sr-users March 2006

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

223 participants
505 discussions

by Jean-Michel Hiver

Hi List, Is there a way to configure SER to properly reject T.38 FAX calls (with a "circuit fast-busy" or something)? I have tried to google for this but haven't found anything. Cheers, Jean-Michel. -- Jean-Michel Hiver - http://ykoz.net/ Découvrez la Réunion des Technologies IP & Telecom TEL: +262 (0)262 55 03 98 - RCS 434 273 330 SAINT PIERRE

18 years, 1 month

RE: [Serusers] Via: SIP/2.0/UDP X.X.X.X; branch=0

by Ronald Voermans

Carlos, Use ngrep -W byline -d any port 5060, to see only SIP packets. To also view RTP use: ngrep -W byline -d any port not 22. Port 22 (the irrelevant packets) are the ssh packets. Met vriendelijke groet, --------------------------------------------- R.L.L.M. Voermans Manager Network Connectivity Global-e Raadhuisstraat 32 5126 CJ Gilze (NL) T: +31-(0)161-888888 F: +31-(0)161-888899 E: r.voermans(a)global-e.nl W: http://www.global-e.nl --------------------------------------------- -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: serusers-bounces(a)iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org] Namens Carlos Loarca Verzonden: donderdag 30 maart 2006 10:59 Aan: Klaus Darilion CC: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Onderwerp: Re: [Serusers] Via: SIP/2.0/UDP X.X.X.X; branch=0 Hi Klaus, when I run the command "ngrep -d any" I get olny irrelevant packets like # T 83.140.44.243:22 -> 83.140.44.242:32965 [AP] ,...............AL. .xI.b.V...........#.$../.KN.;.......e....".P.5.6.8.... .s.{#.`..R.....U4.......}.A.+.l....92 exit 9313 received, 75 dropped Is that the command I should use??? Cheers, /Carlos --- Klaus Darilion <klaus.mailinglists(a)pernau.at> wrote: > To debug this, we would need a complete ngrep trace and ser.cfg > (remove sensitive information like passwords) > > regards > klaus > > Carlos Loarca wrote: > > Yes Klaus, it seems that it is looping. but the strange behaviour > > occurs when there is a > missdialled > > call and gets the error message from other > equipment > > (ie. voip gateway). Otherwise, the ser performance > is > > correct. > > > > Any clue?. I have checked my traces and the > repeated > > ACK coming from the voip-gateway has the right Via > and > > the ACK sent my ser are ok as well. Where can the problem be? > > > > Cheers, > > /Carlos > > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list serusers(a)lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers

18 years, 1 month

[Serusers] please help me resolve the question!

by 甘海华

serusers，hello！ I want to use ser to resolve the question about prepay accounting, when to user agent during talking, but the caller pay is out of service, how to cut(bye) the dialog? 　　　　　　　　致礼！ http://www.glink.com.cn 　　　　　　　　metal 　　　　　　　　ghh(a)glink.com.cn 　　　　　　　　　　2006-03-30

18 years, 1 month

RE: [Serusers] Ser as a presence server with other SIP proxy asregistrar and rtp proxy

by İlker Aktuna (Koç.net)

Hi again, Is it impossible ? I need ideas please... thanks, ilker ________________________________ From: serusers-bounces(a)iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org] On Behalf Of İlker Aktuna (Koç.net) Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 11:13 AM To: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Subject: [Serusers] Ser as a presence server with other SIP proxy asregistrar and rtp proxy Hi, I already have a SIP proxy which handles SIP registers and acts as RTP proxy. But that one does not handle presence messages as SUBSCRIBE and PUBLISH. Is it possible to use Ser together with my Sip proxy ? What I mean: - SIP clients will send all messages to SER. - SER will forward SIP messages like REGISTER, INVITE, NOTIFY to my SIP proxy with no modification to the message. - SER will also handle SIP messages related to presence and resource lists. Is this possible ? What kind of configuration is needed ? Thanks, ilker C "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> Hi again, Is it impossible ? I need ideas please... thanks, ilker ________________________________ From: serusers-bounces(a)iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org] On Behalf Of İlker Aktuna (Koç.net) Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 11:13 AM To: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Subject: [Serusers] Ser as a presence server with other SIP proxy asregistrar and rtp proxy Hi, I already have a SIP proxy which handles SIP registers and acts as RTP proxy. But that one does not handle presence messages as SUBSCRIBE and PUBLISH. Is it possible to use Ser together with my Sip proxy ? What I mean: - SIP clients will send all messages to SER. - SER will forward SIP messages like REGISTER, INVITE, NOTIFY to my SIP proxy with no modification to the message. - SER will also handle SIP messages related to presence and resource lists. Is this possible ? What kind of configuration is needed ? Thanks, ilker <http://387555.sigclick.mailinfo.com/sigclick/0A090400/04044F02/0E4D01191351…> _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Bu e-posta mesaji kisiye ozel olup, gizli bilgiler iceriyor olabilir. Eger bu e-posta mesaji size yanlislikla ulasmissa, icerigini hic bir sekilde kullanmayiniz ve ekli dosyalari acmayiniz. Bu durumda lutfen e-posta mesajini kullaniciya hemen geri gonderiniz ve tum kopyalarini mesaj kutunuzdan siliniz. Bu e-posta mesaji, hic bir sekilde, herhangi bir amac icin cogaltilamaz, yayinlanamaz ve para karsiligi satilamaz. Bu e-posta mesaji viruslere karsi anti-virus sistemleri tarafindan taranmistir. Ancak yollayici, bu e-posta mesajinin - virus koruma sistemleri ile kontrol ediliyor olsa bile - virus icermedigini garanti etmez ve meydana gelebilecek zararlardan dogacak hicbir sorumlulugu kabul etmez. This message is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed , and may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this message or you receive this mail in error, you should refrain from making any use of the contents and from opening any attachment. In that case, please notify the sender immediately and return the message to the sender, then, delete and destroy all copies. This e-mail message, can not be copied, published or sold for any reason. This e-mail message has been swept by anti-virus systems for the presence of computer viruses. In doing so, however, sender cannot warrant that virus or other forms of data corruption may not be present and do not take any responsibility in any occurrence. _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

18 years, 1 month

RE: [Users] OpenSER MySQL Updates - Weird

by Douglas Garstang

Norman/Bogdan, I went and implemented three location tables in MySQL and pointed each OpenSER to a different one. I think this is going to have problems... Say a phone registers with proxy1, and proxy1 updates location table location_proxy1. I see two problems here: a) Based on the expiry in location_proxy1, proxy1 removes the phone from it's location table location_proxy1. At about the same time, the phone re-registers, and this time registers with proxy2 (our phones use DNS SRV). For some small amount of time, the phone could be present in TWO location tables. This is bad. b) The phone re-registers before the expiry in location_proxy1 occurs, lets say because it's been rebooted. When the phone comes back up and re-registers, it regisers with proxy2 this time (again because of DNS SRV). For possibly a very LONG time, the phone will be current in two location tables on 2 proxy servers. If the phone was rebooted again, it could be present in the location table on THREE proxy servers. This is also bad. > -----Original Message----- > From: Norman Brandinger [mailto:norm@goes.com] > Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 12:41 PM > To: Douglas Garstang > Cc: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu; users(a)openser.org > Subject: Re: [Users] OpenSER MySQL Updates - Weird > > > Douglas, > > Below is Bogdan's previous response to you: > > <snip> > all db_mods from 0 to 2 use mem cache - the difference is > when the DB is > updated with changes from cache. in mod 1 the changes from cache are > immediately written into DB. > > the only non-cache db mod is 3, but this is available only in > the devel > branch - read carefully the docs to understand the > implications of this mod. > </snip> > > As you can see, he didn't say that db mode 3 is required in your > situation. He was just briefly explaining the option and > steering you > to the docs for more detailed information. I don't think > that the devel > CVS branch is called OpenSER 1.1 but that's just a matter of > semantics. > > Anyway, getting back to your question: > > If you google "multiple SER site:mail.iptel.org" you will find a > discussion of your problem along with suggested solutions. > > A thread along these lines is, for example: > http://mail.iptel.org/pipermail/serusers/2003-November/003847.html > > <from the above thread> > We have multiple SER servers all accesing the same database. > We had to > introduce a new "location" table for each instance of SER. > So for example > we have a main SER server which acceses the standard > "location" table and we > have another SER as RTPProxy which uses a table called > "location_proxy". We > just created that custom table using the structure of the > regular "location" > table. > > Has been working great for us for several months. > </from the above thread> > > I have found that searching mail.iptel.org will often provide > answers to > many questions. Note that the above example thread was > posted back in 2003. > > Regards, > Norm > > > > Douglas Garstang wrote: > > So, are you saying, based on the email you sent (which I > just found) that Openser 1.1 and db_mode 3 are REQUIRED in > order to support multiple OpenSER systems accessing a common > MySQL database? > > > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu [mailto:bogdan@voice-system.ro] > >> Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 9:06 AM > >> To: Douglas Garstang > >> Cc: users(a)openser.org > >> Subject: Re: [Users] OpenSER MySQL Updates - Weird > >> > >> > >> Doug, > >> > >> first of all, if you do not get a reply, do not repost ...no > >> one owes > >> replies to no body. > >> > >> second...you got a reply..check carefully your emails. > >> > >> bogdan > >> > >> Douglas Garstang wrote: > >> > >> > >>> Posted this yesterday. Didn't get a reply... > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>> Bogdan, thanks for the reply. I'm don't quite understand. I'm > >>>> using db_mode 1, which the docs say writes all updates > >>>> immediately to the database. A 'openserctl ul show' still > >>>> shows cached entries though. Why? Is db_mode 1 supposed to > >>>> cache at all? Which db_mode should I use so that I can have > >>>> two or more OpenSER systems safely accessing the same database? > >>>> > >>>> Douglas. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Users mailing list > > Users(a)openser.org > > http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users > > > > > > > > > >

18 years, 1 month

Re: [Users] dispatch sip calls according to from ip address

by Daniel-Constantin Mierla

Hello, On 03/29/06 12:35, Raymond Chen wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > My apologies for the bad English, it's late here. Anyway, what I want to > ask is how to redirect the incoming sip request to a set of sip proxy based > on the incoming ip address. Like what a dispatcher modules does. > it is not possible to use source ip for hashing with dispatcher right now. Cheers, Daniel > Thanks > > Ray > > -----Original Message----- > From: Daniel-Constantin Mierla [mailto:daniel@voice-system.ro] > Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 8:37 AM > To: Raymond Chen > Cc: users(a)openser.org > Subject: Re: [Users] dispatch sip calls according to from ip address > > Hello, > > On 03/29/06 06:06, Raymond Chen wrote: > >> Dear all, >> >> >> >> We need to improve some internetwork delays by rerouting incoming sip >> invite to sip platforms within the same provider of the UA. Can the >> dispatcher module fulfill this feature? And how? >> >> > I am not sure I got the question properly, but using record routing you > ensure that all requests within same dialog go via same path. > > Cheers, > Daniel > > >> >> >> Thanks >> >> >> >> ray >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Users mailing list >> Users(a)openser.org >> http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users >> >> > > > > >

18 years, 1 month

R: [Users] OpenSER trigger

by D'Addelfio Davide

Thanks for reply. Could you give me more details about it, i'm new in this and like to have more instruction about what I have to do. Thanks a lot. -----Messaggio originale----- Da: Klaus Darilion [mailto:klaus.mailinglists@pernau.at] Inviato: mercoledì 29 marzo 2006 15.22 A: D'Addelfio Davide Cc: users(a)openser.org Oggetto: Re: [Users] OpenSER trigger You can use global flags for routing, and change the value of the global flag via the fifo. regards klaus D'Addelfio Davide wrote: > Hi everyone, > > is possibile to configure openser with some trigger that allows it to > switch incoming message (INVITE, REQUEST, etc...) towards another > element, like an application server? Do they exists? Where can I find > it? > > Thanks for help > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > Users(a)openser.org > http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

18 years, 1 month

[Users] OpenSER trigger

by D'Addelfio Davide

Hi everyone, is possibile to configure openser with some trigger that allows it to switch incoming message (INVITE, REQUEST, etc...) towards another element, like an application server? Do they exists? Where can I find it? Thanks for help

18 years, 1 month

[Serusers] Port mapping with Linksys wrt54g

by PREVOT Paul

Hello, I am using a Linksys wrt54g router that applies Symetric NAT. When I register with my OpenSer proxy, I set my private IP address to Via, Call-ID and Contact fields, because I have enabled fix_nated_contact(); from the nathelper module. There is no problem with the registration. I get the OK back and openserctl ul show returns public IP and public port in Contact field. Also, OpenSer knows an IP:port to use to forward me SIP messages, or small UDP packets to keep the mapping on my NAT alive. To do so, I use modparam("nathelper", "natping_interval", 10). But I noticed that after each SIP transaction the router changes the mapping used. It means Register and OK on port for example 10000 on the router's public interface and the next INVITE-OK-ACK through port 10005, a second INVITE, through other port. So the mapping done for my 5060 port change very often and also as soon as the register transaction is finished, it becomes false and openSer can't send me any Sip Message. There is no problem with MSN or Skype because the signalling is done on TCP. Do you think registration using TCP instead of UDP will fixe the issue? Have you ever come across that issue? Can it be solved out differently? Thanks, Paul

18 years, 1 month

[Users] Bug in RR-Module

by Carsten Bock

Hi Everybody, I guess i just found a bug record_route_preset(). Everything worked fine, until i replaced record_route() with record_route_preset(). I have noticed, that it is not possible to store any Parameters with add_rr_param(), if you use record_route_preset(). Carsten

18 years, 1 month

← Newer
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
...
51
Older →

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users March 2006