sr-users February 2004

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

144 participants
382 discussions

[Serusers] Voicemail..
by Atle Samuelsen 02 Feb '04

02 Feb '04

Hey again Iv just got a weird problem.. When I connect my ip phone to the voicemail gateway.. it works Perfect. I get the voicemail message and everything.. Tho.. When I try to call via the other gateway (my regualar ser).. I get to the voicemail.. it picks up the phone.. tho No voice back.. anybody had this problem before? - Atle

2 3

[Serusers] Asterisk as B2BUA with SER?
by Anton Yurchenko 02 Feb '04

02 Feb '04

Hello, Has anybody done this? Do you have any pointers on this or maybe even a howto. Thanks -- -- Anton Yurchenko<phila(a)dg.net.ua> Digital Generation

2 3

Re: [Serusers] permissions.so
by Miklos Tirpak 02 Feb '04

02 Feb '04

Do you mean the deny rule did not work with ALL:ALL ? What is in the debug output? You should see: Allow file (/usr/local/etc/ser/permissions.allow) parsed Deny file (/usr/local/etc/ser/permissions.deny) parsed Miklos On Mon, 2 Feb 2004, kapil dhawan wrote: > > Yes I have done same, and i hav tried by sip addresses also > > > > >From: Miklos Tirpak <mtirpak(a)sztaki.hu> > >To: kapil dhawan <oswriter(a)hotmail.com> > >CC: <serusers(a)lists.iptel.org> > >Subject: Re: [Serusers] permissions.so > >Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2004 10:43:42 +0100 (MET) > > > >Hello, > > > >The keywords are case sensitive, use ALL: ALL with upper case! > > > >Miklos > > > >On Mon, 2 Feb 2004, kapil dhawan wrote: > > > > > i am loading module permissons.so > > > > > > created two files permissions.allow and permissions.deny in sme folder > >where > > > my ser.cfg is.... > > > > > > /usr/local/etc/ser > > > > > > i have set > > > > > > modparam("permissions", "allow_file", > > > "/usr/local/etc/ser/permissions.allow") > > > modparam("permissions", "deny_file", > >"/usr/local/etc/ser/permissions.deny") > > > > > > also... > > > > > > > > > permissions.allow > > > # SIP Express Router permissions module config file > > > # > > > # Syntax: > > > # from_list [EXCEPT from_list] : to_list [EXCEPT to_list] > > > # > > > # from_list and to_list are comma separated expressions > > > # Expressions are treated as case insensitive POSIX Extended > >Regular > > > Expressions. > > > # Keyword ALL matches any expression. > > > # > > > # Examples: > > > # ALL : "^sip:361[0-9]*@abc.com$" EXCEPT > >"^sip:361[0-9]*3@abc.com$", > > > "^sip:361[0-9]*4@abc.com$" > > > # > > > # "^sip:3677[0-9]*@abc.com$" : "^sip:361[0-9]*@abc.com$" > > > # > > > # ALL : ALL > > > > > > > > > permissions.deny > > > All : All > > > > > > > > > but it shud stop all my calls...its not doing that....any help > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > > Games, MMS cards, ringtones. Operator logos, picture messages & more. > > > http://server1.msn.co.in/sp03/mobilesms/ Jazz up your mobile! > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Serusers mailing list > > > serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > > > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers > > > > > > >-- > >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Miklos Tirpak > > Computer and Automation Research Institute e-mail : mtirpak(a)sztaki.hu > > Hungarian Academy of Sciences phone : (361) 279-6011 > > H-1132. Budapest, Victor Hugo u 18-22 fax : (361) 279-6021 > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > MSN Hotmail now on your Mobile phone. > http://server1.msn.co.in/sp03/mobilesms/ Click here. > -- --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Miklos Tirpak Computer and Automation Research Institute e-mail : mtirpak(a)sztaki.hu Hungarian Academy of Sciences phone : (361) 279-6011 H-1132. Budapest, Victor Hugo u 18-22 fax : (361) 279-6021

1 0

[Serusers] permissions.so
by kapil dhawan 02 Feb '04

02 Feb '04

i am loading module permissons.so created two files permissions.allow and permissions.deny in sme folder where my ser.cfg is.... /usr/local/etc/ser i have set modparam("permissions", "allow_file", "/usr/local/etc/ser/permissions.allow") modparam("permissions", "deny_file", "/usr/local/etc/ser/permissions.deny") also... permissions.allow # SIP Express Router permissions module config file # # Syntax: # from_list [EXCEPT from_list] : to_list [EXCEPT to_list] # # from_list and to_list are comma separated expressions # Expressions are treated as case insensitive POSIX Extended Regular Expressions. # Keyword ALL matches any expression. # # Examples: # ALL : "^sip:361[0-9]*@abc.com$" EXCEPT "^sip:361[0-9]*3@abc.com$", "^sip:361[0-9]*4@abc.com$" # # "^sip:3677[0-9]*@abc.com$" : "^sip:361[0-9]*@abc.com$" # # ALL : ALL permissions.deny All : All but it shud stop all my calls...its not doing that....any help _________________________________________________________________ Games, MMS cards, ringtones. Operator logos, picture messages & more. http://server1.msn.co.in/sp03/mobilesms/ Jazz up your mobile!

2 1

FW: [Serusers] failure route and ERROR: t_should_relay: status rewriteby UAS: stored: 408, received: 487
by David R. Kompel 02 Feb '04

02 Feb '04

Sorry, I thought I did a "reply-all" but I didn't. To provide a little more info: To handle voice mail in the user doesn't answer the phone case, using a falure_route timeout is not the best way to go. You have no control over the time delay before the voice mail answers, on a per call/number basis. To overcome this problem, we append_branch a fork to the voice mail box (asterisk modified), right away. The asterisk looks up in a database how long to wait before answering. This works great, except for when the user is busy. In the case of the user busy, it still waits the delay time, before answering. Having the routing script be notified of a failure, if one fork fails, and allowing the script to decide if it should let the rest proceed, or cancel them and start new ones, would solve this problem. Should the UAC of the user be busy, and only on a busy response, you could then abort the other fork (the one waiting to answer), and place a new INVITE to the vm box, to tell it to answer right away. --Dave -----Original Message----- From: David R. Kompel [mailto:drk@drkngs.net] Sent: Friday, January 30, 2004 1:50 AM To: 'Jiri Kuthan' Subject: RE: [Serusers] failure route and ERROR: t_should_relay: status rewriteby UAS: stored: 408, received: 487 Not the idea of giving you N-1, but the ability if any one fails, to decide if you want to let the others go, or cancel them, and start new ones. Example: ... if(is_user_in("VM")) append_branch(); rewritehostport("<your voice mail server that waits to answer>"); t_on_failure("x"); }; ... failure_route[x]{ if(status =~ "^486") { if(t_other_forks() > 0) { t_cancle_all_forks(); }; prefix("special digits to tell vm server busy"); append_branch(); t_relay(); }; }; In other words, always pass script to failure_route, and let it decide if the other forks should be continued, or allow it to abort them and try something else. In the case of voice mail, w/ delayed answer, if the user was busy, they could get the VM instantly, not waiting for the time out, and in the case of some vm systems, could play the user busy greeting, rather then the user away greeting. --Dave -----Original Message----- From: Jiri Kuthan [mailto:jiri@iptel.org] Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2004 12:59 PM To: David R. Kompel; serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Subject: RE: [Serusers] failure route and ERROR: t_should_relay: status rewriteby UAS: stored: 408, received: 487 At 08:04 PM 1/29/2004, David R. Kompel wrote: >I'm glad this issue was brought up when it was, cause I was just about >to post on it :) I am using the same trick for voice mail. The problem >is, if the user is busy, there is no way to detect it, since >t_on_failure doesn't call the failure_route[x], if only one of the forks >in the dset gets an error from the UAS. > >It would be nice to see a way that the failure_route could get called if >any fork gets an error, and had a way to test for other existing forks, >and cancel them, and then re-direct the call. I am not sure if there is a benefit in forking to N destinations and giving on N-1 of them if one fails... what is the use case? (I naively thought you fork in parallel to try as many destinations as you wish and fall back to other alternative such as voicemail only if none of these original destinations succeded.) -jiri

2 3

[Serusers] permissions.so
by kapil dhawan 02 Feb '04

02 Feb '04

is there any problem with the file permissions it is -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 489 Feb 2 18:52 permissions.allow -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 10 Feb 2 19:22 permissions.deny -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3734 Feb 2 19:09 ser.cfg -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3190 Feb 2 18:28 ser.cfg.sample _________________________________________________________________ Easiest Money Transfer to India. http://go.msnserver.com/IN/41490.asp Send Money To 6000 Indian Towns.

1 0

[Serusers] ser memory footprints
by Greg Goodknight 02 Feb '04

02 Feb '04

I've been playing with ser for about a week and we're planning on using it in both memory and runtime constrained embedded environments. To characterize it in newbie-ish, both the IPAQ and big system applications, as low as a relative handful of simultaneous calls in some comparatively remote hardware to hundreds and thousands of simultaneous calls in similarly architectured machines in more central locations on hardware that is less cost sensitive and more spare memory and cycles. I started looking at this seriously a couple days ago and really could use some pointers. thanks Greg

1 0

Re: [Serusers] New versions of RTP proxy/nathelper commited
by Dinesh 02 Feb '04

02 Feb '04

May l ask for your help with the CVS. When I goto the CVS it indicates that the file rtpproxy.c is ver 1.4 and is 2 weeks old. Pls tell me how to get yesterdays commit. If it is not a bother, I would appreciate it if you could email it to me. Thanks Dinesh -----Original Message----- From: "Andres"<andres(a)telesip.net> Snt: 01-Feb-04 11:20:05 AM To: "Maxim Sobolev"<sobomax(a)portaone.com> Cc: "serusers(a)lists.iptel.org"<serusers(a)lists.iptel.org> Subject: Re: [Serusers] New versions of RTP proxy/nathelper commited Maxim Sobolev wrote: > Yes, indeed, there was a problem with force_rtp_proxy(). I've just > committed a fix (1.38). The problem was that you were trying to use > results of one call to ip_addr2a() after another call to that > function. Since ip_addr2a() returns pointer to a static internal > buffer, it was leading to incorrect results. > > -Maxim > > Thank you Maxim! It is working properly now with today's nathelper version on CVS. -- Andres Network Admin http://www.telesip.net _______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list serusers(a)lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serus??ers

2 3

[Serusers] nathelper and natping interval
by Vitali Nikolaev 01 Feb '04

01 Feb '04

Hello, I have problem with natping_interval.. it is not pinging at all and look like it just doesnot aware that I have something registered I use lates table release: 0.8.12 I added some more debugging in nathelper.c to timer function: DBG("DEBUG: nathelper buff != NULL\n"); cp = buf; while (1) { memcpy(&(c.len), cp, sizeof(c.len)); if (c.len == 0) { LOG(L_ERR, "ERROR: nathelper::c.len == 0\n"); break; } and can see that it break from the loop with c.len = 0. but when i look at location table in mysql there is few devices registered. probably something with ul_get_all_ucontact from usrloc.. please advise here is config: loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/sl.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/tm.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/rr.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/auth.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/auth_db.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/mysql.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/auth_mssql.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/usrloc.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/textops.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/maxfwd.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/registrar.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/nathelper.so" loadmodule "/usr/local/lib/ser/modules/exec.so" modparam("nathelper", "natping_interval", 10) modparam("registrar", "nat_flag", 6) # modparam("nathelper", "ping_nated_only", 1) # Ping only clients behind NAT modparam("auth_db", "db_url","sql://ser:XXX@localhost/ser") modparam ("usrloc", "db_mode", 1) modparam("usrloc", "use_domain", 0) modparam("usrloc", "db_url", "sql://ser:XXX@localhost/ser") modparam("rr", "enable_full_lr", 1) force_rport(); fix_nated_contact(); setflag(6); # Mark as natted all clients if (!(method=="REGISTER")) record_route(); # 1=loose routing # loose-route processing if (loose_route()) { log(1, "LOOSE ROUTE\n"); t_relay(); break; }; if(!uri==myself) { log(1, "URI!=myself"); t_relay(); break; }; if (method=="REGISTER") { log(1, "REGISTER REQUEST RECEIVED\n"); if (!mssql_authorize("209.227.183.21", "subscriber")) { log(1, "AUTH FAILED, REQUESTED\n"); www_challenge("", "1"); break; }; log(1, "AUTH OK, REGISTER\n"); save("location"); break; }; ..... -- Best regards, Vitali

4 5

[Serusers] add alias of ser
by voip＠orzar.net 01 Feb '04

01 Feb '04

Hello, I'm new in SER, after installed ser 0.8.12 cvs versions, I try to add alias to a user, but I met a problem. After I type: serctl alias add 8040 sip:jeytest@voip.orzar.net It' shows: sip:jeytest@voip.orzar.net 400 Table 'aliases' not found in memory, use save("aliases") or lookup("aliases") in the configuration script first I'm sure I have lookup("aliases"); in my /etc/ser/ser.cfg file, and I did edit serctl script FOREVER_REL=1073741823 to FOREVER_REL=1003741823 follow by http://lists.iptel.org/pipermail/serusers/2004-January/004949.html . Thanks, Jey

2 2

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users February 2004