sr-users January 2004

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

142 participants
338 discussions

Start a nNew thread

[Serusers] Hi
by info＠iptel.org 19 Jan '04

19 Jan '04

Test =) xpogjmmsugfcqw -- Test, yep.

1 0

[Serusers] {Virus?} Hi
by talldarkboy2003＠yahoo.com 19 Jan '04

19 Jan '04

Warning: This message has had one or more attachments removed Warning: (uidotktk.exe). Warning: Please read the "gateway.lankacom.net-Attachment-Warning.txt" attachment(s) for more information. Test =) ooarcbrlyrmrx -- Test, yep.

1 0

[Serusers] Alternative for ISPBS: CDRTool
by Adrian Georgescu 18 Jan '04

18 Jan '04

See OSS CDRTool. Costs money, non open-source. In production at major Telcos for several years. http://www.ag-projects.com/#CDRTool -- Adrian Hi, can anyone who is using the ispbs billing software in a "real-life" installation from hostplus.net comment on this product? best regards, Arnd

2 1

[Serusers] non-RTP-symmetric UAs
by Adrian Georgescu 18 Jan '04

18 Jan '04

IPDialog Siptone is another non-RTP-symmetric UA -- Adrian Olle E. Johansson wrote: > Maxim Sobolev wrote: > >> address). Please also note that there is no other way to detect >> non-RTP-symmetric UA than to compare User-Agent/Server header field >> against list of known non-RTP-symmetric UAs. > > > Do we have access to such a list? No. The only popular non-RTP-symmetric UA I know about is cisco IOS. -Maxim

1 0

[Serusers] New bugfix version of radiusclient library (0.4.1)
by Maxim Sobolev 18 Jan '04

18 Jan '04

New bugfix release is available, main changes: - Fixed a critical bug - if request contains any string attributes with length of 6 symbols, an incorrect secret can be user resulting in auth reject; - string attributes now can be zero-length. Beware: it resulted in ABI/API breakage. Due to the first item above update is strongly recommended to all current users. Please note that you need an updated cvs version of ser, since I've committed changes necessary to work correctly with new version of rc_avpair_add() function. As usually, bug any reports, suggestions or patches are highly appreciated. Download here: https://developer.berlios.de/project/showfiles.php?group_id=1208 -Maxim

2 3

[Serusers] Anyone here using ispbs?
by Arnd Vehling 18 Jan '04

18 Jan '04

Hi, can anyone who is using the ispbs billing software in a "real-life" installation from hostplus.net comment on this product? best regards, Arnd

1 0

Re: [Serusers] CVS source distribution
by Jiri Kuthan 18 Jan '04

18 Jan '04

At 01:12 AM 1/18/2004, Annie Sasidar wrote: >Hi, > I want to get the source distribution for ser 0.8.11 for linux. use 8.12, 8.11 is old. > I dont >want the tarball version since i want to only compile the present modules >and add the dbtext module for file based database support. > Please let me know where i can find the distribution folder that i can >download and just compile not install. see the webpage, http://www.iptel.org/ser/download/ -jiri

1 0

[Serusers] Do serweb and the ispbs work together?
by Arnd Vehling 18 Jan '04

18 Jan '04

Hi, can serweb and the ispbs billing/management interface from hostplus.net run with the same ser proxy and mysql installation? Anyone done this? best regards, Arnd

1 0

[Serusers] CVS source distribution
by Annie Sasidar 18 Jan '04

18 Jan '04

Hi, I want to get the source distribution for ser 0.8.11 for linux. I dont want the tarball version since i want to only compile the present modules and add the dbtext module for file based database support. Please let me know where i can find the distribution folder that i can download and just compile not install. Thanks, Annie

1 0

[Serusers] multiple SER instances / REGISTRATION problem
by Greg Fausak 17 Jan '04

17 Jan '04

I'd like to run multiple SER instances on the same database. I knew from previous experiments that would not be possible because of the cache. However, I just tried running multiple SER instances, on the same database, but in different domains. This did not work, they both wrote over each others location entries in the database even though the domains on each SER instance were different. SER knows which domain it is in because of the www_authorize("named.com", "subscriber") authentication challenge. So it seems reasonable that this instance of SER should only mess with authorizations that it challenged. Perhaps the problem is with the initial load of 'previous' registrations. When SER starts, it loads the current location table. During the load, ALL domains are loaded. Perhaps only the domains listed by the 'alias="domain"' should be loaded and tracked, and all of the rest should be ignored for each instance of SER? ---greg

7 18

← Newer
1
...
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
...
34
Older →

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users January 2004