This little test program shows same output before and after patch.
`
#include <stdio.h>
#include "sha256.h"
#include "shautils.h"
#define BUFSIZE 1024
int main(void) {
uint8_t buffer[BUFSIZE];
uint8_t src[2];
src[0]='a';
src[1]=0x0a;
compute_sha256((char *)buffer, (uint8_t *)&src, sizeof(src));
buffer[SHA256_DIGEST_STRING_LENGTH -1] = '\0';
printf("%s\n", buffer);
compute_sha512((char *)buffer, (uint8_t *)&src, sizeof(src));
buffer[SHA512_DIGEST_STRING_LENGTH -1] = '\0';
printf("%s\n", buffer);
return 0;
}
`
Output is also same when compared to /sbin/sha256 and /sbin/sha512 (FreeBSD 10).
`
% gcc -Wall shatest.c ../../md5.o sha256.o shautils.o
% ./a.out
87428fc522803d31065e7bce3cf03fe475096631e5e07bbd7a0fde60c4cf25c7
162b0b32f02482d5aca0a7c93dd03ceac3acd7e410a5f18f3fb990fc958ae0df6f32233b91831eaf99ca581a8c4ddf9c8ba315ac482db6d4ea01cc7884a635be
% echo a|sha256 ; echo a|sha512
87428fc522803d31065e7bce3cf03fe475096631e5e07bbd7a0fde60c4cf25c7
162b0b32f02482d5aca0a7c93dd03ceac3acd7e410a5f18f3fb990fc958ae0df6f32233b91831eaf99ca581a8c4ddf9c8ba315ac482db6d4ea01cc7884a635be
%
`
---
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/626#issuecomment-219704725