That is curious... Are you using a derivative of the sample configuration and if yes, have you deviated in any way from the sample WITHINDLG route?

Still, I haven't tested specifically for this with 5.0 branch, it is possible I missed it...

However the reINVITE I tested was only in one direction. In this case, the 200 OK relayed by kamailio is not the same direction as the 200 OK corrupted by topos for the OPTIONs I reported originally. So my test maybe didn't replicate yours exactly (barring any config file differences).


You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.