sr-users March 2005

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

250 participants
627 discussions

Re: [Serusers] SER 0.8.14 to 0.9.0
by Aisling O'Driscoll 29 Mar '05

29 Mar '05

Thanks for the replies so far - Everyone has been very helpful. I have one final question. I deleted the "ser" directory from /usr/sbin as suggested. I am using Suse Linux 9.0 so then I modified the "profile" file in the /etc directory with the following: PATH="$PATH:/usr/local/sbin/ser:." Then I carried out the cvs instructions from the iptel site (as detailed at end of this mail) to install SER 0.9.1. When I run "ser -V" I now see that SER has been updated. However when I run /usr/local/sbin/serctl start to start SER. I get an error: Starting SER: PID file /var/run/ser.pid does not exist -- SER start failed. I used to start SER using /etc/init.d/ser start. That also doesn't work. What could be wrong? Also where is my new ser.cfg file stored? My old one is still in /etc/ser. Thanks again. Aisling. cd /usr/src export CVSROOT=:pserver:anonymous@cvs.berlios.de:/cvsroot/ser cvs login [enter for password] "cvs co -r rel_0_9_0 sip_router" from onsip site. cd sip_router make all make install >---- Original Message ---- >From: javarockx(a)gmail.com >To: ashling.odriscoll(a)cit.ie >Subject: Re: [Serusers] SER 0.8.14 to 0.9.0 >Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 08:07:35 -0500 > >>Each linux user has an environment variable called PATH. You can set >>your path in the .bash_profile (assuming a redhat linux distro). >>Consult your linux distro for setting environment variables. >> >>On most you can just do this: >> >>export PATH=$PATH:/usr/local/sbin/ >> >>But this will only be for you current logged in session. When you >exit >>the bash shell this setting will be lost. >> >>Regards, >>Paul >> >> >>On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 13:50:18 +0100, Aisling O'Driscoll >><ashling.odriscoll(a)cit.ie> wrote: >>> Apologies if this is a ridculous question where will I find the >$PATH >>> variable? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Aisling >>> > >>> >---- Original Message ---- >>> >From: javarockx(a)gmail.com >>> >To: ashling.odriscoll(a)cit.ie, serusers(a)iptel.org >>> >Subject: Re: [Serusers] SER 0.8.14 to 0.9.0 >>> >Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 07:49:44 -0500 >>> > >>> >>it looks like you have two copies of ser on your machine. >>> >> >>> >>You should complete remove /usr/sbin/ser and make sure >>> >>/usr/local/sbin/ser is in your $PATH. >>> >> >>> >>Regards, >>> >>Paul >>> >> >>> >> >>> >>On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 13:43:56 +0100, Aisling O'Driscoll >>> >><ashling.odriscoll(a)cit.ie> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> When I type "which ser". I get /usr/sbin/ser. How can I >proceed >>> >from >>> >>> here?. Thank you for the reply. >>> >>> >>> >>> Aisling. >>> >>> >>> >>> ---- Original Message ---- >>> >>> From: javarockx(a)gmail.com >>> >>> To: ashling.odriscoll(a)cit.ie >>> >>> Subject: Re: [Serusers] SER 0.8.14 to 0.9.0 >>> >>> Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 06:46:20 -0500 >>> >>> >>> >>> >Aisling, >>> >>> > >>> >>> >It seems like one of the following is true: >>> >>> > >>> >>> >1) you're somehow mixing 0.8.14 source code with 0.9.1 >>> >>> > >>> >>> >2) you have more than one copy of ser installed on your >system. >>> >If >>> >>> >you >>> >>> >type "which ser" does it point to /usr/local/sbin/ser ?? >>> >>> > >>> >>> >Regards, >>> >>> >Paul >>> >>> > >>> >>> > >>> >>> >On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 09:55:06 +0100, Aisling O'Driscoll >>> >>> ><ashling.odriscoll(a)cit.ie> wrote: >>> >>> >> Hello, >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> I am still trying to change my SER version from 0.8.14 to >>> >0.9.0. I >>> >>> >> have >>> >>> >> followed the instructions at the following link and also on >the >>> >>> >onsip >>> >>> >> site. >>> >>> >> http://www.iptel.org/ser/cvs/ >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> However when I run ser -V, I still see that I'm running >0.8.14. >>> >>> >I've >>> >>> >> given an exact detail of what i do below and can someone >PLEASE >>> >>> >> PLEASE point out the mistake. Thank you. >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> cd /usr/src >>> >>> >> export >CVSROOT=:pserver:anonymous@cvs.berlios.de:/cvsroot/ser >>> >>> >> cvs login >>> >>> >> [enter for password] >>> >>> >> Here I've tried both "cvs co sip_router" for unstable >version >>> >and >>> >>> >> "cvs co -r rel_0_9_0 sip_router" from onsip site. >>> >>> >> cd sip_router >>> >>> >> make all >>> >>> >> make install >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> It says every file is updated but I still run the same >stable >>> >>> >> version. I've killed all ser processes before running this >>> >command >>> >>> >> (killall ser) >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> Please let me know what Im doing wrong, >>> >>> >> Aisling. >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> -------------------Legal >>> >>> >Disclaimer--------------------------------------- >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> The above electronic mail transmission is confidential and >>> >intended >>> >>> >only for the person to whom it is addressed. Its contents may >be >>> >>> >protected by legal and/or professional privilege. Should it >be >>> >>> >received by you in error please contact the sender at the >above >>> >>> >quoted email address. Any unauthorised form of reproduction >of >>> >this >>> >>> >message is strictly prohibited. The Institute does not >guarantee >>> >the >>> >>> >security of any information electronically transmitted and is >not >>> >>> >liable if the information contained in this communication is >not >>> >a >>> >>> >proper and complete record of the message as transmitted by >the >>> >>> >sender nor for any delay in its receipt. >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >>> >>> >> Serusers mailing list >>> >>> >> Serusers(a)iptel.org >>> >>> >> http://mail.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers >>> >>> >> >>> >>> > >>> >>> >-------------------Legal >>> >>> >Disclaimer--------------------------------------- >>> >>> > >>> >>> >The above electronic mail transmission is confidential and >>> >intended >>> >>> >only for the person to whom it is addressed. Its contents may >be >>> >>> >protected by legal and/or professional privilege. Should it >be >>> >>> >received by you in error please contact the sender at the >above >>> >>> >quoted email address. Any unauthorised form of reproduction >of >>> >this >>> >>> >message is strictly prohibited. The Institute does not >guarantee >>> >the >>> >>> >security of any information electronically transmitted and is >not >>> >>> >liable if the information contained in this communication is >not >>> >a >>> >>> >proper and complete record of the message as transmitted by >the >>> >>> >sender nor for any delay in its receipt. >>> >>> > >>> >>> >>> >>> -------------------Legal >>> >Disclaimer--------------------------------------- >>> >>> >>> >>> The above electronic mail transmission is confidential and >>> >intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. Its >contents >>> >may be protected by legal and/or professional privilege. Should >it be >>> >received by you in error please contact the sender at the above >>> >quoted email address. Any unauthorised form of reproduction of >this >>> >message is strictly prohibited. The Institute does not guarantee >the >>> >security of any information electronically transmitted and is not >>> >liable if the information contained in this communication is not >a >>> >proper and complete record of the message as transmitted by the >>> >sender nor for any delay in its receipt. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>-------------------Legal >>> >Disclaimer--------------------------------------- >>> >> >>> >>The above electronic mail transmission is confidential and >intended >>> >only for the person to whom it is addressed. Its contents may be >>> >protected by legal and/or professional privilege. Should it be >>> >received by you in error please contact the sender at the above >>> >quoted email address. Any unauthorised form of reproduction of >this >>> >message is strictly prohibited. The Institute does not guarantee >the >>> >security of any information electronically transmitted and is not >>> >liable if the information contained in this communication is not >a >>> >proper and complete record of the message as transmitted by the >>> >sender nor for any delay in its receipt. >>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> -------------------Legal >Disclaimer--------------------------------------- >>> >>> The above electronic mail transmission is confidential and >intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. Its contents >may be protected by legal and/or professional privilege. Should it be >received by you in error please contact the sender at the above >quoted email address. Any unauthorised form of reproduction of this >message is strictly prohibited. The Institute does not guarantee the >security of any information electronically transmitted and is not >liable if the information contained in this communication is not a >proper and complete record of the message as transmitted by the >sender nor for any delay in its receipt. >>> >>> >> >>-------------------Legal >Disclaimer--------------------------------------- >> >>The above electronic mail transmission is confidential and intended >only for the person to whom it is addressed. Its contents may be >protected by legal and/or professional privilege. Should it be >received by you in error please contact the sender at the above >quoted email address. Any unauthorised form of reproduction of this >message is strictly prohibited. The Institute does not guarantee the >security of any information electronically transmitted and is not >liable if the information contained in this communication is not a >proper and complete record of the message as transmitted by the >sender nor for any delay in its receipt. >> >> -------------------Legal Disclaimer--------------------------------------- The above electronic mail transmission is confidential and intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. Its contents may be protected by legal and/or professional privilege. Should it be received by you in error please contact the sender at the above quoted email address. Any unauthorised form of reproduction of this message is strictly prohibited. The Institute does not guarantee the security of any information electronically transmitted and is not liable if the information contained in this communication is not a proper and complete record of the message as transmitted by the sender nor for any delay in its receipt.

2 1

[Serusers] Routing BYEs
by Giovanni Balasso 29 Mar '05

29 Mar '05

Hi serusers another simple problem making me crazy. I can't get my NATed clients to send ACKs and BYEs thru ser. After inviting another uac with ser taking care of the relay (setting up rtpproxy and fixing nat), any other signaling message doesn't even hit ser and gets lost. My configuration is the following: I have ser running on a machine with only private ip, but reachable from the internet via router public ip and port forwarding. I noticed that the INVITE is sent by uacs to the right public ip but then every other signal (ACKs, BYEs, CANCELs) is sent by uacs to ser private ip. Let me understand something more about ser, please. Any ideas why BYEs are sent to private ip? Is ser forcing the uacs to modify sip header whith its own ip? where is it doing this? maybe in record_route or in fix_nated_contact? Thanks in advance to everyone who will make some light on my doubts. Here is the stripped ser.cfg listen=192.168.1.100 if (nat_uac_test("3")) { if (method == "REGISTER" || !search("^Record-Route:")) { fix_nated_contact(); if (method == "INVITE") { fix_nated_sdp("1"); }; force_rport(); setflag(6); }; }; record_route(); if (loose_route()) { route(1); }; if (method=="INVITE") { if (lookup("location")) { setflag(1); route(1); break; }; }; route[1] { if (isflagset(6)){ force_rtp_proxy(); t_on_reply("1"); }; if (method == "BYE" || method == "CANCEL"){ setflag(1); }; if (!t_relay()){ sl_reply_error(); }; break; } -- Giovanni Balasso giaso(a)yahoo.it

1 0

Re: [Serusers] SER 0.8.14 to 0.9.0
by Aisling O'Driscoll 29 Mar '05

29 Mar '05

When I type "which ser". I get /usr/sbin/ser. How can I proceed from here?. Thank you for the reply. Aisling. ---- Original Message ---- From: javarockx(a)gmail.com To: ashling.odriscoll(a)cit.ie Subject: Re: [Serusers] SER 0.8.14 to 0.9.0 Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 06:46:20 -0500 >Aisling, > >It seems like one of the following is true: > >1) you're somehow mixing 0.8.14 source code with 0.9.1 > >2) you have more than one copy of ser installed on your system. If >you >type "which ser" does it point to /usr/local/sbin/ser ?? > >Regards, >Paul > > >On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 09:55:06 +0100, Aisling O'Driscoll ><ashling.odriscoll(a)cit.ie> wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I am still trying to change my SER version from 0.8.14 to 0.9.0. I >> have >> followed the instructions at the following link and also on the >onsip >> site. >> http://www.iptel.org/ser/cvs/ >> >> However when I run ser -V, I still see that I'm running 0.8.14. >I've >> given an exact detail of what i do below and can someone PLEASE >> PLEASE point out the mistake. Thank you. >> >> cd /usr/src >> export CVSROOT=:pserver:anonymous@cvs.berlios.de:/cvsroot/ser >> cvs login >> [enter for password] >> Here I've tried both "cvs co sip_router" for unstable version and >> "cvs co -r rel_0_9_0 sip_router" from onsip site. >> cd sip_router >> make all >> make install >> >> It says every file is updated but I still run the same stable >> version. I've killed all ser processes before running this command >> (killall ser) >> >> Please let me know what Im doing wrong, >> Aisling. >> >> -------------------Legal >Disclaimer--------------------------------------- >> >> The above electronic mail transmission is confidential and intended >only for the person to whom it is addressed. Its contents may be >protected by legal and/or professional privilege. Should it be >received by you in error please contact the sender at the above >quoted email address. Any unauthorised form of reproduction of this >message is strictly prohibited. The Institute does not guarantee the >security of any information electronically transmitted and is not >liable if the information contained in this communication is not a >proper and complete record of the message as transmitted by the >sender nor for any delay in its receipt. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Serusers mailing list >> Serusers(a)iptel.org >> http://mail.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers >> > >-------------------Legal >Disclaimer--------------------------------------- > >The above electronic mail transmission is confidential and intended >only for the person to whom it is addressed. Its contents may be >protected by legal and/or professional privilege. Should it be >received by you in error please contact the sender at the above >quoted email address. Any unauthorised form of reproduction of this >message is strictly prohibited. The Institute does not guarantee the >security of any information electronically transmitted and is not >liable if the information contained in this communication is not a >proper and complete record of the message as transmitted by the >sender nor for any delay in its receipt. > -------------------Legal Disclaimer--------------------------------------- The above electronic mail transmission is confidential and intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. Its contents may be protected by legal and/or professional privilege. Should it be received by you in error please contact the sender at the above quoted email address. Any unauthorised form of reproduction of this message is strictly prohibited. The Institute does not guarantee the security of any information electronically transmitted and is not liable if the information contained in this communication is not a proper and complete record of the message as transmitted by the sender nor for any delay in its receipt.

3 2

Re: [Serusers] SER 0.8.14 to 0.9.0
by Aisling O'Driscoll 29 Mar '05

29 Mar '05

Apologies if this is a ridculous question where will I find the $PATH variable? Thanks, Aisling > >---- Original Message ---- >From: javarockx(a)gmail.com >To: ashling.odriscoll(a)cit.ie, serusers(a)iptel.org >Subject: Re: [Serusers] SER 0.8.14 to 0.9.0 >Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 07:49:44 -0500 > >>it looks like you have two copies of ser on your machine. >> >>You should complete remove /usr/sbin/ser and make sure >>/usr/local/sbin/ser is in your $PATH. >> >>Regards, >>Paul >> >> >>On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 13:43:56 +0100, Aisling O'Driscoll >><ashling.odriscoll(a)cit.ie> wrote: >>> >>> When I type "which ser". I get /usr/sbin/ser. How can I proceed >from >>> here?. Thank you for the reply. >>> >>> Aisling. >>> >>> ---- Original Message ---- >>> From: javarockx(a)gmail.com >>> To: ashling.odriscoll(a)cit.ie >>> Subject: Re: [Serusers] SER 0.8.14 to 0.9.0 >>> Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 06:46:20 -0500 >>> >>> >Aisling, >>> > >>> >It seems like one of the following is true: >>> > >>> >1) you're somehow mixing 0.8.14 source code with 0.9.1 >>> > >>> >2) you have more than one copy of ser installed on your system. >If >>> >you >>> >type "which ser" does it point to /usr/local/sbin/ser ?? >>> > >>> >Regards, >>> >Paul >>> > >>> > >>> >On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 09:55:06 +0100, Aisling O'Driscoll >>> ><ashling.odriscoll(a)cit.ie> wrote: >>> >> Hello, >>> >> >>> >> I am still trying to change my SER version from 0.8.14 to >0.9.0. I >>> >> have >>> >> followed the instructions at the following link and also on the >>> >onsip >>> >> site. >>> >> http://www.iptel.org/ser/cvs/ >>> >> >>> >> However when I run ser -V, I still see that I'm running 0.8.14. >>> >I've >>> >> given an exact detail of what i do below and can someone PLEASE >>> >> PLEASE point out the mistake. Thank you. >>> >> >>> >> cd /usr/src >>> >> export CVSROOT=:pserver:anonymous@cvs.berlios.de:/cvsroot/ser >>> >> cvs login >>> >> [enter for password] >>> >> Here I've tried both "cvs co sip_router" for unstable version >and >>> >> "cvs co -r rel_0_9_0 sip_router" from onsip site. >>> >> cd sip_router >>> >> make all >>> >> make install >>> >> >>> >> It says every file is updated but I still run the same stable >>> >> version. I've killed all ser processes before running this >command >>> >> (killall ser) >>> >> >>> >> Please let me know what Im doing wrong, >>> >> Aisling. >>> >> >>> >> -------------------Legal >>> >Disclaimer--------------------------------------- >>> >> >>> >> The above electronic mail transmission is confidential and >intended >>> >only for the person to whom it is addressed. Its contents may be >>> >protected by legal and/or professional privilege. Should it be >>> >received by you in error please contact the sender at the above >>> >quoted email address. Any unauthorised form of reproduction of >this >>> >message is strictly prohibited. The Institute does not guarantee >the >>> >security of any information electronically transmitted and is not >>> >liable if the information contained in this communication is not >a >>> >proper and complete record of the message as transmitted by the >>> >sender nor for any delay in its receipt. >>> >> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >>> >> Serusers mailing list >>> >> Serusers(a)iptel.org >>> >> http://mail.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers >>> >> >>> > >>> >-------------------Legal >>> >Disclaimer--------------------------------------- >>> > >>> >The above electronic mail transmission is confidential and >intended >>> >only for the person to whom it is addressed. Its contents may be >>> >protected by legal and/or professional privilege. Should it be >>> >received by you in error please contact the sender at the above >>> >quoted email address. Any unauthorised form of reproduction of >this >>> >message is strictly prohibited. The Institute does not guarantee >the >>> >security of any information electronically transmitted and is not >>> >liable if the information contained in this communication is not >a >>> >proper and complete record of the message as transmitted by the >>> >sender nor for any delay in its receipt. >>> > >>> >>> -------------------Legal >Disclaimer--------------------------------------- >>> >>> The above electronic mail transmission is confidential and >intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. Its contents >may be protected by legal and/or professional privilege. Should it be >received by you in error please contact the sender at the above >quoted email address. Any unauthorised form of reproduction of this >message is strictly prohibited. The Institute does not guarantee the >security of any information electronically transmitted and is not >liable if the information contained in this communication is not a >proper and complete record of the message as transmitted by the >sender nor for any delay in its receipt. >>> >>> >> >>-------------------Legal >Disclaimer--------------------------------------- >> >>The above electronic mail transmission is confidential and intended >only for the person to whom it is addressed. Its contents may be >protected by legal and/or professional privilege. Should it be >received by you in error please contact the sender at the above >quoted email address. Any unauthorised form of reproduction of this >message is strictly prohibited. The Institute does not guarantee the >security of any information electronically transmitted and is not >liable if the information contained in this communication is not a >proper and complete record of the message as transmitted by the >sender nor for any delay in its receipt. >> >> -------------------Legal Disclaimer--------------------------------------- The above electronic mail transmission is confidential and intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. Its contents may be protected by legal and/or professional privilege. Should it be received by you in error please contact the sender at the above quoted email address. Any unauthorised form of reproduction of this message is strictly prohibited. The Institute does not guarantee the security of any information electronically transmitted and is not liable if the information contained in this communication is not a proper and complete record of the message as transmitted by the sender nor for any delay in its receipt.

2 1

[Serusers] SIP 477 error when registered using TCP
by mahesh 29 Mar '05

29 Mar '05

Hi all, I am using the following network configuration. HOST1---NAT---Internet---HOST2 HOST1 and HOST2 are windows XP machines with SJPhone software. The NAT box has SIP ALG(Application Level Gateway), which modifies the SIP packets to replace the Private IP address with the Public IP address. I am registering with iptel.org proxy server using TCP from both the machines. I am able to make a call from HOST1 to HOST2. But when i try to make a call from HOST2 to HOST1, i get an error which says, "477 Unfortunately error on sending to next hop occurred(477/TM)". When I register using UDP, then i do not see this problem. Could someone tell me what I am missing here. Thanks Mahesh

1 0

[Serusers] Can't make latest SIP-Version
by Dirk Willbrandt 29 Mar '05

29 Mar '05

Hi all ! I tried to compile the latest CVS-Version of ser but i get always the same failure: root@siiip:~/sip_router> make prefix=/usr/local all "Makefile.sources", line 17: Missing dependency operator "Makefile.sources", line 19: Need an operator "Makefile", line 56: Missing dependency operator Error expanding embedded variable. I tried also different versions of ser but i get this failure everytime. I'm using FreeBSD 5.3. Can anyone help me ? Thanks Dirk Willbrandt

2 1

[Serusers] Self registering tool for X-lite with SER
by Ladislav Andel 29 Mar '05

29 Mar '05

Hi guys, Does anybody have an experience with making X-lite more user-friendly when after installing X-lite it asks for new user name and password and sets X-lite ready to use for a call? Of course, already registered with my SER router. I know that FWD had this possibility. Would anybody give me a hint what tool or software I need for this task, please? Thank you, Lada

2 2

[Serusers] SER 0.8.14 to 0.9.0
by Aisling O'Driscoll 29 Mar '05

29 Mar '05

Hello, I am still trying to change my SER version from 0.8.14 to 0.9.0. I have followed the instructions at the following link and also on the onsip site. http://www.iptel.org/ser/cvs/ However when I run ser -V, I still see that I'm running 0.8.14. I've given an exact detail of what i do below and can someone PLEASE PLEASE point out the mistake. Thank you. cd /usr/src export CVSROOT=:pserver:anonymous@cvs.berlios.de:/cvsroot/ser cvs login [enter for password] Here I've tried both "cvs co sip_router" for unstable version and "cvs co -r rel_0_9_0 sip_router" from onsip site. cd sip_router make all make install It says every file is updated but I still run the same stable version. I've killed all ser processes before running this command (killall ser) Please let me know what Im doing wrong, Aisling. -------------------Legal Disclaimer--------------------------------------- The above electronic mail transmission is confidential and intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. Its contents may be protected by legal and/or professional privilege. Should it be received by you in error please contact the sender at the above quoted email address. Any unauthorised form of reproduction of this message is strictly prohibited. The Institute does not guarantee the security of any information electronically transmitted and is not liable if the information contained in this communication is not a proper and complete record of the message as transmitted by the sender nor for any delay in its receipt.

2 1

[Serusers] ser+asterisk+voicemail
by hofi 29 Mar '05

29 Mar '05

hi all configuration: inalp gw (pstn) ------> ser ------> asterisk (only voicemail) the following problems occur: 1) ser forwards the call to asterisk (if the user is in the voicemail group) if the client does not answer after 30 sec. from sip to sip is working. but if a call comes from the pstn to a sip client, the client rings and hangs up after 30 sec. ser then forwards it to the asterisk, but the pstn call keeps on ringing and no voicemail is to hear. ser writes the following error Mar 29 13:24:39 sip /usr/local/sbin/ser[7017]: ++++++++++++INVITE****************** Mar 29 13:24:39 sip /usr/local/sbin/ser[7017]: ++++++++++++voicemail*********************** Mar 29 13:25:19 sip /usr/local/sbin/ser[7022]: ++++++++++++Failure Route****************** Mar 29 13:25:19 sip /usr/local/sbin/ser[7022]: ++++++++++++Failure Route****************** Mar 29 13:25:19 sip /usr/local/sbin/ser[7017]: ++++++++++++voicemail*********************** Mar 29 13:25:19 sip /usr/local/sbin/ser[7016]: ERROR: t_should_relay_response: status rewrite by UAS: stored: 408, received: 200 Mar 29 13:25:20 sip /usr/local/sbin/ser[7017]: ERROR: t_should_relay_response: status rewrite by UAS: stored: 408, received: 200 Mar 29 13:25:21 sip /usr/local/sbin/ser[7016]: ERROR: t_should_relay_response: status rewrite by UAS: stored: 408, received: 200 Mar 29 13:25:24 sip last message repeated 3 times Mar 29 13:25:28 sip /usr/local/sbin/ser[7015]: ++++++++++++Loose Route****************** Mar 29 13:25:28 sip /usr/local/sbin/ser[7014]: contact_parser(): Empty body Mar 29 13:25:28 sip /usr/local/sbin/ser[7014]: parse_contact(): Error while parsing Mar 29 13:25:28 sip /usr/local/sbin/ser[7014]: get_contact_uri: Error while parsing Contact body 2) if ua1 call ua2 (and ua2 is in the voicemail group) and ua1 hangs up ser forwards to asterisk and the voicemail is run in the background, but instead the call should be cancelled and not forwarded to the voicemail does anyone know about these problems? regards raid ser config snip: loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/sl.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/tm.so" # ------------- tm parameters modparam("tm", "fr_timer", 30) modparam("tm", "fr_inv_timer", 25) modparam("tm", "wt_timer", 5) modparam("tm", "fr_inv_timer_avp", "inv_timeout") route { if (lookup("location") | lookup("aliases")) { if (is_user_in("Request-URI", "voicemail")) { log (1, "++++++++++++voicemail***********************"); t_on_failure("1"); avp_write("i:30", "inv_timeout"); t_relay(); route(2); break; } else { log (1, "++++++++++++no voicemail********************"); route(2); break; } } } route [2] { if (uri=~"[@:](192\.168\.|10\.|172\.(1[6-9]|2[0-9]|3[0-1])\.)" && !search("^Route:")){ sl_send_reply("479", "We don't forward to private IP addresses"); break; }; if (isflagset(2)) { force_rtp_proxy(); }; t_on_reply("1"); if (!t_relay()) { sl_reply_error(); }; } failure_route[1] { log (1, "++++++++++++Failure Route******************"); revert_uri(); rewritehostport("XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX:5060"); append_branch(); t_on_failure("1"); t_relay(); break(); }

1 0

[Serusers] Doubt on loose routing
by sipit 2005 29 Mar '05

29 Mar '05

Hi, I have record-route set from 200 OK for INVITE as Record-Route: <sip:pu3@P3.com:5060;lr> Record-Route: <sip:pu2@P2.com:5060;lr> Record-Route: <sip:pu1@P1.com:5060> Contact:<sip:u@UA.com:5060> As the last record-route header doesn't have lr param(P1 might be expecting strict routing), in this combination can I send the ACK/BYE requests to sip:u@UA.com:5060 directly? Is it possible to follow strict routing even though I get lr param? While I was interoperating with sipgate.de (SIP express router) I got ftag param and lr param in 200 OK, I was trying to send ACK/BYE requests to record-route URI instead of final destination. Iam not getting any response for BYE. Please help me. regards, SIPIT --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - now with 250MB free storage. Learn more.

1 0

← Newer
1
...
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
...
63
Older →

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users March 2005