Looking at the code, it seems that the last reply is the one returned now -- the name is a
bit misleading if it expects the previous reply. I think it needs a dedicated field in the
structure if one needs to get access to previous reply code. I would also suggest to add
an alias like $T(prev_reply) for more suggestive name and obsolete $T_reply_last over the
time, or let the one like it is now and add $T(prev_reply) for prev reply code.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: