Sipwise hat ON:
We have more than one server and we need to keep things in db in order to share sca subscription/appearance between servers
Any thoughts @TheGrandWazoo ?
I assume you mean more then one kamailio server in a load-balancing type environment?
If so, that was on my radar for future enhancements but I am glad someone is finally looking at this module and making some improvements. Thank you so much!!!! This module is one that I use at many customers and has been the bane of my existence with the hold seizes.
@miconda I'm thinking if ``sca`` can be redesigned and integrate the subscription part of it as a module like ``presence_sca`` using ``presence`` infrastructure.
The thing is that ``presence`` has support for process only the body not for the headers and ``sca`` is adding ``Call-Info`` header to a bodyless ``NOTIFY`` reply.
Is it worth the trouble to implement that in ``presence`` or should I just keep hacking into ``sca`` directly?
2017-02-24 11:03 GMT+01:00 Victor Seva notifications@github.com:
@miconda https://github.com/miconda I'm thinking if sca can be redesigned and integrate the subscription part of it as a module like presence_sca using presence infrastructure.
The thing is that presence has support for process only the body not for the headers and sca is adding Call-Info header to a bodyless NOTIFY reply.
Is it worth the trouble to implement that in presence or should I just keep hacking into sca directly?
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/781#issuecomment-282253011, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AF36ZXYM7H46BGg_b5LwD_-oHN7rgfQbks5rfqsGgaJpZM4J8iuL .
any thoughts?
Cheers, Victor
This issue is stale because it has been open 6 weeks with no activity. Remove stale label or comment or this will be closed in 2 weeks.
Closed #781 as not planned.
-
github-actions[bot] -
Kevin Scott Adams
-
Victor Seva
-
Victor Seva