12 Feb
2014
12 Feb
'14
8:14 p.m.
would be acceptable if i try to add to rtpproxy-ng module a new module parameter setid_avp where (if defined and set) rtpproxy functions take id of rtpproxy set?
-- juha
12 Feb
12 Feb
9:18 p.m.
I vote in favour of it. Although, I wonder, does set_rtp_proxy_set() not take PV arguments?
On 02/12/2014 03:14 PM, Juha Heinanen wrote:
would be acceptable if i try to add to rtpproxy-ng module a new module parameter setid_avp where (if defined and set) rtpproxy functions take id of rtpproxy set?
-- juha
sr-dev mailing list sr-dev@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev
--
Alex Balashov - Principal
Evariste Systems LLC
235 E Ponce de Leon Ave
Suite 106
Decatur, GA 30030
United States
Tel: +1-678-954-0670
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.alexbalashov.com/
4042
Age (days ago)
4042
Last active (days ago)
1 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Alex Balashov -
Juha Heinanen