That is curious... Are you using a derivative of the sample configuration and if yes, have
you deviated in any way from the sample WITHINDLG route?
Still, I haven't tested specifically for this with 5.0 branch, it is possible I missed
it...
However the reINVITE I tested was only in one direction. In this case, the 200 OK relayed
by kamailio is not the same direction as the 200 OK corrupted by topos for the OPTIONs I
reported originally. So my test maybe didn't replicate yours exactly (barring any
config file differences).
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/1350#issuecomment-351727018