Looking at the code, it seems that the last reply is the one returned now -- the name is a bit misleading if it expects the previous reply. I think it needs a dedicated field in the structure if one needs to get access to previous reply code. I would also suggest to add an alias like $T(prev_reply) for more suggestive name and obsolete $T_reply_last over the time, or let the one like it is now and add $T(prev_reply) for prev reply code.

—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.