Hello,
I updated a bit the defined groups of modules in Makefile system (located now in Makefile.groups). I cc-ed Peter, Jon, Victor and Claudio for a direct ping, being involved in rpm/deb/ebuild packaging.
Hopefully your specs didn't get that much broken. Feel free to update Makefile groups to fit better your needs.
I just wanted to underline that you can compile/install many groups at the same time, like:
make every-module group_include="kxml kpresence"
So it might be an option to put more groups in one package, by having smaller groups listed in the same make command, rather than creating new groups for rpm or pkg specs, which have overlapping modules inside. Therefore, the rule should be to break groups in smaller one if you need to move content from a defined group to another package.
If you need any assistance, let me know.
Cheers, Daniel
El Tue, 05 Mar 2013 18:24:05 +0100 Daniel-Constantin Mierla miconda@gmail.com escribió:
Hello,
I updated a bit the defined groups of modules in Makefile system (located now in Makefile.groups). I cc-ed Peter, Jon, Victor and Claudio for a direct ping, being involved in rpm/deb/ebuild packaging.
Hopefully your specs didn't get that much broken. Feel free to update Makefile groups to fit better your needs.
I just wanted to underline that you can compile/install many groups at the same time, like:
make every-module group_include="kxml kpresence"
So it might be an option to put more groups in one package, by having smaller groups listed in the same make command, rather than creating new groups for rpm or pkg specs, which have overlapping modules inside. Therefore, the rule should be to break groups in smaller one if you need to move content from a defined group to another package.
If you need any assistance, let me know.
Cheers, Daniel
Today nightly builds of the 4.0 branch failed for wheezy and ubuntu-precise. I'll check the logs ASAP but I'm in the middle of a training this week.
cheers,
Jon
On 3/5/13 11:54 PM, Jon Bonilla (Manwe) wrote:
El Tue, 05 Mar 2013 18:24:05 +0100 Daniel-Constantin Mierla miconda@gmail.com escribió:
Hello,
I updated a bit the defined groups of modules in Makefile system (located now in Makefile.groups). I cc-ed Peter, Jon, Victor and Claudio for a direct ping, being involved in rpm/deb/ebuild packaging.
Hopefully your specs didn't get that much broken. Feel free to update Makefile groups to fit better your needs.
I just wanted to underline that you can compile/install many groups at the same time, like:
make every-module group_include="kxml kpresence"
So it might be an option to put more groups in one package, by having smaller groups listed in the same make command, rather than creating new groups for rpm or pkg specs, which have overlapping modules inside. Therefore, the rule should be to break groups in smaller one if you need to move content from a defined group to another package.
If you need any assistance, let me know.
Cheers, Daniel
Today nightly builds of the 4.0 branch failed for wheezy and ubuntu-precise.
Do you mean master branch or you already have a build service for branch 4.0? I noticed it is still referred as 3.4 in the source tree, i made a local patch and tested for squeeze on OBS, all went fine: - https://build.opensuse.org/package/show?package=kamailio40-d6.0&project=...
I added also the packages for outbound and websocket modules.
I'll check the logs ASAP but I'm in the middle of a training this week.
OK, thanks, Daniel
El Wed, 06 Mar 2013 09:03:41 +0100 Daniel-Constantin Mierla miconda@gmail.com escribió:
Today nightly builds of the 4.0 branch failed for wheezy and ubuntu-precise.
Do you mean master branch or you already have a build service for branch 4.0? I noticed it is still referred as 3.4 in the source tree, i made a local patch and tested for squeeze on OBS, all went fine:
I created a nightly build for 4.0 branch some days ago but didn't announce it. Now we are building nightlies for 3.2, 3.3, 4.0 and master.
4.0 failed but tonight's builds are successful again.
Maybe it's time to put the nightlies in the wiki. I'll build the finals as soon as I can.
cheers,
Jon
2013/3/5 Daniel-Constantin Mierla miconda@gmail.com:
Hello,
I updated a bit the defined groups of modules in Makefile system (located now in Makefile.groups). I cc-ed Peter, Jon, Victor and Claudio for a direct ping, being involved in rpm/deb/ebuild packaging.
Hopefully your specs didn't get that much broken. Feel free to update Makefile groups to fit better your needs.
I just wanted to underline that you can compile/install many groups at the same time, like:
make every-module group_include="kxml kpresence"
So it might be an option to put more groups in one package, by having smaller groups listed in the same make command, rather than creating new groups for rpm or pkg specs, which have overlapping modules inside. Therefore, the rule should be to break groups in smaller one if you need to move content from a defined group to another package.
If you need any assistance, let me know.
I'm in Vienna for several days. Hopefully this weekend I'll have the time to begin with 4.0 packaging.
Cheers, Víctor
-
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -
Jon Bonilla -
Victor Seva