26 Apr
2013
26 Apr
'13
6:25 p.m.
Hello,
When I run this:
kamctl fifo dlg_list | grep '^dialog' | wc -l
I get 38 dialogs.
When I run this:
sercmd -s unixs:/tmp/kamailio_ctl dlg.list | egrep '^hash' | wc -l
I get 8 dialogs, rain or shine.
Has anyone heard of this bug? Running the latest 3.3 pull...
Thanks,
-- Alex
--
Alex Balashov - Principal
Evariste Systems LLC
235 E Ponce de Leon Ave
Suite 106
Decatur, GA 30030
United States
Tel: +1-678-954-0670
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.alexbalashov.com/
28 Apr
28 Apr
11:27 a.m.
I've racked my brain trying to figure out the difference between the
implementation of rpc_print_dlgs() (and internal_rpc_print_dlg()) vs.
mi_print_dlgs() (and internal_mi_print_dlg()), but I just can't.
Yet, for some reason, the MI function always shows the correct number of
tracked calls (let's say 30-40), while the RPC function shows 6 to 8 at
most. This has been confirmed on multiple deployments, and is
consistently the case, although the amount of dialogs shown by the RPC
function varies. However, it is always <= 8.
A little help please, if anyone has a moment?
On 04/26/2013 12:25 PM, Alex Balashov wrote:
Hello,
When I run this:
kamctl fifo dlg_list | grep '^dialog' | wc -l
I get 38 dialogs.
When I run this:
sercmd -s unixs:/tmp/kamailio_ctl dlg.list | egrep '^hash' | wc -l
I get 8 dialogs, rain or shine.
Has anyone heard of this bug? Running the latest 3.3 pull...
Thanks,
-- Alex
--
Alex Balashov - Principal
Evariste Systems LLC
235 E Ponce de Leon Ave
Suite 106
Decatur, GA 30030
United States
Tel: +1-678-954-0670
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.alexbalashov.com/
29 Apr
29 Apr
10:41 a.m.
I noticed the mail, but had no time to look over it. Perhaps it will
happen soon if nothing else is discovered meanwhile.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 4/28/13 11:27 AM, Alex Balashov wrote:
I've racked my brain trying to figure out the
difference between the
implementation of rpc_print_dlgs() (and internal_rpc_print_dlg()) vs.
mi_print_dlgs() (and internal_mi_print_dlg()), but I just can't.
Yet, for some reason, the MI function always shows the correct number
of tracked calls (let's say 30-40), while the RPC function shows 6 to
8 at most. This has been confirmed on multiple deployments, and is
consistently the case, although the amount of dialogs shown by the RPC
function varies. However, it is always <= 8.
A little help please, if anyone has a moment?
On 04/26/2013 12:25 PM, Alex Balashov wrote:
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Advanced Training, San Francisco, USA - June 24016, 2013
* http://asipto.com/u/katu *
Hello,
When I run this:
kamctl fifo dlg_list | grep '^dialog' | wc -l
I get 38 dialogs.
When I run this:
sercmd -s unixs:/tmp/kamailio_ctl dlg.list | egrep '^hash' | wc -l
I get 8 dialogs, rain or shine.
Has anyone heard of this bug? Running the latest 3.3 pull...
Thanks,
-- Alex
10:43 a.m.
On 04/29/2013 04:41 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
I noticed the mail, but had no time to look over it.
Perhaps it will
happen soon if nothing else is discovered meanwhile.
Not a problem, Daniel, thank you for responding. I'll see if I can
track it down on my own; this is open source, after all. Not everyone
can stand on the shoulders of one giant. :-)
--
Alex Balashov - Principal
Evariste Systems LLC
235 E Ponce de Leon Ave
Suite 106
Decatur, GA 30030
United States
Tel: +1-678-954-0670
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.alexbalashov.com/
20 May
20 May
11:52 a.m.
Has anyone had a chance to take a look at this? I have not been able to
figure out the problem on my own, and I'm under very strong pressure to
revert to using MI FIFO interface for everything, since the RPC
interface "obviously doesn't work".
On 04/29/2013 04:43 AM, Alex Balashov wrote:
On 04/29/2013 04:41 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
wrote:
--
Alex Balashov - Principal
Evariste Systems LLC
235 E Ponce de Leon Ave
Suite 106
Decatur, GA 30030
United States
Tel: +1-678-954-0670
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.alexbalashov.com/
I noticed the mail, but had no time to look over
it. Perhaps it will
happen soon if nothing else is discovered meanwhile.
Not a problem, Daniel, thank you for responding. I'll see if I can
track it down on my own; this is open source, after all. Not everyone
can stand on the shoulders of one giant. :-)
4:49 p.m.
Hello,
just looked in the code for the rpc function and looks ok. Have you
increased the buffers in ctl module?
Cheers,
Daniel
On 5/20/13 11:52 AM, Alex Balashov wrote:
Has anyone had a chance to take a look at this? I
have not been able
to figure out the problem on my own, and I'm under very strong
pressure to revert to using MI FIFO interface for everything, since
the RPC interface "obviously doesn't work".
On 04/29/2013 04:43 AM, Alex Balashov wrote:
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Advanced Training, San Francisco, USA - June 24-27, 2013
* http://asipto.com/u/katu *
On 04/29/2013 04:41 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
wrote:
I noticed the mail, but had no time to look over
it. Perhaps it will
happen soon if nothing else is discovered meanwhile.
Not a problem, Daniel, thank you for responding. I'll see if I can
track it down on my own; this is open source, after all. Not everyone
can stand on the shoulders of one giant. :-)
5:05 p.m.
No, I have not. It seems I was not aware of this... let me try.
Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hello,
just looked in the code for the rpc function and looks ok. Have you
increased the buffers in ctl module?
Cheers,
Daniel
On 5/20/13 11:52 AM, Alex Balashov wrote:
--
Sent from my mobile, and thus lacking in the refinement one might expect from a fully
fledged keyboard.
Alex Balashov - Principal
Evariste Systems LLC
235 E Ponce de Leon Ave
Suite 106
Decatur, GA 30030
United States
Tel: +1-678-954-0670
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.alexbalashov.com
Has anyone had a chance to take a look at this?
I have not been able
to figure out the problem on my own, and I'm
under very strong
pressure to revert to using MI FIFO interface for everything, since
the RPC interface "obviously doesn't work".
On 04/29/2013 04:43 AM, Alex Balashov wrote:
> On 04/29/2013 04:41 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
>
>> I noticed the mail, but had no time to look over it. Perhaps it
will
>> happen soon if nothing else is discovered
meanwhile.
>
> Not a problem, Daniel, thank you for responding. I'll see if I can
> track it down on my own; this is open source, after all. Not
everyone
>> can stand on the shoulders of one giant. :-)
>>
>
> 
5:28 p.m.
On May 20, 2013, at 10:49 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hello,
just looked in the code for the rpc function and looks ok. Have you increased the buffers
in ctl module?
Depending on the amount of output you're getting, it's more than that. I
understand it's a relatively small amount in this case, but that may change. You may
need to increase buffers in sercmd/kamcmd, too, and even then you're limited--on
Linux, at least--by the values of some sysctl settings (net.core.rmem_max,
net.core.wmem_max and net.unix.max_dgram_qlen).
andrew
On 5/20/13 11:52 AM, Alex Balashov wrote:
Has anyone had a chance to take a look at this?
I have not been able to figure out the problem on my own, and I'm under very strong
pressure to revert to using MI FIFO interface for everything, since the RPC interface
"obviously doesn't work".
On 04/29/2013 04:43 AM, Alex Balashov wrote:
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla - http://www.asipto.com
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio Advanced Training, San Francisco, USA - June 24-27, 2013
* http://asipto.com/u/katu *
_______________________________________________
sr-dev mailing list
sr-dev(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev On 04/29/2013 04:41 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
wrote:
I noticed the mail, but had no time to look over
it. Perhaps it will
happen soon if nothing else is discovered meanwhile.
Not a problem, Daniel, thank you for responding. I'll see if I can
track it down on my own; this is open source, after all. Not everyone
can stand on the shoulders of one giant. :-)
22 May
22 May
2:47 p.m.
Daniel et al,
Your suggestion to increase the buffer sizes does appear to have fixed
the problem. I'm sorry for my stupidity; I know it's quite irritating
when a user reports their own ineptitude as a so-called "bug". It's not
a bug, just my failure to read docs.
Please accept my apologies!
--
Alex Balashov - Principal
Evariste Systems LLC
235 E Ponce de Leon Ave
Suite 106
Decatur, GA 30030
United States
Tel: +1-678-954-0670
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.alexbalashov.com/
3989
days inactive
4015
days old
8 comments
3 participants
participants (3)
-
Alex Balashov -
Andrew Mortensen -
Daniel-Constantin Mierla