At 10:06 PM 9/7/2003, Felix Schmid wrote:
>Jiri,
>
>I am aware of the reason why private Contacts make no sense. What was
>confusing me is that, in the record-route-header, my PRIVATE ip-address
>is quoted (not my dialup address) as shown in the ngrep-dump I attached.
We simply don't check that far, perhaps we will someday.
>That's why I was interested in the config you are using at iptel.org.
>You are saying that there is no such one for 8.11 - what about 8.10? Is
>this still available?
It must be somewhere on CVS repository or some 8.10 source packages.
-Jiri
Hi,
I just implemented the "t_replicate" directive in order to have the
registration message sent to a backup server as well.
It works fine...but the syslog is getting filled with this message:
Sep 6 20:06:02 maui /usr/local/sbin/ser[2602]: WARNING: sip_msg_cloner:
header body ignored: 8192
What does it mean?
Thanks.
Ricardo
From these logs:
10(28016) pre_auth(): Credentials with given realm not found
10(28016) REGISTER: challenging user
10(28016) build_auth_hf(): 'WWW-Authenticate: Digest realm="ford.com", nonce="3f578eaee00b29a57d6fb234024d112ecf485627"
I infer that the radius database includes no user identified by
the username in question and domain "ford.com".
-jiri
At 09:20 PM 9/4/2003, Rork, Joseph (J.P.) wrote:
>I am trying to get my setup working with radius. I have the lastest freeradius, radiusclient, and ser.
>
>The test programs that come with radiusclient work fine, so I've determined that the problem now comes down to my ser setup.
>I've attached my ser.cfg as well as the output of ser debug.
>
>Any ideas?
>
>
> <<attempt>> <<ser.cfg>>
>Regards,
>Joseph Rork
>Ford Motor Company
>Real-Time Collaborative Applications, SIE
>Phone: 313-594-6672
>Email: jrork(a)ford.com
>
>"There are 10 types of people in the world: Those who understand binary, and those who don't."
>
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Serusers mailing list
>serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
>http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
--
Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/
>>Are there OSed proxies I can use with SER? Can SER
itself be
configured to act as that kind of proxy?
>I don't know what OSed proxy is but there's Maxim
Sobolev's media relay
for use in the
>nathelper module.
>https://demo.portaone.com/~sobomax/PortaSIP/
-----
The setup I have is that my Linux server on which SER
runs is not
firewalled, all UDP ports are directly available as
well as standard
ports like 5060.
My understanding is that PortaSIP will be thus able to
open up some kind
of voice traffic redirection for each firewalled
client to use...
Can anyone give me just a bit more explanation on that
and tell me how I
can integrate PortaSIP with SER.
Specifically I'd like to know if I have to use it with
nathelper and if
so, what's the proper way to do that.
Any information collected through this list will be
put in a quick HOWTO
document for other newbies such as myself :)
Thanks a lot,
Daniel
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
I'm having trouble logging into serweb. When I enter the admin/heslo or
any other username/password combination, it just brings me back to the
login screen again.
I am using the serweb tar file off of the download site from Sep 1st on
RedHat9.
I thought maybe there was some issue with the user_id/username mismatch
that I have seen between some of the documentation and the scripts
themselves, so I downloaded the latest ser_mysql.sh file from cvs,
modified the username field to user_id. Deleted the database and
reinstalled it. I then had to change username in the serctl script to
user_id to match. I am still getting the same symptoms in serweb. Has
anyone else had this problem or have any suggestions?
Thanks,
Stephen
I have setup a LAN SER and everything is workingfine. Obviously, clients being on the LAN, everything is direct IP and thereare no NAT issues.
I am now trying to make NAT#8217;d clients accessthe server. I know NAT and SIP together are full of problems, but since volumewill be low I am considering simply using a proxy such as #8220;fwdnat#8221;for Free World. This solution is already tested and works properly in our testsetup, using xten#8217;s X-lite soft IP phone. We will consider migrating tofull fledged #8220;hard#8221; IP Phones when everything is in order.
Can anyone tell me if this is the best solution for asmall (< 50) company? What is the best way to setup access from outside our firewalls?
Are there OSed proxies I can use with SER? Can SERitself be configured to act as that kind of proxy?
Thanks for all the info you can provide,
Daniel
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
Hello,
It appears that serweb has been removed from the ftp site, i cant find it on
the website either? The directories are all empty, does anyone know where i
can download it?
The location i tried is: ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/serweb
Thanks in advance!
Kind regards,
Wouter Prins
1 - Can anyone recommend a SIP to PSTN Gateway? (I'd like to connect using a
T1.) Preferably Freeware on Linux. Any comments on Asterisk? I came across
it, but have not really looked into it yet.
2 - Can someone give me a short explanation of strict & loose router. I've
gone through much of RFC3261 and just remember one short description that
did not help.
Thanks.
i've extract SERweb under the default directory of the
web server /var/www/html. The links for images and css
for the default web page did not appear. When i point
the browser to page.php, i see a blank page.
I then created test.php contaning "<?php phpinfo();
?>", that page displayed fine showing PHP version,
config etc. I'm missing something, someone help?
I am running redhat 9.0
PHP 4.2.2
Apache/2.0.40
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
Folks,
We came over the problem with on-failure processing. In a nutshell our
config looks like the following:
route {
if (method == "INVITE") {
rewriteuser("345678");
rewritehostport("1.1.1.1:5060");
t_on_failure("1");
t_relay();
break;
};
}
failure_route[1] {
rewritehostport("2.2.2.2:5060");
append_branch();
t_relay();
}
The problem is that if transaction to 1.1.1.1 fails and we are
initiating another transaction to 2.2.2.2, the username part of requiest
URI sent to 2.2.2.2 is original one, not "345678", as it could be
expected.
Any ideas?
-Maxim
