sr-users July 2003

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

67 participants
160 discussions

[Serusers] Typo in Admin Guide 0.8.11
by Klaus Darilion 11 Jul '03

11 Jul '03

At section: Admin Guide 0.8.11 - Troubleshooting - Question: Q: On a multihomed host, ...... Answer: Set the configuration option mhome to "1" That's wrong, option is called mhomed, not mhome. ^ regards, Klaus

2 1

[Serusers] recommended test phones/adapters for newbie?
by Rich Adamson 11 Jul '03

11 Jul '03

I'm new to Ser and would like to set up a test lab with a couple different ip phones / adapters to learn from. Could someone recommend a few devices that we could use for that purpose? Would like to install a FX voice card in a Cisco 1750 router. Is there a particular card that others have found works? Any suggestions on a SIP IP phone? Thoughts on the ATA186? TIA, Rich

2 1

[Serusers] Fatl erro while trying to use Serweb
by Younger Wang 11 Jul '03

11 Jul '03

PHP directive register_globals went from ON to OFF in PHP 4.2.0. Serweb requires register_globals set to On. Find your functioning php.ini ,modify it and try.

1 0

RE: [Serusers] www_authorize()
by Marcelo Schmidt 10 Jul '03

10 Jul '03

No, there is not problem. --M -----Original Message----- From: Jan Janak [mailto:jan@iptel.org] Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 2:56 AM To: Marcelo Schmidt Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Subject: Re: [Serusers] www_authorize() Hello, sorry, but I don't understand. Is there any problem or is it working ? If your users get 401 then enabled debugging (debug=9) and see the server outputs, there should be some messages from auth module. Jan. On 09-07 16:30, Marcelo Schmidt wrote: > I am trying to find out why users get 401. This simple error got me. > Server realm is siptest.corp.equinix.com so if > (!www_authorize("siptest.corp.equinix.com", "subscriber")) {...} > > The table subscriber, domain: displaying localhost. It should read > siptest.corp.equinix.com. Based on the code under modules/auth sip > gets stripped and ha1 creates: gen_ha1 marcelo localhost sermarcelo > 2686e9018da810053455be71a35d6928 > In subscriber ha1: 2686e9018da810053455be71a35d6928 (all OK so far with > ha1) > > But I forgot when I installed this version for some reason > SIP_DOMAIN=localhost SO NEVER DO THAT! :) > > --M > > Btw: I am running ser 0.8.11pre29 (i386/netbsd) so far w/mysql all OK. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jan Janak [mailto:jan@iptel.org] > Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 2:36 PM > To: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > Subject: Re: [Serusers] www_authorize() > > > What exactly do you need to know ? The documentation is in > sip_router/modules/auth_db/doc > > The function tries to verify user's credentials. It returns 1 if they > are correct and -1 if not. > > Jan. > > On 09-07 14:24, Marcelo Schmidt wrote: > > Could someone point me where I can read about this www_authorize()? > > > > Thanks. > > --M > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Serusers mailing list > > serusers(a)lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers > > _______________________________________________ > Serusers mailing list > serusers(a)lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers

1 0

Re: [Serusers] nathelper updated to support RTP proxy
by Maxim Sobolev 10 Jul '03

10 Jul '03

Oh, sorry, I've misunderstood your problem. What kind of device UA1 is? Can you please try the same with ATAs on both ends? -Maxim Ricardo Villa wrote: > Hi Maxim, > > Sorry but I don't understand what you mean. Ser and RTP Proxy are on a > machine with IP Address=192.168.1.111. The WAN interface of the NAT Router > is 192.168.1.1. What exactly should I do? > > UA1---SER(192.168.1.111)---(192.168.1.1)NAT(192.168.0.1)----ATA186(192.168.0 > .15) > > > Thanks, > Ricardo > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Maxim Sobolev" <sobomax(a)portaone.com> > To: "Ricardo Villa" <ricvil(a)epm.net.co> > Cc: <serusers(a)lists.iptel.org>; <serdev(a)lists.iptel.org> > Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 7:18 PM > Subject: Re: [Serusers] nathelper updated to support RTP proxy > > > >>Try to bind both ser and rtpproxy to the IP address of "WAN" interface - >>192.168.0.1 and let me know if it helps or not. >> >>-Maxim >> >>Ricardo Villa wrote: >> >> >>>Hi Maxim, >>> >>>I have tested on 0.8.12dev-t10 installed on RedHat 7.3. >>> >>>The results are mixed. Only about 40% of the calls have audio even > > though > >>>the SDP is rewritten properly. >>> >>>My test setup is like this: >>> >>>UA1(192.168.1.10) -- >>>SER(192.168.1.111)---(192.168.1.1)NAT(192.168.0.1)--ATA186(192.168.0.15) >>> >>>I have included the "-f" output from the rtpproxy plus 4 ngrep files. >>> >>>1. success_from_internet.txt --> good call from UA1 to ATA186 >>>2. fail_from_internet.txt ---> no audio call from UA1 to ATA186 >>>3. success_from_nat.txt ----> good call from ATA186 to UA1 >>>4. fail_from_nat.txt ---> no audio call from ATA186 to UA1 >>> >>>Please let me know how else we can troubleshoot this. >>> >>>Thanks, >>>Ricardo >>> >>> >>> >>>----- Original Message ----- >>>From: "Maxim Sobolev" <sobomax(a)portaone.com> >>>To: <serusers(a)lists.iptel.org> >>>Cc: <serdev(a)lists.iptel.org> >>>Sent: Sunday, July 06, 2003 12:16 PM >>>Subject: [Serusers] nathelper updated to support RTP proxy >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>>Folks, >>>> >>>>Today I've updated nathelper module to support RTP proxy. It would >>>>be nice if somebody can test it on platforms other than FreeBSD, >>>>because I don't have an access to such boxes right now. The RTP >>>>proxy itself can be downloaded from: >>>> >>>>https://demo.portaone.com/~sobomax/PortaSIP/rtpproxy/ >>>> >>>>Any feedback is greatly appreciated. >>>> >>>>-Maxim >>>>P.S. I've committed it to the HEAD, those with 0.8.11 prerelease >>>>please apply the following patch: >>>> >>>>https://demo.portaone.com/~sobomax/nathelper.diff >>>> >>>>_______________________________________________ >>>>Serusers mailing list >>>>serusers(a)lists.iptel.org >>>>http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> >>>>_______________________________________________ >>>>Serusers mailing list >>>>serusers(a)lists.iptel.org >>>>http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers >> >> >> > > > >

3 4

RE: [Serusers] www_authorize()
by Marcelo Schmidt 10 Jul '03

10 Jul '03

I am trying to find out why users get 401. This simple error got me. Server realm is siptest.corp.equinix.com so if (!www_authorize("siptest.corp.equinix.com", "subscriber")) {...} The table subscriber, domain: displaying localhost. It should read siptest.corp.equinix.com. Based on the code under modules/auth sip gets stripped and ha1 creates: gen_ha1 marcelo localhost sermarcelo 2686e9018da810053455be71a35d6928 In subscriber ha1: 2686e9018da810053455be71a35d6928 (all OK so far with ha1) But I forgot when I installed this version for some reason SIP_DOMAIN=localhost SO NEVER DO THAT! :) --M Btw: I am running ser 0.8.11pre29 (i386/netbsd) so far w/mysql all OK. -----Original Message----- From: Jan Janak [mailto:jan@iptel.org] Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 2:36 PM To: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Subject: Re: [Serusers] www_authorize() What exactly do you need to know ? The documentation is in sip_router/modules/auth_db/doc The function tries to verify user's credentials. It returns 1 if they are correct and -1 if not. Jan. On 09-07 14:24, Marcelo Schmidt wrote: > Could someone point me where I can read about this www_authorize()? > > Thanks. > --M > > _______________________________________________ > Serusers mailing list > serusers(a)lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers _______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list serusers(a)lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers

2 1

Re: [Serusers] Time zones in acc table
by Jiri Kuthan 10 Jul '03

10 Jul '03

There is currently no such config option. I introduced a "db_localtime" option to devel version of acc module -- if turned on, localtime is used instead. -jiri At 10:38 AM 7/9/2003, Andrzej Radke wrote: >Hello all ! >I would like to change the time zone in time column in acc table >in database ser. Nowaydays it is a UTC(GMT) >Field timestamp in this same table is in my local zone CET >Is some way to change it ? Some parameter in modules >included in ser.cfg (acc.so) ? > >Greetings >Andrzej Radke > >_______________________________________________ >Serusers mailing list >serusers(a)lists.iptel.org >http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers -- Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/

1 0

Re: [Serusers] Re: [Serdev] nathelper updated to support RTP proxy
by Younger Wang 09 Jul '03

09 Jul '03

It compiled and functioned to relay media stream. It's great. However, there is some error message from Ser: WARNING: no fork mode Maxfwd module- initializing textops - initializing stateless - initializing 0(0) INFO: udp_init: SO_RCVBUF is initially 65535 0(0) INFO: udp_init: SO_RCVBUF is finally 131070 2(0) INFO: fifo process starting: 12285 2(12285) SER: open_uac_fifo: fifo server up at /tmp/ser_fifo... 0(12282) ERROR: extract_mediaip: no `c=' in SDP 0(12282) WARNING: get_body_len: Content-TYPE header absent!let's assume the con tent is text/plain ;-) 0(12282) ERROR: on_reply processing failed 0(12282) WARNING: get_body_len: Content-TYPE header absent!let's assume the con tent is text/plain ;-) 0(12282) ERROR: on_reply processing failed 0(12282) ERROR: extract_mediaip: no `c=' in SDP Corresponding output of rtpproxy is: rtpproxy: new session on a port 35000 rtpproxy: lookup on a port 35000 rtpproxy: addr1 filled in rtpproxy: addr2 filled in rtpproxy: session on port 35000 is cleaned up I am making the test on Linux 7.3. Both of the SIP UA is ata186. The network structure is: ATA 1------------NAT 1 (Microsoft ICS)-------NAT 2 (Cisco 2600)--------SER (192.168.0.1) (192.17.1.0) ATA 2------------------------------------------NAT2(Cisco 2600)--------------SER (192.17.1.0) I'll make further test through Cisco 53 to PSTN. Younger Wang ----- Original Message ----- From: "Younger Wang" <wygmail(a)yeah.net> To: "Maxim Sobolev" <sobomax(a)portaone.com> Cc: <serdev(a)lists.iptel.org>; <serusers(a)lists.iptel.org> Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 2:21 PM Subject: Re: [Serusers] Re: [Serdev] nathelper updated to support RTP proxy > It compiled and functioned to relay media stream. It's great. However, > there is some error message from Ser: > > WARNING: no fork mode > Maxfwd module- initializing > textops - initializing > stateless - initializing > 0(0) INFO: udp_init: SO_RCVBUF is initially 65535 > 0(0) INFO: udp_init: SO_RCVBUF is finally 131070 > 2(0) INFO: fifo process starting: 12285 > 2(12285) SER: open_uac_fifo: fifo server up at /tmp/ser_fifo... > 0(12282) ERROR: extract_mediaip: no `c=' in SDP > 0(12282) WARNING: get_body_len: Content-TYPE header absent!let's assume the > con > tent is text/plain ;-) > 0(12282) ERROR: on_reply processing failed > 0(12282) WARNING: get_body_len: Content-TYPE header absent!let's assume the > con > tent is text/plain ;-) > 0(12282) ERROR: on_reply processing failed > 0(12282) ERROR: extract_mediaip: no `c=' in SDP > > > Corresponding output of rtpproxy is: > > rtpproxy: new session on a port 35000 > rtpproxy: lookup on a port 35000 > rtpproxy: addr1 filled in > rtpproxy: addr2 filled in > rtpproxy: session on port 35000 is cleaned up > > > I am making the test on Linux 7.3. Both of the SIP UA is ata186. The network > structure is: > ATA 1------------NAT 1 (Microsoft ICS)-------NAT 2 (Cisco 2600)--------SER > (192.168.0.1) (192.17.1.0) > > ATA 2------------------------------------------NAT2(Cisco > 2600)--------------SER > (192.17.1.0) > > I'll make further test through Cisco 53 to PSTN. > > > Younger Wang > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Maxim Sobolev" <sobomax(a)portaone.com> > To: "Younger Wang" <wygmail(a)yeah.net> > Cc: <serdev(a)lists.iptel.org>; <serusers(a)lists.iptel.org> > Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 12:33 PM > Subject: Re: [Serusers] Re: [Serdev] nathelper updated to support RTP proxy > > > > I've applied a fix. Please update and let me know if it helps or not. > > > > Thanks! > > > > Sincerely, > > > > Maxim > > > > Younger Wang wrote: > > > > > The permission tribute of /var/run/rtpproxy.sock is srwxr-xr-x. > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Younger Wang" <wygmail(a)yeah.net> > > > To: "Maxim Sobolev" <sobomax(a)portaone.com> > > > Cc: <serdev(a)lists.iptel.org>; <serusers(a)lists.iptel.org> > > > Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 11:35 AM > > > Subject: Re: [Serusers] Re: [Serdev] nathelper updated to support RTP > proxy > > > > > > > > > > > >>The call is made from a Nated ata186. I got the message from rtpproxy: > > >> > > >>rtpproxy: can't accept connection on control socket: Invalid argument > > >>rtpproxy: can't accept connection on control socket: Invalid argument > > >> > > >> > > >>The corresponding Ser output: > > >> > > >>[root@sip-iptel ser]# ser -f rtpproxy.cfg > > >> 0(29376) WARNING: could not rev. resolve 192.17.1.173 > > >>Listening on > > >> 192.17.1.173 [192.17.1.173]:5060 > > >>Aliases: > > >>WARNING: no fork mode > > >>textops - initializing > > >>stateless - initializing > > >> 0(0) INFO: udp_init: SO_RCVBUF is initially 65535 > > >> 0(0) INFO: udp_init: SO_RCVBUF is finally 131070 > > >> 0(29376) ERROR: extract_mediaip: no `c=' in SDP > > >> 0(29376) ERROR: get_rtpp_port: can't read reply from a RTP proxy > > >> 0(29376) WARNING: get_body_len: Content-TYPE header absent!let's assume > > > > > > the > > > > > >>content is text/plain ;-) > > >> 0(29376) ERROR: on_reply processing failed > > >> 0(29376) WARNING: get_body_len: Content-TYPE header absent!let's assume > > > > > > the > > > > > >>content is text/plain ;-) > > >> 0(29376) ERROR: on_reply processing failed > > >> 0(29376) ERROR: extract_mediaip: no `c=' in SDP > > >> 0(29376) ERROR: get_rtpp_port: can't read reply from a RTP proxy > > >> 0(29376) ERROR: on_reply processing failed > > >> > > >> > > >>Younger Wang > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >>----- Original Message ----- > > >>From: "Maxim Sobolev" <sobomax(a)portaone.com> > > >>To: "Younger Wang" <wygmail(a)yeah.net> > > >>Cc: <serdev(a)lists.iptel.org>; <serusers(a)lists.iptel.org> > > >>Sent: Monday, July 07, 2003 12:54 PM > > >>Subject: Re: [Serusers] Re: [Serdev] nathelper updated to support RTP > > > > > > proxy > > > > > >> > > >>>Start rtpproxy with `-f' flag which will prevent it from going into the > > >>>daemon mode, make a test call and send me rtpproxy's output. > > >>> > > >>>-Maxim > > >>> > > >>>Younger Wang wrote: > > >>> > > >>> > > >>>>Hi Maxim, > > >>>> > > >>>>I made the test. There is some problems: > > >>>>1. The source of RTP proxy did not compile. I replaced Makefile with > > >>>> Makefile.linux. The following error message is given: > > >>>> cc -o main.o -c main.c > > >>>> main.c: In function `setbindhost': > > >>>> main.c:83: structure has no member named `sin_len' > > >>>> make: *** [main.o] Error 1 > > >>>> > > >>>> I commented line 83 in main.c and it compiled and the executive > > >> > > >>run. > > >> > > >>>>2 I run ser with the example script rtpproxy.cfg (modified to work > > > > > > in > > > > > >>my > > >> > > >>>>network). rtpproxy is also started. I made a nat call and here is the > > >> > > >>debug > > >> > > >>>>message: > > >>>> > > >>>> 0(29497) WARNING: could not rev. resolve 192.17.1.173 > > >>>>Listening on > > >>>> 192.17.1.173 [192.17.1.173]:5060 > > >>>>Aliases: > > >>>>WARNING: no fork mode > > >>>>textops - initializing > > >>>>stateless - initializing > > >>>> 0(0) INFO: udp_init: SO_RCVBUF is initially 65535 > > >>>> 0(0) INFO: udp_init: SO_RCVBUF is finally 131070 > > >>>> 0(29497) ERROR: extract_mediaip: no `c=' in SDP > > >>>> 0(29497) ERROR: get_rtpp_port: can't read reply from a RTP proxy > > >>>> 0(29497) WARNING: get_body_len: Content-TYPE header absent!let's > > > > > > assume > > > > > >>the > > >> > > >>>>content is text/plain ;-) > > >>>> 0(29497) ERROR: on_reply processing failed > > >>>> 0(29497) WARNING: get_body_len: Content-TYPE header absent!let's > > > > > > assume > > > > > >>the > > >> > > >>>>content is text/plain ;-) > > >>>> 0(29497) ERROR: on_reply processing failed > > >>>> 0(29497) ERROR: extract_mediaip: no `c=' in SDP > > >>>> 0(29497) ERROR: get_rtpp_port: can't read reply from a RTP proxy > > >>>> 0(29497) ERROR: on_reply processing failed > > >>>> 0(29497) ERROR: extract_mediaip: no `c=' in SDP > > >>>> 0(29497) ERROR: get_rtpp_port: can't read reply from a RTP proxy > > >>>> 0(29497) WARNING: get_body_len: Content-TYPE header absent!let's > > > > > > assume > > > > > >>the > > >> > > >>>>content is text/plain ;-) > > >>>> 0(29497) ERROR: on_reply processing failed > > >>>> 0(29497) WARNING: get_body_len: Content-TYPE header absent!let's > > > > > > assume > > > > > >>the > > >> > > >>>>content is text/plain ;-) > > >>>> 0(29497) ERROR: on_reply processing failed > > >>>> 0(29497) ERROR: extract_mediaip: no `c=' in SDP > > >>>> 0(29497) ERROR: get_rtpp_port: can't read reply from a RTP proxy > > >>>> 0(29497) ERROR: on_reply processing failed > > >>>> > > >>>> In fact, it should not work because I did not tell ser how to > > > > > > find > > > > > >>>>rtpproxy. But I did not find any information to do so. > > >>>> > > >>>>3. In rtpproxy.cfg, I found the following script: > > >>>> > > >>>>if (search("User-Agent: Cisco ATA.*")) { > > >>>> setflag(1); # remember this is ATA > > >>>> force_rport(); > > >>>> fix_nated_contact(); > > >>>> > > >>>> What force_rport() is for? And in which module is it defined? > > >>>> > > >>>>4. There is two option or parameters for rtpproxy. > > >>>> rtpproxy: usage: rtpproxy [-f] [-l address] > > >>>> > > >>>> Is there more information about its usage other than message > > > > > > above? > > > > > >>>>5. In README of module nathelper, I found: > > >>>> > > >>>>Name: fix_nated_sdp() > > >>>>Params: mode - 0x01 (add direction=active), 0x02 (rewrite media IP > > >>>> address with source address of the message) > > >>>>Desc: Rewrites SDP body in accordance with mode flag > > >>>>Example: if (search("User-Agent: Cisco ATA.*") > > >> > > >>{fix_nated_sdp(3);}; > > >> > > >>>>Does fix_nated_sdp(3) means direction=active and rewrite media IP > > >> > > >>address > > >> > > >>>>with source address of the message? And what does direction=active > > >> > > >>means? > > >> > > >>>> And: > > >>>> > > >>>>Name: force_rtp_proxy > > >>>>Params: none > > >>>> > > >>>>So what does mean? > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>>Your reply is so soon, Maxim. > > >>>> > > >>>>Younger Wang > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>>----- Original Message ----- > > >>>>From: "Maxim Sobolev" <sobomax(a)portaone.com> > > >>>>To: <serusers(a)lists.iptel.org> > > >>>>Cc: <serdev(a)lists.iptel.org> > > >>>>Sent: Sunday, July 06, 2003 10:16 AM > > >>>>Subject: [Serdev] nathelper updated to support RTP proxy > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>>>Folks, > > >>>>> > > >>>>>Today I've updated nathelper module to support RTP proxy. It would > > >>>>>be nice if somebody can test it on platforms other than FreeBSD, > > >>>>>because I don't have an access to such boxes right now. The RTP > > >>>>>proxy itself can be downloaded from: > > >>>>> > > >>>>>https://demo.portaone.com/~sobomax/PortaSIP/rtpproxy/ > > >>>>> > > >>>>>Any feedback is greatly appreciated. > > >>>>> > > >>>>>-Maxim > > >>>>>P.S. I've committed it to the HEAD, those with 0.8.11 prerelease > > >>>>>please apply the following patch: > > >>>>> > > >>>>>https://demo.portaone.com/~sobomax/nathelper.diff > > >>>>> > > >>>>>_______________________________________________ > > >>>>>Serdev mailing list > > >>>>>serdev(a)lists.iptel.org > > >>>>>http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serdev > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>>_______________________________________________ > > >>>>Serusers mailing list > > >>>>serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > > >>>>http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>>_______________________________________________ > > >>>Serusers mailing list > > >>>serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > > >>>http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers > > >> > > >>_______________________________________________ > > >>Serdev mailing list > > >>serdev(a)lists.iptel.org > > >>http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serdev > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Serusers mailing list > > > serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > > > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Serusers mailing list > > serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers >

1 0

[Serusers] www_authorize()
by Marcelo Schmidt 09 Jul '03

09 Jul '03

Could someone point me where I can read about this www_authorize()? Thanks. --M

2 1

[Serusers] SIP & application server
by Victor Gamov 09 Jul '03

09 Jul '03

Hi! I'm novice at SIP technology and I have some questions about it. When we speak about "application server" in SIP (SER may acts as AS) what does it means? Is it server which siply launch external applications (internal module or fork & exec) to rewrite SIP/SDP packet and forward it to next hop or something else? For example if I want to write application which accept external call, make some decisions on it and then make external call. Is it suitable for SER or I must write something like B2BUA and start it as independed application (as UA from the point of view of SER) ? Thanks for advise!

2 2

← Newer
1
...
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
Older →

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users July 2003