Hello,
Does SER is able to cat as a 3cpp server ?
Regards
harry
___________________________________________________________________________
Appel audio GRATUIT partout dans le monde avec le nouveau Yahoo! Messenger
Téléchargez cette version sur http://fr.messenger.yahoo.com
is there anyway to set temp variables in ser.cfg? if so, how to set/access?
Jack Wei
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Hi all,
1st question is does openser support Failover and
load balance of openser server. That means we can use
two or more openser server to handle the SIP
request/response and use hot backup. How to do that
2nd question is that I find openser support both
Jabber and SIMPLE. It look like Jabber is stable and
support and many people from open source world, many
plus GOOGLE. But SIMPLE is still unstable. I want to
use Jabber for providing presence/IM service, plus
file transfer service.(I want to using reSIProcate
stack from sipfoundry as client's stack) Does openser
support that all?
And which is better, Jabber or SIMPLE?
Regards,
Jimway
__________________________________
Yahoo! Mail
Stay connected, organized, and protected. Take the tour:
http://tour.mail.yahoo.com/mailtour.html
The reason is that the function save sends the response and all further processing can not affect this response (which is already travelling back). I don't know if it can be called bug, feature, or just design... ;)
SER config file executes the commands sequentially (besides route blocks) and you have to be careful with the order.
Samuel.
Unclassified.
>>> Fermín Galán Márquez <fermin.galan(a)agora-2000.com> 06/22/05 12:47PM >>>
Hello,
I've found and estrange behaviour in the 'append_to_reply' action when used
in conjunction with 'save' action during REGISTER processing.
In particular, if I use in ser.cfg:
...
append_to_reply("Service-Route:
<sip:orig@scscf.domain1.com;lr>\r\n");
save("domain1");
...
Then the Service-Route header is added to the "200 OK". But if changing the
relative order of the actions:
...
save("domain1");
append_to_reply("Service-Route:
<sip:orig@scscf.domain1.com;lr>\r\n");
...
Then the 'append_to_reply' is ignored: no header is added to the response.
I think is a weird behaviour... I would like to know if this is a bug or a
feature (I have read the textops documentation at
http://www.iptel.org/ser/doc/modules/html/textops.html#AEN104 and nothing
about problems with 'save' are mentioned).
Thank you in advance!
Best regards,
------
Fermín
Agora Systems, S. A.
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Hello,
I've found and estrange behaviour in the 'append_to_reply' action when used
in conjunction with 'save' action during REGISTER processing.
In particular, if I use in ser.cfg:
...
append_to_reply("Service-Route:
<sip:orig@scscf.domain1.com;lr>\r\n");
save("domain1");
...
Then the Service-Route header is added to the "200 OK". But if changing the
relative order of the actions:
...
save("domain1");
append_to_reply("Service-Route:
<sip:orig@scscf.domain1.com;lr>\r\n");
...
Then the 'append_to_reply' is ignored: no header is added to the response.
I think is a weird behaviour... I would like to know if this is a bug or a
feature (I have read the textops documentation at
http://www.iptel.org/ser/doc/modules/html/textops.html#AEN104 and nothing
about problems with 'save' are mentioned).
Thank you in advance!
Best regards,
------
Fermín
Agora Systems, S. A.
Ok, just to recap - cos Im getting a little bit confused ;)
I have two choices(?)
1. Somehow invoke sipsak to configure permanent addresses with a
particular q value.
2. Develop a FIFO method to change q value.
Am I correct in thinking directly modifying the usrloc table in the
database is out of the question because the changes cant be updated
except by SER itself in which case a reboot would required - Correct?
Also lcr module (load_contacts() etc) isnt suitable for per user
configurable sequential forking?
Have others tried to implement similar functionality or is it usually
a generic site wide sequential forking policy?
Many thanks for the opinions and help so far.
Aisling.
>
>---- Original Message ----
>From: jh(a)tutpro.com
>To: greger(a)teigre.com
>Subject: Re: [Serusers] Portal for forking call to
>preferredenddevice-sequential ringing
>Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 21:41:54 +0300
>
>>Greger V. Teigre writes:
>>
>> > :-D Yes, that is true. But I didn't know that you could change
>q-value in
>> > FIFO?
>>
>>if that is not possible, then you can always use sipsak to install
>>"permanent" registrations with a given q value. sipsak has an
>>additional advantage over fifo in that you can apply permissions
>check
>>to sipsak registration, but not to fifo registration.
>>
>>-- juha
>>
>>-------------------Legal
>Disclaimer---------------------------------------
>>
>>The above electronic mail transmission is confidential and intended
>only for the person to whom it is addressed. Its contents may be
>protected by legal and/or professional privilege. Should it be
>received by you in error please contact the sender at the above
>quoted email address. Any unauthorised form of reproduction of this
>message is strictly prohibited. The Institute does not guarantee the
>security of any information electronically transmitted and is not
>liable if the information contained in this communication is not a
>proper and complete record of the message as transmitted by the
>sender nor for any delay in its receipt.
>>
>>
-------------------Legal Disclaimer---------------------------------------
The above electronic mail transmission is confidential and intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. Its contents may be protected by legal and/or professional privilege. Should it be received by you in error please contact the sender at the above quoted email address. Any unauthorised form of reproduction of this message is strictly prohibited. The Institute does not guarantee the security of any information electronically transmitted and is not liable if the information contained in this communication is not a proper and complete record of the message as transmitted by the sender nor for any delay in its receipt.
hi
i have a problem :
i have 2 same softphone , 1 can call the other and the other cannot call the
previous.
it's the same configuration for both in the softphone.
i did test about this that can't call: i change the softphone, i change the
laptop, i use the user that this can call use and change with mine...
in basis ser.cfg what do the difference between 2 users ? nothing i guess
i'm using a stun to pass over nat and it works in one direction (from one
user to the other)
it didn't work
someone has an idea
thanks
M.
hi
i'm wroting you cause i saw that you wrote a lot about pa module and you
finally succeed to install it.
congratulations!
i 'm still trying and only one person answered me...
please can you help me?
my problems and questions are :
1. did you find more docs about pa module cause the README is not very
long.?
2. how install it? what the difference between handle_subscription
("registrar") and publish ?
3. how i have to use the pa module and mysql ? i saw in one of your message
your ser.cfg but i don't know where you found all the informations to write
the lines about pa modules...
4. pa module works with all the softphone (i'm using a softphone from Xten
(eyebeam))? how do they know to communicate with this module of SER? how can
i do test?
please help me it's very important
thanks a lot
Michael