Hello,
Looking to examples/exec.cfg I see: loadmodule "modules/exec/exec.so"
but looking to files tree I see that 'exec' module is absent in modules but existing in modules_k and modules_s both. Which one is a valid ?
I did a small table of found duplicates, the same question is: which modules are valid ? +===========================+=========+===========+===========+ | module_name | modules | modules_k | modules_s | +===========================+=========+===========+===========+ | acc_radius | | x | x | | auth_db | | x | x | | auth_radius | | x | x | | cpl-c | | x | x | | domain | | x | x | | exec | | x | x | | ldap | | x | x | | maxfwd | | x | x | | nathelper | | x | x | | permissions | | x | x | | pike | | x | x | | registrar | | x | x | | rr | | x | x | | textops | | x | x | | uri_db | | x | x | | usrloc | | x | x | +===========================+=========+===========+===========+
2012/12/13 Konstantin M. evilzluk@gmail.com
Hello,
Looking to examples/exec.cfg I see: loadmodule "modules/exec/exec.so"
but looking to files tree I see that 'exec' module is absent in modules but existing in modules_k and modules_s both. Which one is a valid ?
There is an ongoing effort to merge duplicate modules or move them into the obsolete folder. Most used ones are from modules_k.
-ovidiu
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 7:41 PM, Konstantin M. evilzluk@gmail.com wrote:
I did a small table of found duplicates, the same question is: which modules are valid ? +===========================+=========+===========+===========+ | module_name | modules | modules_k | modules_s | +===========================+=========+===========+===========+ | acc_radius | | x | x | | auth_db | | x | x | | auth_radius | | x | x | | cpl-c | | x | x | | domain | | x | x | | exec | | x | x | | ldap | | x | x | | maxfwd | | x | x | | nathelper | | x | x | | permissions | | x | x | | pike | | x | x | | registrar | | x | x | | rr | | x | x | | textops | | x | x | | uri_db | | x | x | | usrloc | | x | x | +===========================+=========+===========+===========+
2012/12/13 Konstantin M. evilzluk@gmail.com
Hello,
Looking to examples/exec.cfg I see: loadmodule "modules/exec/exec.so"
but looking to files tree I see that 'exec' module is absent in modules but existing in modules_k and modules_s both. Which one is a valid ?
13 dec 2012 kl. 01:41 skrev "Konstantin M." evilzluk@gmail.com:
I did a small table of found duplicates, the same question is: which modules are valid ?
When merging SIP Express Router and OpenSER we had duplicates of many modules, some of them using different database schemas. In order to keep backwards compatibliity, the old SER modules continued to live in modules_s and Kamailio/Openser in modules_k, merged modules in "modules".
This is why you see many duplicates. For the coming release, the developers are working on obsoleting many modules that are duplicates, moving missing functions to the module that will continue to exist and eventually trying to have as many modules as possible in "modules".
Summary: There was a plan behind the duplicates. We needed them in order to give SER and OpenSER/KAMAILIO users backwards compatibility for some time. It's been a few years and now we're completing the merger by trying to eliminate the duplicated modules.
/O
+===========================+=========+===========+===========+ | module_name | modules | modules_k | modules_s | +===========================+=========+===========+===========+ | acc_radius | | x | x | | auth_db | | x | x | | auth_radius | | x | x | | cpl-c | | x | x | | domain | | x | x | | exec | | x | x | | ldap | | x | x | | maxfwd | | x | x | | nathelper | | x | x | | permissions | | x | x | | pike | | x | x | | registrar | | x | x | | rr | | x | x | | textops | | x | x | | uri_db | | x | x | | usrloc | | x | x | +===========================+=========+===========+===========+
2012/12/13 Konstantin M. evilzluk@gmail.com Hello,
Looking to examples/exec.cfg I see: loadmodule "modules/exec/exec.so"
but looking to files tree I see that 'exec' module is absent in modules but existing in modules_k and modules_s both. Which one is a valid ?
sr-dev mailing list sr-dev@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
I got the answer. Thanks to all.
2012/12/13 Olle E. Johansson oej@edvina.net
13 dec 2012 kl. 01:41 skrev "Konstantin M." evilzluk@gmail.com:
I did a small table of found duplicates, the same question is: which modules are valid ?
When merging SIP Express Router and OpenSER we had duplicates of many modules, some of them using different database schemas. In order to keep backwards compatibliity, the old SER modules continued to live in modules_s and Kamailio/Openser in modules_k, merged modules in "modules".
This is why you see many duplicates. For the coming release, the developers are working on obsoleting many modules that are duplicates, moving missing functions to the module that will continue to exist and eventually trying to have as many modules as possible in "modules".
Summary: There was a plan behind the duplicates. We needed them in order to give SER and OpenSER/KAMAILIO users backwards compatibility for some time. It's been a few years and now we're completing the merger by trying to eliminate the duplicated modules.
/O
+===========================+=========+===========+===========+ | module_name | modules | modules_k | modules_s | +===========================+=========+===========+===========+ | acc_radius | | x | x | | auth_db | | x | x | | auth_radius | | x | x | | cpl-c | | x | x | | domain | | x | x | | exec | | x | x | | ldap | | x | x | | maxfwd | | x | x | | nathelper | | x | x | | permissions | | x | x | | pike | | x | x | | registrar | | x | x | | rr | | x | x | | textops | | x | x | | uri_db | | x | x | | usrloc | | x | x | +===========================+=========+===========+===========+
2012/12/13 Konstantin M. evilzluk@gmail.com
Hello,
Looking to examples/exec.cfg I see: loadmodule "modules/exec/exec.so"
but looking to files tree I see that 'exec' module is absent in modules but existing in modules_k and modules_s both. Which one is a valid ?
sr-dev mailing list sr-dev@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
sr-dev mailing list sr-dev@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
-
Konstantin M. -
Olle E. Johansson -
Ovidiu Sas