Hi Jason,
i'll be in London Thursday through Sunday, so i will just have time to review your changes on Monday... so take your time! A Zip-File would be great...
Carsten
2011/4/6 Jason Penton jason.penton@gmail.com:
Hey Carsten Sounds great. Yes I have seen activity on the Rf interface from Fraunhofer. At the moment we are testing our Ro interface after which I will add an API to it so it can be called from, for example the dialog module. Right now we only send the START CCR request from the cfg file and all looks good. Should have some code for you to review before the end of this week. Should I just zip the module code up and send to you? Cheers Jason
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 6:16 PM, Carsten Bock lists@bock.info wrote:
Hi Jason,
that would be great! Did you notice? Fraunhofer Institute is currently working on an Rf Interface in the S-CSCF... I wanted to implement the Ro-Interface in the S-CSCF myself (as a step 3), but if you want to do it, go ahead! My focus is currently on the described developments (first on implementation of RFC 3680 in Kamailio, then the replacement of the built-in usrloc within the P-CSCF). i would feel more comfortable, if i could review your code first, before i add it to the official Kamailio/sip-router repository.... would that be ok for you?
Thanks for your support, Carsten
2011/4/5 Jason Penton jason.penton@gmail.com:
Hi Carsten, in light of Daniel's response maybe we should join forces? how would you feel about me contributing the effort you are putting into openims and sr3? btw, I have already written a module for the Ro interface. What I wanted to do next was to incorp. code into the dialog module to be able to support online charging through the Ro interface. thoughts? Cheers jason
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 2:06 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla miconda@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
On 4/5/11 1:35 PM, Carsten Bock wrote:
Hi,
I will simply forward this question... I would suppose to put it somewhere at the Kamailio SVN for 1.5?
1.5 is no longer maintained officially, just backports by developers that still use it -- which may happen down to 0.9 -- but no new features.
Personally I would prefer to go only with one IMS extensions integration, based on current development branch (git master). Besides the fact that joining forces will make things move forward faster, having two directions for same thing (one within very old branch) will confuse people a lot. Maybe Jason will consider trying 3.1.x and we can try removing his doubts about this version when he has specific questions about what he does not trust.
I strongly think this is the best at this moment, there is already confusion with duplicated modules coming from kamailio and ser, creating a new development branch based on 1.5 will confuse even more. We are working to remove duplicated, thus remove confusion, and we should go only in this direction if we want to finish it soon.
Now regarding the trust of 3.x, I can say that 3.1.x is far more better than 1.5. In 1.x one could barely use tcp or tls, the tm module had some potential races which couldn't be handled without a major refurbishment. That happened in 3.x - if one search the recent archive, there were crashes reported to 1.5 rather than to 3.1.
If one does not like the mix of kamailio and ser modules, then just ignore the modules_s/* for a while and you are set. Installing kamailio from packages take care of that and only kamailio modules are installed (modules/* and modules_k/*). AFAIK, the openimscore developers are working also with 3.x so future code from them will just work on latest version of our project.
Cheers, Daniel
Carsten
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Jason Pentonjason.penton@gmail.com Date: 2011/4/5 Subject: Re: [OpenIMSCore-CSCF] About my "carstenbock/ims" branch on the sip-router.org GIT repository To: Carsten Bockcarsten@ng-voice.com Cc: openimscore-cscf@lists.berlios.de
Hey Carsten, Right now I am doing something similar, but rather with kamailio-1.5.5. I have not migrated to SR yet and dont intend to anytime soon. Right now I have ported CDP, CDP_AVP, and ICSCF and they are running. My reason is that I don't quite 'trust' sr2 just yet - and I'm not sure I like the mix and match of ser and kamailio modules - anyway a discussion probably already discussed and not for this thread. I'd be happy to put a 1.5.5 version up somewhere that everyone could use? what do you suggest? Cheers Jason
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 12:30 PM, Carsten Bockcarsten@ng-voice.com wrote:
Hi everyone,
i just wanted to notice, that i am actually working on re-integrating the OpenIMS-core into the sip-router.org/Kamailio project. It is not a fork of the official OpenIMSCore project, but more a merge of the OpenIMScore Project into the Kamailio/sip-router.org project.
As a first step, i've made all the CSCF modules compile and work with a current Kamailio source. In order to do this, only minor adaptions were required.
As a second step, i am working on a better integration into the existing structures of the Kamailio project; i want to achieve the following things:
- replace integrated dialog awareness of the CSCF modules with
Kamailio's dialog module
- replcae integrated registrar of the CSCF modules with Kamailio's
registrar module
- replace integrated nathelper support with the sip-router.org
nathelper/rtpproxy moduels
- replcae integrated RFC 3680 support with Kamailio's
Presence/Presence-User-Agent modules
- add documentation in accordance with the other sip-router.org
modules
I've already changed quite a few things in the Kamailio core, in order to achieve this: K's dialog module is now able to store additional data to a dialog (works great), K's usrloc/registrar module is able to store additional information to an contact (still buggy) and i have already added support for RFC 3680 to Kamailio's presence/pua infrastructure (when you register, the system will "PUBLISH" the registration state; another system may already "SUBSCRIBE" to the status and "NOTIFY" requests are already parsed (but not stored yet)). So it is going on. I have also already modified some of the config to use generic append_hf() and remove_hf() functions instead of custom implemented functions...
The progress is slow but steady since i work on it apart from my regular work. I try to publish any new developments on this on my blog/homepage (www.ng-voice.com), where you may also find some more information about the installation and the components of the project (i provide a repository of the last step for easy installation).
I started implementing an own HSS some time ago (openhss.org), but the development on this currently stopped. First, i do not have enough time to work on both the Kamailio integration, regular work and the HSS; second the main developer on the HSS (Brian) just resigned due to health reasons.
Some of you may have noticed, that i am working for Telefonica in Germany as a regular work. I am working on the Class 4/5 infrastructure at Telefonica and we have already implemented an Ericsson IMS core. However, i wanted to mention, that neither Telefonica nor O2 is behind this project. The only support i get from Telefonica is, that i get a monthly salary and that i may use some time to work on the OpenIMS-project during normal office-hours (as time allows). If i do things, i do it by heart and not half-hearted... that probably explains a lot of the effort spent on the project.
Kind regards, Carsten
-- Carsten Bock http://www.ng-voice.com mailto:carsten@ng-voice.com
Schomburgstr. 80 22767 Hamburg Germany
Mobile +49 179 2021244 Office +49 40 34927219 Fax +49 40 34927220 _______________________________________________ OpenIMSCore-CSCF mailing list OpenIMSCore-CSCF@lists.berlios.de https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openimscore-cscf
-- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://www.asipto.com
-- Carsten Bock http://www.ng-voice.com mailto:carsten@ng-voice.com
Hello,
if it is easier to handle and review since the code base might be big, we can create a devel account for Jason on the GIT repository so he can commit in a private branch under his account. Then should be easier to diff/compare/merge the code.
Cheers, Daniel
On 4/6/11 10:04 AM, Carsten Bock wrote:
Hi Jason,
i'll be in London Thursday through Sunday, so i will just have time to review your changes on Monday... so take your time! A Zip-File would be great...
Carsten
2011/4/6 Jason Pentonjason.penton@gmail.com:
Hey Carsten Sounds great. Yes I have seen activity on the Rf interface from Fraunhofer. At the moment we are testing our Ro interface after which I will add an API to it so it can be called from, for example the dialog module. Right now we only send the START CCR request from the cfg file and all looks good. Should have some code for you to review before the end of this week. Should I just zip the module code up and send to you? Cheers Jason
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 6:16 PM, Carsten Bocklists@bock.info wrote:
Hi Jason,
that would be great! Did you notice? Fraunhofer Institute is currently working on an Rf Interface in the S-CSCF... I wanted to implement the Ro-Interface in the S-CSCF myself (as a step 3), but if you want to do it, go ahead! My focus is currently on the described developments (first on implementation of RFC 3680 in Kamailio, then the replacement of the built-in usrloc within the P-CSCF). i would feel more comfortable, if i could review your code first, before i add it to the official Kamailio/sip-router repository.... would that be ok for you?
Thanks for your support, Carsten
2011/4/5 Jason Pentonjason.penton@gmail.com:
Hi Carsten, in light of Daniel's response maybe we should join forces? how would you feel about me contributing the effort you are putting into openims and sr3? btw, I have already written a module for the Ro interface. What I wanted to do next was to incorp. code into the dialog module to be able to support online charging through the Ro interface. thoughts? Cheers jason
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 2:06 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla miconda@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
On 4/5/11 1:35 PM, Carsten Bock wrote:
Hi,
I will simply forward this question... I would suppose to put it somewhere at the Kamailio SVN for 1.5?
1.5 is no longer maintained officially, just backports by developers that still use it -- which may happen down to 0.9 -- but no new features.
Personally I would prefer to go only with one IMS extensions integration, based on current development branch (git master). Besides the fact that joining forces will make things move forward faster, having two directions for same thing (one within very old branch) will confuse people a lot. Maybe Jason will consider trying 3.1.x and we can try removing his doubts about this version when he has specific questions about what he does not trust.
I strongly think this is the best at this moment, there is already confusion with duplicated modules coming from kamailio and ser, creating a new development branch based on 1.5 will confuse even more. We are working to remove duplicated, thus remove confusion, and we should go only in this direction if we want to finish it soon.
Now regarding the trust of 3.x, I can say that 3.1.x is far more better than 1.5. In 1.x one could barely use tcp or tls, the tm module had some potential races which couldn't be handled without a major refurbishment. That happened in 3.x - if one search the recent archive, there were crashes reported to 1.5 rather than to 3.1.
If one does not like the mix of kamailio and ser modules, then just ignore the modules_s/* for a while and you are set. Installing kamailio from packages take care of that and only kamailio modules are installed (modules/* and modules_k/*). AFAIK, the openimscore developers are working also with 3.x so future code from them will just work on latest version of our project.
Cheers, Daniel
Carsten
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Jason Pentonjason.penton@gmail.com Date: 2011/4/5 Subject: Re: [OpenIMSCore-CSCF] About my "carstenbock/ims" branch on the sip-router.org GIT repository To: Carsten Bockcarsten@ng-voice.com Cc: openimscore-cscf@lists.berlios.de
Hey Carsten, Right now I am doing something similar, but rather with kamailio-1.5.5. I have not migrated to SR yet and dont intend to anytime soon. Right now I have ported CDP, CDP_AVP, and ICSCF and they are running. My reason is that I don't quite 'trust' sr2 just yet - and I'm not sure I like the mix and match of ser and kamailio modules - anyway a discussion probably already discussed and not for this thread. I'd be happy to put a 1.5.5 version up somewhere that everyone could use? what do you suggest? Cheers Jason
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 12:30 PM, Carsten Bockcarsten@ng-voice.com wrote: > Hi everyone, > > i just wanted to notice, that i am actually working on re-integrating > the OpenIMS-core into the sip-router.org/Kamailio project. > It is not a fork of the official OpenIMSCore project, but more a > merge > of the OpenIMScore Project into the Kamailio/sip-router.org project. > > As a first step, i've made all the CSCF modules compile and work with > a current Kamailio source. In order to do this, only minor adaptions > were required. > > As a second step, i am working on a better integration into the > existing structures of the Kamailio project; i want to achieve the > following things: > - replace integrated dialog awareness of the CSCF modules with > Kamailio's dialog module > - replcae integrated registrar of the CSCF modules with Kamailio's > registrar module > - replace integrated nathelper support with the sip-router.org > nathelper/rtpproxy moduels > - replcae integrated RFC 3680 support with Kamailio's > Presence/Presence-User-Agent modules > - add documentation in accordance with the other sip-router.org > modules > > I've already changed quite a few things in the Kamailio core, in > order > to achieve this: K's dialog module is now able to store additional > data to a dialog (works great), K's usrloc/registrar module is able > to > store additional information to an contact (still buggy) and i have > already added support for RFC 3680 to Kamailio's presence/pua > infrastructure (when you register, the system will "PUBLISH" the > registration state; another system may already "SUBSCRIBE" to the > status and "NOTIFY" requests are already parsed (but not stored > yet)). > So it is going on. I have also already modified some of the config to > use generic append_hf() and remove_hf() functions instead of custom > implemented functions... > > The progress is slow but steady since i work on it apart from my > regular work. I try to publish any new developments on this on my > blog/homepage (www.ng-voice.com), where you may also find some more > information about the installation and the components of the project > (i provide a repository of the last step for easy installation). > > I started implementing an own HSS some time ago (openhss.org), but > the > development on this currently stopped. First, i do not have enough > time to work on both the Kamailio integration, regular work and the > HSS; second the main developer on the HSS (Brian) just resigned due > to > health reasons. > > Some of you may have noticed, that i am working for Telefonica in > Germany as a regular work. I am working on the Class 4/5 > infrastructure at Telefonica and we have already implemented an > Ericsson IMS core. However, i wanted to mention, that neither > Telefonica nor O2 is behind this project. The only support i get from > Telefonica is, that i get a monthly salary and that i may use some > time to work on the OpenIMS-project during normal office-hours (as > time allows). > If i do things, i do it by heart and not half-hearted... that > probably > explains a lot of the effort spent on the project. > > Kind regards, > Carsten > > -- > Carsten Bock > http://www.ng-voice.com > mailto:carsten@ng-voice.com > > Schomburgstr. 80 > 22767 Hamburg > Germany > > Mobile +49 179 2021244 > Office +49 40 34927219 > Fax +49 40 34927220 > _______________________________________________ > OpenIMSCore-CSCF mailing list > OpenIMSCore-CSCF@lists.berlios.de > https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/openimscore-cscf
-- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://www.asipto.com
-- Carsten Bock http://www.ng-voice.com mailto:carsten@ng-voice.com