I must be totally out of it. I am trying to download rtpproxy for the CVS
head and I am not having at luck. Has something changed with regard to it's
location?
cvs -d:pserver:anonymous@cvs.ser.berlios.de:/cvsroot/ser co rtpproxy
? rtpproxy/rtpproxy
cvs server: existing repository /cvsroot/ser/PortaSIP/rtpproxy does not
match /cvsroot/ser/rtpproxy
cvs server: ignoring module rtpproxy
[root@ser software]#
folks --
i usually do not participate in mailing list
discussions but it seems that my tls contribution
became hot topic in recent ser vs. openser discussions
so i think i will make an exception here.
i think that openser is a bad idea. please stop using
the tls code as a hostage in this dispute, i did not
write it to fork the project.
iptel guys made no attempt to hide the code when i
approached them although they probably have their own
commercial implementation. for me ser is an open and
free project because:
1. i could download ser freely and use it
2. i needed tls, i was not able to buy it from iptel
so i tried to implement it
3. i sent it to the mailing lists, anyone can find it
there and use it if they want
4. someone else picked up the code, improved it
and committed to cvs (thank you for this, by the
way)
what can be more open than this ? maybe sources stored
in a wiki where anyone can change anything.
openser claims that it will be more open, but:
1. over 20 people have access to ser cvs on berlios,
but only 4 have access to openser cvs on
sourceforge, not even other developers.
2. you took existing code from ser cvs, added your own
improvements, but you did not give other
developers who work on ser any chance to say
whether such changes should be included or not,
although they are still listed in AUTHORS file,
in module documentation and elsewhere. from
the user point of view they will be responsible for
bugs introduced by you and have no chance to
influence it.
3. i did not see any discussion about this move, it is
a bit strange that the people on the lists were not
allowed to participate in the decision, especially
if you claim that it is for the interest of the
community. how do you know people want the project
to be split when you did not ask ?
4. the complete cvs history is missing in openser
repository, effectively hiding who contributed
what.
I also noticed that user miconda created project
named ser on sourceforge, is this a preparation for
the next step - full control ? did other ser
developers know about this ? i think having two
projects with the same name on two sites is
confusing. from my perspective the new fork is
only an attempt to get more power and control
over the sources. it is about who will control what,
not about freedom. try to resolve it without forking
the project.
if ser is bad then openser is not any better:
- iptel.org advertises iptelorg.com on its webpage -
there is an ad of voice-system on the main page of
openser.org, there are voice-system copyright
statements and readme states that the project is
maintained by voice-systems, proving beyond
reasonable doubts that openser promotes
voice-systems just like ser promotes iptel.org
- there were complaints about maintainers deciding
what comes into modules - so in openser only
selected people have access to cvs and they will
probably form a committee and decide.
- there were calls for more discussions, but the fork
was not discussed at all
there probably is a good reason why tls was put in
experimental directory first and is not in the main
tree yet, i do not see this as a problem. in fact i
would appreciate if someone who knows in detail
how tcp code in ser works could review the code before
it is committed in the main tree. there are many
places in the code i don't understand. i did only
limited testing because tls support in end devices is
virtually
non-existent. use it at your own risk.
i don't know about others, but i am on alert when
people talk about "the needs of the community" and
"take over when someone is very busy or unwilling to
cooperate", i don't remember seeing users asking for
anything like this.
-- peter
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Hello,
I am using serial forking, and I need to keep track of failed calls to
t_relay. While in the 'failure_route[x]' block, can the script query why
the previous call to t_relay failed (user not registered, connection
failure, etc)?
Thank You,
Dmitry
when I register a new account .but show me a error blow:
"Sorry, there was an error when sending mail. Please try again later."
Why? where can I configure mail server ?
Zhaomin
----- Original Message -----
From: "Karel Kozlik" <karel(a)iptel.org>
To: "PJR" <pjr_lists(a)mail.ntua.gr>
Cc: <serusers(a)iptel.org>
Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2005 10:29 PM
Subject: Re: [Serusers] serweb PHP errors
> Hi,
> try set:
>
> error_reporting = E_ALL & ~E_NOTICE
>
> in php.ini.
> Regards Karel
>
> PJR napsal(a):
> > On Fedora core 3 with all needed packages installed and config.php
> > configured properly I can't login to serweb user_intrface or admin
> >
> > When I first load the user or admin index.php I get many errors in
> > apache error logs like the following:
> >
> > [client 192.168.25.2] PHP Notice: Undefined index: extrahtml in /var/www/html/phplib/oohforms.inc on line 72, referer: http://192.168.25.3/iptel/user/
> > [client 192.168.25.2] PHP Notice: Undefined property: isfile in /var/www/html/phplib/oohforms.inc on line 250, referer: http://192.168.25.3/iptel/user/
> > [client 192.168.25.2] PHP Notice: Undefined property: hidden in /var/www/html/phplib/oohforms.inc on line 253, referer: http://192.168.25.3/iptel/user/
> > .....snip
> > [client 192.168.25.2] PHP Notice: Undefined index: frozen in /var/www/html/phplib/oohforms.inc on line 284, referer: http://192.168.25.3/iptel/user/
> >
> > When I enter username/passwd and submit I get more errors in logs
> > (Notice, index frozen etc.) and also A Bad Username or Password message
> > and I return to login screen. There is nothing wrong with passwords, and
> > I can connect to ser db with mysql client just fine.
> >
> > I use serweb_2004-07-27 and ser-0.8.14.
> > I have the vars in php.ini according to the instractions.
> >
> > Please point me to any possible solution.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Serusers mailing list
> > Serusers(a)iptel.org
> > http://mail.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> Serusers(a)iptel.org
> http://mail.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
is there anyone have good experience with analog fxo gateways, because
while more basic sip proxies can work with them i still do not understand
why SER does not work with...
because i'm neither an operator nor have a cisco gateway...
please contact me,
thanks
ozan
--
>>> please do not use
>>> l.s.d(a)dnaofdesign.com
>>> above account is stand by
>>> use same account as
>>> cosmocid(a)ispro.net.tr
I'd like to try the monitoring script by serweb but I am unable to get the tables updated.
I followed the installation readme file updating my cronjob conf file, I have a working configuration of serweb so the connection to the db is fine. But I don't get any updated.
Searching the var/log/messages I see the cronjob executed, I don't see any error.
So I don't know where to look to get more info on my problem.
Is there some one of you that uses this script?
Thanks
Rosario
It looks like you are trying to start ser, although it is already running.
regards,
klaus
PS: Please Cc: to the list.
Bruno Oliveira wrote:
> hi
>
> I try, but no resolv. Print this in term:
> uiara:~# netstat -anp|grep 5060
>
> "tcp 0 0 200.236.162.3:5060 0.0.0.0:*
> OUÇA 2816/ser
> tcp 0 0 192.168.1.2:5060 0.0.0.0:*
> OUÇA 2816/ser
> udp 0 0 200.236.162.3:5060 0.0.0.0:*
> 2816/ser
> udp 0 0 192.168.1.2:5060 0.0.0.0:*
> 2816/ser"
>
> it continues with exactly error.
>
> thanks for your time
>
> On 6/17/05, Klaus Darilion <klaus.mailinglists(a)pernau.at> wrote:
>
>>Bruno Oliveira wrote:
>>
>>>hi
>>>
>>>i have rtpproxy runing and serctl. where it is file config of rtpproxy
>>>? and when I type this command "serctl start" show me in
>>>/var/log/syslog this message:
>>>
>>>"Jun 16 14:45:33 uiara /usr/local/sbin/ser[3237]: Maxfwd module- initializing
>>>Jun 16 14:45:33 uiara /usr/local/sbin/ser[3237]: INFO: udp_init:
>>>SO_RCVBUF is initially 111616
>>>Jun 16 14:45:33 uiara /usr/local/sbin/ser[3237]: INFO: udp_init:
>>>SO_RCVBUF is finally 223232
>>>Jun 16 14:45:33 uiara /usr/local/sbin/ser[3237]: ERROR: tcp_init:
>>>bind(6, 0x813753c, 16) on 192.168.1.2: Address already in use"
>>
>>Looks like another process already has bind to TCP port 5060. Maybe ser
>>is already running? Or maybe a SIP client?
>>
>>Try
>>#> netstat -anp|grep 5060
>>
>>regards,
>>klaus
>>
>
>
>
Hi all,
I have a problem with in the following scenario:
Lucent GW SER IPPhone
IP: 1.2.3.4 IP:5.6.7.8 IP:8.9.5.5
INVITE-->
<-- 100
INVITE-->
<--100
<--180
<--180
<--200
<--200
ACK-->(Request-Uri = sip:5.6.7.8:5060) <-- PROBLEM HERE
The problem arises only with the Lucent Gateway, because it sends the
ACK with the Request-Uri as showed above (Request-Uri has the IP and
port of the SER). I also found the same problem with BYEs. I attach the
ser.cfg at this mail.
I think this is a bug of Lucent, because I expected that Request-Uri
of the ACKs should equal to the contact uri of the 200 message sent by
the ipphone. The same for BYEs. Could some one clarify me that?
Thanks in advance !!!
Yes, your right. my bad.
-----Original Message-----
From: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu [mailto:bogdan@voice-system.ro]
Sent: Friday, June 17, 2005 1:08 PM
To: Matt Schulte
Cc: users(a)openser.org
Subject: Re: [Users] extcmd removed?
Hi Matt,
there are two module which allows you to run external application :
exec
ext
extcmd was a module developed exclusively for a FOKUS project - some
interface (via udp) messaging for a JAVA application...
are you sure you are not referring to "exec" as functionality??
regards,
bogdan
Matt Schulte wrote:
>All,
>I was just curious why ext/cmd were removed?
>
>The website says:
>"extcmd - the functionality is not required anymore"
>
>I've ran into several cases where we require running external commands,
>while I reason they're not the best idea and can cause memory
>leaks/crashes, there is no alternativer other than writing a module. Of
>which no one in our company can do so :-)
>
>ideas? Thanks.
>
>_______________________________________________
>Users mailing list
>Users(a)openser.org http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
>
All,
I was just curious why ext/cmd were removed?
The website says:
"extcmd - the functionality is not required anymore"
I've ran into several cases where we require running external commands,
while I reason they're not the best idea and can cause memory
leaks/crashes, there is no alternativer other than writing a module. Of
which no one in our company can do so :-)
ideas? Thanks.
