sr-users December 2003

sr-users@lists.kamailio.org

108 participants
257 discussions

[Serusers] Problems with CANCEL on Xlite
by Chuck Ramirez 12 Dec '03

12 Dec '03

Hello, I am using the X-Lite 2.0 build 1086 with ser 0.8.11 and noticed a strange behaviour regarding the CANCEL method. Whenever the X-lite sends a CANCEL to a Cisco gateway after having received a 183 Session Progress, the gateway sends back a 481 Call Leg/Transaction Does Not Exist. This way, the call is not being canceled as the called phone will keep ringing. If no 183 Session Progress is received, the call is normally canceled. Any ideas on this issue? Has anyone has experienced the same problems? Thanks, Chuck Ramirez #################### INVITE sip:555199434103@200.229.101.9:5060 SIP/2.0 Record-Route: <sip:99434103@200.229.119.20;ftag=760418566;lr> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 200.229.100.20;branch=z9hG4bK4851.71c4b895.2 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 200.229.100.18:5060 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 200.176.103.227:54708 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.0.0.25:5060;rport;branch=z9hG4bKEF01CC8838FF465AB1FC49BFADEC2843 Record-Route: <sip:99434103@200.229.100.18:5060> From: 55519 <sip:55519@myproxy.com>;tag=760418566 To: <sip:99434103@myproxy.com> Call-ID: E43869EB-1F92-4FE4-A73B-3EAAEEE5B6EE(a)10.0.0.25 CSeq: 53730 INVITE Contact: <sip:55519@200.229.100.18:5060> Authorization: Digest username="55519", realm="myproxy.com", nonce="3fc226f57eab90d318703f3913f8d12bdfdf27fd", uri="sip:99434103@myproxy.com", response="2058c7da78fea8ed4b6c894d460fce71" max-forwards: 69 user-agent: X-Lite build 1086 Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Length: 238 v=0 o=55519 1033766 1033766 IN IP4 10.0.0.25 s=X-Lite c=IN IP4 200.229.100.18 t=0 0 m=audio 7074 RTP/AVP 3 0 8 101 a=rtpmap:0 pcmu/8000 a=rtpmap:8 pcma/8000 a=rtpmap:3 gsm/8000 a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 a=fmtp:101 0-15 SIP/2.0 100 Trying Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 200.229.100.20;branch=z9hG4bK4851.71c4b895.2,SIP/2.0/UDP 200.229.100.18:5060,SIP/2.0/UDP 200.176.103.227:54708,SIP/2.0/UDP 10.0.0.25:5060;rport;branch=z9hG4bKEF01CC8838FF465AB1FC49BFADEC2843 From: 55519 <sip:55519@myproxy.com>;tag=760418566 To: <sip:99434103@myproxy.com>;tag=C221BDBC-46A Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 15:37:46 GMT Call-ID: E43869EB-1F92-4FE4-A73B-3EAAEEE5B6EE(a)10.0.0.25 Server: Cisco-SIPGateway/IOS-12.x CSeq: 53730 INVITE Content-Length: 0 SIP/2.0 100 Trying Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 200.229.100.20;branch=z9hG4bK4851.71c4b895.2,SIP/2.0/UDP 200.229.100.18:5060,SIP/2.0/UDP 200.176.103.227:54708,SIP/2.0/UDP 10.0.0.25:5060;rport;branch=z9hG4bKEF01CC8838FF465AB1FC49BFADEC2843 From: 55519 <sip:55519@myproxy.com>;tag=760418566 To: <sip:99434103@myproxy.com>;tag=C221BDBC-46A Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 15:37:46 GMT Call-ID: E43869EB-1F92-4FE4-A73B-3EAAEEE5B6EE(a)10.0.0.25 Server: Cisco-SIPGateway/IOS-12.x CSeq: 53730 INVITE Content-Length: 0 CANCEL sip:555199434103@200.229.101.9:5060 SIP/2.0 Max-Forwards: 10 Record-Route: <sip:99434103@200.229.100.20;ftag=760418566;lr> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 200.229.100.20;branch=z9hG4bK4851.71c4b895.2 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 200.229.100.18:5060 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 200.176.103.227:54708 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.0.0.25:5060;rport;branch=z9hG4bKEF01CC8838FF465AB1FC49BFADEC2843 Record-Route: <sip:99434103@200.229.100.18:5060> From: 55519 <sip:55519@myproxy.com>;tag=760418566 To: <sip:99434103@myproxy.com>;tag=C221BDBC-46A Call-ID: E43869EB-1F92-4FE4-A73B-3EAAEEE5B6EE(a)10.0.0.25 CSeq: 53730 CANCEL Contact: <sip:55519@200.229.100.18:5060> Authorization: Digest username="55519", realm="myproxy.com", nonce="3fc226f57eab90d318703f3913f8d12bdfdf27fd", uri="sip:99434103@myproxy.com", response="1f17428b2a3e7ad85ed1aea6fdb162e3" user-agent: X-Lite build 1086 Content-Length: 0 SIP/2.0 481 Call Leg/Transaction Does Not Exist Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 200.229.100.20;branch=z9hG4bK4851.71c4b895.2,SIP/2.0/UDP 200.229.100.18:5060,SIP/2.0/UDP 200.176.103.227:54708,SIP/2.0/UDP 10.0.0.25:5060;rport;branch=z9hG4bKEF01CC8838FF465AB1FC49BFADEC2843 From: 55519 <sip:55519@myproxy.com>;tag=760418566 To: <sip:99434103@myproxy.com>;tag=C221BDBC-46A Call-ID: E43869EB-1F92-4FE4-A73B-3EAAEEE5B6EE(a)10.0.0.25 CSeq: 53730 CANCEL Content-Length: 0 --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now

2 1

Re: [Serusers] another RTPProxy for SER
by Adrian Georgescu 12 Dec '03

12 Dec '03

Hello Bernie, Port range is run time configurable now. You can download the latest version from: http://SERMediaProxy.dns-hosting.info/ Regards, Adrian Georgescu On Thursday, Dec 11, 2003, at 10:15 Europe/Amsterdam, Bernie Hoeneisen wrote: > Hi Adrian! > > Thanks! > > It would be indeed useful to make the range of ports configurable. Our > security department wont be really delighted, if I request them to > open > such a wide range of ports...;-) > > Have fun! > > cheers, > Bernie > > > On Wed, 10 Dec 2003, Adrian Georgescu wrote: > >> It uses randomly available ports in the next range: >> >> minPort = 35000 >> maxPort = 65000 >> >> I have noted this down. We will add an option to specify the range at >> runtime. >> >> Regards, >> Adrian >> >> >> On Wednesday, Dec 10, 2003, at 16:58 Europe/Amsterdam, Bernie >> Hoeneisen >> wrote: >> >>> Hi Adrian! >>> >>> I have just installed and tested it. Cool! >>> >>> My question: >>> >>> - Which port range is it using? Can this be configured? >>> So for I found, that it uses at least port 35004... >>> >>> Thanx! >>> >>> T: Bernie >>> >>> >>> On Wed, 10 Dec 2003, Adrian Georgescu wrote: >>> >>>> Hello, we have released an alternative RTPProxy that works with SER >>>> nathelper module. Is a completely new program written in Python and >>>> should be able to run without recompilation on any system where >>>> Python >>>> is supported. We have tested Linux Debian and Solaris 8. There are >>>> little differences against PortaOne's rtpproxy, mainly the problem >>>> with >>>> Xten choppy audio was solved. >>>> >>>> Features >>>> - Compliant with SER nathelper module >>>> - Runs without recompilation on SUN Solaris >>>> - Xten audio quality is perfect without gaps >>>> - Display active media sessions >>>> - Display traffic in minutes and kilobytes >>>> - Log to syslog the IP/port numbers and traffic statistics per >>>> session >>>> - Flexible design for adding new features >>>> >>>> To do list >>>> - Run it on separate machine than SER >>>> - Log network traffic per domain >>>> - Integrate traffic logging with CDRtool >>>> >>>> The application is free to download and use without limitations. You >>>> can download it from: >>>> >>>> http://download.dns-hosting.info/RTPProxy/ >>>> >>>> The application is developed and supported by AG Projects. Any >>>> feedback >>>> is welcome at support(a)jobserver.org >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Adrian Georgescu >>>> ag(a)ag-projects.com >>>> http://ag-projects.com >>>> Tel: +31-23-5458104 >>>> IP phone: sip:ag@ag-projects.com >>>> ------------------------------------------------ >>>> DNS, ENUM & IP telephony http://managed-dns.org/ >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Serusers mailing list >>>> serusers(a)lists.iptel.org >>>> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers >>>> >> >> >>

1 0

[Serusers] Release of New SERAdmin version V03f
by Xten India 12 Dec '03

12 Dec '03

Hi all, We (Xten india) released the latest version of SERAdmin V03f. please check the release notes of latest version. 1. Introduction 1.1 Why SER Administration Application Present SER is software, which is very tedious to work with, as we have to type each and every command in the command line. It is not user friendly. Moreover SER is not compatible with Microsoft Windows. Also the user cannot know about all the options of SER on running it. To overcome all this disadvantages of SER, SERAdmin has been developed. 1.2 Where to get SER Administration Application SER Administration Application is available for download in http://developer.berlios.de/projects/seradmin If the documentation does not resolve your problem you may try contacting us by e-mail at xten_India(a)berlios.de or xten_india(a)yahoo.com 2. Installation 2.1 Installation Notes Supported architectures: -- Linux/i386 (Both Server and Client components) -- Windows (9x,NT, XP, 2000) (for Client component only) 2.2 Requirements - ser-0.8.10 or ser-0.8.11 - mysql - jdk1.2 2.3 Download the package Download all the below three files into the java root of your machine e.g. / jdk<ver>/ bin 1. serserver_v03f.tar 2. seradmin_v03f.jar 2.4 To install the Server Module: Linux: 1. < tar -xvzf serserver_v03f.tar > 2. export PATH=$PATH:/Seradminserver:/<Java root Path> 3. Type "installserver" It will install the serserver component. 4. Then It will automatically starts the Serserver. (press any key to get the command prompt) 2.5 To install the Client Module (SER Administration Application) : 1. Set the PATH to /jdk<ver>/bin in Windows /usr/java/jdk<ver>/bin in Linux 2. Copy the file "seradmin_v03f.jar" to your system 3. unjar the file by <jar -xvf seradmin_v03f.jar> 4. To run the "SER Administration Application". <java seradmin> 5. Then proceed the steps as "SER Administration Application" guides. IMPORTANT NOTE: Before running the client module, the server module should be started on the Linux machine. The objective of the SERAdminv03f is to support any linux version of ser. This latest SER Administration Application handles ser-0.8.10 and above. What is new?. The "Add New user" is replaced by "Approve New user". This option is to approve the requested user from Pending table to Subscriber. The following commands available in this release ------------------------------------------------ Ping(uri) - Pinging a URI Cisco_restart(uri) - Restart a Cisco Phone arg - Arguments of SER pwd - Present Working Directory t_uac_dlg - Initiate a Transaction and also we are included the option to change the SIP_DOMAIN. Regards, Xten India --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? Protect your identity with Yahoo! Mail AddressGuard

1 0

[Serusers] budgetone -> ser -> asterisk
by Muhammad Nasim 11 Dec '03

11 Dec '03

I have a budgetone behind nat it registers with ser fine. I can make a call from it to another non nat budgetone fine. In the following scenario budgeton(no nat) -> ser -> asterisk -> ........, things work fine However in the following scenario budgeton(nat) -> ser -> asterisk ->....., asterisk cannot authenticate the forwarded messages from ser If I remove the authentication requirement from asterisk there is no problem. Is there a problem with forwarded authentication when the phone registered with ser is behind nat? Muhammad Nasim TelAppliant Ltd Tel: 020 7740 3492 Int: +44 20 7740 3492 Main: 0845 004 4040 Fax: 0845 004 4040 www.telappliant.com TelAppliant is the UK's provider of IP telephony solutions for small and medium-sized businesses -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The information in this message is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this message by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying or distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it is prohibited and may be unlawful.

1 0

RE: [Serusers] Re: Xten-RTPProxy choppy audio
by Klaus Darilion 11 Dec '03

11 Dec '03

Hi! > -----Original Message----- > From: Jan Janak [mailto:jan@iptel.org] ... > It would be interesting to test this with kphone (kphone-xten directly > without RTP proxy) which doesn't listen for RTCP traffic and > thus the host > will generate "port unreachable" too. Anyone willing to test this ? (I > am travelling and couldn't do it). > kphone (3.14) also generates ICMP error messages. x-lite 1094 (and propably some of the old versions) can handle this. Klaus

3 3

[Serusers] SIP response 403
by jerk face 11 Dec '03

11 Dec '03

I am trying to make an outgoing call to another iptel account using Asterisk. I have followed a how-to for asterisk and iptel found at http://www.voip-info.org/tiki-index.php?page=Asterisk%20sip%20client%20SER I am getting the following error message: Got SIP response 403 "That is ugly -- use From=id next time (OB)" back from 195.37.77.101 I'm not quite sure what that means. Does anybody know what I might have done wrong? Here is my configuration: sip.conf register => account:passwd@iptel.org/ [iptel] type=friend username=account secret=passwd host=iptel.org extensions.conf exten=>_3.,1,SetCallerID(myNumber) exten=>_3.,2,SetCIDName("myName") exten=>_3.,3,Dial,SIP/${EXTEN:1}@iptel exten=>_3.,4,Playback(pbx-invalid) exten=>_3.,5,Hangup Thank you for your time. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New Yahoo! Photos - easier uploading and sharing. http://photos.yahoo.com/

2 1

RE: [Serusers] stop rety
by Klaus Darilion 11 Dec '03

11 Dec '03

You can use the fr_invite_timer: http://www.iptel.org/ser/doc/seruser/seruser.html#REPLYPROCESSINGSECTION Klaus > -----Original Message----- > From: - zaki - [mailto:zaki@edge.jp] > Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 6:11 PM > To: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > Subject: [Serusers] stop rety > > > > Hi, > > With following situation, > > * endpoint exists in location > (found by serctl ul show) > > * but endpoint is actually dead > > if someone call the endpoint, then SER try to send INVITE request > again and again. > > Could anyone please let me know how to change the number of retry > in this situation? > > Best Regards, > > -- > - zaki - YAMAZAKI Noriyuki, Director of EDGE Co., Ltd. > +81-3-5749-9621(Phone), +81-3-5749-9910(Fax), zaki(a)edge.jp > > > _______________________________________________ > Serusers mailing list > serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers > >

4 6

RE: [Serusers] nathelper question - nat_flag
by Klaus Darilion 11 Dec '03

11 Dec '03

Thanks for the detailed explanation, slowly i understand the flags :-) Klaus -----Original Message----- From: Jan Janak [mailto:jan@iptel.org] Sent: Wed 10.12.2003 23:50 To: Klaus Darilion Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Subject: Re: [Serusers] nathelper question - nat_flag Basically usrloc has been extended to save the status of a flag. Which flag it should save can be configured using the "nat_flag" parameter of the registrar module. Let's say you configure modparam("registrar", "nat_flag", 6) Then flag 6 will be saved into the user location database each time you call save("location") and retrieved each time you call lookup("location"). If flag 6 is set before save() then it will be also set after lookup() for the same contact. Because the user location database stores already rewritten contact (in case the user agent was behind a NAT), you don't know if the contact returned by lookup() is behind NAT That's what the flag is for. If the configured flag is set after lookup("location") then you know that the contact is behind NAT. Typically you would do something like this (very rough example): # For REGISTER If (contact_is_behind_nat) { rewrite_contact setflag(6) save("location") } # For INVITE if (lookup("location")) { if (isset(6)) { # Contact is behind NAT force_rtp_proxy } } Jan. On 10-12 23:40, Klaus Darilion wrote: > Hi! > > I'm lost in the NAT problem! > > I read about the 'new' flags which will be stored in the location table to > detect the presence of NATed clients. > http://lists.iptel.org/pipermail/serdev/2003-October/000690.html > > But I can't find any documentation about them. How do I use them? Do I have > to use setflag(?) before save("location")? Which flag do I have to set? Do I > have to retrive the flags during lookup("location") to force_rtp_proxy in > case of an registered client whic is nated? > > regards, > Klaus > > > _______________________________________________ > Serusers mailing list > serusers(a)lists.iptel.org > http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers

3 2

[Serusers] Separate MySQL Server
by Antonio Rabena 11 Dec '03

11 Dec '03

Hi, Is it possible to have a separate machine for SER and MySQL Server? Regards, Antonio Rabena LGA Telecom Pte Ltd Tel: +65 6892 2308 Fax: +65 6872 5668 Email: antonio(a)lgatelecom.net

2 1

[Serusers] response port..?
by Santosh Subramanian, Noida 11 Dec '03

11 Dec '03

If I use the port 5060 for sending REGISTER request, response from SER will be on the same port or on different port no..? Kind Regards, Santhosh.S

2 1

← Newer
1
...
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
...
26
Older →

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

sr-users December 2003