Hello
The tm.t_uac_start function generates a “tm:local-request” event.
But the tm.cancel function doesn't generete “tm:local-request” event.
Is it possible to activate a parameter in the TM or TMX module to generate the event?
Thanks
Juan
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/3831
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/issues/3831(a)github.com>
<!-- Kamailio Pull Request Template -->
<!--
IMPORTANT:
- for detailed contributing guidelines, read:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/blob/master/.github/CONTRIBUTING.md
- pull requests must be done to master branch, unless they are backports
of fixes from master branch to a stable branch
- backports to stable branches must be done with 'git cherry-pick -x ...'
- code is contributed under BSD for core and main components (tm, sl, auth, tls)
- code is contributed GPLv2 or a compatible license for the other components
- GPL code is contributed with OpenSSL licensing exception
-->
#### Pre-Submission Checklist
<!-- Go over all points below, and after creating the PR, tick all the checkboxes that apply -->
<!-- All points should be verified, otherwise, read the CONTRIBUTING guidelines from above-->
<!-- If you're unsure about any of these, don't hesitate to ask on sr-dev mailing list -->
- [x] Commit message has the format required by CONTRIBUTING guide
- [x] Commits are split per component (core, individual modules, libs, utils, ...)
- [x] Each component has a single commit (if not, squash them into one commit)
- [x] No commits to README files for modules (changes must be done to docbook files
in `doc/` subfolder, the README file is autogenerated)
#### Type Of Change
- [x] Small bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds new functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would change existing functionality)
#### Checklist:
<!-- Go over all points below, and after creating the PR, tick the checkboxes that apply -->
- [x] PR should be backported to stable branches
- [x] Tested changes locally
- [x] Related to issue #3831
#### Description
<!-- Describe your changes in detail -->
This PR fixes the error introduced in #3962, about not being able to access the generated CANCEL message.
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/3979
-- Commit Summary --
* tm: move local-request event route to the right location to access CANCEL
-- File Changes --
M src/modules/tm/t_cancel.c (93)
-- Patch Links --
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/3979.patchhttps://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/3979.diff
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/3979
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/pull/3979(a)github.com>
Hi There,
We found a situation where topos seems to break, let me explain... Assuming the following scenario:
```
Caller ---- Callee
A: ------INVITE-----> Record-Route:A.A.A.A, Record-Route:B.B.B.B
B: <-----200 OK------
C: <-----INVITE------ Route: A.A.A.A, B.B.B.B
D: ------200 OK-----> Record-Route:B.B.B.B, Record-Route:A.A.A.A (reversed order)
E: <======INVITE===== Route: B.B.B.B, A.A.A.A (wrong)
```
A and B establish the connection from caller to callee, and topos works fine.
C (re-INVITE from callee) sends the Route header according to the Record-Routes from the original INVITE (A)
D is the 200 OK sent from the caller to the first re-INVITE (C) coming from the callee, with the Record-Route headers reversed, because is the order in which the callee received them; and according to the RFC it's working as intended:
```
When a UAS responds to a request with a response that establishes a
dialog (such as a 2xx to INVITE), the UAS MUST copy all Record-Route
header field values from the request into the response (including the
URIs, URI parameters, and any Record-Route header field parameters,
whether they are known or unknown to the UAS) and MUST maintain the
order of those values.
[...]
[When a UAC receives a response...]
The route set MUST be set to the list of URIs in the Record-Route
header field from the response, taken in reverse order and preserving
all URI parameters.
```
E takes the Route order from the last 200 OK ignoring they are in reversed order and assuming the top one is the first one, when it should be the other way around, sending to an IP address not reachable from the callee. And I think here is the issue, topos should not update the path on the Record-Routes from a 200 OK but if it does, it should take the reverse order
When disabling topos, everything works fine, or with topos enabled, by setting rr_update=0 works for us, but what if there is a real path update, rr_update=0 wouldn't work for us anymore. The Kamailio version is 5.8.0-rc0
Let me know if you need more information.
Thanks a lot,
Javi
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/3778
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/issues/3778(a)github.com>
#### Pre-Submission Checklist
- [x] Commit message has the format required by CONTRIBUTING guide
- [x] Commits are split per component (core, individual modules, libs, utils, ...)
- [ ] Each component has a single commit (if not, squash them into one commit)
- [x] No commits to README files for modules (changes must be done to docbook files
in `doc/` subfolder, the README file is autogenerated)
#### Type Of Change
- [x] Small bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change which adds new functionality)
- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would change existing functionality)
#### Checklist:
- [x] PR should be backported to stable branches
- [x] Tested changes locally
- [ ] Related to issue #3592
#### Description
The `kamailio-geoip` RPM sub package currently builds both the `geoip` module - based on [the old and out of support MaxMind GeoIP library](https://github.com/maxmind/geoip-api-c) - and the newer `geoip2` module - based on [the currently supported `libmaxminddb`](https://github.com/maxmind/libmaxminddb).
The old GeoIP C library had its end of support date at May 2022 but for a while was still shipped for many distributions. At this point though, the EPEL repository that shipped the GeoIP library for RHEL-based operating systems, has removed it from their repositories for "Enterprise Linux 9":
![Screenshot_20240620_144233](https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/assets/381782/bb1f2481-57f7-48af-b0f1-0ba1c14a3042)
Therefor builds using the bundled spec file fail on EL9 installations.
The suggested change is to add an RPM build option `--with geoip2` that when specified will build just the `geoip2` module for the `kamailio-geoip` RPM subpackage. This build option is not enabled by default, unless the build is running on a RHEL 9 based OS - in which case it is set as the default, because otherwise trivial builds break. To revert to the older behavior in RHEL 9 based OSs (and assuming you have the required unsupported library installed correctly) one will need to set both `--without geoip2 --with geoip`.
You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/3886
-- Commit Summary --
* packaging: RPM build option to build just the geoip2 module
* packaging: make 'with geoip2' the default behavior for EL9
-- File Changes --
M pkg/kamailio/obs/kamailio.spec (36)
-- Patch Links --
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/3886.patchhttps://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/3886.diff
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/3886
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: <kamailio/kamailio/pull/3886(a)github.com>