sr-users May 2004

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

154 participants
333 discussions

by Rafael J. Risco G.V.

hello serusers! I have followed these instructions carefully (http://iptel.org/ser/doc/ser_radius/ser_radius.html) but now I have this error: ser:~/SER/ser-0.8.12 # /sbin/ser 0(31886) loading module //lib/ser/modules/sl.so 0(31886) loading module //lib/ser/modules/tm.so 0(31886) loading module //lib/ser/modules/rr.so 0(31886) loading module //lib/ser/modules/maxfwd.so 0(31886) loading module //lib/ser/modules/usrloc.so 0(31886) loading module //lib/ser/modules/registrar.so 0(31886) loading module //lib/ser/modules/group_radius.so 0(31886) loading module //lib/ser/modules/auth.so 0(31886) loading module //lib/ser/modules/auth_radius.so 0(31886) loading module //lib/ser/modules/acc.so 0(31886) set_mod_param_regex: rr matches module rr 0(31886) set_mod_param_regex: found <enable_full_lr> in module rr [//lib/ser/modules/rr.so] 0(31886) set_mod_param_regex: auth_radius matches module auth_radius 0(31886) set_mod_param_regex: found <radius_config> in module auth_radius [//lib/ser/modules/auth_radius.so] 0(31886) set_mod_param_regex: auth_radius matches module auth_radius 0(31886) set_mod_param_regex: found <service_type> in module auth_radius [//lib/ser/modules/auth_radius.so] 0(31886) set_mod_param_regex: acc matches module acc 0(31886) set_mod_param_regex: found <radius_config> in module acc [//lib/ser/modules/acc.so] 0(31886) set_mod_param_regex: acc matches module acc 0(31886) set_mod_param_regex: found <service_type> in module acc [//lib/ser/modules/acc.so] 0(31886) set_mod_param_regex: acc matches module acc 0(31886) set_mod_param_regex: found <radius_flag> in module acc [//lib/ser/modules/acc.so] 0(31886) set_mod_param_regex: acc matches module acc 0(31886) set_mod_param_regex: found <radius_missed_flag> in module acc [//lib/ser/modules/acc.so] 0(31886) find_export: found <mf_process_maxfwd_header> in module maxfwd_module [//lib/ser/modules/maxfwd.so] 0(31886) find_export: found <sl_send_reply> in module sl_module [//lib/ser/modules/sl.so] 0(31886) find_export: found <sl_send_reply> in module sl_module [//lib/ser/modules/sl.so] 0(31886) find_export: found <record_route> in module rr [//lib/ser/modules/rr.so] 0(31886) find_export: found <loose_route> in module rr [//lib/ser/modules/rr.so] 0(31886) find_export: found <t_relay> in module tm [//lib/ser/modules/tm.so] 0(31886) find_export: <radius_www_authorize> not found 0(31886) find_export: <radius_www_authorize> not found 0(31886) parse error (115,55-56): unknown command, missing loadmodule? 0(31886) find_export: found <www_challenge> in module auth [//lib/ser/modules/auth.so] 0(31886) find_export: found <save> in module registrar [//lib/ser/modules/registrar.so] 0(31886) find_export: found <lookup> in module registrar [//lib/ser/modules/registrar.so] 0(31886) find_export: found <sl_send_reply> in module sl_module [//lib/ser/modules/sl.so] 0(31886) find_export: found <t_relay> in module tm [//lib/ser/modules/tm.so] 0(31886) find_export: found <sl_reply_error> in module sl_module [//lib/ser/modules/sl.so] ERROR: bad config file (1 errors) 0(31886) DEBUG: tm_shutdown : start 0(31886) DEBUG: tm_shutdown : empting hash table 0(31886) DEBUG: tm_shutdown: releasing timers 0(31886) DEBUG: tm_shutdown : removing semaphores 0(31886) DEBUG: tm_shutdown : done 0(31886) shm_mem_destroy 0(31886) destroying the shared memory lock SOME ADVICE PLEASE!!! Thanks Rafael ------------SER.CFG--------------------------------->>>>>>> ser:~/SER/ser-0.8.12 # more /etc/ser/ser.cfg # # $Id: ser.cfg,v 1.21.4.1 2003/11/10 15:35:15 andrei Exp $ # # simple quick-start config script # # ----------- global configuration parameters ------------------------ #debug=3 # debug level (cmd line: -dddddddddd) #fork=yes #log_stderror=no # (cmd line: -E) #/* Uncomment these lines to enter debugging mode debug=7 fork=no log_stderror=yes #*/ check_via=no # (cmd. line: -v) dns=no # (cmd. line: -r) rev_dns=no # (cmd. line: -R) #port=5060 #children=4 fifo="/tmp/ser_fifo" # ------------------ module loading ---------------------------------- # Uncomment this if you want to use SQL database #loadmodule "//lib/ser/modules/mysql.so" loadmodule "//lib/ser/modules/sl.so" loadmodule "//lib/ser/modules/tm.so" loadmodule "//lib/ser/modules/rr.so" loadmodule "//lib/ser/modules/maxfwd.so" loadmodule "//lib/ser/modules/usrloc.so" loadmodule "//lib/ser/modules/registrar.so" loadmodule "//lib/ser/modules/group_radius.so" #loadmodule "//lib/ser/modules/group.so" # Uncomment this if you want digest authentication # mysql.so must be loaded ! loadmodule "//lib/ser/modules/auth.so" #loadmodule "//lib/ser/modules/auth_db.so" loadmodule "//lib/ser/modules/auth_radius.so" loadmodule "//lib/ser/modules/acc.so" # ----------------- setting module-specific parameters --------------- # -- usrloc params -- #modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 0) # Uncomment this if you want to use SQL database # for persistent storage and comment the previous line #modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 2) # -- auth params -- # Uncomment if you are using auth module # #modparam("auth_db", "calculate_ha1", yes) # # If you set "calculate_ha1" parameter to yes (which true in this config), # uncomment also the following parameter) # #modparam("auth_db", "password_column", "password") # -- rr params -- # add value to ;lr param to make some broken UAs happy modparam("rr", "enable_full_lr", 1) modparam("auth_radius","radius_config","/etc/radiusclient/radiusclient.conf") modparam("auth_radius","service_type",15) modparam("acc", "radius_config","/etc/radiusclient/radiusclient.conf") modparam("acc", "service_type", 15) modparam("acc", "radius_flag", 1) modparam("acc", "radius_missed_flag", 3) # ------------------------- request routing logic ------------------- # main routing logic route{ # initial sanity checks -- messages with # max_forwards==0, or excessively long requests if (!mf_process_maxfwd_header("10")) { sl_send_reply("483","Too Many Hops"); break; }; if ( msg:len > max_len ) { sl_send_reply("513", "Message too big"); break; }; # we record-route all messages -- to make sure that # subsequent messages will go through our proxy; that's # particularly good if upstream and downstream entities # use different transport protocol record_route(); # loose-route processing if (loose_route()) { t_relay(); break; }; # if the request is for other domain use UsrLoc # (in case, it does not work, use the following command # with proper names and addresses in it) if (uri==myself) { if (method=="REGISTER") { # Uncomment this if you want to use digest authentication if (!radius_www_authorize("iptel.org", "subscriber")) { www_challenge("iptel.org", "0"); break; }; save("location"); break; }; # native SIP destinations are handled using our USRLOC DB if (!lookup("location")) { sl_send_reply("404", "Not Found"); break; }; }; # forward to current uri now; use stateful forwarding; that # works reliably even if we forward from TCP to UDP if (!t_relay()) { sl_reply_error(); }; }

19 years, 11 months

Re: [Serusers] Is this possible in ser+sem/Voicemail+b2bua

by Klaus Darilion

Hi! For this feature you need an element which is call-statefull, i.e. a B2BUA. You could also use ser, which calls an external script (which keeps track of current calls, e.g. every INVITE increases the counter, and every BYE decreases the counter. But that will cause problems if the BYE messages is lost (e.g. user agent crashes). regards, klaus Lambros Lambrinos wrote: >>I still have not understand your problem: do you want that only certain >>users are allowed to dial to this destination, or do you want to limit >>the number of calls to this destination? >> >>klaus > > > Klaus, > I am planning a similar scenario where the number of calls > to a destination needs to be limited (e.g. if the destination > has a low bandwidth connection). > Do you think it is possible just with SER (considering that > it is stateless) ? > I was planning on using a combination of SER and Freeradius. > Any other idea ? > > Regards, > Lambros > >

19 years, 11 months

[Serusers] mailbox

by gaillac harry

Hi, here is my python script in order to send emails. For example i call my mailbox to listen messages if I'm offline i wish to received a voicemail. I don't know how to get the new wav recorded messages (path) from the the mailbox. I'm not a devolopper so I need help. I don't test it because of I have to update Mysql !! I do hope somebody could help me (and ser users) about this feature. Regards Harry

19 years, 11 months

[Serusers] MyStun

by peter.boot＠ihug.com.au

Has anyone been able to get the Grandtream HT486 to work with MyStun or any other opensource stun server ? thanks Peter

19 years, 11 months

[Serusers] [SEMS] can't send the Wave file

by Andrea Dompè

Hi. i'm Andrea, i have a problem with sems. I have the follow configuration: ----------------- -------------------------------- |ser[proxy] | ---> |ser[voicemail]+sems | ------------------ --------------------------------- I have clients that are connected on the proxy. I don't receive the e-mail when a user is offline because VOICEMAIL didn't write the e-mail in the ser_fifo and SEMS can't send the Wave file. How can i do? Tanks. Andrea.

19 years, 11 months

[Serusers] (no subject)

by Andrea Dompè

19 years, 11 months

Re: [Serusers] ZyXel P2000w wlan SIP UA's

by mike

Maybe I should be more specific with the question. At the moment I am only testing IP-to IP without PSTN connectivity. I'm still waiting for an FXO module for my channelbank Adtran Atlas 550-series (anyone tested this?)which I plan on integrating w/ Asterisk. . maybe. Basically I now have SER /RTP running with a basic configuration. See below--> I have been modifying ser.cfg lots just to experiment and learn. I have two separate locations at my use , the other office(1) being behind a NAT and on the other side where my research lab(2) is no NAT/firewall with public addresses. On top of this I have a public hotspot available to my lab which uses RADIUS/LDAP authentication with a pre-assigned login name and password. To get to the point then. At office 1, When I first received the phones, tried them out behind a D-link wireless router, so basically it was behind two nat's :( (what's the scenario on this?) Inside the private dhcp-generated IP-space, calls between the UA's worked fine. phones sip-settings as my SER (sip3.dc.turkuamk.fi) for both proxy and outgoing. SER did log an incoming request, but at the moment didn't even have NAT-helper conf.d. so the reply was lost. Even afterwards the phones would not register to my server. Now my research-lab doesn't have a wireless network except for the hotspot. The Prestige finds the network and receives an IP-address, but fails to make calls and register on both sip3.dc.turkuamk.fi server nor iptel.org servers. To my understanding the "SPARKNET" hotspot uses also ssl encryption, but I'm not sure. I am also a bit strange on the authentication scenario due to the public access point. The phone has no setting for such authentication. Ofcourse there is the SIP-setting username and password, but that's it. Otherwise my current configuration has worked fine for softphones, (kphone, M$-mes.. and SCS-client)making, receiving and registering calls and UA's using the digest authentication scheme even behind the NAT. Sip-clients work fine on my laptop on the hotspot. Maybe I should get another d-link wireless network... :) thanks, Michael Seppänen # ----------- global configuration parameters ------------------------ debug=3 # debug level (cmd line: -dddddddddd) fork=yes log_stderror=no # (cmd line: -E) check_via=no # (cmd. line: -v) dns=no # (cmd. line: -r) rev_dns=no # (cmd. line: -R) #port=5060 #children=4 fifo="/tmp/ser_fifo" alias="sip3.dc.turkuamk.fi" alias="wlan.turkuamk.fi" alias="sip.dc.turkuamk.fi" alias="turkuamk.fi" alias="brage-dataware.fi" alias="10.42.1.179" alias="93.166.139.107" listen=193.166.135.116 # ------------------ module loading ---------------------------------- loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/mysql.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/sl.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/tm.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/rr.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/maxfwd.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/usrloc.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/registrar.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/auth.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/auth_db.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/acc.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/exec.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/group.so" #loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/msilo.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/textops.so" #loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/uri.so" loadmodule "/usr/lib/ser/modules/nathelper.so" # ----------------- setting module-specific parameters --------------- # -- usrloc params -- modparam("usrloc", "db_mode", 2) # -- auth params -- modparam("auth_db", "calculate_ha1", yes) modparam("auth_db", "password_column", "password") # -- rr params -- modparam("rr", "enable_full_lr", 1) # !! Nathelper modparam("registrar", "nat_flag", 6) modparam("nathelper", "natping_interval", 30) # Ping interval 30 s #modparam("nathelper", "ping_nated_only", 1) # Ping only clients behind NAT # ------------------------- request routing logic ------------------- # main routing logic route{ # initial sanity checks -- messages with # max_forwards==0, or excessively long requests if (!mf_process_maxfwd_header("10")) { sl_send_reply("483","Too Many Hops"); break; }; if ( msg:len > max_len ) { sl_send_reply("513", "Message too big"); break; }; # !! Nathelper # Special handling for NATed clients; first, NAT test is # executed: it looks for via!=received and RFC1918 addresses # in Contact (may fail if line-folding is used); also, # the received test should, if completed, should check all # vias for rpesence of received #if (nat_uac_test("3")) { # Allow RR-ed requests, as these may indicate that # a NAT-enabled proxy takes care of it; unless it is # a REGISTER if (method == "REGISTER" || ! search("^Record-Route:")) { log("LOG: Someone trying to register from private IP, rewriting\n"); # This will work only for user agents that support symmetric # communication. We tested quite many of them and majority is # smart enough to be symmetric. In some phones it takes a configuration # option. With Cisco 7960, it is called NAT_Enable=Yes, with kphone it is # called "symmetric media" and "symmetric signalling". fix_nated_contact(); # Rewrite contact with source IP of signalling if (method == "INVITE") { fix_nated_sdp("1"); # Add direction=active to SDP }; force_rport(); # Add rport parameter to topmost Via setflag(6); # Mark as NATed }; #}; # we record-route all messages -- to make sure that # subsequent messages will go through our proxy; that's # particularly good if upstream and downstream entities # use different transport protocol if (!method=="REGISTER") record_route(); # subsequent messages withing a dialog should take the # path determined by record-routing if (loose_route()) { # mark routing logic in request append_hf("P-hint: rr-enforced\r\n"); route(1); break; }; if (!uri==myself) { # mark routing logic in request append_hf("P-hint: outbound\r\n"); route(1); break; }; # if the request is for other domain use UsrLoc # (in case, it does not work, use the following command # with proper names and addresses in it) if (uri==myself) { if (method=="REGISTER") { #Uncomment this if you want to use digest authentication if (!www_authorize("", "subscriber")) { www_challenge("", "0"); break; }; save("location"); break; }; lookup("aliases"); if (!uri==myself) { append_hf("P-hint: outbound alias\r\n"); route(1); break; }; lookup("aliases"); # native SIP destinations are handled using our USRLOC DB if (!lookup("location")) { sl_send_reply("404", "Not Found"); break; }; }; # forward to current uri now; use stateful forwarding; that # works reliably even if we forward from TCP to UDP if (!t_relay()) { sl_reply_error(); }; append_hf("P-hint: usrloc applied\r\n"); route(1); } route[1] { # !! Nathelper if (uri=~"[@:](192\.168\.|10\.|172\.(1[6-9]|2[0-9]|3[0-1])\.)" && ! search("^Route:")){ sl_send_reply("479", "We don't forward to private IP addresses"); break; }; # if client or server know to be behind a NAT, enable relay if (isflagset(6)) { force_rtp_proxy(); }; # NAT processing of replies; apply to all transactions (for example, # re-INVITEs from public to private UA are hard to identify as # NATed at the moment of request processing); look at replies t_on_reply("1"); # send it out now; use stateful forwarding as it works reliably # even for UDP2TCP if (!t_relay()) { sl_reply_error(); }; } # !! Nathelper onreply_route[1] { # NATed transaction ? if (isflagset(6) && status =~ "(183)|2[0-9][0-9]") { fix_nated_contact(); force_rtp_proxy(); # otherwise, is it a transaction behind a NAT and we did not # know at time of request processing ? (RFC1918 contacts) } else { fix_nated_contact(); }; } _______________________________________________ > Serusers mailing list > serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers -- Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/

19 years, 11 months

[Serusers] help with ser

by Peter Liu

I have installed ser in my redhat linux computer. I start it with /etc/init.d/ser start then when I check status use /etc/init.d/ser status It gives this message:" ser dead but subsys locked." then I try to use serctl start I got message "starting ser: cat /var/run/ser.pid: no such file or directory started pid()" What happened please help! Thanks a lot! peter __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Friends. Fun. Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger. http://messenger.yahoo.com/

19 years, 11 months

[Serusers] Is this possible in ser+sem/Voicemail+b2bua

by Glynn Condez

Hi everyone, I have a working ser and sems with voicemail, I would like to limit some call to some of my end points, so Im planning to use b2bua from vovida. I would like to ask if this setup is possible? regards

19 years, 11 months

[Serusers] Cannot capture call status in failure route

by Zeus Ng

I have the following logic. route { ... t_on_reply("1"); t_on_failure("1"); t_relay(); } onreply_route[1] { xlog("L_NOTICE", "Reply status %rs: Reason %rr\n"); } failure_route[1] { xlog("L_NOTICE", "Reply status %rs: Reason %rr\n"); if (status=="408") { do something 1 } else if (status=="480") { do something 2 } else if (status=="486") { do something 3 } } When a reply with 4xx comes in, it first goes through onreply_route[1] and get the result printed to syslog. The message is then passed to failure_route[1]. But it seems that the status code and reason are gone. I get a <null> for both values in the failure route. How should I change the script to get that. Zeus Ng

19 years, 11 months

← Newer
1
...
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
...
34
Older →

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users May 2004