-- VoIP Embedded, Inc. http://www.voipembedded.com On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 11:36 AM, Jasmin Schnatterbeck js@data-cmr.net wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > that issue seems to be fixed in 3.3... may the corresponding commit is > related to app_lua or pvapi. > > Cheers > Jasmin > > Am 02.03.2013 04:06, schrieb Jasmin Schnatterbeck: > >> Hi Daniel, >> >> when printing fscript only, there is no output line in the log. So I >> added the following code: >> >> if(fscript == nil) then >> sr.log("warn","Filterscript is nil") >> elseif(fscript == 0) then >> sr.log("warn","Filterscript is 0 n") >> elseif(fscript == "0") then >> sr.log("warn","Filterscript is 0 s") >> else >> sr.log("info","fscript found") >> end >> >> And the output is: >> >> WARNING: app_lua [app_lua_sr.c:99]: Filterscript is nil >> >> So nothing is returned at all. But the htable entry is definitely set, >> because it works in some cases (without changing anything) and in some >> cases not. According to sht_dump, everything seems to be ok. >> >> When using pv index like sr.pv.get("$(hdr(X-Test)["..i.."])") , a >> similar problem occurs (sometimes the value is returned, sometimes not). >> When omitting the pv index at all, it works everytime... >> So may the dynamic name of the variable is the problem? But (according >> to the debug message) the pv cache check function gets the correct name... >> >> Cheers >> Jasmin >> >> Am 01.03.2013 17:49, schrieb Daniel-Constantin Mierla: >>> >>> Hello, >>> >>> On 3/1/13 3:40 PM, Jasmin Schnatterbeck wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> when using sr.pv.get() in app_lua the pv value is not always returned. >>>> >>>> Lua code is: >>>> >>>> local fscript = sr.pv.get("$(sht(myscripts=>" .. args["filterid"] >>>> .."))") >>>> >>>> if(fscript) then >>>> sr.log("info","Filterscript is " .. fscript) >>>> else >>>> sr.log("warn","fscript not found!") >>>> end >>>> >>>> >>>> And log shows: >>>> >>>> app_lua [app_lua_sr.c:888]: pv get: (sht(myscripts=>1)) >>>> <core> [pvapi.c:318]: pvar [$(sht(myscripts=>1))] found in cache >>>> WARNING: app_lua [app_lua_sr.c:99]: fscript not found! >>>> >>>> So the pv is being discovered in the pv cache, but sr.pv.get() returns >>>> no value. >>>> >>>> I think the problem occurs especially in the case, when using >>>> sht_reload mi command. So I have had a short look into htable.c and I >>>> did not find any code, that clears the pv cache... is that >>>> necessary/may the reason for the problem, that pv is found in pv cache >>>> but nothing returned? (kamailio 3.2.3) >>>> >>>> Thanks for any ideas... >>> >>> the cache is for PV names, not for PV values. What is printed as value >>> of fscript anyhow? It might get 0 which will result in same logic with >>> IF. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Daniel