I think this is related to a bug in some old gcc:

• https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53119

It should be ignored, like suggested at:

• https://stackoverflow.com/a/13758286

I do not plan to go for the non-standard {{0}} variant just for this case, the initialization with {0} is what C standard specify.

—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.