28 Mar
2011
28 Mar
'11
10:12 a.m.
How many lookup("location") things do you use in your configuration file ?
This seems to be the problem with more then once use of this command. Try to
avoid this, or check if you can substitute some of them with simple SQL
select in location table.
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Efelin Novak <efelin.novak(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Hi Folks,
I have a problem with a registrar module (at least I suppose so). When A
calls to B, in some specific situation, B receives two INVITEs. This
mostly
(not only) happens when one account is registered on
two or more UAs. In
this situation the extra INVITE is sent only to the one that is second in
the list (kamctl ul show ACCOUNT).
kamctl ul show Alice:
Contact::
<sip:orlvuzyd@192.168.28.72:52129
;q=0;expires=1916;flags=0x0;cflags=0x40;socket=<udp:8.8.8.8:5060
;methods=0xFFFFFFFF;received=<sip:8.8.8.8:52129>;user_agent=<Blink
0.2.5 (Linux)>
Contact::
<sip:Alice@192.168.28.51:5060
;q=;expires=3061;flags=0x0;cflags=0x40;socket=<udp:8.8.8.8:5060
;methods=0x129F;received=<sip:8.8.8.8:5060
;user_agent=<Linksys/PAP2T-3.1.15(LS)>
My situation.
1. Alice calls to BOB.
2. kamailio looks up in location table for BOBs registrations
3. in DB there are two rows (two devices(linksys PAP2T and Blink(blink is
the second one)))
4. kamailio send 3 INVITES ( linksys, blink and blink). Every INVITE has
different via.branch
(Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 8.8.8.8;branch=z9hG4bKe2d7.009b1df2.1)
(Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 8.8.8.8;branch=z9hG4bKe2d7.009b1df2.2)
(Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 8.8.8.8;branch=z9hG4bKe2d7.009b1df2.3)
All my registrar parameters are set to default.
Nothing is looping on interfaces.
I have no idea whether this is a bug or my missconfiguration.
Thanks for replies.
Kind regards,
Efelin Novak
_______________________________________________
sr-dev mailing list
sr-dev(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
29 Mar
29 Mar
2:58 a.m.
New subject: Registrar module creates an extra branch
Hi Mino,
thank you very much. This solved the problem. Second lookup added (dunno
why) an extra branch. I assume this is a bug. Or do I have to specify second
lookup somehow special?
Now the question is: I needed second lookup just to make sure a user is not
online (the conditional redirect). Is it OK just to make query like this:
sql_query("ca","
SELECT
1
FROM
location
WHERE
username = $rU
","ra");
and check for the number of rows?
I find out that DB and memory content is not really the same. DB is
something about minute behind memory( Do you know the precise time?). If
this is true I'm ok with this time. Is there any other difference?
Thanks folks,
Efelin Novak
2011/3/28 Mino Haluz <mino.haluz(a)gmail.com>
How many lookup("location") things do you
use in your configuration file ?
This seems to be the problem with more then once use of this command. Try
to avoid this, or check if you can substitute some of them with simple SQL
select in location table.
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Efelin Novak <efelin.novak(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Hi Folks,
I have a problem with a registrar module (at least I suppose so). When A
calls to B, in some specific situation, B receives two INVITEs. This
mostly
(not only) happens when one account is registered
on two or more UAs. In
this situation the extra INVITE is sent only to the one that is second in
the list (kamctl ul show ACCOUNT).
kamctl ul show Alice:
Contact::
<sip:orlvuzyd@192.168.28.72:52129
;q=0;expires=1916;flags=0x0;cflags=0x40;socket=<udp:8.8.8.8:5060
;methods=0xFFFFFFFF;received=<sip:8.8.8.8:52129>;user_agent=<Blink
0.2.5 (Linux)>
Contact::
<sip:Alice@192.168.28.51:5060
;q=;expires=3061;flags=0x0;cflags=0x40;socket=<udp:8.8.8.8:5060
;methods=0x129F;received=<sip:8.8.8.8:5060
;user_agent=<Linksys/PAP2T-3.1.15(LS)>
My situation.
1. Alice calls to BOB.
2. kamailio looks up in location table for BOBs registrations
3. in DB there are two rows (two devices(linksys PAP2T and Blink(blink is
the second one)))
4. kamailio send 3 INVITES ( linksys, blink and blink). Every INVITE has
different via.branch
(Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 8.8.8.8;branch=z9hG4bKe2d7.009b1df2.1)
(Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 8.8.8.8;branch=z9hG4bKe2d7.009b1df2.2)
(Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 8.8.8.8;branch=z9hG4bKe2d7.009b1df2.3)
All my registrar parameters are set to default.
Nothing is looping on interfaces.
I have no idea whether this is a bug or my missconfiguration.
Thanks for replies.
Kind regards,
Efelin Novak
_______________________________________________
sr-dev mailing list
sr-dev(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
_______________________________________________
sr-dev mailing list
sr-dev(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
3:03 a.m.
New subject: Registrar module creates an extra branch
Efelin Novak wrote:
thank you very much. This solved the problem. Second lookup added
(dunno why) an extra branch. I assume this is a bug.
No, that is correct behaviour. Or, sort of. The whole adding or not of
branches is a bit fiddely, if I may say so.
Or do I have to
specify second lookup somehow special?
Now the question is: I needed second lookup just to make sure a user
is not online (the conditional redirect). Is it OK just to make query
like this:
Have a look at the registered() function of the registrar module. It is
probably what you are looking for.
I find out that DB and memory content is not really
the same. DB is
something about minute behind memory( Do you know the precise time?).
If this is true I'm ok with this time. Is there any other difference?
That depends on the db_mode parameter of the usrloc module. If you set
it to either 1 or 3, changes will be written to the database right away.
On 3, there isn't even any caching in memory at all.
Regards,
Martin
4:21 a.m.
New subject: Registrar module creates an extra branch
I think you can use registered() or fetch_contacts() function.
http://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/3.1.x/modules_k/registrar.html#id29551…
regards
Klaus
On 29.03.2011 08:58, Efelin Novak wrote:
Hi Mino,
thank you very much. This solved the problem. Second lookup added (dunno
why) an extra branch. I assume this is a bug. Or do I have to specify
second lookup somehow special?
Now the question is: I needed second lookup just to make sure a user is
not online (the conditional redirect). Is it OK just to make query like
this:
sql_query("ca","
SELECT
1
FROM
location
WHERE
username = $rU
","ra");
and check for the number of rows?
I find out that DB and memory content is not really the same. DB is
something about minute behind memory( Do you know the precise time?). If
this is true I'm ok with this time. Is there any other difference?
Thanks folks,
Efelin Novak
2011/3/28 Mino Haluz <mino.haluz(a)gmail.com <mailto:mino.haluz@gmail.com>>
How many lookup("location") things do you use in your configuration
file ?
This seems to be the problem with more then once use of this
command. Try to avoid this, or check if you can substitute some of
them with simple SQL select in location table.
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Efelin Novak
<efelin.novak(a)gmail.com <mailto:efelin.novak@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi Folks,
I have a problem with a registrar module (at least I suppose so).
When A
calls to B, in some specific situation, B
receives two INVITEs.
This mostly
(not only) happens when one account is registered
on two or more
UAs. In
this situation the extra INVITE is sent only to
the one that is
second in
the list (kamctl ul show ACCOUNT).
kamctl ul show Alice:
Contact::
<sip:orlvuzyd@192.168.28.72:52129
<http://sip:orlvuzyd@192.168.28.72:52129>>;q=0;expires=1916;flags=0x0;cflags=0x40;socket=<udp:8.8.8.8:5060
<http://8.8.8.8:5060>>;methods=0xFFFFFFFF;received=<sip:8.8.8.8:52129
<http://8.8.8.8:52129>>;user_agent=<Blink
0.2.5 (Linux)>
Contact::
<sip:Alice@192.168.28.51:5060
<http://sip:Alice@192.168.28.51:5060>>;q=;expires=3061;flags=0x0;cflags=0x40;socket=<udp:8.8.8.8:5060
<http://8.8.8.8:5060>>;methods=0x129F;received=<sip:8.8.8.8:5060
<http://8.8.8.8:5060>>;user_agent=<Linksys/PAP2T-3.1.15(LS)>
My situation.
1. Alice calls to BOB.
2. kamailio looks up in location table for BOBs registrations
3. in DB there are two rows (two devices(linksys PAP2T and
Blink(blink is
the second one)))
4. kamailio send 3 INVITES ( linksys, blink and blink). Every
INVITE has
different via.branch
(Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 8.8.8.8;branch=z9hG4bKe2d7.009b1df2.1)
(Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 8.8.8.8;branch=z9hG4bKe2d7.009b1df2.2)
(Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 8.8.8.8;branch=z9hG4bKe2d7.009b1df2.3)
All my registrar parameters are set to default.
Nothing is looping on interfaces.
I have no idea whether this is a bug or my missconfiguration.
Thanks for replies.
Kind regards,
Efelin Novak
_______________________________________________
sr-dev mailing list
sr-dev(a)lists.sip-router.org <mailto:sr-dev@lists.sip-router.org>
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
_______________________________________________
sr-dev mailing list
sr-dev(a)lists.sip-router.org <mailto:sr-dev@lists.sip-router.org>
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
_______________________________________________
sr-dev mailing list
sr-dev(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
5028
days inactive
5029
days old
3 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Efelin Novak -
Klaus Darilion -
Martin Hoffmann -
Mino Haluz