15 Feb
2021
15 Feb
'21
9:05 a.m.
I think this is related to a bug in some old gcc:
* https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53119
It should be ignored, like suggested at:
* https://stackoverflow.com/a/13758286
I do not plan to go for the non-standard `{{0}}` variant just for this case, the
initialization with `{0}` is what C standard specify.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/2636#issuecomment-779244549