Add rtpengine module files from upstream to 4.1 branch. Don't do any changes to rtpproxy-ng module. You can view, comment on, or merge this pull request online at:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/493
-- Commit Summary --
* rtpengine: Add module
-- File Changes --
A modules/rtpengine/Makefile (15) A modules/rtpengine/README (880) A modules/rtpengine/bencode.c (703) A modules/rtpengine/bencode.h (561) A modules/rtpengine/doc/Makefile (4) A modules/rtpengine/doc/rtpengine.xml (103) A modules/rtpengine/doc/rtpengine_admin.xml (1304) A modules/rtpengine/doc/rtpengine_faq.xml (103) A modules/rtpengine/rtpengine.c (3297) A modules/rtpengine/rtpengine.h (86) A modules/rtpengine/rtpengine_db.c (180) A modules/rtpengine/rtpengine_funcs.c (394) A modules/rtpengine/rtpengine_funcs.h (38) A modules/rtpengine/rtpengine_hash.c (552) A modules/rtpengine/rtpengine_hash.h (40)
-- Patch Links --
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/493.patch https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/493.diff
--- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/493
We don't introduce new features in previous versions. In my honest opinion this change must be rejected
--- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/493#issuecomment-177843275
Indeed, we do not introduce new features in the stable branches, 4.1 is also no longer officially packaged (no new releases out of it).
Somehow related, I think we discussed with different occasions in the past, and if there are people interested in doing the work, there can be created something similar to Debian backports repository, sort of 'semi-official' branches like "backports/x.y" (x.y being an official stable branch, in this case will be backports/4.1), where people maintaining this backports branch can decide to backport whatever they like from newer versions, including development branch. I am not having much time for such effort, but I do backport from time to time new features (typically from devel to latest stable branch) for various customers and I can push them to such repository just in case others will like to use them. Maybe we can get the discussion to sr-dev/sr-users mailing lists to see if there is interest and people willing to allocate maintenance resources.
--- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/493#issuecomment-177878560
Closed #493.
--- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/493#event-534011427
Closing this for now. Thanks for the suggestions.
--- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/pull/493#issuecomment-177916001
-
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -
Stefan Mititelu
-
Victor Seva