This little test program shows same output before and after patch.

`
#include
#include "sha256.h"
#include "shautils.h"
#define BUFSIZE 1024

int main(void) {

    uint8_t buffer[BUFSIZE];
    uint8_t src[2];

    src[0]='a';
    src[1]=0x0a;

    compute_sha256((char *)buffer, (uint8_t *)&src, sizeof(src));
    buffer[SHA256_DIGEST_STRING_LENGTH -1] = '\0';
    printf("%s\n", buffer);

    compute_sha512((char *)buffer, (uint8_t *)&src, sizeof(src));
    buffer[SHA512_DIGEST_STRING_LENGTH -1] = '\0';
    printf("%s\n", buffer);

    return 0;

}

`
Output is also same when compared to /sbin/sha256 and /sbin/sha512 (FreeBSD 10).

`
% gcc -Wall shatest.c ../../md5.o sha256.o shautils.o

% ./a.out
87428fc522803d31065e7bce3cf03fe475096631e5e07bbd7a0fde60c4cf25c7
162b0b32f02482d5aca0a7c93dd03ceac3acd7e410a5f18f3fb990fc958ae0df6f32233b91831eaf99ca581a8c4ddf9c8ba315ac482db6d4ea01cc7884a635be
% echo a|sha256 ; echo a|sha512

87428fc522803d31065e7bce3cf03fe475096631e5e07bbd7a0fde60c4cf25c7
162b0b32f02482d5aca0a7c93dd03ceac3acd7e410a5f18f3fb990fc958ae0df6f32233b91831eaf99ca581a8c4ddf9c8ba315ac482db6d4ea01cc7884a635be
%
`


You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub