sr-users July 2004

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

178 participants
449 discussions

Start a nNew thread

[Serusers] Why ser is not a B2BUA
by ser 23 Jul '04

23 Jul '04

What is the missing functionnality that miss to ser to be a B2BUA ?? (i was sure it could work in statefull mode).

2 1

RE: Fw: [Serusers] mediaproxy <-> rtpproxy
by dhiraj.2.bhuyan＠bt.com 23 Jul '04

23 Jul '04

The SER/modules/mediaproxy/Readme contains a detailed comparison. http://cvs.berlios.de/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/ser/sip_router/modules/mediaproxy… Dhiraj -----Original Message----- From: serusers-bounces(a)iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org]On Behalf Of Jan Janak Sent: 23 July 2004 10:06 To: Gustavo Russo Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Subject: Re: Fw: [Serusers] mediaproxy <-> rtpproxy Adrian and Dan described the main differences from nathelper module when they announced mediaproxy, you can find the email in the archives of the mailing list. You can also find some information on their webpage. What additional comparison do you want ? If it is not enough then try both of them, write some comparison and send it to the list. Regarding the directions of the projects, it would be better to have just one module for NAT traversal, but we were unable to resolve some conflicts between the two modules so we decided to include both of them and give users the possibility to choose. Both modules do approximately the same, mediaproxy is simpler to setup, nathelper gives you more flexibility but is more complicated to setup. Jan. On 22-07 20:15, Gustavo Russo wrote: > Arne : > > Several times many people on this list and once myself too, made a similar > question, in every case nobody answered. > > It seems that due to the copyright discussion between nathelper and > mediaproxy, many listers are afraid of beginning a flame war by comparing > the two. > > Regards, > Gustavo Russo > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Arne Scheffer" <arne.scheffer(a)ritstele.com> > > To: <serusers(a)lists.iptel.org> > > Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2004 6:06 PM > > Subject: [Serusers] mediaproxy <-> rtpproxy > > > > > > Hello all, > > > > Can anyone give an indication of what direction the project is moving with > > mediaproxy and rtpproxy ? > > > > >From the mediaproxy readme I understand the advantages of being able to > > have multiple mediaproxies. > > (sonds good) > > > > On the mailing list I have found limited questions on the mediaproxy so I > > get the impression it is not being used a lot (yet) ? > > > > I have installed it on a box with the latest CVS head. > > > > I am experencing may problems with diffent NAT types, some work (eg e-tech > > ADSL modem with NAT) but others don't (linux debian with iptables). > > > > What is the most compatible solution at present ? > > > > thanks in advance, > > Arne. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Serusers mailing list > > serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers > > > > _______________________________________________ > Serusers mailing list > serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers _______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list serusers(a)lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers

1 0

[Serusers] sip-communicator with ser
by ser die 23 Jul '04

23 Jul '04

hello friends, has any body got success using the sip-communicator with ser does any body know which codec it uses does this support in nat traveresal so please guide me with regards serdiehard __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Address AutoComplete - You start. We finish. http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail

2 1

Fw: [Serusers] mediaproxy <-> rtpproxy
by Gustavo Russo 23 Jul '04

23 Jul '04

Arne : Several times many people on this list and once myself too, made a similar question, in every case nobody answered. It seems that due to the copyright discussion between nathelper and mediaproxy, many listers are afraid of beginning a flame war by comparing the two. Regards, Gustavo Russo > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Arne Scheffer" <arne.scheffer(a)ritstele.com> > To: <serusers(a)lists.iptel.org> > Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2004 6:06 PM > Subject: [Serusers] mediaproxy <-> rtpproxy > > > Hello all, > > Can anyone give an indication of what direction the project is moving with > mediaproxy and rtpproxy ? > > >From the mediaproxy readme I understand the advantages of being able to > have multiple mediaproxies. > (sonds good) > > On the mailing list I have found limited questions on the mediaproxy so I > get the impression it is not being used a lot (yet) ? > > I have installed it on a box with the latest CVS head. > > I am experencing may problems with diffent NAT types, some work (eg e-tech > ADSL modem with NAT) but others don't (linux debian with iptables). > > What is the most compatible solution at present ? > > thanks in advance, > Arne. > > _______________________________________________ > Serusers mailing list > serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers >

3 2

[Serusers] cant compile mysql support
by Rafael J. Risco G.V 23 Jul '04

23 Jul '04

This is the error when I try to compile ser with mysql support: sipser:~/ser-0.8.12 # make modules modules=modules/mysql make[1]: Entering directory `/var/root/ser-0.8.12/modules/mysql' gcc -shared -Wl,-O2 -Wl,-E db_con.o db_mod.o db_res.o db_row.o db_utils.o db_val.o dbase.o utils.o -L/usr/lib/mysql -L/usr/local/lib -L/usr/local/lib/mysql -L/usr/local/mysql/lib/mysql/ -L/usr/pkg/lib/mysql -L/usr/local/mysql/lib -lmysqlclient -lz -o mysql.so /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i586-suse-linux/3.3.1/../../../../i586-suse-linux/bin/ld: cannot find -lz collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[1]: *** [mysql.so] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/var/root/ser-0.8.12/modules/mysql' sipser:~/ser-0.8.12 # what can I do now? Rafael --------------------------------- Do You Yahoo!? Todo lo que quieres saber de Estados Unidos, América Latina y el resto del Mundo. Visíta Yahoo! Noticias.

2 1

[Serusers] Is a terminal present?
by l.gaillard01＠free.fr 23 Jul '04

23 Jul '04

How can I know if a phone is on a particular sip server if I have more than one server via a script ? Thanks

5 7

[Serusers] expired bindings...
by Cory Zue 23 Jul '04

23 Jul '04

Hi, I'm trying to design a virtual sip client for some research that I am doing, and I am using ser as my sip server. One thing I have noticed is that when I use something like sipsak to simulate sip messages to the server, the binding of a user expires rather quickly (a few seconds...). I get this message: Binding user,'sip:user@mysipdomain.com:32791' has expired. Does the sip client need to constantly alert the server that he is still connected? And if so, what is the client/server structure of these pings? thanks, Cory

2 1

RE: [Serusers] Radius Acc errors.
by Sean Lowry 23 Jul '04

23 Jul '04

I have done this but i'm getting another strange error 0(0) ERROR: acc: can't get code for the Sip-Method attribute 0(0) init_mod(): Error while initializing module acc ERROR: error while initializing modules this debug is from ser -ddddd start. any ideas Sean > -----Original Message----- > From: Daniel-Constantin Mierla [SMTP:daniel@iptel.org] > Sent: 22 July 2004 10:31 > To: Sean Lowry > Cc: 'serusers(a)lists.iptel.org' > Subject: Re: [Serusers] Radius Acc errors. > > Have you compiled the acc module with radius support? If no, take a look > into Makefile of acc module for documentation about how to do it. > > Daniel > > > On 7/22/2004 10:27 AM, Sean Lowry wrote: > > >i compiled ser from source so i could add the radius accounting features. > > > > > >0(18879) set_mod_param_regex: acc matches module acc > > 0(18879) set_mod_param_regex: parameter <radius_config> not found in > module > ><acc> > > 0(18879) parse error (57,80-81): Can't set module parameter > > 0(18879) set_mod_param_regex: acc matches module acc > > 0(18879) set_mod_param_regex: parameter <service_type> not found in > module > ><acc> > > 0(18879) parse error (58,35-36): Can't set module parameter > > 0(18879) set_mod_param_regex: acc matches module acc > > 0(18879) set_mod_param_regex: parameter <radius_flag> not found in > module > ><acc> > > 0(18879) parse error (59,33-34): Can't set module parameter > > 0(18879) set_mod_param_regex: acc matches module acc > > 0(18879) set_mod_param_regex: parameter <radius_missed_flag> not found > in > >module <acc> > > 0(18879) parse error (60,40-41): Can't set module parameter > > > > > >does anyone have any idea's > > > >Sean > > > >_______________________________________________ > >Serusers mailing list > >serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > >http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers > > > > > >

2 1

[Serusers] Rewriting Contact and ACK uri?
by Arnd Vehling 23 Jul '04

23 Jul '04

Hi, is it allowed to rewrite Contact: and the ACK uri? thanx, Arnd

2 1

[Serusers] user_interface login
by Sanjiv Ranjan 23 Jul '04

23 Jul '04

Hi all, I have one query and I just want it to be clarified. whenever, I try to open user_interface/index or my_account.php page.It seems to be lost somewhere.Neighter showing any error nor going anywhere. Is it try to communicate with ser which is not running on my system.Is it only becouse serweb couldn't communicate with ser. Although all the pages of admin module and apart from index and my_account pages of user_interface are opening. PLease help me in getting the answer. Thanks Sanjiv

1 0

← Newer
1
...
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
...
45
Older →

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users July 2004