You have several choices (like always on Unix):
1. Do like this:
if (method=="INVITE") {
# save messages in mysql for CDRTool
exec_msg("/etc/ser/sertrace.py; exit 1");
};
Make your own script to replace /etc/ser/sertrace.py
You can log the whole SIP packet from STDIN to mysql and index it by
environment variable set by SER (SIP_HF_CALLID).
To scale it up a bit you demonize the logger to reuse only one mysql
connection.
2. Log all SIP packets to a log file with a script like this one:
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
#!/bin/sh
#
# chkconfig: 2345 20 80
# description: controls execution of SIP sniffer
# processname: ng
NAME=ngrep
OPTIONS="-L -d bond0 -t port 5060"
BIN=/usr/bin/ngrep
ROTATE=/usr/sbin/rotatelogs
RETVAL=0
# See how we were called.
case "$1" in
start)
killall $NAME
echo -n "Starting SIP sniffer: "
$BIN $OPTIONS 2>&1 | $ROTATE /var/log/ser/trace/sip 86400 &
RETVAL=$?
echo "ngrep."
;;
stop)
echo -n "Stopping SIP ngrep: "
killall $NAME
RETVAL=$?
echo "done."
;;
restart)
#$0 stop
$0 start
RETVAL=$?
;;
*)
echo "Usage: $0 {start|stop|restart}"
exit 1
esac
exit $RETVAL
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
--
Adrian
How to get the call log and registration request in a
different file other that /var/log/messages.
Also, can i get some more details on autherisation and
accountingpackets. Rt now, iam getting only details
given below.
ACC: transaction answered: method=BY
E, i-uri=sip:12334 at 10.10.0.1,
o-uri=sip:12334 at 10.10.0.1, call_id
=4F6F069B-4BF4-4CC7-B99C-4E24F0E2C667 at 192.168.10.154,
from=Manu Sip <sip:manu at s
ip.test.net>;tag=2654486816, code=200
thank you.
MANU.
I have also had problems with getting the ACK back.
I don't completely understand your configuration, you
must allow for packets going both directions, right?
Here is my config :
route
{
# check to see if the message has been around too long
# probably means that it is looping
#
if (!mf_process_maxfwd_header("10"))
{
log("LOG: Too many hops\n");
sl_send_reply("483","Too Many Hops");
break;
};
#
# make sure the length of the message isn't too long!
#
if (len_gt( max_len ))
{
sl_send_reply("513", "Wow -- Message too large");
break;
};
#
# do the loose-routing thing, this is important!
#
if(loose_route())
{
log(1,"doing top loose route");
t_relay();
break;
};
# this is where I was dropping the ACKS.
# I was simply dropping these, but they must be relayed
# because they can be ACKs
if(!(uri==myself))
{
if(!t_relay())
{
sl_reply_error();
break;
};
break;
};
This gets the ACKs through for me.
By the way, I have this configured with Cisco ATAs, version 2.16.
---greg
>
>I have the same problem and posed it to the group yesterday ([Serusers]
>Ignored 200 OK message.) So far the only workaround that I have found is to
>use the rules in my gateway to rewrite the dialed digits before sending them
>to the PSTN PRI, thus leaving the origianl URI intact for SIP
>communications.
>
>One person told me that this is a bug in the Cisco ATA, but it happens on my
>IPDialog phones also. It seems to me that the INVITE is being processed by
>the SER dial rules and is rewritten, but the ACK is not.
>
>Sean
>_______________________________________________
>
>Sean Robertson
>
>NETXUSA
>p. 800-289-6389
>f. 864-233-4344 "Ask me about Voice over IP."
>http://www.netxusa.com/
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Alexander Mayrhofer" <axelm(a)nic.at>
>To: <serusers(a)lists.iptel.org>
>Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 12:15 PM
>Subject: [Serusers] rewrite & ACK forwarding problem
>
>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> we're running SER together with a PSTN Gateway. Before a call get's
>> forwarded to the gateway, we are rewriting the request URI to make
>> rewriting on the GW as simple as possible:
>>
>> route {
>> ...
>> strip(3); # +43xxx -> xxx
>> prefix("0"); # xxx -> 0xxx
>> rewritehostport(xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx, 5060); # request to gateway
>> route(1);
>> break;
>> ...
>>
>> SIP call flow looks like (record route enabled):
>>
>> (1) phone -> SER
>> INVITE sip:*43699xxxxxxxx@nic.at43.at SIP/2.0
>>
>> (2) SER -> phone
>> SIP/2.0 100 trying -- your call is important to us
>>
>> (3) SER -> GW
>> INVITE sip:0699xxxxxxxx@xx.xx.xx.xx:5060 SIP/2.0
>>
>> (4) GW -> SER
>> SIP/2.0 100 Trying
>>
>> (5) GW -> SER
>> SIP/2.0 183 Session Progress
>>
>> (6) SER -> phone
>> SIP/2.0 183 Session Progress
>>
>> (7) GW -> SER
>> SIP/2.0 180 Ringing
>>
>> (8) SER -> phone
>> SIP/2.0 180 Ringing
>>
>> (9) GW -> SER
>> SIP/2.0 200 OK
>> Contact: <sip:0699xxxxxxxx@xx.xx.xx.xx:5060>
>>
>> (10) SER -> phone
>> SIP/2.0 200 OK
>> Contact: <sip:0699xxxxxxx@xx.xx.xx.xx:5060>
>>
>> [ call established, we can talk, but ... ]
>>
>> (11) phone -> SER
>> ACK sip:0699xxxxxxxx@xx.xx.xx.xx:5060 SIP/2.0
>>
>> --> Here starts the problem. That ACK (11) never gets forwarded to the
>> Gateway, so after a few seconds, the GW starts over at (9). Those three
>> packets (9-11) repeat a few times until GW runs into a timeout and drops
>> the call.
>>
>> I have the impression that SER can't match the packet to the previous
>> requests because of the rewritten URI. Is that correct?
>>
>> The only output at debug level 3 is:
>>
>> Warning: sl_send_reply: I won't send a reply for ACK!!
>>
>> Is that a routing goof somewhere in our scripts or is that a more
>> generic problem? Is the problem that the warning indicates somehow
>> related to the fact that the ACK is not being forwarded?
>>
>> Help appreciated.
>>
>> cheers
>>
>> axelm
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Serusers mailing list
>> serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
>> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Serusers mailing list
>serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
>http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>
Hi!
I'm not sure about this, but I think the problem is that the hashed
password also include an random generated string.
What you can do is to authenticate only on the first server and trust
the request automaticall if REGISTER request comes from the other server.
regards,
klaus
John LI wrote:
> Hi Klaus,
>
> Thanks for your response, I have another question:
> I installed 2 Ser on the different machine, and add the 2 user 3001 3002 on
> both Ser. I configuer 2 SIP client to Regiseter to the same ser, there is no
> problem to make call to each other, but when I try to registered 2 sip
> client on the different machine, the problem happend.
>
> For example, 2 ser server IP is A=192.168.0.10 and B=192.168.0.20
>
> I changed ser.cfg in ser A as
>
> if (!src_ip==192.168.0.20) {
> log("*****replicate***");
> t_replicate("192.168.0.20", "5060");
>
> and on B
>
> if (!src_ip==192.168.0.10) {
> log("*****replicate***");
> t_replicate("192.168.0.10", "5060");
>
> And when I try to regiseter SIP client on A, it can register on A, then the
> Ser A will send a Register request to B like this:
>
> U 192.168.0.10:5060 -> 192.168.0.20:5060
> REGISTER sip:ny1.signalc.com SIP/2.0..Record-Route:
> <sip:192.168.0.10;ftag=35a
> 3@ny1.signalc.com..From:
> 3001<sip:3001@ny1.signalc.com;user=phone>;tag=35adc-1
> =phone>..CSeq: 102 REGISTER..Via: SIP/2.0/UDP
> 192.168.0.10;branch=z9hG4bK247f.
> 060..Contact: <sip:3001@192.168.0.30:5060;user=phone>..Max-Forwards:
> 69..User-
> ..Expires: 900..Supported: timer..Authorization: Digest
> username="3001",realm=
>
> ,response="4890af0391f9985e7d28a4f98e9132ab",nonce="4064805a3152161d3bb4ba9d
> 50
>
> U 192.168.0.20:5060 -> 192.168.0.10:5060
> SIP/2.0 401 Unauthorized..Call-ID:
> 55af-6a37c-4000fbb3@ny1.signalc.com..From:
> ag=35adc-1408..To:
> 3001<sip:3001@ny1.signalc.com;user=phone>;tag=b27e1a1d33761
> R..Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.0.10;branch=z9hG4bK247f.7ee9ba07.0..Via:
> SIP/2.0/U
> est realm="ny1.signalc.com",
> nonce="406490a267fa70c71b2e27a481dfbde8b5fd6bd4".
> inux))..Content-Length: 0..Warning: 392 192.168.0.20:5060 "Noisy feedback
> tell
> c_port=5060 in_uri=sip:ny1.signalc.comout_uri=sip:ny1.signalc.com
> via_cnt==2"
>
>
> Ser A will try to register 3001 to Ser B, but Ser B dose not authenticate
> the 3001 although the 3001 has the same user ID and Password on the Ser B.
>
> I wonder if the modification on the ser.cfg is correct, should I do more
> things for this?
>
> Thanks
>
> John
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Klaus Darilion" <klaus.mailinglists(a)pernau.at>
> To: "John LI" <john(a)signalc.com>
> Cc: "Serusers" <serusers(a)lists.iptel.org>
> Sent: Friday, March 26, 2004 4:36 AM
> Subject: Re: [Serusers] The problem when enable the MySql
>
>
>
>>Hi John!
>>
>>comments inline
>>
>>PS: Please always cc: to the list.
>>
>>John LI wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Hi Klaus,
>>>
>>>Thanks for your instaruction, after I do all those steps, the Ser with
>
> the
>
>>>Digest creditial works fine now.
>>>
>>>My Questions is, after I complile and installed the ser, is the Ser
>
> database
>
>>>installed?
>>
>>No, the ser database is not installed by "make install". You have to use
>>the ser_mysql.sh script to create the database.
>>
>>
>>>Need I to use the serctl create to create the database ser
>>>database again(from my practice, the Ser DB has been setup after all
>
> those
>
>>>steps), need I to install the ser-mysql-0.8.12-0 RPM package again?
>>
>>Once you have created the databse, you inly have to re-create it, if you
>>are using a new version of ser which uses a new format.
>>
>>If you compile ser from source, you don't need any of the rpm packages.
>>
>>regards,
>>klaus
>>
>>
>>>Thanks for you advice again.
>>>
>>>John
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>----- Original Message -----
>>>From: "Klaus Darilion" <klaus.mailinglists(a)pernau.at>
>>>To: "John LI" <john(a)signalc.com>
>>>Cc: <serusers(a)lists.iptel.org>
>>>Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2004 3:07 AM
>>>Subject: Re: [Serusers] The problem when enable the MySql
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>compile ser by calling make:
>>>># make
>>>>
>>>>compile ser modules by calling:
>>>># make modules
>>>>
>>>>compile mysql ser modules by calling:
>>>># make modules modules=modules/mysql
>>>>
>>>>install ser:
>>>># make install
>>>>
>>>>install mysql module:
>>>># cp modules/mysql/mysql.so /usr/local/lib/ser/modules/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>regards,
>>>>klaus
>>>>
>>>>John LI wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Dear Sir,
>>>>>
>>>>>I am installing the Ser on Redhat 9.0 platform.
>>>>>
>>>>>I download ser-0.8.12_src.tar.gz, and compile the souce code, and
>>>>>install it.
>>>>>The Ser working fine with out the MySQL enabled.
>>>>>
>>>>>I download the MySQL packges from www.mysql.com <http://www.mysql.com>
>>>>>
>>>>>MySQL-client-4.0.18-0.i386.rpm
>>>>>MySQL-server-4.0.18-0.i386.rpm
>>>>>MySQL-shared-4.0.18-0.i386.rpm
>>>>>
>>>>>and install them, and Mysql can start up.
>>>>>
>>>>>After this, I download the ser-0.8.12_src.tar.gz
>>>>>
>>>>>and try to install it, and it give me out the error messge
>>>>>error: Failed dependencies:
>>>>> ser = 0.8.12 is needed by ser-mysql-0.8.12-0
>>>>>
>>>>>I don't know what this means.
>>>>>
>>>>>BTW, when i enable the MySQL in ser.cfg, it give out the following
>
> error
>
>>>>>messages:
>>>>>0(25007) ERROR: load_module: could not open module
>>>>></usr/local/lib/ser/modules/mysql.so>:
>>>>>/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/mysql.so: cannot open shared object file: No
>>>>>such file or directory
>>>>>I wonder how can I get the mysql.so module.
>>>>>
>>>>>I am the fresh man in using Ser, please give me some instructions.
>>>>>
>>>>>John
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>
>>>>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>>Serusers mailing list
>>>>>serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
>>>>>http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
Hi,
I have ser working fine with all other products with authentication. I have
problem with MSN messenger. It is sending request to ser more than about 15
times but ser is not registering. SER is even not responds with any type of
error message.
Can somebody help me please?
Thanks,
Fahriz Aqeel Ansari
Tried that, ie put the "" around the 192.168.0.100 and get the same
response ie Error: bad config file (2 errors).
The report doesn't specify what the errors are Im afraid.
Re naming of server. I don't use DNS on my network just ip addresses.
Im providing access to the server to the outside world by using port
forwarding. So Im assuming that I can use the ip address instead of the
name in the config file. Is this acceptable to SER??
Best regards Martin Coggin
Information in this message is confidential and may be legally
privileged. It is intended solely for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you have received this email in error please delete it
immediately and also reply to me to let me know. Thank you for your
help.
-----Original Message-----
From: Atle Samuelsen [mailto:clona@cyberhouse.no]
Sent: 29 March 2004 09:12
To: Martin Coggin
Subject: Re: [Serusers] Quick start SER Too much shared memory
Hey Martin
* Martin Coggin <martin(a)mc2-consulting.co.uk> [040329 10:04]:
> Tks. Got through to point 6 of the section on adding my sql ser.
>
> I edited the ser.cfg file see the attached file. However I got 2
errors
> reported as per extract below and sorry I cant find them in the file.
>
> hattie:/etc/init.d# ser restart
> ERROR: bad config file (2 errors)
> hattie:/etc/init.d#
>
> Note that I don't have DNS server on my network so Im using my
internal
# Uncomment this if you want to use digest authentication
if (!www_authorize(192.168.0.100, "subscriber"))
{
www_challenge(192.168.0.100, "0");
break;
};
Im guessing without seeing the erros that you are hitting are that you
are missing some " in the block I pasted erly'er..
try to change it to !www_authorize("192.168.0.100",
and www_channenge("192.168.0.100", ..
tho. remeber that your domain must now be 192.168.0.100...
> ip address, I assume that hence the entry for the ip address is
> acceptable. My hosts file does include the host name. Is this ok.
Ill
> be doing a forward on my firewall from my ip address to my internal ip
> address of the server.
>
> Im a little concerned that I didn't do step 3 completely. Ie creation
> of MySQL tables. I used the /usr/sbin/ser_mysql.sh creation process.
I
> entered a blank password for root, I entered ser as the domain: I got
a
> creating database ... message, then got another "Enter password:"
> request, entered blank and then returned to the command line.
>
>
>
> You've been very patient with your help tks Martin
>
>
- Atle
> _______________________________________________
> Serusers mailing list
> serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Hi,
I would like to try use the module nathelper with rtpproxy to test when INVITE , voice (rtp) can pass nat and firewall,
just like
(http://www.informatik.uni-bremen.de/~prelle/terena/cookbook/main/ch04s07.ht… 4.7.3.5.1. SIP Express Router mentioned), but ser crashes after receive REGISTER
but after REGISTER , ser crashe...
=================================================================
syslog:
BUG: 15 (23183) tcp_main_loop: dead child 5
0 (23168) child process 23173 existed by a signal 11
0 (23168) core was not generated
0 (23168) INFO:terminating due to SIGCHILD
...
...
=================================================================
i install ser0.8.12 , and download newest nathelper , rtpproxy form berlios cvs
Makefile rev 1.6
nathelper.c rev 1.51
nathelper.cfg rev 1.2
nathelper_rtpp.cfg rev 1.1
nhelpr_funcs.c rev 1.7
nhelpr_funcs.h rev 1.2
rtpproxy
main.c rev 1.17
...
...
My environment is
kphone 3.14 -------> Gateway(NAT+Firewall) ----Internet----Ser + rtpproxy
kphone use UDP , Symmetric Signaling and Symmetric Media , not use STUN server
my ser.cfg is the same as the link (http://www.informatik.uni-bremen.de/~prelle/terena/cookbook/main/ch04s07.ht… 4.7.3.5.1. SIP Express Router mentioned)
besides one line
if (method == "REGISTER" || ! search("^Record-Route:")) { ===> ser said it is wrong , i don't what's wrong...?
so i modify it to
if (method == "REGISTER") {
My question is :
1. Does the idea (http://www.informatik.uni-bremen.de/~prelle/terena/cookbook/main/ch04s07.ht… 4.7.3.5.1. SIP Express Router mentioned) work?
2. used ser 0.8.12 and only update nathelper module to newest work?
Thanks
Jimmy
Hi,
I configured serweb very well, but when I can't login any valid user ...
Neither in admin pages ... It says its an invalid user ..
The register pages works until the confirmation ... With this error ...
-------
Warning: fopen("/tmp/ser_fifo", "w") - Permission denied in
/var/www/html/functions.php on line 206
fie.uclv.edu.cu User Management
sorry -- cannot open write fifo
-------
My /etc/init.d/ser script doesn't work at boot time ... So a run it by
hand ...
Do I have to run it as another user .. (a ser user for example ?)
My apache is running under the apache user ... What abaut the
permissions of /tmp/ser_fifo ...
Thanks ...
Robert
Hi,
I'm new in IP Telephony world and I began from the beginning using SER
...
I have found it very nice, simple to configure/use ... Althoug I've had
some problems in redhat9.
Ok, some days ago I was talking to a friend of mine who was
investigating on VoIP and tall me about VOCAL from Vovida.org and
Asterisk ...
I have read something about Asterisk in this mailing list but I hadn't
know of VOCAL ...
Could any one tell me about the open source SIP platforms in the todays
world ?
Their differences ... Etc ...
And also the Oparating Systems usually used for this ... (I work with
RedHat Linux 9)
I'm working for a really good solution for my University VoIP platform
...
Thanks,
Robert.
1. Prepaid billing
2. IF user gets disconnected due to electricity, SER must know that
>From: Jan Janak <jan(a)iptel.org>
>To: Kapil Dhawan <sersavvy(a)hotmail.com>
>CC: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
>Subject: Re: [Serusers] SER + B2BUA
>Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 20:07:23 +0200
>
>It is not easy to implement a B2BUA on top of ser, what functionality do
>you need exactly ?
>
> Jan.
>
>On 22-03 12:03, Kapil Dhawan wrote:
> > Hi all
> > i don't want to use B2BUA but need the features of it....so want to
>write
> > some small module for it.....can anyone suggest me how to proceed with
> > it.....
> >
> > what all changes shud i look forward too and where to get the start for
>it
> >
> > regards
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > Get head-hunted by 10,000 recruiters.
>http://go.msnserver.com/IN/44798.asp
> > Post your CV on naukri.com today.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Serusers mailing list
> > serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
> > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
_________________________________________________________________
Easiest Money Transfer to India. Send Money To 6000 Indian Towns.
http://go.msnserver.com/IN/42198.asp Easiest Way To Send Money Home!
