug error
0(9857) XJAB trace 2 to debug error
0(9857) XJAB:mod_init: Database connection opened successfully
0(9857) XJAB trace 1 to debug error
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
