15 Sep
2022
15 Sep
'22
4:28 a.m.
Module: kamailio
Branch: 5.6
Commit: 2b1a5ffb75566fb9411b23be23b263986b3eafaa
URL: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/commit/2b1a5ffb75566fb9411b23be23b2639…
Author: Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com>
Committer: Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com>
Date: 2022-09-15T10:28:03+02:00
dmq: docs - note about using same Kamailio version
(cherry picked from commit 1fd789246cc7c58237b9a903a198521cd5b3494d)
---
Modified: src/modules/dmq/doc/dmq_admin.xml
---
Diff:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/commit/2b1a5ffb75566fb9411b23be23b2639…
Patch:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/commit/2b1a5ffb75566fb9411b23be23b2639…
---
diff --git a/src/modules/dmq/doc/dmq_admin.xml b/src/modules/dmq/doc/dmq_admin.xml
index 661fd4b8471..7a2c933c62f 100644
--- a/src/modules/dmq/doc/dmq_admin.xml
+++ b/src/modules/dmq/doc/dmq_admin.xml
@@ -47,6 +47,11 @@
Nodes that are not responding to KDMQ reguests are removed the from local
list of active nodes, no longer being considered to be part of the KDMQ cluster.
</para>
+ <para>
+ IMPORTANT: DMQ must be used only between Kamailio instances having same
+ major version. Internal structures can be incompatible between different
+ major versions and can lead to crashes or unexpected behaviour.
+ </para>
<example>
<title>KDMQ Request Example</title>
<para>
15 Sep
15 Sep
4:42 a.m.
On 15 Sept 2022, at 10:28, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
<miconda(a)gmail.com> wrote:
<para>
+ IMPORTANT: DMQ must be used only between Kamailio instances having same
+ major version. Internal structures can be incompatible between different
+ major versions and can lead to crashes or unexpected behaviour.
+ </para>
Would it be possible to include a check in the actual DMQ protocol?
Cheers,
/O
4:58 a.m.
On 15.09.22 10:42, Olle E. Johansson wrote:
It's open source, someone just needs to write the C code.
Otherwise, right now, one could check in the config with the User-Agent
header.
On the other hand, afaik, all the storage systems that do replication
ensure compatibility only for the same version, and adding checks for
each mirrored packet can add to the processing overhead and affect
performances.
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com
www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
On 15 Sept 2022, at 10:28, Daniel-Constantin
Mierla
<miconda(a)gmail.com> wrote:
<para>
+IMPORTANT: DMQ must be used only between Kamailio instances having same
+major version. Internal structures can be incompatible between different
+major versions and can lead to crashes or unexpected behaviour.
+</para>
Would it be possible to include a check in the actual DMQ protocol?
5:21 a.m.
On 15 Sept 2022, at 10:58, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
<miconda(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 15.09.22 10:42, Olle E. Johansson wrote:
It's open
source, someone just needs to write the C code.
Otherwise, right now, one could check in the config with the User-Agent header.
On the other hand, afaik, all the storage systems that do replication ensure
compatibility only for the same version, and adding checks for each mirrored packet can
add to the processing overhead and affect performances.
Agreed, adding mandatory CPU
is not what we want. It could like many other things, be handled in the routing script.
Cheers,
/O
On 15 Sept 2022, at 10:28, Daniel-Constantin
Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com <mailto:miconda@gmail.com>> wrote:
<para>
+ IMPORTANT: DMQ must be used only between Kamailio instances having same
+ major version. Internal structures can be incompatible between different
+ major versions and can lead to crashes or unexpected behaviour.
+ </para>
Would it be possible to include a check in the actual DMQ protocol?
841
days inactive
841
days old
3 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -
Olle E. Johansson