2 Dec
2017
2 Dec
'17
8:07 p.m.
I also tried the ring strategy but, I did not like the fact that if you loose one server
the ring may get broken.
Maybe this is still better in the end but when you have a lot of server it is more likely
that one server may be removed from service.
This is why I am testing with a "master" node
Not sure what is you opinion
Example of broken state with a ring config and 4 servers:
```
/etc/init.d/kamailio_second stop
/etc/init.d/kamailio_third stop
/etc/init.d/kamailio_second start
```
You end up with
```
show dmq bus: first
host: 127.0.0.103 status: 8 last_notification: 0 local: 0
host: 127.0.0.104 status: 2 last_notification: 0 local: 0
host: 127.0.0.102 status: 8 last_notification: 0 local: 0
host: 127.0.0.101 status: 2 last_notification: 0 local: 1
show dmq bus: second
host: 127.0.0.103 status: 2 last_notification: 0 local: 0
host: 127.0.0.102 status: 2 last_notification: 0 local: 1
show dmq bus: third not running !
show dmq bus: fourth
host: 127.0.0.102 status: 8 last_notification: 0 local: 0
host: 127.0.0.103 status: 8 last_notification: 0 local: 0
host: 127.0.0.101 status: 2 last_notification: 0 local: 0
host: 127.0.0.104 status: 2 last_notification: 0 local: 1
```
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/1349#issuecomment-348732404