sr-users October 2006

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

189 participants
345 discussions

by Jayesh Nambiar

Hi all, I have a doubt over this warning message appearing in my logs. When my Openser sends a 4xx message to any gateway, the gateway replies with an ACK, but then openser does not send an OK for that ACK and leaves this message in the logs. Can someone please explain why this message comes again and again. I have in my script, if(method=="ACK") { route(1); exit; }; after record routing and loose route handling. route(1) does the t_relay(). Please explain. w/regards, jayesh __________________________________________________________ Yahoo! India Answers: Share what you know. Learn something new http://in.answers.yahoo.com/

17 years, 7 months

Re: [Users] Out of Memory error

by Bogdan-Andrei Iancu

Hi Bill, see http://openser.org/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=memory. regards, bogdan Bill Zhang wrote: > Hi, > > > > Anyone knows what could be wrong? This happens only when the client > using TCP sending registration. > > > > First, there are a LOT of following lines: > > > > Oct 2 16:26:52 ip67-153-142-69 /usr/local/sbin/openser[2463]: ERROR: > build_res_buf_from_sip_req: out of memory ; needs 698 > > Oct 2 16:26:52 ip67-153-142-69 /usr/local/sbin/openser[2463]: > challenge(): Error while sending response > > Oct 2 16:26:52 ip67-153-142-69 /usr/local/sbin/openser[2463]: ERROR: > build_res_buf_from_sip_req: out of memory ; needs 698 > > Oct 2 16:26:52 ip67-153-142-69 /usr/local/sbin/openser[2463]: > challenge(): Error while sending response > > > > Then, following: > > > > Oct 2 16:30:09 ip67-153-142-69 /usr/local/sbin/openser[2462]: ERROR: > build_res_buf_from_sip_req: out of memory ; needs 779 > > Oct 2 16:30:09 ip67-153-142-69 /usr/local/sbin/openser[2462]: > challenge(): Error while sending response > > Oct 2 16:30:09 ip67-153-142-69 /usr/local/sbin/openser[2462]: ERROR: > build_res_buf_from_sip_req: out of memory ; needs 779 > > Oct 2 16:30:09 ip67-153-142-69 /usr/local/sbin/openser[2462]: > challenge(): Error while sending response > > > > Then, > > Oct 2 16:49:01 ip67-153-142-69 /usr/local/sbin/openser[2462]: ERROR: > build_res_buf_from_sip_req: out of memory ; needs 780 > > Oct 2 16:49:01 ip67-153-142-69 /usr/local/sbin/openser[2462]: > challenge(): Error while sending response > > Oct 2 16:49:41 ip67-153-142-69 /usr/local/sbin/openser[2462]: ERROR: > build_res_buf_from_sip_req: out of memory ; needs 780 > > Oct 2 16:49:41 ip67-153-142-69 /usr/local/sbin/openser[2462]: > challenge(): Error while sending response > > > > And on and on. > > > > Using UDP register are fine. > > > > Thanks in advanceJ. > > Best Regards, > Bill > > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >_______________________________________________ >Users mailing list >Users(a)openser.org >http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users > >

17 years, 7 months

[Users] Out of Memory error

by Bill Zhang

Hi, Anyone knows what could be wrong? This happens only when the client using TCP sending registration. First, there are a LOT of following lines: Oct 2 16:26:52 ip67-153-142-69 /usr/local/sbin/openser[2463]: ERROR: build_res_buf_from_sip_req: out of memory ; needs 698 Oct 2 16:26:52 ip67-153-142-69 /usr/local/sbin/openser[2463]: challenge(): Error while sending response Oct 2 16:26:52 ip67-153-142-69 /usr/local/sbin/openser[2463]: ERROR: build_res_buf_from_sip_req: out of memory ; needs 698 Oct 2 16:26:52 ip67-153-142-69 /usr/local/sbin/openser[2463]: challenge(): Error while sending response Then, following: Oct 2 16:30:09 ip67-153-142-69 /usr/local/sbin/openser[2462]: ERROR: build_res_buf_from_sip_req: out of memory ; needs 779 Oct 2 16:30:09 ip67-153-142-69 /usr/local/sbin/openser[2462]: challenge(): Error while sending response Oct 2 16:30:09 ip67-153-142-69 /usr/local/sbin/openser[2462]: ERROR: build_res_buf_from_sip_req: out of memory ; needs 779 Oct 2 16:30:09 ip67-153-142-69 /usr/local/sbin/openser[2462]: challenge(): Error while sending response Then, Oct 2 16:49:01 ip67-153-142-69 /usr/local/sbin/openser[2462]: ERROR: build_res_buf_from_sip_req: out of memory ; needs 780 Oct 2 16:49:01 ip67-153-142-69 /usr/local/sbin/openser[2462]: challenge(): Error while sending response Oct 2 16:49:41 ip67-153-142-69 /usr/local/sbin/openser[2462]: ERROR: build_res_buf_from_sip_req: out of memory ; needs 780 Oct 2 16:49:41 ip67-153-142-69 /usr/local/sbin/openser[2462]: challenge(): Error while sending response And on and on. Using UDP register are fine. Thanks in advance:-). Best Regards, Bill

17 years, 7 months

[Users] NEW - Management Interface

by Bogdan-Andrei Iancu

Hi everybody, as shown by the roadmap, one of the objectives is the creation of a unique interface (management interface or MI) to replace the current FIFO and UNIXSOCK interfaces. Why? The current design does not scale, neither from core point of view, nor from modules point of view. The transport layers are currently implemented in core, so each new type of layer implies changes of the core. But the worst part is on the module side - as the implementations are transport specific, for each exported function, the module needs to implement a version for each available transport layer. So, adding a new transport layer will imply: (1) changes in core (2) reimplementation of all existent functions in modules for the new transport layer. What brings the new MI? MI will define in core an abstract layer for both functions and data types to be used between the external function implementations (from modules) and the transport layers (which now will be implemented as modules). When a module wants to export a function for external usage, it will just register it to the MI and it will use for implementation the data types defined by MI. So, the exported function will be automatically visible via all transport layer (existent or future). Also adding a new transport layer will imply only writing a new module which implements MI - no impact on the core or the module exporting functions. First version of the MI (Management interface) was uploaded on the public CVS couple of days ago. Also there is available the first module implementing it - the mi_fifo module implementing the FIFO interface. Sooner will follow a module for unixsockets and later NET UDP and TCP, HTTP, RPC, XML-RPC and so on.... Also we are in process of re-implementing the external function based on the MI specs. So far all core functions are done and cpl-c and dialog modules. The rest of the modules will be finished in the next week. Any comments, opinions on the topic are welcomed. Regards, Bogdan

17 years, 7 months

[Serusers] Australia DID incoming problem

by ram

Hi I have got Aus DID from provider I have configured in my Server Aus DID combination of below 1161XXXXXX635 161XXXXXX635 1XXXXXX635 XXXXXX635 DID As a user ID when i call 01161XXXXXX635 the call is coming to My SER, but the User is online, its not rininging on the Phone But dialed person getting Ringing sound. what format i need to use to create account DID I have simple route config till now iam able to config all USA DID but iam getting problem here with AUS some one give me idea or help Ram

17 years, 7 months

[Users] Multiple OpenSER DB Question

by Curt Moore

Hello all. I have a question with regard to sharing the location table between multiple OpenSER servers when using multiple OpenSER servers for load balancing and redundancy. I am using db_mode 1 with usrloc in OpenSER 1.1.0. When the usrloc module gets/sets information from the location table, does it pull all contact information or just the contact information where the socket field is an IP assigned to the running OpenSER process, ie. a local IP address? It appears that the preload_udomain() function pulls all location information and then makes determinations on whether it is for the current OpenSER process. I see where the dbrow2info() function in udomain.c makes the determination that the socket is non local but it seems that this is just an error message and the process continues as normal. Should there be a return just after this debug message so that the usrloc module does not continue and manipulate a location entry that does not belong to this particular OpenSER process? Should the information even be pulled from the DB on startup for records which do not have a socket belonging to the current OpenSER process? Thanks, -Curt

17 years, 7 months

[Users] openser TLS error problem

by Tracy Lofton

Hi, I noticed that the SSL dump you ran dispays RSA 1024, while, openSER-1.1.0-tls uses 2048 and was wondering if one was to change openser RSA to 1024 what type of effect would this have on the question at hand (UA trying to register...)? Noted below is the gen_rootCA.sh script with a RSA of 2048 for OpenSER: gen_rootCA.sh:( cd $CA_PATH; openssl req -config ../$CA_CONF -x509 -newkey rsa:2048 -days 365 -out ./cacert.pem -outform PEM ) I am experimenting with TLS and am very new to the TLS functionality/performance/security protocol and would like to know if the descrepancy in RSA 1024 and 2048 matters? I apologize that I could not offer assistance but just another question. Tracy ----------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2006 17:21:21 +0800 From: Lindsey Hans Joseph Lao <llao(a)infoweapons.com> Subject: [Users] openser TLS error problem To: Users(a)openser.org Message-ID: <4524CE91.2050500(a)infoweapons.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Hello, I have an Openser server with TLS support running ok. However, when a UA client tries to register with it, it gives off this error: 7(63031) tls_accept: Error in SSL: 7(63031) tls_error: error:1408F10B:SSL routines:SSL3_GET_RECORD:wrong version number I ran SSLDUMP and got these logs: 8 1 2.4157 (2.4157) C>S SSLv2 compatible client hello Version 3.1 cipher suites TLS_RSA_WITH_RC4_128_MD5 TLS_RSA_WITH_RC4_128_SHA TLS_RSA_WITH_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA SSL2_CK_RC4 SSL2_CK_3DES SSL2_CK_RC2 TLS_RSA_WITH_DES_CBC_SHA SSL2_CK_DES TLS_RSA_EXPORT1024_WITH_RC4_56_SHA TLS_RSA_EXPORT1024_WITH_DES_CBC_SHA TLS_RSA_EXPORT_WITH_RC4_40_MD5 TLS_RSA_EXPORT_WITH_RC2_CBC_40_MD5 SSL2_CK_RC4_EXPORT40 SSL2_CK_RC2_EXPORT40 TLS_DHE_DSS_WITH_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA TLS_DHE_DSS_WITH_DES_CBC_SHA TLS_DHE_DSS_EXPORT1024_WITH_DES_CBC_SHA 8 2.4163 (0.0005) S>C TCP FIN 8 2.4165 (0.0002) C>S TCP FIN Any idea of what might the problem be? Help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks! ---------------------------- _________________________________________________________________ SearchYour way, your world, right now! http://imagine-windowslive.com/minisites/searchlaunch/?locale=en-us&FORM=WL…

17 years, 7 months

[Users] Inquiry on Mediaproxy

by Lindsey Hans Joseph Lao

Hello, Just a quick question on Mediaproxy NAT traversal. When using mediaproxy on a NATed. router/firewall, would the registrar show a private contact header IP address or the public ip address of the User Agent client? I'm running openser configured to be multihomed listening to a private and public interface. However, it baffles me since the contact header registering in another Openser registrar is the private IP address of the user agent. Did mediaproxy function as its supposed to be? Thanks!

17 years, 7 months

[Serusers] radius authentication on Invite with rpid header

by Rosario Pingaro

I have an ata that support rpid headr. So when I block the cid serivce I receive an anonymous from header with the rpid header that has the info about user and domain. How to have my radius authentication working on this situation? At the moment I am not able to authenticate because I get Domain=localhost instead of my domain. Reagrds Rosario Pingaro D. Lgs 196/2003 Il presente messaggio contiene informazioni confidenziali, indirizzate esclusivamente alle persone sopra indicate. Se il ricevente non è tra dette persone, non dovrà intraprendere alcuna azione, tipo copia, stampa o trasmettere il suo contenuto a terzi ed i relativi allegati, ma solo informare il mittente dell'errore e cancellare il messaggio. Il mittente dovrà, altresì, accertarsi che gli allegati non contengano virus prima di aprirli.

17 years, 7 months

[Serusers] Dual number with SER

by reza shah

I want to create a service like this. User have two number given by 2 provider PA and PB called NA and NB. PA and PB can connect with each other. When user start his/her phone it will register first to PB with number NB, then PB will create register message (new message i think) with NA number to PA. PB is what i will develop. Is this possible with SER, i`m new to SER. Another question is how to create a module that i can call from SER? Thanks alot Reza __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com

17 years, 7 months

← Newer
1
...
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
...
35
Older →

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users October 2006