hi guys,
i need help please. newbie here.
i just installed v0.9.0(ser-0.9.0_src.tar) using "make
prefix=/usr/local all" then "make prefix=/usr/local
install". looks like everything was installed.
ser.cfg is /usr/local/etc/ser and executables are in
/usr/local/sbin. the modules are in their correct
directory as shown in the ser.cfg.
my problem is when i do a "serctl start" i get this
problem:
[root@SIPserver sbin]# serctl start
Starting SER : PID file /var/run/ser.pid does not
exist -- SER start failed
secondly, if i do a "serctl moni" i get this message:
[root@SIPserver sbin]# serctl moni
Error opening ser's FIFO /tmp/ser_fifo
Make sure you have line fifo=/tmp/ser_fifo in your
config
i am sure that the default ser.cfg has the line
fifo=/tmp/ser_fifo.
thirdly, if i do a "ser start" i get this message but
it looks like ser is not still running:
[root@SIPserver sbin]# ser start
Listening on
udp: 127.0.0.1 [127.0.0.1]:5060
udp: 146.82.219.99 [146.82.219.99]:5060
tcp: 127.0.0.1 [127.0.0.1]:5060
tcp: 146.82.219.99 [146.82.219.99]:5060
Aliases:
tcp: SIPserver.islandtel.com.ph:5060
tcp: localhost:5060
tcp: localhost.localdomain:5060
tcp: SIPserver:5060
udp: SIPserver.islandtel.com.ph:5060
udp: localhost:5060
udp: localhost.localdomain:5060
udp: SIPserver:5060
[root@SIPserver sbin]#
other info about the server are the following:
[root@SIPserver sbin]# ser -V
version: ser 0.9.0 (i386/linux)
flags: STATS: Off, USE_IPV6, USE_TCP, DISABLE_NAGLE,
USE_MCAST, DNS_IP_HACK, SHM_MEM, SHM_MMAP, PKG_MALLOC,
DBG_QM_MALLOC, FAST_LOCK-ADAPTIVE_WAIT
ADAPTIVE_WAIT_LOOPS=1024, MAX_RECV_BUFFER_SIZE 262144,
MAX_LISTEN 16, MAX_URI_SIZE 1024, BUF_SIZE 65535
@(#) $Id: main.c,v 1.197 2004/12/03 19:09:31 andrei
Exp $
main.c compiled on 14:40:36 Apr 19 2005 with gcc 3.2
[root@SIPserver sbin]# uname -a
Linux SIPserver 2.4.20-8 #1 Thu Mar 13 17:54:28 EST
2003 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
[root@SIPserver sbin]#
any help regarding my problem will be highly
appreciated.
best regards,
Noel
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
I am using the onsip ser.cfg for mediaproxy. All seems OK when I call
between two X-Lite clients. However calls between X-Lite and a Sipura 2000
have no audio in either direction. Both the X-Lite clients and the Sipura
are on the same network behind NAT and going out to the SER/Mediaproxy
server which has a public IP. SER and Mediaproxy are on the same server.
I've tested SJPhone to Sipura and there's no audio also, so it seems like a
Sipura issue.
I've set NAT mapping enable and NAT Keep Alive enable to yes on the Sipura.
What am I missing?
Regards
Cameron
Hi:
I know that ser itself can work with a remote database through changing
the ser.cfg but can serctl add/remove user to a remote mysql database.
Thanks for any help.
Hi there!
I was able to install ser 0.8.14 on my debian box and make a call.
However, I can hear
echo every time I speak. Is there something missing with my config that can
filter / stop
this problem.
Another, mysql authentication is not working though my config file is ok as
reported during compilation.
Can somebody help me in building a simple ser config file that use mysql to
authenticate user.
thanks in advance.
ed
Hi,
i install SER 0.8.14 on my SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 9.
it works. but i dont like to run SER under root-account, so
i add a new system user "ser", i can start SER, but serctl have problems
with access to fifo. After "serctl moni" i see in /var/log/messages
following:
Apr 20 09:31:57 xxx /sbin/ser[8669]: ERROR: open_reply_pipe: open
error (/tmp/ser_receiver_8732): Permission denied
Apr 20 09:31:57 xxx /sbin/ser[8669]: ERROR: fifo_reply: no reply pipe
/tmp/ser_receiver_8732
the user "ser" is member of group "users".
how can i allow the user "ser" to create and access the fifos?
many thanks,
Grigory Fishilevich
Hello,
Thanks for reading this mail.
I have installed latest SER in linux. With serctl moni, it shows 0
failures.But when we try to register from a SIP client, it times out
always .
The ps -eaf | grep ser shows several process running. Any pointers on
how to test this will be really helpful.
Thanks
Ramki
DISCLAIMER:
This email (including any attachments) is intended for the sole use of the intended recipient/s and may contain material that is CONFIDENTIAL AND PRIVATE COMPANY INFORMATION. Any review or reliance by others or copying or distribution or forwarding of any or all of the contents in this message is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by email and delete all copies; your cooperation in this regard is appreciated.
Hi all,
Here is my confusion about SER supporting NAT transversal.
1. With only RTPProxy, what kinds of types of NAT can SER with nathelper transverse?
2. What's the difference between MediaProxy and RTPProxy?
3. If UA supports STUN, do SER need to configure nathelper to support NAT transversal? Just because I knew STUN protocol only process a few kinds of types of NAT, I want to know what advantage it will add if I configure SER with nathelper.
Thanks a lot!
ljzhang
xueyou38(a)163.com
2005-04-12
Hi all,
Here is my confusion about SER supporting NAT transversal.
1. With only RTPProxy, what kinds of types of NAT can SER with nathelper transverse?
2. What's the difference between MediaProxy and RTPProxy?
3. If UA supports STUN, do SER need to configure nathelper to support NAT transversal? Just because I knew STUN protocol only process a few kinds of types of NAT, I want to know what advantage it will add if I configure SER with nathelper.
Thanks a lot!
ljzhang
xueyou38(a)163.com
2005-04-12
Hello everyone,
I was wondering whether anyone knew what was going on with the following
bug:
http://developer.berlios.de/bugs/?func=detailbug&bug_id=2925&group_id=480
For those not wanting to follow the links, this is a bug submitted by
someone back in December wherein ser puts 'branch=0' in the Via header it
creates for an ACK to a 200 OK Invite response.
I haven't seen any activity related to this, and it's affecting
interoperability with one of our termination providers.
0.9.0 users, have you seen the same problem??
Cheers,
Darryl