On 11/02/15 21:24, Olle E. Johansson wrote: It seems to be git behaviour when the change is consistent. Found on the net that the rename itself should be a single commit in order to preserve history in 'git log'. See: - https://coderwall.com/p/_csouq/renaming-and-changing-files-in-git-without-l… Even with a rename as part of a bigger change, history can be seen when using --follow for git-log, like: git log --follow modules/uac_redirect/uac_redirect.c But git web viewer don't do that usually. Therefore, it is better to do just the rename as single commit. Eventually will work fine to see all history. Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel-Constantin Mierla http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015 Berlin, Germany - http://www.kamailioworld.com