Hello All.
This is really a question for the ser maintainers.
Have you guys decided on a timeframe yet for releasing ser-0.8.15? I'm just
curious because there are a few features I'd love to use such as flatstore and
avp, without putting ser-0.8.99-devXX in to a production environment.
Cheers,
Paul
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - You care about security. So do we.
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
I have a problem with my SER configuration .when I start ser,the error
happens like this:
_______________________________________________________________________
[root@localhost local]# ser -E -D
0(2796) WARNING: could not rev. resolve 135.252.20.230
Listening on
127.0.0.1 [127.0.0.1]:5060
135.252.20.230 [135.252.20.230]:5060
Aliases: localhost:5060 localhost.localdomain:5060
WARNING: no fork mode and more than one listen address found (will use
only the the first one)
stateless - initializing
Maxfwd module- initializing
acc - initializing
0(2796) ERROR: acc: can't get code for the Failed attribute value
0(2796) init_mod(): Error while initializing module acc
ERROR: error while initializing modules
________________________________________________________________________
Does anyone know about this ? Need your help!
Regards.
Hello,
What are the criterias that influence the Acct-Delay-Time-Field Value in
Radius Accounting? Or is it set to 0 always?
Thanks,
Best regards,
Martin
Any ideas here?
Thanks in advance.
Ricardo
-----Mensaje original-----
De: Ricardo Martinez [mailto:rmartinez@redvoiss.net]
Enviado el: Jueves, 28 de Octubre de 2004 10:03
Para: 'serusers(a)lists.iptel.org'
Asunto: [Serusers] REGISTER location table problem.
Hello List.
Regarding to my last post in the mail-list. I downloaded the last
version of SER, as Marian Dumitro says ( i use : cvs -z3
-d:pserver:anonymous@cvs.ser.berlios.de:/cvsroot/ser co -r rel_0_8_14
sip_router). It compiled ok and i have it running. I use the parameters :
modparam("registrar","append_branches", 0)
modparam("registrar","desc_time_order", 1)
And this is what i see in my location table.
...Record(0x422b9158)...
domain: 'location'
aor : '5555832351'
~~~Contact(0x422b9270)~~~
domain : 'location'
aor : '5555832351'
Contact : 'sip:5555832351@10.0.0.2'
Expires : 735
q : 0.00
Call-ID : '259a9f42-fd7e-df78-8000-0002a400f1e9(a)10.0.0.2'
CSeq : 2
replic : 0
User-Agent: 'AddPac SIP Gateway'
State : CS_NEW
Flags : 0
next : 0x422b91a0
prev : (nil)
~~~/Contact~~~~
~~~Contact(0x422b91a0)~~~
domain : 'location'
aor : '5555832351'
Contact : 'sip:5555832351@10.0.0.3'
Expires : 658
q : 0.00
Call-ID : 'b9cf9e42-fd7e-df78-8000-0002a400f1e9(a)10.0.0.2'
CSeq : 153
replic : 0
User-Agent: 'AddPac SIP Gateway'
State : CS_NEW
Flags : 0
next : (nil)
prev : 0x422b9270
~~~/Contact~~~~
...Record(0x422bb328)...
domain: 'location'
aor : '5555832357'
~~~Contact(0x422bd3b8)~~~
domain : 'location'
aor : '5555832357'
Contact : 'sip:5555832357@10.0.0.4:5060'
Expires : 3541
q : 0.00
Call-ID : '977749f3-f4afb971(a)10.0.0.4'
CSeq : 2
replic : 0
User-Agent: 'Sipura/SPA1000-2.0.10(d)'
State : CS_NEW
Flags : 0
next : 0x422bd448
prev : (nil)
~~~/Contact~~~~
~~~Contact(0x422bd448)~~~
domain : 'location'
aor : '5555832357'
Contact : 'sip:5555832357@10.0.0.5:5060'
Expires : 3595
q : 0.00
Call-ID : 'd3a96cf7-1a9a523e(a)10.0.0.5'
CSeq : 2
replic : 0
User-Agent: 'Sipura/SPA1000-2.0.10(d)'
State : CS_NEW
Flags : 0
next : (nil)
prev : 0x422bd3b8
~~~/Contact~~~~
.../Record...
---/Domain---
===/Domain list===
As you can see the Addpac Sip Gateway is in descending order (according to
his Expire-Timer), as the module manual says, but the Sipura is ascending
order. I still don't understand why this is happening. Is this a bug? or a
wrong configuration?. I really hope that someone can help me here.
Thanks in advance.
Best Regards.
Ricardo.-
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
ser.cfg
if (!www_authorize("", "subscriber"))
if (!radius_proxy_authorize(""))
sipsak have passed 401 authorize.But can not pass 407 authorize.
I found server send 407,
sipsak send
INVITE SIP/2.0..Proxy-Authorization:
sipsak NOT ok
received:
error: did not received the INVITE that was sent (see above). aborting
////
but kphone send ACK
and INVITE Proxy-Authorization:
is ok
please help me
