sr-users June 2005

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

241 participants
595 discussions

[Serusers] Problems with ser and Micronet SP5012

by gsalvucci＠ing.unrc.edu.ar

Hi, I´m using ser-0.8.14 in a LAN with the ser.cfg from the distribution. I have many ATAs and softphones(x-lite) and a PSTN gateway Micronet SP5012 connected to PBX. Problem is the following: When I call to a PSTN number everything works fine but when call finishes the port FXO of the gateway stays busy. Thanks Gustavo. ---------------------------------------------------------------- Este mensaje ha sido enviado usando el servicio de Webmail de la Universidad Nacional de Río Cuarto. Basado en Horde/IMP

19 years, 3 months

[Serusers] peering

by Joao Pereira

Hello to all I whant my SIP clients to be able to do calls to any other SIP network, and to do It, I writed this line (for the IPTEL.ORG case): if(uri=~"@iptel.org"){ forward(iptel.org,5060); break; } But this way, I need to put theese 4 lines to all VoIP providers. Is there any way of saying: if( ! uri=~"@fccn.pt" ) { # if the invite isnt for my domain (fccn.pt) send it to the correct domain Thanks João Pereira

19 years, 3 months

[Serusers] ser , its forks and knives, and docs, and everything else

by Iqbal

Hi Another day of going back and forth, feel sorry for the poor newbie who might have signed up for this mailing list, and realized he'd was standing in no mans land between too factions who had dug deep into their trenches.... I cant recall the names of who posted what, and who wants what, but I think a summation, together with some sort of action towards an outcome, is really needed, so I'll try, and please add to it. 1. There is a definant call for two modes, one stable and one more fast paced for those who like to try out new things a) A mode where these two can be linked is required, someone suggested maintaining two threads in CVS, b) do you need to mailing lists, yes/no c) Do you need two websites yes/no d) Should iptel be inherently linked with SER, as most users think, or should their be a non-biased site, I think since SER has its own name, why not use something based upon that, just as other opensource has, if companies wish to sponser, add there name etc, then they should be allowed by the maintainers discretion 2. Documentation, yes it is poor, but that means it can only get better , or at least the way I look at it, a)Who maintains it, is there a overwhelming need for help on this, if so, can we not on the website above, include a link for those who would like to help contribute, and then set some standards as to how it needs to be done etc b) Informal documentation, I think sites such as onsip etc have started something good, and many users will eventually have their own websites etc, with tips and tricks, however if this could also be added to in one place it would be good for the newbie, maybe a wiki, maybe onsip. 3. Working together, now this is a tricky one, since no matter how we look at it, SER seems to be splitting (unless I am misreading the posts), which means even in theory if we want to make it work like i did, its just wont, and we need to accept that, its growing and people want/wish to do it there way, and I guess the compromise is in 1, above. No matter how many emails go back and forth, going back to what it was is not possible, cause human nature will not allow it. 4. Justification and blame, well I think alot of that has happened, and as a user, since I dont know all the details I cannot really comment, except to say, that I am sure its all justified, and everyone is too blame :-), but its time too move on, it was a project and like all projects starts a little chaotically, and somewhere down the line a radical shake up needs to be done, this also happens in companies, trust me I have built quite a few, the casual working modes are dropped for a formal approach, suddenly hand written scraps of paper are no longer acceptable, everything needs to have 3 signatures on it...such is life. I guess this is what SER is going through, and maybe this is what it needs, who's fault it is, or who realized a change is required is irrelevant, but without change I think SER will not work, simply because some of the core team want a change, and you cannot argue with that. Soooo write down what is needed take a vote, ask a few users what they think, and lets get it done. As a side note, I hope the above doesn't seem biased one way or the other, it is not meant to, its meant to get things moving and a decision reached, before everyone goes on holiday, and starts smoking a pipe of peace....without having invited me. Iqbal

19 years, 3 months

[Serusers] forwarding to voicemail (SEMS)

by Llanos Serna García-Conde

19 years, 3 months

[Serusers] Domain module

by harry gaillac

Hello, I checked my ser.cfg my table domain in db ser and re-read the documentation of domain module . After reading domain.c file I found a exported function for R-URI which is not is_from_local() for outbound domain but is_uri_host_local(): I add this function in my conf file now i can call others domains however we don't find this function anywhere else that domain.c I use documentation from onsip.org which talk about nat however the examples may be wrong or incomplete. Regards Harry ___________________________________________________________________________ Appel audio GRATUIT partout dans le monde avec le nouveau Yahoo! Messenger Téléchargez cette version sur http://fr.messenger.yahoo.com

19 years, 3 months

[Serusers] RE: Domain module

by harry gaillac

According to domain.c file "is_uri_host_local()" function is needed to check R-URI. Harry --- Juha Heinanen <jh(a)tutpro.com> a écrit : > put xlog debug into the script. print from header > before the tests, > etc. also, wheck with fifo command domain_dump (or > something like that) > that domain table is really loaded. > > -- juha > ___________________________________________________________________________ Appel audio GRATUIT partout dans le monde avec le nouveau Yahoo! Messenger Téléchargez cette version sur http://fr.messenger.yahoo.com

19 years, 3 months

Fw: [Serusers] voice mail problem on alias

by Rosario Pingaro

Debugging sems seems that the probelm is related on how ser pass the user to sems; in fact when I call the alias and the use is ofline ser pass the real user to sems. when ser get a timeout pass to sems the alias, sems is not able to find an email for the alias and so i get the error. How to workaround this? Thanks Rosario ----- Original Message ----- From: Rosario Pingaro To: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2005 5:20 PM Subject: [Serusers] voice mail problem on alias Hi I am implementing voice mail using ser and sems, ser 0.9.2 and latesr sems from cvs. I have the failure_route[x] to activate the voicemail also when i get an invite timeoute for my users. failure_route[1] { revert_uri(); rewritehostport("xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:5090"); append_branch(); t_relay_to_udp("xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx", "5090"); } I don't have any problem when i try to leave a voice mail for an "user". On the "alias" the voicemail works fine when the user is offline, but when it is online and get a timeout sems respond with a 404 no email address for user the fact that the voicemail works on alias when it is off line push me to think the problem is into the failure_route. But I don't know what to add to get it working. Any help is welcome. Thanks Rosario -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list serusers(a)lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers

19 years, 3 months

[Serusers] Re: problem in ser

by Kamran Ahmad

hello i was using ser-0.9.0 with radiusclient, freeradisus, but unable to configure on this mechine. I am already using these kind of setup on my fedora core mechine with no problem. but i have many problems on this mechine. i am using same ser.cfg as my successfull setups but no success. now i am using ser-0.8.0 with radiusclient.0.4.8 with kernel 2.6.9-1.667 after lot of compiliation i am able to compile auth_radius.so but now i am getting 0(4156) auth module - initializing 0(4156) find_export: found <sl_send_reply> in module sl_module [/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/sl.so] 0(4156) DEBUG: init_mod: auth_radius 0(4156) auth_radius - Initializing 0(4156) auth_radius: No `Cisco' vendor in Radius dictionary 0(4156) find_export: found <pre_auth> in module auth [/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/auth.so] 0(4156) find_export: found <post_auth> in module auth [/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/auth.so] 0(4156) ERROR: auth_radius: can't get code for the Digest-Response attribute 0(4156) init_mod(): Error while initializing module auth_radius ERROR: error while initializing modules /var/log/messages ----------------- Jun 9 18:48:50 voice ser: WARNING: could not rev. resolve 217.8.112.104 Jun 9 18:48:50 voice ser[4153]: ERROR: auth_radius: can't get code for the Digest-Response attribute Jun 9 18:48:50 voice ser[4153]: init_mod(): Error while initializing module auth_radius __________________________________ Discover Yahoo! Find restaurants, movies, travel and more fun for the weekend. Check it out! http://discover.yahoo.com/weekend.html

19 years, 3 months

[Users] LCR module

by Bogdan-Andrei Iancu

Hi folks, As more an more people are asking for a LCR module in 0.9.4 release, I prepared an official backport of the module for OpenSER 0.9.4 (sources): http://www.openser.org/pub/openser/0.9.4/src/lcr-opsenser-0.9.4.tgz Also there is more and more positive feedback regarding the stability of the module and we are looking for including it in a second fast release on 0.9 branch - a 0.9.5 which will additionally bring the LCR module. Any opinions on this? regards, bogdan

19 years, 3 months

[Serusers] lost in cvs tags - difference between 0.9.3 and rel_0_9_0

by Klaus Darilion

Hi! I'm lost in the name of new ser versions and the CVS tags. There is talk about version 0.9, 0.9.2 and 0.9.3, although I only found rel_0_9_0 on cvs. What is the relation between this versions and the CVS tag. thanks, klaus

19 years, 3 months

← Newer
1
...
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
...
60
Older →

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users June 2005