20 May
2013
20 May
'13
6:28 p.m.
On May 20, 2013, at 10:49 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hello,
just looked in the code for the rpc function and looks ok. Have you increased the buffers
in ctl module?
Depending on the amount of output you're getting, it's more than that. I
understand it's a relatively small amount in this case, but that may change. You may
need to increase buffers in sercmd/kamcmd, too, and even then you're limited--on
Linux, at least--by the values of some sysctl settings (net.core.rmem_max,
net.core.wmem_max and net.unix.max_dgram_qlen).
andrew
On 5/20/13 11:52 AM, Alex Balashov wrote:
Has anyone had a chance to take a look at this?
I have not been able to figure out the problem on my own, and I'm under very strong
pressure to revert to using MI FIFO interface for everything, since the RPC interface
"obviously doesn't work".
On 04/29/2013 04:43 AM, Alex Balashov wrote:
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Advanced Training, San Francisco, USA - June 24-27, 2013
* http://asipto.com/u/katu *
_______________________________________________
sr-dev mailing list
sr-dev(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev On 04/29/2013 04:41 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
wrote:
I noticed the mail, but had no time to look over
it. Perhaps it will
happen soon if nothing else is discovered meanwhile.
Not a problem, Daniel, thank you for responding. I'll see if I can
track it down on my own; this is open source, after all. Not everyone
can stand on the shoulders of one giant. :-)